The structure of antagonism: A hierarchical model of self- and interview-rated psychopathology.

Personality disorders Pub Date : 2023-07-01 Epub Date: 2022-09-22 DOI:10.1037/per0000603
William R Calabrese, Maria Martin Lopez, Harold W Koenigsberg, Antonia S New, Daniel R Rosell, Erin A Hazlett, Margaret M McClure, Mercedes M Perez-Rodriguez
{"title":"The structure of antagonism: A hierarchical model of self- and interview-rated psychopathology.","authors":"William R Calabrese, Maria Martin Lopez, Harold W Koenigsberg, Antonia S New, Daniel R Rosell, Erin A Hazlett, Margaret M McClure, Mercedes M Perez-Rodriguez","doi":"10.1037/per0000603","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Recent initiatives in the empirically based classification of psychopathology, namely, the Hierarchical Taxonomy of Psychopathology (HiTOP), have made significant strides in addressing the limitations of traditional taxonomies (i.e., <i>Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, International Classification of Diseases</i>). The current study aimed to extend this work by helping to clarify the lower order structure of an understudied dimension of psychopathology-antagonism (i.e., HiTOP antagonistic externalizing spectrum)-a core feature of many externalizing disorders and related to important outcomes such as interpersonal problems, childhood conduct problems, and incarceration. We examined the hierarchical structure of several measures of antagonistic externalizing features across both self-report and clinical interview ratings for 2,279 community participants with a diverse range of personality pathology (~75% with a personality disorder) and antagonistic behaviors (~30% with intermittent explosive disorder). Exploratory structural equation modeling was used to account for the shared variance between variables within self-report and interview methods. Results revealed an optimal lower order structure consisting of six factors labeled Antisociality, Anger, Hostility, Narcissism, Mistrust, and Attention Seeking. Factor scores yielded expected relations with self-report and interview ratings of psychopathology, personality, and childhood trauma. Implications for future research in classification and treatment of psychopathology are discussed. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":74420,"journal":{"name":"Personality disorders","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Personality disorders","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/per0000603","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/9/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Recent initiatives in the empirically based classification of psychopathology, namely, the Hierarchical Taxonomy of Psychopathology (HiTOP), have made significant strides in addressing the limitations of traditional taxonomies (i.e., Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, International Classification of Diseases). The current study aimed to extend this work by helping to clarify the lower order structure of an understudied dimension of psychopathology-antagonism (i.e., HiTOP antagonistic externalizing spectrum)-a core feature of many externalizing disorders and related to important outcomes such as interpersonal problems, childhood conduct problems, and incarceration. We examined the hierarchical structure of several measures of antagonistic externalizing features across both self-report and clinical interview ratings for 2,279 community participants with a diverse range of personality pathology (~75% with a personality disorder) and antagonistic behaviors (~30% with intermittent explosive disorder). Exploratory structural equation modeling was used to account for the shared variance between variables within self-report and interview methods. Results revealed an optimal lower order structure consisting of six factors labeled Antisociality, Anger, Hostility, Narcissism, Mistrust, and Attention Seeking. Factor scores yielded expected relations with self-report and interview ratings of psychopathology, personality, and childhood trauma. Implications for future research in classification and treatment of psychopathology are discussed. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
对抗的结构:自我评定和访谈评定的精神病理学的层次模型。
最近在以经验为基础的精神病理学分类方面的倡议,即精神病理学分层分类法(HiTOP),在解决传统分类法(即《精神障碍诊断和统计手册》、《国际疾病分类》)的局限性方面取得了重大进展。目前的研究旨在通过帮助阐明精神病理学中一个尚未被充分研究的维度的低阶结构——对抗(即HiTOP对抗性外化谱)——这是许多外化障碍的核心特征,与人际问题、童年行为问题和监禁等重要结果相关。我们通过自我报告和临床访谈评分对2,279名具有不同人格病理(约75%患有人格障碍)和敌对行为(约30%患有间歇性爆发障碍)的社区参与者进行了对抗性外化特征的几种测量的层次结构检查。探索性结构方程模型用于解释自我报告和访谈方法中变量之间的共享方差。结果显示,最优低阶结构由六个因素组成:反社会、愤怒、敌意、自恋、不信任和关注寻求。因子得分与精神病理、人格和童年创伤的自我报告和访谈评分产生了预期的关系。讨论了对今后精神病理分类和治疗研究的启示。(PsycInfo数据库记录(c) 2023 APA,版权所有)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
First psychometric evaluation of the Level of Personality Functioning Scale-Brief Form 2.0 in adolescents. Peer support for borderline personality disorder: A critical review of its feasibility, acceptability, and alignment with concepts of recovery. Investigating the transdiagnostic potential of rumination in relation to Cluster B personality disorder symptoms. An evaluation of measurement invariance of Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition borderline personality disorder criteria across heterosexual, lesbian, gay, and bisexual adults. Identity disturbance in dimensional and categorical models of personality disorder: The incremental value of self-rated identity and narrative identity.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1