A Bridge Between DSM-5 Section II Personality Disorder Criteria and ICD-11 Personality Disorder Trait Domains.

IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q3 PSYCHIATRY Journal of Personality Disorders Pub Date : 2023-06-01 DOI:10.1521/pedi.2023.37.3.317
Holly F Levin-Aspenson, Shereen Khoo, Kasey Stanton, Brittany King, Mark Zimmerman
{"title":"A Bridge Between <i>DSM-5</i> Section II Personality Disorder Criteria and <i>ICD-11</i> Personality Disorder Trait Domains.","authors":"Holly F Levin-Aspenson,&nbsp;Shereen Khoo,&nbsp;Kasey Stanton,&nbsp;Brittany King,&nbsp;Mark Zimmerman","doi":"10.1521/pedi.2023.37.3.317","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The organization of personality pathology into trait domains (vs. specific disorders) in <i>ICD-11</i> represents an important shift in personality disorder (PD) nosology. However, to facilitate clinical implementation, a bridge is needed between this system and the <i>DSM-5</i> Section II system familiar to many researchers and clinicians. In this study, individual <i>DSM-5</i> PD criteria were assigned to <i>ICD-11</i> trait domains based on the published Clinical Descriptions and Diagnostic Requirements. This scoring scheme was examined empirically alongside <i>DSM-5</i> PD dimensions (using SIDP ratings from the MIDAS project; <i>N</i> = 2,147 outpatients) in terms of descriptive properties and relations with psychosocial morbidity and functioning. Most PD criteria could be matched to at least one <i>ICD-11</i> trait domain, indicating considerable cross-system continuity. However, points of incongruity are noteworthy for research and clinical applications. Results provide key information for bridging categorical and dimensional frameworks, indicating that the shift toward trait-based PD models need not be as disruptive as feared.</p>","PeriodicalId":48175,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Personality Disorders","volume":"37 3","pages":"317-336"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Personality Disorders","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1521/pedi.2023.37.3.317","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The organization of personality pathology into trait domains (vs. specific disorders) in ICD-11 represents an important shift in personality disorder (PD) nosology. However, to facilitate clinical implementation, a bridge is needed between this system and the DSM-5 Section II system familiar to many researchers and clinicians. In this study, individual DSM-5 PD criteria were assigned to ICD-11 trait domains based on the published Clinical Descriptions and Diagnostic Requirements. This scoring scheme was examined empirically alongside DSM-5 PD dimensions (using SIDP ratings from the MIDAS project; N = 2,147 outpatients) in terms of descriptive properties and relations with psychosocial morbidity and functioning. Most PD criteria could be matched to at least one ICD-11 trait domain, indicating considerable cross-system continuity. However, points of incongruity are noteworthy for research and clinical applications. Results provide key information for bridging categorical and dimensional frameworks, indicating that the shift toward trait-based PD models need not be as disruptive as feared.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
DSM-5第二部分人格障碍标准与ICD-11人格障碍特征域之间的桥梁。
ICD-11将人格病理组织为特征域(相对于特定障碍)代表了人格障碍(PD)分类学的重要转变。然而,为了促进临床实施,需要在该系统与许多研究人员和临床医生熟悉的DSM-5第二部分系统之间建立桥梁。在本研究中,根据已发表的临床描述和诊断要求,将DSM-5个体PD标准分配到ICD-11特征域。该评分方案与DSM-5 PD维度一起进行了实证检验(使用MIDAS项目的SIDP评分;N = 2147门诊患者)的描述性特征和与社会心理疾病和功能的关系。大多数PD标准可以匹配至少一个ICD-11特征域,表明相当大的跨系统连续性。然而,在研究和临床应用中,不一致的点值得注意。研究结果为连接分类和维度框架提供了关键信息,表明向基于特征的PD模型的转变并不像人们担心的那样具有破坏性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
4.30%
发文量
31
期刊介绍: The Journal of Personality Disorders has long been the only forum devoted exclusively to the diagnosis and treatment of clinically significant personality disorders. The journal fosters dialogue among researchers and practitioners working from a variety of orientations and approaches. Its international impact is well established, with subscribers in over 30 countries. This multidisciplinary journal regularly features: - Research on normal and pathological personality and development - New methodologies for assessing personality - Etiologies and clinical classifications for personality disorders - Epidemiological studies and outcomes research on diagnostic criteria - Treatment techniques and innovations
期刊最新文献
A Qualitative Exploration of Help-Seeking and Experiences of Diagnosis Among Men With Borderline Personality Disorder. Alexithymia and Personality Pathology. Erratum. Increasing Prevalence of Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder in Patients With Borderline Personality Disorder. The Role of Diagnostic Models in Prejudice Toward People With Borderline Personality Disorder: An Experimental Investigation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1