Pub Date : 2025-03-14eCollection Date: 2025-01-01DOI: 10.7573/dic.2024-11-4
Tiago Torres, Pedro Mendes-Bastos, Joana Antunes, Maria João Cruz, Fernando Mota, Paulo Ferreira
Background: Brodalumab is a monoclonal antibody directed to the IL-17 receptor A, approved for the treatment of moderate-to-severe psoriasis. In phase III clinical trials, brodalumab showed clinical efficacy and a favourable safety profile. However, real-world data on brodalumab treatment are still limited. This study aimed to evaluate the real-world efficacy and safety of brodalumab treatment in a Portuguese population.
Methods: This is a retrospective, observational, multicentre study of patients with moderate-to-severe plaque-type psoriasis treated with brodalumab between January 2019 and August 2022. The follow-up period was 74 weeks. Brodalumab efficacy was accessed by the percentage of patients reaching the Psoriasis Area Severity Index (PASI) 75, 90 and 100 responses and by improvement in absolute PASI and Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) scores. Drug survival of brodalumab treatment, causes of treatment discontinuation and adverse events were also reported.
Results: A total of 126 patients were included. Four weeks after treatment initiation, 83%, 57% and 29% of patients reached PASI 75, 90 and 100, respectively. These values increased to 96%, 93% and 66% at 74 weeks. A significant reduction in PASI score was observed after 4 weeks of brodalumab treatment and until week 74 (p<0.001). Quality of life measured by DLQI score significantly increased during the treatment period (p<0.001). Drug survival of brodalumab treatment was 82.5%, and secondary failure (8.5%) was the main reason for treatment discontinuation. The occurrence of adverse events was low and restricted to non-severe infectious.
Conclusion: This real-world data show that brodalumab is effective and safe for the treatment of moderate-to- severe psoriasis.
{"title":"Real-world experience with brodalumab in a Portuguese cohort of patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis.","authors":"Tiago Torres, Pedro Mendes-Bastos, Joana Antunes, Maria João Cruz, Fernando Mota, Paulo Ferreira","doi":"10.7573/dic.2024-11-4","DOIUrl":"10.7573/dic.2024-11-4","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Brodalumab is a monoclonal antibody directed to the IL-17 receptor A, approved for the treatment of moderate-to-severe psoriasis. In phase III clinical trials, brodalumab showed clinical efficacy and a favourable safety profile. However, real-world data on brodalumab treatment are still limited. This study aimed to evaluate the real-world efficacy and safety of brodalumab treatment in a Portuguese population.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a retrospective, observational, multicentre study of patients with moderate-to-severe plaque-type psoriasis treated with brodalumab between January 2019 and August 2022. The follow-up period was 74 weeks. Brodalumab efficacy was accessed by the percentage of patients reaching the Psoriasis Area Severity Index (PASI) 75, 90 and 100 responses and by improvement in absolute PASI and Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) scores. Drug survival of brodalumab treatment, causes of treatment discontinuation and adverse events were also reported.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 126 patients were included. Four weeks after treatment initiation, 83%, 57% and 29% of patients reached PASI 75, 90 and 100, respectively. These values increased to 96%, 93% and 66% at 74 weeks. A significant reduction in PASI score was observed after 4 weeks of brodalumab treatment and until week 74 (<i>p</i><0.001). Quality of life measured by DLQI score significantly increased during the treatment period (<i>p</i><0.001). Drug survival of brodalumab treatment was 82.5%, and secondary failure (8.5%) was the main reason for treatment discontinuation. The occurrence of adverse events was low and restricted to non-severe infectious.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This real-world data show that brodalumab is effective and safe for the treatment of moderate-to- severe psoriasis.</p>","PeriodicalId":11362,"journal":{"name":"Drugs in Context","volume":"14 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-03-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11927392/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143691564","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-03-06eCollection Date: 2025-01-01DOI: 10.7573/dic.2024-10-5
Carlos Escobar, Jesús Saldaña, José Luis Merino, Rafael Peinado
Background: This analysis assesses the effectiveness and tolerability profile of vericiguat in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) and implantable cardioverter-defibrillator, with an emphasis on the emergence of ventricular arrhythmias.
Methods: Retrospective analysis of patients with HFrEF and implantable cardioverter-defibrillator who started treatment with vericiguat in daily clinical practice in a tertiary university hospital in Spain.
Results: The study population comprised 14 patients treated since January 2023. At baseline, mean age was 77.0±7.0 years, 71.4% of patients were men and mean left ventricular ejection fraction was 32.1±5.4%. Regarding heart failure treatments, 13 (92.3%) patients were prescribed renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system inhibitors, mainly sacubitril-valsartan (61.5%), they were all prescribed aldosterone antagonists, 10 (71.4%) were prescribed β-blockers and 10 (71.4%) were prescribed sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 (SGLT2) inhibitors. After a mean duration of treatment with vericiguat of 12.4±5.3 months, two (14.3%) patients presented to the emergency department, one with hypotension and the other with impaired kidney function, and a further two (14.3%) patients were hospitalised, one of whom had decompensated heart failure. At baseline, four (28.6%) patients presented non-sustained/sustained ventricular tachycardia; at study end, this decreased to two patients (50% of patients with ventricular arrhythmias at baseline). Additionally, in one patient (25% of patients with ventricular arrhythmias at baseline), there was a substantial reduction in the number of episodes of ventricular arrhythmia. At study end, seven patients achieved the target dose of 10 mg daily and one patient discontinued vericiguat owing to hypotension.
Conclusions: Amongst patients with HFrEF and implantable cardioverter-defibrillator, vericiguat showed a good safety profile in addition to standard heart failure therapy, with low rates of adverse events. Moreover, a potential reduction in the risk of ventricular arrhythmias could also be obtained with vericiguat.
{"title":"Vericiguat in patients with heart failure and implantable cardioverter-defibrillator.","authors":"Carlos Escobar, Jesús Saldaña, José Luis Merino, Rafael Peinado","doi":"10.7573/dic.2024-10-5","DOIUrl":"10.7573/dic.2024-10-5","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This analysis assesses the effectiveness and tolerability profile of vericiguat in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) and implantable cardioverter-defibrillator, with an emphasis on the emergence of ventricular arrhythmias.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Retrospective analysis of patients with HFrEF and implantable cardioverter-defibrillator who started treatment with vericiguat in daily clinical practice in a tertiary university hospital in Spain.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study population comprised 14 patients treated since January 2023. At baseline, mean age was 77.0±7.0 years, 71.4% of patients were men and mean left ventricular ejection fraction was 32.1±5.4%. Regarding heart failure treatments, 13 (92.3%) patients were prescribed renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system inhibitors, mainly sacubitril-valsartan (61.5%), they were all prescribed aldosterone antagonists, 10 (71.4%) were prescribed β-blockers and 10 (71.4%) were prescribed sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 (SGLT2) inhibitors. After a mean duration of treatment with vericiguat of 12.4±5.3 months, two (14.3%) patients presented to the emergency department, one with hypotension and the other with impaired kidney function, and a further two (14.3%) patients were hospitalised, one of whom had decompensated heart failure. At baseline, four (28.6%) patients presented non-sustained/sustained ventricular tachycardia; at study end, this decreased to two patients (50% of patients with ventricular arrhythmias at baseline). Additionally, in one patient (25% of patients with ventricular arrhythmias at baseline), there was a substantial reduction in the number of episodes of ventricular arrhythmia. At study end, seven patients achieved the target dose of 10 mg daily and one patient discontinued vericiguat owing to hypotension.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Amongst patients with HFrEF and implantable cardioverter-defibrillator, vericiguat showed a good safety profile in addition to standard heart failure therapy, with low rates of adverse events. Moreover, a potential reduction in the risk of ventricular arrhythmias could also be obtained with vericiguat.</p>","PeriodicalId":11362,"journal":{"name":"Drugs in Context","volume":"14 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-03-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11900887/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143613959","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-03-03eCollection Date: 2025-01-01DOI: 10.7573/dic.2024-12-2
Rajesh R Tampi
This Editorial reviews data on the efficacy and adverse effects of lecanemab amongst individuals with mild Alzheimer disease. Additionally, the recent controversy regarding the rejection by the EMA of a marketing authorization request for lecanemab, followed by its subsequent approval, is also discussed. The need for thoughtful discussions regarding the risks and benefits of this medication as well as the importance of developing Appropriate Use Recommendations and/or national guidelines for the use of lecanemab are also highlighted.
{"title":"Lecanemab for mild Alzheimer disease - is there a way forward?","authors":"Rajesh R Tampi","doi":"10.7573/dic.2024-12-2","DOIUrl":"10.7573/dic.2024-12-2","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This Editorial reviews data on the efficacy and adverse effects of lecanemab amongst individuals with mild Alzheimer disease. Additionally, the recent controversy regarding the rejection by the EMA of a marketing authorization request for lecanemab, followed by its subsequent approval, is also discussed. The need for thoughtful discussions regarding the risks and benefits of this medication as well as the importance of developing Appropriate Use Recommendations and/or national guidelines for the use of lecanemab are also highlighted.</p>","PeriodicalId":11362,"journal":{"name":"Drugs in Context","volume":"14 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-03-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11900888/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143613957","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Background: Carvedilol has shown greater potency than propranolol as a β-blocker in managing cardiac conditions. However, its efficacy in reducing portal hypertension (PHTN) in patients with cirrhosis remains unclear. This study evaluates the efficacy and safety of carvedilol compared with propranolol in managing PHTN.
Methods: A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted using PubMed, Scopus and Embase databases. Randomized controlled trials comparing carvedilol and propranolol were included. Primary outcomes were changes in hepatic venous pressure gradient, wedge hepatic venous pressure and free hepatic venous pressure. Secondary outcomes included heart rate, cardiac output and mean arterial pressure. Tertiary outcomes assessed adverse event incidences.
Results: Six randomized controlled trials involving 336 patients (171 carvedilol, 165 propranolol) were analysed. Carvedilol significantly reduced hepatic venous pressure gradient (mean difference (MD): 2.22 (95% CI 1.82-2.62); p<0.00001) and wedge hepatic venous pressure (MD: 2.38 (95% CI 1.92-2.84); p<0.00001). Propranolol significantly reduced cardiac output (MD: -0.60 (95% CI -0.74 to -0.45); p<0.00001). Mean arterial pressure was significantly lower in the carvedilol group (MD: 1.79 (95% CI 0.38-3.20); p=0.01). Adverse events, such as orthostatic hypotension and increased diuretic use, were more frequent in the carvedilol group but were manageable.
Conclusion: Carvedilol demonstrates superior efficacy in reducing PHTN compared with propranolol, with a slightly higher but tolerable adverse event profile. It may be considered the first-line treatment for PHTN. Further research is needed to validate long-term benefits and safety.
背景:卡维地洛作为β受体阻滞剂在治疗心脏疾病方面已显示出比心得安更强的效力。然而,其降低肝硬化患者门静脉高压(PHTN)的疗效尚不清楚。本研究比较卡维地洛与心得安治疗PHTN的疗效和安全性。方法:采用PubMed、Scopus和Embase数据库进行系统综述和meta分析。纳入比较卡维地洛和心得安的随机对照试验。主要结局是肝静脉压梯度、楔形肝静脉压和游离肝静脉压的变化。次要结局包括心率、心输出量和平均动脉压。第三期结局评估不良事件发生率。结果:对6项随机对照试验336例患者(卡维地洛171例,心得安165例)进行分析。卡维地洛显著降低肝静脉压梯度(平均差(MD): 2.22 (95% CI 1.82-2.62);pppp = 0.01)。不良事件,如直立性低血压和利尿剂使用增加,在卡维地洛组更频繁,但是可控的。结论:卡维地洛在降低PHTN方面的疗效优于心得安,不良事件发生率略高,但可耐受。它可能被认为是PHTN的一线治疗方法。需要进一步的研究来验证长期的益处和安全性。
{"title":"Is carvedilol superior to propranolol in patients with cirrhosis with portal hypertension: a systematic and meta-analysis.","authors":"Siddheesh Rajpurohit, Balaji Musunuri, Pooja Basthi Mohan, Ganesh Bhat, Shiran Shetty","doi":"10.7573/dic.2024-11-3","DOIUrl":"10.7573/dic.2024-11-3","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Carvedilol has shown greater potency than propranolol as a β-blocker in managing cardiac conditions. However, its efficacy in reducing portal hypertension (PHTN) in patients with cirrhosis remains unclear. This study evaluates the efficacy and safety of carvedilol compared with propranolol in managing PHTN.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted using PubMed, Scopus and Embase databases. Randomized controlled trials comparing carvedilol and propranolol were included. Primary outcomes were changes in hepatic venous pressure gradient, wedge hepatic venous pressure and free hepatic venous pressure. Secondary outcomes included heart rate, cardiac output and mean arterial pressure. Tertiary outcomes assessed adverse event incidences.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Six randomized controlled trials involving 336 patients (171 carvedilol, 165 propranolol) were analysed. Carvedilol significantly reduced hepatic venous pressure gradient (mean difference (MD): 2.22 (95% CI 1.82-2.62); <i>p</i><0.00001) and wedge hepatic venous pressure (MD: 2.38 (95% CI 1.92-2.84); <i>p</i><0.00001). Propranolol significantly reduced cardiac output (MD: -0.60 (95% CI -0.74 to -0.45); <i>p</i><0.00001). Mean arterial pressure was significantly lower in the carvedilol group (MD: 1.79 (95% CI 0.38-3.20); <i>p</i>=0.01). Adverse events, such as orthostatic hypotension and increased diuretic use, were more frequent in the carvedilol group but were manageable.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Carvedilol demonstrates superior efficacy in reducing PHTN compared with propranolol, with a slightly higher but tolerable adverse event profile. It may be considered the first-line treatment for PHTN. Further research is needed to validate long-term benefits and safety.</p>","PeriodicalId":11362,"journal":{"name":"Drugs in Context","volume":"14 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-02-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11867166/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143523038","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-02-21eCollection Date: 2025-01-01DOI: 10.7573/dic.2024-9-1
Concetto Sessa, Dario Galeano, Luca Zanoli, Marco Delsante, Giovanni Maria Rossi, Walter Morale
Membranous nephropathy (MN) is a kidney disease characterized by thickening of the glomerular basement membrane due to immune complex deposition, often leading to nephrotic syndrome and potentially progressing to end-stage renal disease. Traditional treatments, including corticosteroids and immunosuppressive agents, have significant side-effects and variable efficacy. Recently, obinutuzumab, a fully humanized monoclonal antibody targeting CD20, has emerged as a promising therapeutic option for MN. Herein, we review the pathophysiology of MN, the mechanism of action of obinutuzumab, clinical data supporting its use and highlight its potential as a game changer in MN treatment.
{"title":"Obinutuzumab in membranous nephropathy: a potential game-changer in treatment.","authors":"Concetto Sessa, Dario Galeano, Luca Zanoli, Marco Delsante, Giovanni Maria Rossi, Walter Morale","doi":"10.7573/dic.2024-9-1","DOIUrl":"10.7573/dic.2024-9-1","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Membranous nephropathy (MN) is a kidney disease characterized by thickening of the glomerular basement membrane due to immune complex deposition, often leading to nephrotic syndrome and potentially progressing to end-stage renal disease. Traditional treatments, including corticosteroids and immunosuppressive agents, have significant side-effects and variable efficacy. Recently, obinutuzumab, a fully humanized monoclonal antibody targeting CD20, has emerged as a promising therapeutic option for MN. Herein, we review the pathophysiology of MN, the mechanism of action of obinutuzumab, clinical data supporting its use and highlight its potential as a game changer in MN treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":11362,"journal":{"name":"Drugs in Context","volume":"14 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-02-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11867167/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143523040","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-02-18eCollection Date: 2025-01-01DOI: 10.7573/dic.2024-10-7
Francesco Serra, Federica Valerio, Paolo Pedrazzoli, Jacopo Viganò, Riccardo Caccialanza, Daniela Cicognini, Anna Pagani, Salvatore Corallo
Background: Gastric cancer has a high mortality rate. Therapeutic management must be multidisciplinary to offer the patient the best, personalized strategy.
Patients and methods: We performed an observational study to evaluate the pathological response, survival and nutritional status in patients with resectable gastric cancer and candidates for perioperative chemotherapy with the fluorouracil, leucovorin, oxaliplatin and docetaxel (FLOT) regimen versus other regimens. The primary endpoints were pathological response rate, care continuity rate and survival outcomes. A total of 96 patients attending the Hospital "Policlinico San Matteo" in Pavia (Italy) between January 2012 and August 2022 were selected for the study.
Results: Regarding pathological response rates, the best rate (TRG-0) was recorded in the FLOT group with a percentage of 6.2% compared with 4.7% in the NO-FLOT arm (p=0.052). The highest failure rate to complete the post-operative phase was 75% in the NO-FLOT group and only 25% in the FLOT group (p=0.007). Survival outcomes were better in the FLOT group with a median disease-free survival of 30 versus 22.2 months (p=0.586).
Conclusions: Despite the limitations, the results obtained were consistent with the medical literature and confirmed the effectiveness of the FLOT chemotherapy in real life. Nevertheless, some questions remain: the application in elderly patients, the addition of immunotherapy in patients with microsatellite instability or with high PD-L1 levels, comparison with chemoradiotherapy in junctional cancers and real cure rates. The FLOT regimen has revolutionized the treatment of resectable gastric cancer, but caution is needed before considering it an absolute standard of care.
背景:胃癌死亡率很高:胃癌的死亡率很高。治疗管理必须是多学科的,以便为患者提供最佳的个性化策略:我们进行了一项观察性研究,评估可切除胃癌患者的病理反应、生存和营养状况,以及氟尿嘧啶、亮菌素、奥沙利铂和多西他赛(FLOT)方案与其他方案的围手术期化疗候选者。主要终点是病理反应率、护理持续率和生存结果。研究选取了2012年1月至2022年8月期间在意大利帕维亚 "Policlinico San Matteo "医院就诊的96名患者:在病理反应率方面,FLOT组的病理反应率(TRG-0)最高,为6.2%,而NO-FLOT组为4.7%(P=0.052)。NO-FLOT组完成术后阶段的最高失败率为75%,而FLOT组仅为25%(P=0.007)。FLOT组的生存结果更好,中位无病生存期为30个月对22.2个月(P=0.586):尽管存在局限性,但所获得的结果与医学文献一致,证实了FLOT化疗在现实生活中的有效性。尽管如此,一些问题依然存在:老年患者的应用、微卫星不稳定或PD-L1水平较高患者的免疫治疗、与交界性癌症化放疗的比较以及实际治愈率。FLOT方案彻底改变了可切除胃癌的治疗,但在将其视为绝对的治疗标准之前还需谨慎。
{"title":"Real-life effectiveness of FLOT in resectable gastric cancer: existing challenges.","authors":"Francesco Serra, Federica Valerio, Paolo Pedrazzoli, Jacopo Viganò, Riccardo Caccialanza, Daniela Cicognini, Anna Pagani, Salvatore Corallo","doi":"10.7573/dic.2024-10-7","DOIUrl":"10.7573/dic.2024-10-7","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Gastric cancer has a high mortality rate. Therapeutic management must be multidisciplinary to offer the patient the best, personalized strategy.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>We performed an observational study to evaluate the pathological response, survival and nutritional status in patients with resectable gastric cancer and candidates for perioperative chemotherapy with the fluorouracil, leucovorin, oxaliplatin and docetaxel (FLOT) regimen <i>versus</i> other regimens. The primary endpoints were pathological response rate, care continuity rate and survival outcomes. A total of 96 patients attending the Hospital \"Policlinico San Matteo\" in Pavia (Italy) between January 2012 and August 2022 were selected for the study.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Regarding pathological response rates, the best rate (TRG-0) was recorded in the FLOT group with a percentage of 6.2% compared with 4.7% in the NO-FLOT arm (<i>p</i>=0.052). The highest failure rate to complete the post-operative phase was 75% in the NO-FLOT group and only 25% in the FLOT group (<i>p</i>=0.007). Survival outcomes were better in the FLOT group with a median disease-free survival of 30 <i>versus</i> 22.2 months (<i>p</i>=0.586).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Despite the limitations, the results obtained were consistent with the medical literature and confirmed the effectiveness of the FLOT chemotherapy in real life. Nevertheless, some questions remain: the application in elderly patients, the addition of immunotherapy in patients with microsatellite instability or with high PD-L1 levels, comparison with chemoradiotherapy in junctional cancers and real cure rates. The FLOT regimen has revolutionized the treatment of resectable gastric cancer, but caution is needed before considering it an absolute standard of care.</p>","PeriodicalId":11362,"journal":{"name":"Drugs in Context","volume":"14 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-02-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11867168/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143523043","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-01-29eCollection Date: 2025-01-01DOI: 10.7573/dic.2024-11-1
David Young, Sohail Rahmany, Deborah Taylor, Emma Davis, Michael Colwill, Sonia Kalyanji Mehta, Roisin Campbell, Karl Hazel, Karishma Sethi-Arora, Susan Ritchie, Ashley I Heinson, Helen Moyses, Keith Bodger, Emma Johnston, Lucy Hicks, Anjan Dhar, Jimmy Limdi, Rachel Cooney, John Paul Seenan, Kamal Patel, Alissa Walsh, Fraser Cummings
Background: Filgotinib, an oral Janus kinase 1 preferential inhibitor, has been shown to be an effective treatment for ulcerative colitis (UC) in pre-registration studies. We aimed to describe the treatment population, effectiveness and safety of filgotinib in a real-world cohort of patients with UC.
Methods: A retrospective observational cohort evaluation was conducted across nine UK inflammatory bowel disease centres. Baseline demographic and clinical data, clinical disease activity scores, endoscopic activity indices, and biomarkers (C-reactive protein and faecal calprotectin) were collected at baseline, at 8-12 weeks after initiation (post-induction) and during maintenance (the most recent review) where available. Effectiveness outcomes were assessed in patients with combined clinical disease activity and objective evidence of inflammation at filgotinib initiation.
Results: Data were analysed for a total of 286 patients with a median follow-up time of 229 (IQR 113-324) days. The median age at filgotinib initiation was 38 (IQR 27-51) years, 64% were men and median disease duration was 5.1 (IQR 1.9-10.5) years; 56% had previous exposure to advanced therapies (biologics and small molecule) and 6% previously received tofacitinib. At the post-induction review, clinical response and remission were achieved in 65% and 51% of patients, respectively. There was a reduction in biomarkers and 78% of patients using corticosteroids at baseline were steroid-free. Persistence on filgotinib at 12 months was 66%. Adverse events were recorded in 30 patients with 8 patients discontinuing filgotinib as a result of an adverse event.
Conclusions: In a large real-world cohort of patients with UC, filgotinib appears to be effective and well-tolerated.
{"title":"Real-world assessment of effectiveness and safety of filgotinib in 286 patients with ulcerative colitis in 9 UK centres.","authors":"David Young, Sohail Rahmany, Deborah Taylor, Emma Davis, Michael Colwill, Sonia Kalyanji Mehta, Roisin Campbell, Karl Hazel, Karishma Sethi-Arora, Susan Ritchie, Ashley I Heinson, Helen Moyses, Keith Bodger, Emma Johnston, Lucy Hicks, Anjan Dhar, Jimmy Limdi, Rachel Cooney, John Paul Seenan, Kamal Patel, Alissa Walsh, Fraser Cummings","doi":"10.7573/dic.2024-11-1","DOIUrl":"10.7573/dic.2024-11-1","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Filgotinib, an oral Janus kinase 1 preferential inhibitor, has been shown to be an effective treatment for ulcerative colitis (UC) in pre-registration studies. We aimed to describe the treatment population, effectiveness and safety of filgotinib in a real-world cohort of patients with UC.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective observational cohort evaluation was conducted across nine UK inflammatory bowel disease centres. Baseline demographic and clinical data, clinical disease activity scores, endoscopic activity indices, and biomarkers (C-reactive protein and faecal calprotectin) were collected at baseline, at 8-12 weeks after initiation (post-induction) and during maintenance (the most recent review) where available. Effectiveness outcomes were assessed in patients with combined clinical disease activity and objective evidence of inflammation at filgotinib initiation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Data were analysed for a total of 286 patients with a median follow-up time of 229 (IQR 113-324) days. The median age at filgotinib initiation was 38 (IQR 27-51) years, 64% were men and median disease duration was 5.1 (IQR 1.9-10.5) years; 56% had previous exposure to advanced therapies (biologics and small molecule) and 6% previously received tofacitinib. At the post-induction review, clinical response and remission were achieved in 65% and 51% of patients, respectively. There was a reduction in biomarkers and 78% of patients using corticosteroids at baseline were steroid-free. Persistence on filgotinib at 12 months was 66%. Adverse events were recorded in 30 patients with 8 patients discontinuing filgotinib as a result of an adverse event.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In a large real-world cohort of patients with UC, filgotinib appears to be effective and well-tolerated.</p>","PeriodicalId":11362,"journal":{"name":"Drugs in Context","volume":"14 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-01-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11798541/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143364026","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-12-18eCollection Date: 2024-01-01DOI: 10.7573/dic.2024-10-6
Hema Sundaram, Beatriz Molina, Editta Buttura da Prato, Gabriel Siquier-Dameto, Michela Zazzaron, Clara Cigni, Franco Grimolizzi
Background: Aliaxin fillers (HAALI), produced by IBSA Farmaceutici Italia SrL (Italy), are biodegradable, non-pyrogenic, 1,4-butanediol diglycidyl ether cross-linked hyaluronic acid (HA) hydrogels. The formulations are tailored for different clinical indications, ensuring precise and natural outcomes. Their cohesivity and tissue integration capabilities are associated with relatively few adverse events (AEs), supporting their widespread use in aesthetic treatments. This article examines the real-world safety profile of HAALI fillers derived from worldwide post-marketing surveillance data.
Methods: Post-marketing surveillance was registered by the manufacturer from January 2018 to September 2023. During this period, product complaints were globally gathered from healthcare practitioners and consumers, relating to technical issues or safety and product-related adverse events.
Results: No discernible trend or substantial escalation in AEs across the entire product range were observed during the surveillance period (p>0.05). No statistically significant increases (p>0.05) in the frequency or severity of safety incidents and AEs were observed. The most frequently observed AEs were oedema (26%) and swelling (19%).
Conclusion: The analysed data further support and confirm the high safety profile of the HAALI fillers for different approaches in aesthetic medicine. This evaluation also highlights the importance of post-marketing analysis by continuing to foster a robust understanding of products currently used in daily clinical practice.
背景:Aliaxin填料(HAALI)由IBSA Farmaceutici Italia SrL(意大利)公司生产,是一种可生物降解、无热原的1,4-丁二醇二甘油酯醚交联透明质酸(HA)水凝胶。配方针对不同的临床适应症量身定制,确保精确和自然的结果。它们的内聚性和组织整合能力与相对较少的不良事件(ae)相关,支持它们在美容治疗中的广泛应用。本文研究了从全球上市后监测数据得出的HAALI填料的实际安全性概况。方法:2018年1月至2023年9月,由生产商注册上市后监测。在此期间,在全球范围内收集了来自医疗保健从业人员和消费者的产品投诉,涉及技术问题或安全和产品相关的不良事件。结果:在监测期间,在整个产品范围内,没有观察到明显的ae趋势或大幅上升(p>0.05)。两组安全事故发生频率和严重程度无统计学差异(p < 0.05)。最常见的ae是水肿(26%)和肿胀(19%)。结论:分析的数据进一步支持和证实了HAALI填充材料在不同入路美容医学中的高安全性。该评估还强调了上市后分析的重要性,通过继续培养对日常临床实践中使用的产品的强大理解。
{"title":"Good scientific practice of using worldwide post-marketing surveillance data to ensure safety with HA<sub>ALI</sub> BDDE cross-linked hyaluronic acid fillers.","authors":"Hema Sundaram, Beatriz Molina, Editta Buttura da Prato, Gabriel Siquier-Dameto, Michela Zazzaron, Clara Cigni, Franco Grimolizzi","doi":"10.7573/dic.2024-10-6","DOIUrl":"10.7573/dic.2024-10-6","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Aliaxin fillers (HA<sub>ALI</sub>), produced by IBSA Farmaceutici Italia SrL (Italy), are biodegradable, non-pyrogenic, 1,4-butanediol diglycidyl ether cross-linked hyaluronic acid (HA) hydrogels. The formulations are tailored for different clinical indications, ensuring precise and natural outcomes. Their cohesivity and tissue integration capabilities are associated with relatively few adverse events (AEs), supporting their widespread use in aesthetic treatments. This article examines the real-world safety profile of HA<sub>ALI</sub> fillers derived from worldwide post-marketing surveillance data.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Post-marketing surveillance was registered by the manufacturer from January 2018 to September 2023. During this period, product complaints were globally gathered from healthcare practitioners and consumers, relating to technical issues or safety and product-related adverse events.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>No discernible trend or substantial escalation in AEs across the entire product range were observed during the surveillance period (<i>p</i>>0.05). No statistically significant increases (<i>p</i>>0.05) in the frequency or severity of safety incidents and AEs were observed. The most frequently observed AEs were oedema (26%) and swelling (19%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The analysed data further support and confirm the high safety profile of the HA<sub>ALI</sub> fillers for different approaches in aesthetic medicine. This evaluation also highlights the importance of post-marketing analysis by continuing to foster a robust understanding of products currently used in daily clinical practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":11362,"journal":{"name":"Drugs in Context","volume":"13 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-12-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11666269/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142881249","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-11-28eCollection Date: 2024-01-01DOI: 10.7573/dic.2023-12-3
Joel C Marrs, Sarah L Anderson
Inclisiran is a synthetic small interfering RNA (siRNA) that inhibits the production of proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin 9 (PCSK9) in hepatocytes by silencing the translation of PCSK9 mRNA. The result of this mechanism is a decrease in PCSK9 synthesis resulting in decreased degradation of the LDL receptor, leading to more LDL receptors being available to clear LDL cholesterol (LDL-C) from the circulation. Inclisiran received FDA approval in 2021 and EMA approval in 2020. The indication for inclisiran use is as an adjunct to diet and statin therapy for the treatment of adults with primary hyperlipidaemia, including those with heterozygous familial hypercholesterolaemia to reduce LDL-C. Inclisiran has demonstrated consistent LDL-C lowering in the range of 44-54%. Furthermore, inclisiran has been demonstrated to be a safe medication with indications of significant or serious adverse events when compared to placebo. Inclisiran is given as an initial subcutaneous dose followed by a repeat dose at 3 months and every 6 months thereafter. The 2022 American College of Cardiology Expert Consensus Decision Pathway includes inclisiran as an option for non-statin therapy in addition to maximally tolerated statin therapy in those at very high risk of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease or those with LDL-C >190 mg/dL. The ORION-4, VICTORION-1 PREVENT and VICTORION-2 PREVENT trials are ongoing and designed to evaluate the ability of inclisiran to reduce major cardiovascular events in addition to LDL-C lowering but will not be completed for a few years.
{"title":"Inclisiran for the treatment of hypercholesterolaemia.","authors":"Joel C Marrs, Sarah L Anderson","doi":"10.7573/dic.2023-12-3","DOIUrl":"10.7573/dic.2023-12-3","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Inclisiran is a synthetic small interfering RNA (siRNA) that inhibits the production of proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin 9 (PCSK9) in hepatocytes by silencing the translation of PCSK9 mRNA. The result of this mechanism is a decrease in PCSK9 synthesis resulting in decreased degradation of the LDL receptor, leading to more LDL receptors being available to clear LDL cholesterol (LDL-C) from the circulation. Inclisiran received FDA approval in 2021 and EMA approval in 2020. The indication for inclisiran use is as an adjunct to diet and statin therapy for the treatment of adults with primary hyperlipidaemia, including those with heterozygous familial hypercholesterolaemia to reduce LDL-C. Inclisiran has demonstrated consistent LDL-C lowering in the range of 44-54%. Furthermore, inclisiran has been demonstrated to be a safe medication with indications of significant or serious adverse events when compared to placebo. Inclisiran is given as an initial subcutaneous dose followed by a repeat dose at 3 months and every 6 months thereafter. The 2022 American College of Cardiology Expert Consensus Decision Pathway includes inclisiran as an option for non-statin therapy in addition to maximally tolerated statin therapy in those at very high risk of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease or those with LDL-C >190 mg/dL. The ORION-4, VICTORION-1 PREVENT and VICTORION-2 PREVENT trials are ongoing and designed to evaluate the ability of inclisiran to reduce major cardiovascular events in addition to LDL-C lowering but will not be completed for a few years.</p>","PeriodicalId":11362,"journal":{"name":"Drugs in Context","volume":"13 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-11-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11619601/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142784573","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-11-21eCollection Date: 2024-01-01DOI: 10.7573/dic.2024-6-5
Marta Matrone, Alessandro Cuomo, Sergio De Filippis, Andrea Fagiolini, Mario Amore
Psychomotor agitation (PMA) is a prominent clinical issue frequently observed in various psychiatric and neurological conditions, including schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, Parkinson disease, dementia and substance use disorder. Characterized by motor restlessness, anxiety and irritability, PMA can rapidly escalate into aggression and violence, necessitating prompt intervention to ensure patient and caregiver safety. The prevalence of PMA in psychiatric emergency settings ranges from 4.3% to 10%, imposing a substantial burden on healthcare systems. Despite the critical nature of PMA, there is a lack of standardized treatment protocols, particularly concerning the use of liquid formulations of antipsychotics such as liquid promazine, which may offer unique advantages in emergency care. This review aims to provide a comprehensive analysis of the existing literature on the efficacy, safety and tolerability of liquid antipsychotics, with a particular focus on promazine, in the management of PMA. An extensive literature search was conducted across publicly available databases with no time limitations to ensure the inclusion of all relevant articles. The findings suggest that liquid promazine offers several benefits, including ease of administration, rapid onset of action and improved patient compliance, making it a valuable option in acute PMA management. However, the review also highlights the need for future research, particularly long-term studies and head-to-head comparisons with other antipsychotics, to better establish the clinical utility of liquid promazine. Future research should focus on expanding the evidence base for liquid antipsychotic formulations, which will contribute to improved clinical outcomes in the management of PMA.
{"title":"Liquid antipsychotics in the management of psychomotor agitation: a focus on promazine.","authors":"Marta Matrone, Alessandro Cuomo, Sergio De Filippis, Andrea Fagiolini, Mario Amore","doi":"10.7573/dic.2024-6-5","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.7573/dic.2024-6-5","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Psychomotor agitation (PMA) is a prominent clinical issue frequently observed in various psychiatric and neurological conditions, including schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, Parkinson disease, dementia and substance use disorder. Characterized by motor restlessness, anxiety and irritability, PMA can rapidly escalate into aggression and violence, necessitating prompt intervention to ensure patient and caregiver safety. The prevalence of PMA in psychiatric emergency settings ranges from 4.3% to 10%, imposing a substantial burden on healthcare systems. Despite the critical nature of PMA, there is a lack of standardized treatment protocols, particularly concerning the use of liquid formulations of antipsychotics such as liquid promazine, which may offer unique advantages in emergency care. This review aims to provide a comprehensive analysis of the existing literature on the efficacy, safety and tolerability of liquid antipsychotics, with a particular focus on promazine, in the management of PMA. An extensive literature search was conducted across publicly available databases with no time limitations to ensure the inclusion of all relevant articles. The findings suggest that liquid promazine offers several benefits, including ease of administration, rapid onset of action and improved patient compliance, making it a valuable option in acute PMA management. However, the review also highlights the need for future research, particularly long-term studies and head-to-head comparisons with other antipsychotics, to better establish the clinical utility of liquid promazine. Future research should focus on expanding the evidence base for liquid antipsychotic formulations, which will contribute to improved clinical outcomes in the management of PMA.</p>","PeriodicalId":11362,"journal":{"name":"Drugs in Context","volume":"13 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-11-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11610565/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142767510","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}