Pain associated with intravascular instrumentation reduces orthostatic tolerance and predisposes to vasovagal reactions in healthy young adults without needle phobia: a randomised controlled study.

IF 3.9 3区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Clinical Autonomic Research Pub Date : 2023-12-01 Epub Date: 2023-08-17 DOI:10.1007/s10286-023-00972-8
Brooke C D Hockin, Vera-Ellen M Lucci, Ryan E Y Wu, Michelle Nicholas, Iain T Parsons, Victoria E Claydon
{"title":"Pain associated with intravascular instrumentation reduces orthostatic tolerance and predisposes to vasovagal reactions in healthy young adults without needle phobia: a randomised controlled study.","authors":"Brooke C D Hockin, Vera-Ellen M Lucci, Ryan E Y Wu, Michelle Nicholas, Iain T Parsons, Victoria E Claydon","doi":"10.1007/s10286-023-00972-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Vasovagal syncope (VVS), or fainting, is frequently triggered by pain, fear, or emotional distress, especially with blood-injection-injury stimuli. We aimed to examine the impact of intravenous (IV) instrumentation on orthostatic tolerance (OT; fainting susceptibility) in healthy young adults. We hypothesized that pain associated with IV procedures would reduce OT.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, cross-over study, participants (N = 23; 14 women; age 24.2 ± 4.4 years) underwent head-up tilt with combined lower body negative pressure to presyncope on three separate days: (1) IV cannulation with local anaesthetic cream (EMLA) (IV + EMLA); (2) IV cannulation with placebo cream (IV + Placebo); (3) sham IV cannulation with local anaesthetic cream (Sham + EMLA). Participants rated pain associated with IV procedures on a 1-5 scale. Cardiovascular (finger plethysmography and electrocardiogram; Finometer Pro), and forearm vascular resistance (FVR; brachial Doppler) responses were recorded continuously and non-invasively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Compared to Sham + EMLA (27.8 ± 2.4 min), OT was reduced in IV + Placebo (23.0 ± 2.8 min; p = 0.026), but not in IV + EMLA (26.2 ± 2.2 min; p = 0.185). Pain was increased in IV + Placebo (2.8 ± 0.2) compared to IV + EMLA (2.0 ± 2.2; p = 0.002) and Sham + EMLA (1.1 ± 0.1; p < 0.001). Orthostatic heart rate responses were lower in IV + Placebo (84.4 ± 3.1 bpm) than IV + EMLA (87.3 ± 3.1 bpm; p = 0.007) and Sham + EMLA (87.7 ± 3.1 bpm; p = 0.001). Maximal FVR responses were reduced in IV + Placebo (+ 140.7 ± 19.0%) compared to IV + EMLA (+ 221.2 ± 25.9%; p < 0.001) and Sham + EMLA (+ 190.6 ± 17.0%; p = 0.017).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Pain plays a key role in predisposing to VVS following venipuncture, and our data suggest this effect is mediated through reduced capacity to achieve maximal sympathetic activation during orthostatic stress. Topical anaesthetics, such as EMLA, may reduce the frequency and severity of VVS during procedures requiring needles and intravascular instrumentation.</p>","PeriodicalId":10168,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Autonomic Research","volume":" ","pages":"673-689"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Autonomic Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10286-023-00972-8","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/8/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Vasovagal syncope (VVS), or fainting, is frequently triggered by pain, fear, or emotional distress, especially with blood-injection-injury stimuli. We aimed to examine the impact of intravenous (IV) instrumentation on orthostatic tolerance (OT; fainting susceptibility) in healthy young adults. We hypothesized that pain associated with IV procedures would reduce OT.

Methods: In this randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, cross-over study, participants (N = 23; 14 women; age 24.2 ± 4.4 years) underwent head-up tilt with combined lower body negative pressure to presyncope on three separate days: (1) IV cannulation with local anaesthetic cream (EMLA) (IV + EMLA); (2) IV cannulation with placebo cream (IV + Placebo); (3) sham IV cannulation with local anaesthetic cream (Sham + EMLA). Participants rated pain associated with IV procedures on a 1-5 scale. Cardiovascular (finger plethysmography and electrocardiogram; Finometer Pro), and forearm vascular resistance (FVR; brachial Doppler) responses were recorded continuously and non-invasively.

Results: Compared to Sham + EMLA (27.8 ± 2.4 min), OT was reduced in IV + Placebo (23.0 ± 2.8 min; p = 0.026), but not in IV + EMLA (26.2 ± 2.2 min; p = 0.185). Pain was increased in IV + Placebo (2.8 ± 0.2) compared to IV + EMLA (2.0 ± 2.2; p = 0.002) and Sham + EMLA (1.1 ± 0.1; p < 0.001). Orthostatic heart rate responses were lower in IV + Placebo (84.4 ± 3.1 bpm) than IV + EMLA (87.3 ± 3.1 bpm; p = 0.007) and Sham + EMLA (87.7 ± 3.1 bpm; p = 0.001). Maximal FVR responses were reduced in IV + Placebo (+ 140.7 ± 19.0%) compared to IV + EMLA (+ 221.2 ± 25.9%; p < 0.001) and Sham + EMLA (+ 190.6 ± 17.0%; p = 0.017).

Conclusions: Pain plays a key role in predisposing to VVS following venipuncture, and our data suggest this effect is mediated through reduced capacity to achieve maximal sympathetic activation during orthostatic stress. Topical anaesthetics, such as EMLA, may reduce the frequency and severity of VVS during procedures requiring needles and intravascular instrumentation.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
一项随机对照研究:在没有针刺恐惧症的健康年轻人中,血管内器械操作带来的疼痛会降低正压耐受性并导致血管迷走反应。
目的:血管迷走性晕厥(VVS)或晕厥经常由疼痛、恐惧或情绪困扰引发,尤其是在血液注射损伤刺激下。我们旨在研究静脉注射器械对健康青壮年正静息耐受性(OT;晕厥易感性)的影响。我们假设,与静脉注射过程相关的疼痛会降低 OT:在这项随机、双盲、安慰剂对照、交叉研究中,参与者(N = 23;14 名女性;年龄为 24.2 ± 4.4 岁)分别在三天内接受了抬头仰卧联合下半身负压预晕厥治疗:(1) 使用局麻药膏(EMLA)进行静脉插管(IV + EMLA);(2) 使用安慰剂药膏进行静脉插管(IV + 安慰剂);(3) 使用局麻药膏进行假静脉插管(Sham + EMLA)。参与者对静脉注射过程中的疼痛进行 1-5 级评分。连续无创记录心血管(手指胸压计和心电图;Finometer Pro)和前臂血管阻力(FVR;肱动脉多普勒)反应:与 Sham + EMLA(27.8 ± 2.4 分钟)相比,IV + 安慰剂(23.0 ± 2.8 分钟;p = 0.026)减少了 OT,但 IV + EMLA(26.2 ± 2.2 分钟;p = 0.185)没有减少。与 IV + EMLA(2.0 ± 2.2;p = 0.002)和 Sham + EMLA(1.1 ± 0.1;p 结论相比,IV + 安慰剂(2.8 ± 0.2)会增加疼痛:疼痛在静脉穿刺后导致 VVS 的易感性中起着关键作用,我们的数据表明,这种效应是通过降低在正立应激期间实现最大交感神经激活的能力来介导的。局部麻醉剂(如 EMLA)可减少在需要使用针头和血管内器械的手术中发生 VVS 的频率和严重程度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical Autonomic Research
Clinical Autonomic Research 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
6.90%
发文量
65
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinical Autonomic Research aims to draw together and disseminate research work from various disciplines and specialties dealing with clinical problems resulting from autonomic dysfunction. Areas to be covered include: cardiovascular system, neurology, diabetes, endocrinology, urology, pain disorders, ophthalmology, gastroenterology, toxicology and clinical pharmacology, skin infectious diseases, renal disease. This journal is an essential source of new information for everyone working in areas involving the autonomic nervous system. A major feature of Clinical Autonomic Research is its speed of publication coupled with the highest refereeing standards.
期刊最新文献
Comment to the article titled: sympathetic dysfunction as an early indicator of autonomic involvement in Parkinson's disease. Autonomic failure associated with 16p11.2 duplication in two siblings. Adiposity and cardiac autonomic function in children with a family history of obesity. Responses to Valsalva's maneuver in spinal cord injury do not broadly relate to vasoconstrictor capacity. The insular cortex, autonomic asymmetry and cardiovascular control: looking at the right side of stroke.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1