Validity and reliability of simple surrogate indexes to evaluate beta-cell function and insulin sensitivity.

IF 0.5 4区 医学 Q3 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Revista medica de Chile Pub Date : 2022-11-01 DOI:10.4067/S0034-98872022001101458
Alonso Romo-Romo, Carlos A Aguilar-Salinas, Rita A Gómez-Díaz, Griselda X Brito-Córdova, Francisco J Gómez-Pérez, M Guadalupe López-Carrasco, Paloma Almeda-Valdés
{"title":"Validity and reliability of simple surrogate indexes to evaluate beta-cell function and insulin sensitivity.","authors":"Alonso Romo-Romo,&nbsp;Carlos A Aguilar-Salinas,&nbsp;Rita A Gómez-Díaz,&nbsp;Griselda X Brito-Córdova,&nbsp;Francisco J Gómez-Pérez,&nbsp;M Guadalupe López-Carrasco,&nbsp;Paloma Almeda-Valdés","doi":"10.4067/S0034-98872022001101458","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Simple surrogate indexes (SSI) to assess beta-cell function, insulin sensitivity (IS) and insulin resistance (IR) are an easy and economic tool used in clinical practice to identify glucose metabolism disturbances.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To evaluate the validity and reliability of SSI that estimate beta-cell function, IS and IR using as a reference the parameters obtained from the frequently sampled intravenous glucose tolerance test (FSIVGTT).</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>We included 62 subjects aged 20-45 years, with a normal body mass index and without diabetes or prediabetes. SSI were compared with the acute insulin response to glucose (AIRg), insulin sensitivity index (Si) and disposition index (DI) obtained from the FSIVGTT using the minimal model approach. Half of the participants (n = 31) were randomly selected for a second visit two weeks later to evaluate the reliability of all the variables.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>HOMA1-%B and HOMA2-%B had a significant correlation with AIRg (Spearman Rho (rs) = 0.33 and 0.37 respectively, p < 0.01). The SSI evaluating IS/IR that showed stronger correlation (rs > 0.50) with Si were fasting insulin, HOMA1-IR, HOMA2-IR, HOMA1-%S, HOMA2-%S, QUICKI, and the McAuley index. The parameters that showed good reliability with an intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) > 0.75 were AIRg, HOMA1-%S, HOMA2-%S, and QUICKI.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our results suggest that most of the SSI are useful and reliable.</p>","PeriodicalId":21360,"journal":{"name":"Revista medica de Chile","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista medica de Chile","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4067/S0034-98872022001101458","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Simple surrogate indexes (SSI) to assess beta-cell function, insulin sensitivity (IS) and insulin resistance (IR) are an easy and economic tool used in clinical practice to identify glucose metabolism disturbances.

Aim: To evaluate the validity and reliability of SSI that estimate beta-cell function, IS and IR using as a reference the parameters obtained from the frequently sampled intravenous glucose tolerance test (FSIVGTT).

Material and methods: We included 62 subjects aged 20-45 years, with a normal body mass index and without diabetes or prediabetes. SSI were compared with the acute insulin response to glucose (AIRg), insulin sensitivity index (Si) and disposition index (DI) obtained from the FSIVGTT using the minimal model approach. Half of the participants (n = 31) were randomly selected for a second visit two weeks later to evaluate the reliability of all the variables.

Results: HOMA1-%B and HOMA2-%B had a significant correlation with AIRg (Spearman Rho (rs) = 0.33 and 0.37 respectively, p < 0.01). The SSI evaluating IS/IR that showed stronger correlation (rs > 0.50) with Si were fasting insulin, HOMA1-IR, HOMA2-IR, HOMA1-%S, HOMA2-%S, QUICKI, and the McAuley index. The parameters that showed good reliability with an intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) > 0.75 were AIRg, HOMA1-%S, HOMA2-%S, and QUICKI.

Conclusions: Our results suggest that most of the SSI are useful and reliable.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评价β细胞功能和胰岛素敏感性的简单替代指标的效度和信度。
背景:简单替代指标(SSI)评估β细胞功能,胰岛素敏感性(IS)和胰岛素抵抗(IR)是临床实践中用于识别葡萄糖代谢紊乱的简单和经济的工具。目的:以频繁采样静脉葡萄糖耐量试验(FSIVGTT)获得的参数为参考,评价评价β细胞功能、IS和IR的SSI的效度和可靠性。材料和方法:我们纳入了62名年龄在20-45岁之间,身体质量指数正常,无糖尿病或前驱糖尿病的受试者。使用最小模型方法将SSI与FSIVGTT获得的急性胰岛素对葡萄糖反应(AIRg)、胰岛素敏感性指数(Si)和处置指数(DI)进行比较。一半的参与者(n = 31)被随机选择在两周后进行第二次访问,以评估所有变量的可靠性。结果:HOMA1-%B、HOMA2-%B与AIRg有显著相关性(Spearman Rho (rs)分别为0.33、0.37,p < 0.01)。评价IS/IR与Si相关性较强(rs > 0.50)的SSI指标为空腹胰岛素、HOMA1-IR、HOMA2-IR、HOMA1-%S、HOMA2-%S、QUICKI和McAuley指数。信度较高且类内相关系数(ICC) > 0.75的参数有AIRg、HOMA1-%S、HOMA2-%S和QUICKI。结论:我们的结果表明大多数SSI是有用和可靠的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Revista medica de Chile
Revista medica de Chile 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
16.70%
发文量
75
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: La Revista Médica de Chile publica trabajos originales sobre temas de interés médico y de Ciencias Biomédicas, dando preferencia a los relacionados con la Medicina Interna y sus especialidades derivadas. Publicada mensualmente, desde 1872, por la Sociedad Médica de Santiago. La abreviatura de su título es Rev Med Chile, que debe ser usado en bibliografías, notas al pié de página, leyendas y referencias bibliográficas.
期刊最新文献
[Being Depressed or Having Depression. The biomedical model and the difference between mood and illness]. Chronic angina secondary to Takayasu arteritis. Report of one case. [Single-pass albumin dialysis as treatment of acute on chronic liver failure during COVID-19 pneumonia. report of one case]. [The perception of teachers and students about clinical reasoning in health care careers]. [Knowing better, knowing the why, and knowing how to do: assumptions of depression in psychiatry].
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1