Kimberly J Gilbert, Christopher C Conway, Ivar Snorrason, Courtney Beard, Emma Moscardini, Thröstur Björgvinsson
Borderline personality disorder (BPD) diagnoses reliably predict worse mental health treatment outcomes. It is unknown whether multidimensional models of psychopathology, increasingly viewed as viable alternatives to traditional diagnostic systems, can match BPD's predictive power in clinical settings. In a sample of 2,625 partial hospital patients, we compared BPD with internalizing and harmful substance use dimensions as predictors of treatment success, defined by improvement in symptom severity, functional impairment, and quality of life. On a bivariate level, BPD features were moderately related to posttreatment functional impairment (r = .28) and quality of life (r = -.24), but not self-rated symptom improvement (r = .04). When adjusting for internalizing and harmful substance use, however, BPD features had very little unique predictive power. Instead, the internalizing spectrum was the strongest, most consistent predictor of symptom and functional improvement. This pattern of effects suggests that broad dimensions of psychopathology, particularly internalizing, capture much of BPD's prognostic utility in a partial hospital setting. We advise more attention to how the traditional BPD diagnosis compares to broad psychopathology dimensions in terms of clinical utility. This study's data, analysis code, and materials are posted at https://osf.io/wpy7e. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).
{"title":"Borderline personality disorder does not predict treatment outcome in a partial hospital program independent of internalizing and harmful substance use dimensions.","authors":"Kimberly J Gilbert, Christopher C Conway, Ivar Snorrason, Courtney Beard, Emma Moscardini, Thröstur Björgvinsson","doi":"10.1037/per0000758","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1037/per0000758","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Borderline personality disorder (BPD) diagnoses reliably predict worse mental health treatment outcomes. It is unknown whether multidimensional models of psychopathology, increasingly viewed as viable alternatives to traditional diagnostic systems, can match BPD's predictive power in clinical settings. In a sample of 2,625 partial hospital patients, we compared BPD with internalizing and harmful substance use dimensions as predictors of treatment success, defined by improvement in symptom severity, functional impairment, and quality of life. On a bivariate level, BPD features were moderately related to posttreatment functional impairment (<i>r</i> = .28) and quality of life (<i>r</i> = -.24), but not self-rated symptom improvement (<i>r</i> = .04). When adjusting for internalizing and harmful substance use, however, BPD features had very little unique predictive power. Instead, the internalizing spectrum was the strongest, most consistent predictor of symptom and functional improvement. This pattern of effects suggests that broad dimensions of psychopathology, particularly internalizing, capture much of BPD's prognostic utility in a partial hospital setting. We advise more attention to how the traditional BPD diagnosis compares to broad psychopathology dimensions in terms of clinical utility. This study's data, analysis code, and materials are posted at https://osf.io/wpy7e. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":74420,"journal":{"name":"Personality disorders","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.2,"publicationDate":"2025-12-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145746033","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Molly Fennig Steinhoff, Julian Baudinet, Roelie J Hempel, Rebecca Tillman, Thomas R Lynch, Kirsten E Gilbert
Obsessive-compulsive personality disorder (OCPD) is commonly comorbid with major depressive disorder, and their comorbidity is associated with worsened outcomes and treatment refraction. Radically open dialectical behavior therapy (RO DBT) is a novel transdiagnostic psychosocial intervention. RO DBT targets OCPD-related traits (e.g., maladaptive perfectionism, inflexibility) and has been theorized as an OCPD treatment. This study examined RO DBT efficacy for treatment-refractory depression (TRD), with and without comorbid OCPD. RefraMED was a multisite randomized controlled trial of treatment as usual (TAU) versus RO DBT + TAU for TRD (N = 250). In this secondary data analysis, linear regression predicted 7-month (end of treatment) and 12-month (follow-up) symptoms, controlling for baseline symptoms. Three models examined: (a) outcomes for participants with OCPD (n = 117) comparing RO DBT + TAU and TAU, (b) outcomes among participants receiving RO DBT (n = 162) comparing OCPD and no OCPD, and (c) OCPD diagnosis moderating treatment effects for all participants (N = 250). At 12 months, participants with OCPD had significantly improved emotional approach coping (emotion recognition and communication) and psychological flexibility in RO DBT + TAU (vs. TAU alone; false discovery rate-adjusted ps = .008), with no significant differences observed for depression or interpersonal functioning. OCPD presence did not predict any outcomes within the RO DBT group, nor moderate the effect of treatment on outcomes, suggesting treatment effects were not significantly inhibited by OCPD presence. In conclusion, RO DBT shows promise as a potential evidence-based treatment for OCPD, particularly when comorbid with TRD. Treatment effects were equivalent for those with and without OCPD. Moreover, RO DBT may be particularly beneficial for improving emotional approach coping and flexibility. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).
{"title":"Obsessive-compulsive personality disorder in radically open dialectical behavior therapy for treatment-refractory depression.","authors":"Molly Fennig Steinhoff, Julian Baudinet, Roelie J Hempel, Rebecca Tillman, Thomas R Lynch, Kirsten E Gilbert","doi":"10.1037/per0000754","DOIUrl":"10.1037/per0000754","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Obsessive-compulsive personality disorder (OCPD) is commonly comorbid with major depressive disorder, and their comorbidity is associated with worsened outcomes and treatment refraction. Radically open dialectical behavior therapy (RO DBT) is a novel transdiagnostic psychosocial intervention. RO DBT targets OCPD-related traits (e.g., maladaptive perfectionism, inflexibility) and has been theorized as an OCPD treatment. This study examined RO DBT efficacy for treatment-refractory depression (TRD), with and without comorbid OCPD. RefraMED was a multisite randomized controlled trial of treatment as usual (TAU) versus RO DBT + TAU for TRD (<i>N</i> = 250). In this secondary data analysis, linear regression predicted 7-month (end of treatment) and 12-month (follow-up) symptoms, controlling for baseline symptoms. Three models examined: (a) outcomes for participants with OCPD (<i>n</i> = 117) comparing RO DBT + TAU and TAU, (b) outcomes among participants receiving RO DBT (<i>n</i> = 162) comparing OCPD and no OCPD, and (c) OCPD diagnosis moderating treatment effects for all participants (<i>N</i> = 250). At 12 months, participants with OCPD had significantly improved emotional approach coping (emotion recognition and communication) and psychological flexibility in RO DBT + TAU (vs. TAU alone; false discovery rate-adjusted <i>p</i>s = .008), with no significant differences observed for depression or interpersonal functioning. OCPD presence did not predict any outcomes within the RO DBT group, nor moderate the effect of treatment on outcomes, suggesting treatment effects were not significantly inhibited by OCPD presence. In conclusion, RO DBT shows promise as a potential evidence-based treatment for OCPD, particularly when comorbid with TRD. Treatment effects were equivalent for those with and without OCPD. Moreover, RO DBT may be particularly beneficial for improving emotional approach coping and flexibility. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":74420,"journal":{"name":"Personality disorders","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.2,"publicationDate":"2025-11-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12646503/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145598218","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Due to conflicting evidence regarding gender-specific prevalence of borderline personality disorder (BPD), this systematic review aims to evaluate its occurrence in men within the general population to inform more responsive approaches in assessment and treatment. A systematic search was conducted in MEDLINE, PubMed, PsycINFO, PsycARTICLES, Embase, and Web of Science for English-language publications between 1980 and 2023. Inclusion criteria included peer-reviewed studies reporting original prevalence data for BPD in men in the general population. Study quality was assessed using Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses guidelines, and data were synthesized using quantitative methods including meta-analysis. Eleven studies met the inclusion criteria (N = 2,027,764). Results indicated that the prevalence of BPD in men in the general population varied based on measurement method. Seven studies using clinical interviews reported a pooled prevalence of 0.9% and a men-to-women ratio of 43:100. In contrast, four studies using self-report measurements revealed a pooled prevalence of 8.1% and a men-to-women ratio of 73:100. The prevalence also differed according to sampling methods, participants age, as well as cultural and economic factors. This review suggests that BPD prevalence in men appears to vary according to multiple factors, with men meeting diagnostic criteria less frequently than women in the general population. The variations of prevalence may be influenced by gender bias in diagnostic criteria and clinical practice, as well as methodological and environmental factors. Future research should focus on refining measurement tools and improving clinical practice to better capture gender-specific and age-related manifestations of BPD, particularly across diverse cultural and economic contexts. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).
由于关于边缘型人格障碍(BPD)的性别差异患病率的证据相互矛盾,本系统综述旨在评估其在普通人群中男性的发生率,以提供更有效的评估和治疗方法。系统检索了MEDLINE、PubMed、PsycINFO、PsycARTICLES、Embase和Web of Science中1980 - 2023年间的英文出版物。纳入标准包括同行评议的研究,报告了普通人群中男性BPD的原始患病率数据。采用系统评价首选报告项目和荟萃分析指南评估研究质量,并采用包括荟萃分析在内的定量方法综合数据。11项研究符合纳入标准(N = 2,027,764)。结果表明,男性BPD在普通人群中的患病率因测量方法的不同而不同。采用临床访谈的七项研究报告,总患病率为0.9%,男女比例为43:100。相比之下,使用自我报告测量的四项研究显示,总患病率为8.1%,男女比例为73:100。根据抽样方法、参与者的年龄以及文化和经济因素,患病率也有所不同。这篇综述表明,男性BPD患病率似乎因多种因素而异,在一般人群中,男性符合诊断标准的频率低于女性。患病率的变化可能受到诊断标准和临床实践中的性别偏见以及方法学和环境因素的影响。未来的研究应侧重于改进测量工具和改善临床实践,以更好地捕捉BPD的性别特异性和年龄相关表现,特别是在不同的文化和经济背景下。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA,版权所有)。
{"title":"A systematic review and meta-analysis of the prevalence of borderline personality disorder among men in the general population.","authors":"Yan Huo, Sophie C Dahlenburg, Dianna R Bartsch","doi":"10.1037/per0000756","DOIUrl":"10.1037/per0000756","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Due to conflicting evidence regarding gender-specific prevalence of borderline personality disorder (BPD), this systematic review aims to evaluate its occurrence in men within the general population to inform more responsive approaches in assessment and treatment. A systematic search was conducted in MEDLINE, PubMed, PsycINFO, PsycARTICLES, Embase, and Web of Science for English-language publications between 1980 and 2023. Inclusion criteria included peer-reviewed studies reporting original prevalence data for BPD in men in the general population. Study quality was assessed using Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses guidelines, and data were synthesized using quantitative methods including meta-analysis. Eleven studies met the inclusion criteria (<i>N</i> = 2,027,764). Results indicated that the prevalence of BPD in men in the general population varied based on measurement method. Seven studies using clinical interviews reported a pooled prevalence of 0.9% and a men-to-women ratio of 43:100. In contrast, four studies using self-report measurements revealed a pooled prevalence of 8.1% and a men-to-women ratio of 73:100. The prevalence also differed according to sampling methods, participants age, as well as cultural and economic factors. This review suggests that BPD prevalence in men appears to vary according to multiple factors, with men meeting diagnostic criteria less frequently than women in the general population. The variations of prevalence may be influenced by gender bias in diagnostic criteria and clinical practice, as well as methodological and environmental factors. Future research should focus on refining measurement tools and improving clinical practice to better capture gender-specific and age-related manifestations of BPD, particularly across diverse cultural and economic contexts. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":74420,"journal":{"name":"Personality disorders","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.2,"publicationDate":"2025-11-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145544225","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Distress tolerance (DT) is thought to be a transdiagnostic risk factor for psychopathology, especially borderline (BPD) and antisocial personality disorders (ASPD). However, most of the studies documenting the relationship of DT with BPD and ASPD have been cross-sectional, with few examining basic longitudinal patterns of change or interrelationships of these constructs. The present study examined longitudinal patterns of change and prospective reciprocal associations of DT with BPD and ASPD-related pathological personality traits (PPTs) in an adult clinical sample (N = 354) receiving inpatient treatment for substance use disorders and then reintegrating into the community across five time points (baseline, posttreatment, 1-, 3-, and 6-month follow-up). Results indicated high rank-order stability for DT and all PPTs, with significant mean level changes between baseline and follow-ups. Eleven bivariate random intercept cross-lagged panel models were fitted for the association of DT with PPTs. Within-person autoregressive effects were generally nonsignificant during treatment up until the posttreatment period but became significant during the community follow-up for both PPTs and DT. Within-person cross-lagged effects were generally nonsignificant, with only four brief and isolated reciprocal associations observed across disinhibition- and antagonism-related PPT models. Significant concurrent associations were replicated at both the within-person and between-person levels. These findings add to the limited literature on the longitudinal dynamics of DT and PPTs in clinical populations. They also underscore the potential value of targeting DT in interventions aimed at reducing emotional and behavioral dysregulation during the transition from treatment to community settings. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).
痛苦耐受(DT)被认为是精神病理,特别是边缘型人格障碍(BPD)和反社会人格障碍(ASPD)的跨诊断风险因素。然而,大多数记录DT与BPD和ASPD关系的研究都是横断面的,很少有研究这些结构的基本纵向变化模式或相互关系。本研究通过5个时间点(基线、治疗后、1个月、3个月和6个月随访)对接受药物使用障碍住院治疗并重新融入社区的成人临床样本(N = 354)进行了DT与BPD和aspd相关病理人格特征(PPTs)的纵向变化模式和预期相互关联的研究。结果显示,DT和所有PPTs的秩序稳定性较高,基线和随访之间的平均水平变化显著。11个二元随机截距交叉滞后面板模型拟合DT与ppt的关联。在治疗期间直至治疗后期间,个人内部自回归效应通常不显著,但在PPTs和DT的社区随访期间变得显著。人体内交叉滞后效应通常不显著,在去抑制和拮抗相关PPT模型中只观察到四个短暂和孤立的相互关联。重要的并发关联在人内部和人之间的水平上都得到了复制。这些发现增加了临床人群中DT和PPTs纵向动态的有限文献。他们还强调了针对DT的干预措施的潜在价值,旨在减少从治疗到社区环境过渡期间的情绪和行为失调。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA,版权所有)。
{"title":"Longitudinal association of distress tolerance with borderline and antisocial personality traits in a substance use treatment sample attempting sobriety.","authors":"Eun-Sun Lee, Marina A Bornovalova","doi":"10.1037/per0000755","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1037/per0000755","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Distress tolerance (DT) is thought to be a transdiagnostic risk factor for psychopathology, especially borderline (BPD) and antisocial personality disorders (ASPD). However, most of the studies documenting the relationship of DT with BPD and ASPD have been cross-sectional, with few examining basic longitudinal patterns of change or interrelationships of these constructs. The present study examined longitudinal patterns of change and prospective reciprocal associations of DT with BPD and ASPD-related pathological personality traits (PPTs) in an adult clinical sample (<i>N</i> = 354) receiving inpatient treatment for substance use disorders and then reintegrating into the community across five time points (baseline, posttreatment, 1-, 3-, and 6-month follow-up). Results indicated high rank-order stability for DT and all PPTs, with significant mean level changes between baseline and follow-ups. Eleven bivariate random intercept cross-lagged panel models were fitted for the association of DT with PPTs. Within-person autoregressive effects were generally nonsignificant during treatment up until the posttreatment period but became significant during the community follow-up for both PPTs and DT. Within-person cross-lagged effects were generally nonsignificant, with only four brief and isolated reciprocal associations observed across disinhibition- and antagonism-related PPT models. Significant concurrent associations were replicated at both the within-person and between-person levels. These findings add to the limited literature on the longitudinal dynamics of DT and PPTs in clinical populations. They also underscore the potential value of targeting DT in interventions aimed at reducing emotional and behavioral dysregulation during the transition from treatment to community settings. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":74420,"journal":{"name":"Personality disorders","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.2,"publicationDate":"2025-11-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145460871","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Kelly V Klein, Alice I Cohen, Nathaniel R Herr, Alanna M Covington, Kathleen C Gunthert
Given that people with borderline personality disorder (BPD) features are vulnerable to emotion dysregulation, they might be particularly sensitive to the emotional impacts of poor sleep quality and low sleep quantity. In the present study, we evaluated whether BPD features moderate the relationship between daily sleep, measured objectively (total sleep time [TST]) and subjectively (perceived sleep quality), and self-reports of positive and negative affect (NA). A sample of 83 cohabitating couples (n = 166) were recruited for a 3-week daily diary study. Participants completed a BPD symptom measure at baseline, a perceived sleep quality assessment each morning, and a daily emotion assessment each evening. TST was assessed daily using a FitBit activity monitor. Mixed-model regression analyses revealed a significant interaction between subjective sleep quality and overall BPD features in predicting daily levels of NA, even after statistical control of depression. Participants with higher BPD features exhibited greater NA on days when they reported worse sleep quality, as compared to participants with lower BPD features. Secondary analyses showed that this interaction seemed to be particularly impactful for anger, but not anxiety or sadness. In contrast, there was no significant interaction effect between BPD features and objectively assessed TST in predicting daily emotion. These results suggest that the emotional impact of poor subjective sleep quality might be more pronounced for those with BPD features. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).
鉴于边缘型人格障碍(BPD)患者容易出现情绪失调,他们可能对睡眠质量差和睡眠时间短对情绪的影响特别敏感。在本研究中,我们评估了BPD特征是否调节了日常睡眠(客观测量(总睡眠时间[TST])和主观测量(感知睡眠质量))与自我报告的积极和消极情绪(NA)之间的关系。83对同居夫妇(n = 166)被招募进行为期3周的每日日记研究。参与者在基线时完成了BPD症状测量,每天早上进行感知睡眠质量评估,每天晚上进行每日情绪评估。每天使用FitBit活动监测器评估TST。混合模型回归分析显示,即使在抑郁症的统计控制之后,主观睡眠质量和总体BPD特征在预测每日NA水平方面存在显著的相互作用。与BPD特征较低的参与者相比,BPD特征较高的参与者在报告睡眠质量较差的日子里表现出更大的NA。二次分析表明,这种互动似乎对愤怒特别有影响,但对焦虑或悲伤没有影响。相比之下,BPD特征与客观评估的TST在预测日常情绪方面没有显著的交互作用。这些结果表明,主观睡眠质量差对那些有BPD特征的人的情绪影响可能更为明显。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA,版权所有)。
{"title":"Sleep and affect in individuals with borderline personality disorder features: A daily diary study.","authors":"Kelly V Klein, Alice I Cohen, Nathaniel R Herr, Alanna M Covington, Kathleen C Gunthert","doi":"10.1037/per0000753","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1037/per0000753","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Given that people with borderline personality disorder (BPD) features are vulnerable to emotion dysregulation, they might be particularly sensitive to the emotional impacts of poor sleep quality and low sleep quantity. In the present study, we evaluated whether BPD features moderate the relationship between daily sleep, measured objectively (total sleep time [TST]) and subjectively (perceived sleep quality), and self-reports of positive and negative affect (NA). A sample of 83 cohabitating couples (<i>n</i> = 166) were recruited for a 3-week daily diary study. Participants completed a BPD symptom measure at baseline, a perceived sleep quality assessment each morning, and a daily emotion assessment each evening. TST was assessed daily using a FitBit activity monitor. Mixed-model regression analyses revealed a significant interaction between subjective sleep quality and overall BPD features in predicting daily levels of NA, even after statistical control of depression. Participants with higher BPD features exhibited greater NA on days when they reported worse sleep quality, as compared to participants with lower BPD features. Secondary analyses showed that this interaction seemed to be particularly impactful for anger, but not anxiety or sadness. In contrast, there was no significant interaction effect between BPD features and objectively assessed TST in predicting daily emotion. These results suggest that the emotional impact of poor subjective sleep quality might be more pronounced for those with BPD features. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":74420,"journal":{"name":"Personality disorders","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.2,"publicationDate":"2025-11-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145460832","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Johanna W van den Eshof, Kim de Bruijn, Anna Bartak, Udo W Nabitz, Henricus L Van, Rosa A van Grieken
Despite the availability of effective treatments for personality disorders (PDs), recovery rates are modest. A better understanding is therefore needed of what patients, significant others and therapists consider to be impediments to PD treatment. We used concept mapping to create a conceptual framework of factors that impede PD treatment. The perspectives of patients, significant others, and therapists with respect to impediments were collected in brainstorm sessions and then formulated as statements by an expert team. The participants subsequently prioritized and sorted these statements prior to analysis with multidimensional scaling and grouping on a two-dimensional concept map using hierarchical cluster analyses. Fifty-four statements were defined and assigned to 11 clusters that were grouped in five metaclusters: (a) lack of trust in the therapeutic relationship, (b) perceived therapist incompetence (c) shortcomings in the mental health care system, (d) patient-related conflicting factors, and (e) insufficient involvement of significant others. This study provides a conceptual framework of factors that are perceived to impede PD treatment. Our findings potentially contribute to an awareness of impediments in clinical practice and suggest that therapists should actively inquire about the expectations, needs, and treatment difficulties of patients and their significant others. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).
尽管人格障碍(pd)有有效的治疗方法,但康复率并不高。因此,需要更好地了解患者,重要他人和治疗师认为PD治疗的障碍。我们使用概念映射来创建阻碍PD治疗因素的概念框架。患者、重要他人和治疗师对障碍的看法是在头脑风暴会议中收集的,然后由专家团队形成陈述。随后,参与者对这些陈述进行优先排序,并在使用分层聚类分析的二维概念图上进行多维缩放和分组之前进行分析。54个陈述被定义并分配到11个聚类,这些聚类被分成5个元聚类:(a)对治疗关系缺乏信任,(b)感知治疗师无能,(c)精神卫生保健系统的缺陷,(d)与患者相关的冲突因素,以及(e)重要他人的参与不足。这项研究提供了一个概念框架的因素,被认为是阻碍PD治疗。我们的发现可能有助于认识到临床实践中的障碍,并建议治疗师应积极询问患者及其重要他人的期望、需求和治疗困难。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA,版权所有)。
{"title":"The perspectives of patients, significant others, and therapists on factors that impede treatment for personality disorders: A concept map study.","authors":"Johanna W van den Eshof, Kim de Bruijn, Anna Bartak, Udo W Nabitz, Henricus L Van, Rosa A van Grieken","doi":"10.1037/per0000749","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1037/per0000749","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Despite the availability of effective treatments for personality disorders (PDs), recovery rates are modest. A better understanding is therefore needed of what patients, significant others and therapists consider to be impediments to PD treatment. We used concept mapping to create a conceptual framework of factors that impede PD treatment. The perspectives of patients, significant others, and therapists with respect to impediments were collected in brainstorm sessions and then formulated as statements by an expert team. The participants subsequently prioritized and sorted these statements prior to analysis with multidimensional scaling and grouping on a two-dimensional concept map using hierarchical cluster analyses. Fifty-four statements were defined and assigned to 11 clusters that were grouped in five metaclusters: (a) lack of trust in the therapeutic relationship, (b) perceived therapist incompetence (c) shortcomings in the mental health care system, (d) patient-related conflicting factors, and (e) insufficient involvement of significant others. This study provides a conceptual framework of factors that are perceived to impede PD treatment. Our findings potentially contribute to an awareness of impediments in clinical practice and suggest that therapists should actively inquire about the expectations, needs, and treatment difficulties of patients and their significant others. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":74420,"journal":{"name":"Personality disorders","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.2,"publicationDate":"2025-11-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145460848","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-11-01Epub Date: 2025-06-26DOI: 10.1037/per0000734
Leon P Wendt, Eva M Klein, Cord Benecke, Susanne Singer, Lena Dotzauer, Deborah Engesser, Yannik van Haaren, Johannes Zimmermann
The Alternative DSM-5 Model for Personality Disorders and ICD-11 adopt a dimensional approach to personality disorders, defining them in terms of impairments in self-related (identity, self-direction) and interpersonal (empathy, intimacy) personality functions. This study examined the clinical utility of a clinician-rated global evaluation of personality functioning based on the Level of Personality Functioning Scale (LPFS). A total of 346 German mental health professionals provided LPFS ratings for 1,403 patients, stratified by 38 diagnostic categories, including, but not limited to, personality disorders. Clinicians reported on each patient's treatment outcome, recommended optimal treatment components for each patient, and provided their perspective on the clinical utility of the LPFS and its potential risk of stigmatizing patients. On average, clinicians rated the LPFS as "very useful," its applicability as "rather easy," and the risk of patient stigmatization as "rather low." Logistic and ordinal Bayesian multilevel models indicated meaningful associations between LPFS ratings and clinical judgments, highlighting its effectiveness in conveying clinical impressions. Greater impairments in personality functioning were associated with poorer clinician-rated treatment outcome and poorer prognosis. In addition, associations with optimal treatment components yielded a nuanced pattern, with clinicians typically recommending short-term outpatient psychotherapy for patients with mild impairments, long-term psychotherapy for patients with moderate to severe impairments, and intensive care interventions (e.g., outreach care, assisted living) for those with extreme impairments. The results indicate that German mental health professionals consider the LPFS to be a clinically useful concept and that it may be valuable in organizing and communicating information about patients. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).
《DSM-5人格障碍替代模型》和《ICD-11》采用了一种维度方法来研究人格障碍,根据自我相关(身份、自我导向)和人际关系(共情、亲密)人格功能的损害来定义它们。本研究考察了基于人格功能水平量表(LPFS)的临床评定人格功能整体评估的临床效用。共有346名德国心理健康专业人员为1403名患者提供了LPFS评分,按38个诊断类别进行分层,包括但不限于人格障碍。临床医生报告了每位患者的治疗结果,为每位患者推荐了最佳治疗成分,并提供了他们对LPFS的临床应用及其对患者污名化的潜在风险的看法。平均而言,临床医生认为LPFS“非常有用”,其适用性“相当容易”,患者被污名化的风险“相当低”。Logistic和有序贝叶斯多水平模型表明,LPFS评分与临床判断之间存在有意义的关联,突出了其在传达临床印象方面的有效性。人格功能损伤越大,临床评价的治疗结果越差,预后越差。此外,与最佳治疗成分的关联产生了一种微妙的模式,临床医生通常建议对轻度损伤患者进行短期门诊心理治疗,对中度至重度损伤患者进行长期心理治疗,对重度损伤患者进行重症监护干预(例如,外联护理,辅助生活)。结果表明,德国精神卫生专业人员认为LPFS是一个临床有用的概念,它可能是有价值的组织和沟通有关患者的信息。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA,版权所有)。
{"title":"Clinical utility of the Level of Personality Functioning Scale: A survey of German mental health professionals.","authors":"Leon P Wendt, Eva M Klein, Cord Benecke, Susanne Singer, Lena Dotzauer, Deborah Engesser, Yannik van Haaren, Johannes Zimmermann","doi":"10.1037/per0000734","DOIUrl":"10.1037/per0000734","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The Alternative DSM-5 Model for Personality Disorders and <i>ICD-11</i> adopt a dimensional approach to personality disorders, defining them in terms of impairments in self-related (identity, self-direction) and interpersonal (empathy, intimacy) personality functions. This study examined the clinical utility of a clinician-rated global evaluation of personality functioning based on the Level of Personality Functioning Scale (LPFS). A total of 346 German mental health professionals provided LPFS ratings for 1,403 patients, stratified by 38 diagnostic categories, including, but not limited to, personality disorders. Clinicians reported on each patient's treatment outcome, recommended optimal treatment components for each patient, and provided their perspective on the clinical utility of the LPFS and its potential risk of stigmatizing patients. On average, clinicians rated the LPFS as \"very useful,\" its applicability as \"rather easy,\" and the risk of patient stigmatization as \"rather low.\" Logistic and ordinal Bayesian multilevel models indicated meaningful associations between LPFS ratings and clinical judgments, highlighting its effectiveness in conveying clinical impressions. Greater impairments in personality functioning were associated with poorer clinician-rated treatment outcome and poorer prognosis. In addition, associations with optimal treatment components yielded a nuanced pattern, with clinicians typically recommending short-term outpatient psychotherapy for patients with mild impairments, long-term psychotherapy for patients with moderate to severe impairments, and intensive care interventions (e.g., outreach care, assisted living) for those with extreme impairments. The results indicate that German mental health professionals consider the LPFS to be a clinically useful concept and that it may be valuable in organizing and communicating information about patients. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":74420,"journal":{"name":"Personality disorders","volume":" ","pages":"491-503"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2,"publicationDate":"2025-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144509880","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-11-01Epub Date: 2025-08-04DOI: 10.1037/per0000743
Leigha Rose, Nathaniel L Phillips, Donald R Lynam, Brian W Bauer, Joshua D Miller
Suicide is a leading cause of death worldwide and is often empirically examined in relation to internalizing psychiatric constructs, such as depression, but less commonly in relation to externalizing disorders. The purpose of this preregistered meta-analysis was to explore the relations between suicide-related variables (i.e., ideation, attempts, and self-harm) and psychopathy-a maladaptive personality construct falling under the externalizing umbrella. The results showed small-to-moderate associations between total psychopathy scores and suicidal ideation (r = .19), behavior (r = .12), and self-harm (r = .20). Psychopathy subscales and factor scores varied widely in their correlations with suicide-related variables, highlighting the utility of assessing psychopathy using a more nuanced, trait-based approach. Potential mechanisms underlying these relations and clinical implications of the findings are discussed. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).
{"title":"Associations between psychopathy and suicide: A meta-analytic review.","authors":"Leigha Rose, Nathaniel L Phillips, Donald R Lynam, Brian W Bauer, Joshua D Miller","doi":"10.1037/per0000743","DOIUrl":"10.1037/per0000743","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Suicide is a leading cause of death worldwide and is often empirically examined in relation to internalizing psychiatric constructs, such as depression, but less commonly in relation to externalizing disorders. The purpose of this preregistered meta-analysis was to explore the relations between suicide-related variables (i.e., ideation, attempts, and self-harm) and psychopathy-a maladaptive personality construct falling under the externalizing umbrella. The results showed small-to-moderate associations between total psychopathy scores and suicidal ideation (<i>r</i> = .19), behavior (<i>r</i> = .12), and self-harm (<i>r</i> = .20). Psychopathy subscales and factor scores varied widely in their correlations with suicide-related variables, highlighting the utility of assessing psychopathy using a more nuanced, trait-based approach. Potential mechanisms underlying these relations and clinical implications of the findings are discussed. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":74420,"journal":{"name":"Personality disorders","volume":" ","pages":"562-576"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2,"publicationDate":"2025-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144777132","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-11-01Epub Date: 2025-07-17DOI: 10.1037/per0000741
Kelci C Davis, Jaime L Anderson
Measures of psychopathic personality traits have been utilized in a variety of settings and are often weighed heavily in decision-making. Though there is evidence of testing bias in marginalized groups, no evaluation of potential bias has been conducted for bias among sexual orientation minorities. This study utilized a slope-intercept bias approach to evaluate the testing bias of three self-report psychopathy measures: the Triarchic Psychopathy Measure, the Comprehensive Assessment of Psychopathic Personality-Self-Report, and the Levenson Self-Report Psychopathy Scale. Broadly, the current findings suggest psychopathy measures predominantly overpredict personality psychopathology and related impairment in sexual minorities, especially detachment, and disinhibition. Reassuringly, although some measures and scales had significantly overpredicted antisocial behaviors, none of these differences reached a threshold of clinically meaningful implications. Nonetheless, the risk of both testing and clinician bias should continue to be assessed in sexual minority persons and other diverse groups to ensure equitable evaluations. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).
精神病人格特征的测量已经在各种环境中被使用,并且经常在决策中被严重权衡。虽然有证据表明在边缘群体中存在测试偏差,但没有对性取向少数群体的潜在偏差进行评估。本研究采用斜截偏倚法对三种自述精神病量表(三型精神病量表、精神病人格综合评估-自述量表和Levenson自述精神病量表)的检验偏倚进行了评价。总的来说,目前的研究结果表明,精神病测量主要高估了性少数群体的人格精神病理学和相关损伤,特别是超脱和去抑制。令人欣慰的是,尽管一些测量和量表明显高估了反社会行为,但这些差异都没有达到具有临床意义的阈值。尽管如此,应该继续对性少数群体和其他不同群体进行测试和临床医生偏见的风险评估,以确保公平的评估。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA,版权所有)。
{"title":"Psychopathy testing bias in sexual orientation minorities.","authors":"Kelci C Davis, Jaime L Anderson","doi":"10.1037/per0000741","DOIUrl":"10.1037/per0000741","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Measures of psychopathic personality traits have been utilized in a variety of settings and are often weighed heavily in decision-making. Though there is evidence of testing bias in marginalized groups, no evaluation of potential bias has been conducted for bias among sexual orientation minorities. This study utilized a slope-intercept bias approach to evaluate the testing bias of three self-report psychopathy measures: the Triarchic Psychopathy Measure, the Comprehensive Assessment of Psychopathic Personality-Self-Report, and the Levenson Self-Report Psychopathy Scale. Broadly, the current findings suggest psychopathy measures predominantly overpredict personality psychopathology and related impairment in sexual minorities, especially detachment, and disinhibition. Reassuringly, although some measures and scales had significantly overpredicted antisocial behaviors, none of these differences reached a threshold of clinically meaningful implications. Nonetheless, the risk of both testing and clinician bias should continue to be assessed in sexual minority persons and other diverse groups to ensure equitable evaluations. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":74420,"journal":{"name":"Personality disorders","volume":" ","pages":"550-561"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2,"publicationDate":"2025-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144651443","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-11-01Epub Date: 2025-03-20DOI: 10.1037/per0000731
Lennart Kiel, Majse Lind, Sune Bo, Carsten Réne Jørgensen, Rikke Bøye, Christina Kjær Frederiksen, Helle Spindler
Contemporary models conceptualize personality disorder (PD) as a combination of personality dysfunction and pathological personality traits. However, some perspectives suggest that pathological traits, along with functional impairment, may be sufficient indicators of PD. This study builds on previous research by investigating whether identity disturbance, defined as impaired coherence, inconsistency, and discontinuity in the sense of self, contributes to pathological personality trait scores beyond basic five-factor personality traits. Additionally, it examines whether the associations between pathological personality trait domains, PD diagnosis, and functional impairment remain when controlling for identity disturbance and basic personality traits. The study included two samples: 776 community individuals (344 with a psychiatric history) and 77 psychiatric patients diagnosed with PD. Structural equation models with latent factors indicated that pathological personality trait domains can be described as a combination of variance from basic personality traits and to a lesser extent identity disturbance. When identity disturbance was controlled for, however, pathological trait domains no longer differentiated individuals with PD from community participants with psychiatric histories. Furthermore, individual pathological trait domains did not demonstrate incremental validity in predicting functional impairment beyond the contributions of basic personality traits and identity disturbance. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).
当代模型将人格障碍(PD)概念化为人格功能障碍和病态人格特征的结合。然而,一些观点认为病理特征以及功能障碍可能是PD的充分指标。本研究建立在先前研究的基础上,调查身份障碍(定义为自我意识上的连贯性、不一致性和不连续性受损)是否会导致超出基本五因素人格特征的病态人格特征得分。此外,它还研究了在控制身份障碍和基本人格特质时,病理人格特质域、PD诊断和功能障碍之间的联系是否仍然存在。该研究包括两个样本:776名社区个体(344名有精神病史)和77名诊断为PD的精神患者。具有潜在因素的结构方程模型表明,病态人格特征域可以被描述为基本人格特征变异和较小程度的身份障碍的组合。然而,当身份障碍得到控制时,病理特征域不再将PD患者与有精神病史的社区参与者区分开来。此外,除了基本人格特质和身份障碍的贡献外,个体病理特征域在预测功能障碍方面没有显示出增加的有效性。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA,版权所有)。
{"title":"Associations between pathological personality traits, functional impairment, and personality disorder: Controlling for basic personality traits and identity disturbance.","authors":"Lennart Kiel, Majse Lind, Sune Bo, Carsten Réne Jørgensen, Rikke Bøye, Christina Kjær Frederiksen, Helle Spindler","doi":"10.1037/per0000731","DOIUrl":"10.1037/per0000731","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Contemporary models conceptualize personality disorder (PD) as a combination of personality dysfunction and pathological personality traits. However, some perspectives suggest that pathological traits, along with functional impairment, may be sufficient indicators of PD. This study builds on previous research by investigating whether identity disturbance, defined as impaired coherence, inconsistency, and discontinuity in the sense of self, contributes to pathological personality trait scores beyond basic five-factor personality traits. Additionally, it examines whether the associations between pathological personality trait domains, PD diagnosis, and functional impairment remain when controlling for identity disturbance and basic personality traits. The study included two samples: 776 community individuals (344 with a psychiatric history) and 77 psychiatric patients diagnosed with PD. Structural equation models with latent factors indicated that pathological personality trait domains can be described as a combination of variance from basic personality traits and to a lesser extent identity disturbance. When identity disturbance was controlled for, however, pathological trait domains no longer differentiated individuals with PD from community participants with psychiatric histories. Furthermore, individual pathological trait domains did not demonstrate incremental validity in predicting functional impairment beyond the contributions of basic personality traits and identity disturbance. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":74420,"journal":{"name":"Personality disorders","volume":" ","pages":"504-515"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2,"publicationDate":"2025-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143671993","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}