首页 > 最新文献

Journal of Personality Disorders最新文献

英文 中文
Alexithymia and Personality Pathology. Alexithymia and Personality Pathology.
IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q3 PSYCHIATRY Pub Date : 2024-10-01 DOI: 10.1521/pedi.2024.38.5.435
Sabrina Winterstein, Trevor G Mazzucchelli, James J Gross, Robert F Krueger, David A Preece

Alexithymia is an important transdiagnostic risk factor for many psychopathologies. To explore its relevance for personality disorders, we examined the association between alexithymia and maladaptive personality traits, as conceptualized within the DSM-5-TR Alternative Model for Personality Disorders (i.e., negative affect, detachment, antagonism, disinhibition, psychoticism). Participants (N = 651) completed a battery of psychometric questionnaires. Regressions revealed that alexithymia facets accounted for a significant 15% of the variance in negative affect, 22% in detachment, 11% in antagonism, 18% in disinhibition, and 25% in psychoticism. Latent profile analysis showed that profiles with more severe personality pathology were generally characterized by more severe levels of alexithymia. Overall, our data highlight that alexithymia is important in understanding personality dysfunction. All facets of alexithymia, across both positive and negative emotions, are linked to each maladaptive personality trait. The assessment and targeting of alexithymia may therefore be of high relevance for the treatment of personality pathology.

亚历山大症是许多精神病症的重要跨诊断风险因素。为了探索其与人格障碍的相关性,我们研究了lexithymia与适应不良人格特质之间的联系,正如DSM-5-TR人格障碍替代模型(即消极情绪、疏离、对抗、抑制、精神病性)所概念化的那样。参与者(N = 651)完成了一系列心理测量问卷。回归结果显示,在消极情绪、疏离感、对抗感、抑制感和精神病性的变异中,亚历山大症各侧面分别占 15%、22%、11%、18% 和 25%。潜特征分析表明,人格病态程度更严重的人通常具有更严重的情感淡漠特征。总之,我们的数据突出表明,情感障碍对于理解人格功能障碍非常重要。情感缺失的各个方面,包括积极情绪和消极情绪,都与每种适应不良的人格特质有关。因此,对情感障碍的评估和针对性治疗可能对人格病理学的治疗具有重要意义。
{"title":"Alexithymia and Personality Pathology.","authors":"Sabrina Winterstein, Trevor G Mazzucchelli, James J Gross, Robert F Krueger, David A Preece","doi":"10.1521/pedi.2024.38.5.435","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1521/pedi.2024.38.5.435","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Alexithymia is an important transdiagnostic risk factor for many psychopathologies. To explore its relevance for personality disorders, we examined the association between alexithymia and maladaptive personality traits, as conceptualized within the <i>DSM-5-TR</i> Alternative Model for Personality Disorders (i.e., negative affect, detachment, antagonism, disinhibition, psychoticism). Participants (<i>N</i> = 651) completed a battery of psychometric questionnaires. Regressions revealed that alexithymia facets accounted for a significant 15% of the variance in negative affect, 22% in detachment, 11% in antagonism, 18% in disinhibition, and 25% in psychoticism. Latent profile analysis showed that profiles with more severe personality pathology were generally characterized by more severe levels of alexithymia. Overall, our data highlight that alexithymia is important in understanding personality dysfunction. All facets of alexithymia, across both positive and negative emotions, are linked to each maladaptive personality trait. The assessment and targeting of alexithymia may therefore be of high relevance for the treatment of personality pathology.</p>","PeriodicalId":48175,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Personality Disorders","volume":"38 5","pages":"435-454"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142477917","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
A Qualitative Exploration of Help-Seeking and Experiences of Diagnosis Among Men With Borderline Personality Disorder. 对边缘型人格障碍男性患者寻求帮助和诊断经历的定性研究。
IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q3 PSYCHIATRY Pub Date : 2024-10-01 DOI: 10.1521/pedi.2024.38.5.455
Chloe Dean, Helen Mildred, Anna Klas, Sathya Rao, Jillian H Broadbear

Borderline personality disorder (BPD) is frequently understood as a diagnosis applicable mainly to women, despite population studies suggesting similar prevalence between men and women. The scarce available information suggests that compared to women, men may face additional gender-related barriers to diagnosis and treatment when attempting to engage with support and treatment for BPD-related difficulties. The current study presents a qualitative in-depth exploration of the help-seeking and diagnosis experiences of four men with BPD. Using Interpretive Phenomenological Analysis, three themes were generated: (1) "There's just no help out there": barriers to treatment; (2) self-understanding and insight; and (3) the importance of emotional and psychological connection with health care professionals and close family and friends. Having a greater understanding of male-specific experiences of BPD could improve the helpseeking journeys of men with BPD through early identification, accurate and timely diagnosis, to relevant and effective treatment and support.

边缘型人格障碍(BPD)通常被理解为一种主要适用于女性的诊断,尽管人口研究表明男性和女性的发病率相似。现有的稀缺信息表明,与女性相比,男性在尝试参与 BPD 相关困难的支持和治疗时,可能会面临更多与性别相关的诊断和治疗障碍。本研究对四名患有 BPD 的男性的求助和诊断经历进行了深入的定性探讨。通过解释性现象学分析,研究得出了三个主题:(1) "就是没有帮助":治疗障碍;(2) 自我理解和洞察力;(3) 与医护人员和亲密亲友建立情感和心理联系的重要性。通过早期识别、准确和及时的诊断,以及相关和有效的治疗和支持,更好地了解男性特有的 BPD 经验可以改善患有 BPD 的男性的求助历程。
{"title":"A Qualitative Exploration of Help-Seeking and Experiences of Diagnosis Among Men With Borderline Personality Disorder.","authors":"Chloe Dean, Helen Mildred, Anna Klas, Sathya Rao, Jillian H Broadbear","doi":"10.1521/pedi.2024.38.5.455","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1521/pedi.2024.38.5.455","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Borderline personality disorder (BPD) is frequently understood as a diagnosis applicable mainly to women, despite population studies suggesting similar prevalence between men and women. The scarce available information suggests that compared to women, men may face additional gender-related barriers to diagnosis and treatment when attempting to engage with support and treatment for BPD-related difficulties. The current study presents a qualitative in-depth exploration of the help-seeking and diagnosis experiences of four men with BPD. Using Interpretive Phenomenological Analysis, three themes were generated: (1) \"There's just no help out there\": barriers to treatment; (2) self-understanding and insight; and (3) the importance of emotional and psychological connection with health care professionals and close family and friends. Having a greater understanding of male-specific experiences of BPD could improve the helpseeking journeys of men with BPD through early identification, accurate and timely diagnosis, to relevant and effective treatment and support.</p>","PeriodicalId":48175,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Personality Disorders","volume":"38 5","pages":"455-476"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142477916","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Increasing Prevalence of Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder in Patients With Borderline Personality Disorder. 边缘型人格障碍患者中注意力缺陷/多动障碍的患病率越来越高。
IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q3 PSYCHIATRY Pub Date : 2024-10-01 DOI: 10.1521/pedi.2024.38.5.493
Kelly V Huynh, Isabel V Glass, Mary C Zanarini

While research has shown that the prevalence of ADHD in the general population has increased over time, there have been no studies focused on ADHD prevalence in patients with borderline personality disorder (BPD). This study compares two cohorts of adults with rigorously diagnosed BPD recruited nearly three decades apart (1992 vs. 2020). Participants from the 1992 McLean Study of Adult Development (MSAD) (N = 290) and the 2020 Flourishing study (N = 147) were assessed for ADHD using DSM-III-R and DSM-5 criteria respectively. Compared to MSAD subjects, the prevalence of ADHD among Flourishing subjects was significantly higher overall, and in female (but not male) subjects. This increased prevalence, which is likely due to the broadening of the DSM criteria over time, highlights what many observers believe to be a problematic expansion of the diagnostic criteria for ADHD that may have decoupled this criteria set from capturing a neurodevelopmental disorder that typically begins in childhood.

研究表明,随着时间的推移,多动症在普通人群中的患病率在不断上升,但目前还没有针对边缘型人格障碍(BPD)患者多动症患病率的研究。本研究比较了相隔近三十年(1992 年与 2020 年)招募的两组严格诊断为 BPD 的成年人。1992年麦克林成人发展研究(McLean Study of Adult Development,MSAD)的参与者(N = 290)和2020年Flourishing研究的参与者(N = 147)分别采用DSM-III-R和DSM-5标准进行了多动症评估。与 MSAD 受试者相比,Flourishing 受试者的多动症患病率总体上明显较高,女性(而非男性)的患病率也明显较高。这种患病率的增加很可能是由于随着时间的推移,DSM标准的范围不断扩大,这凸显了许多观察家认为ADHD诊断标准的扩大是有问题的,它可能使这套标准与通常始于儿童期的神经发育障碍脱钩。
{"title":"Increasing Prevalence of Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder in Patients With Borderline Personality Disorder.","authors":"Kelly V Huynh, Isabel V Glass, Mary C Zanarini","doi":"10.1521/pedi.2024.38.5.493","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1521/pedi.2024.38.5.493","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>While research has shown that the prevalence of ADHD in the general population has increased over time, there have been no studies focused on ADHD prevalence in patients with borderline personality disorder (BPD). This study compares two cohorts of adults with rigorously diagnosed BPD recruited nearly three decades apart (1992 vs. 2020). Participants from the 1992 McLean Study of Adult Development (MSAD) (<i>N</i> = 290) and the 2020 Flourishing study (<i>N</i> = 147) were assessed for ADHD using <i>DSM-III-R</i> and <i>DSM-5</i> criteria respectively. Compared to MSAD subjects, the prevalence of ADHD among Flourishing subjects was significantly higher overall, and in female (but not male) subjects. This increased prevalence, which is likely due to the broadening of the <i>DSM</i> criteria over time, highlights what many observers believe to be a problematic expansion of the diagnostic criteria for ADHD that may have decoupled this criteria set from capturing a neurodevelopmental disorder that typically begins in childhood.</p>","PeriodicalId":48175,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Personality Disorders","volume":"38 5","pages":"493-502"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142477919","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Underdiagnosis of Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Among Outpatients With Personality Disorders in Clinical Practice Despite the Use of a Diagnostic Instrument. 尽管使用了诊断工具,但在临床实践中对患有人格障碍的门诊患者中创伤后应激障碍的诊断不足。
IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q3 PSYCHIATRY Pub Date : 2024-10-01 DOI: 10.1521/pedi.2024.38.5.477
Simon Hofman, Christina W Slotema

While existing literature suggests that posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) is frequently undetected in routine clinical practice, the detection rate of PTSD in patients with a personality disorder (PD) has not been investigated. This study examined the point prevalence of PTSD and frequency of trauma-focused treatment in 204 outpatients with a PD. Data were derived from electronic patient files. Compared to the mean weighted prevalence of PTSD in the literature, the Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview Plus (MINI-Plus) found lower rates of PTSD for the entire sample (29.2%), but not separately for patients with borderline PD (BPD; 33.3%) and patients with other PDs (26.9%). In addition, PTSD diagnoses following intake were less prevalent for PD patients overall (18.6%), BPD patients (27%), and patients with other PDs (13.8%). The present study provides preliminary evidence that PTSD might be underdiagnosed and consequently unmanaged in PD patients in clinical practice, suggesting that the recognition of PTSD among patients with PD needs improvement.

现有文献表明,创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)在常规临床实践中经常未被发现,但人格障碍(PD)患者中创伤后应激障碍的检出率尚未得到研究。本研究调查了 204 名人格障碍门诊患者中创伤后应激障碍的点患病率和接受创伤焦点治疗的频率。数据来自患者电子档案。与文献中创伤后应激障碍的平均加权患病率相比,迷你国际神经精神访谈强化版(MINI-Plus)发现整个样本的创伤后应激障碍患病率较低(29.2%),但边缘型人格障碍患者(BPD;33.3%)和其他人格障碍患者(26.9%)的患病率并不一样。此外,PD 患者总体(18.6%)、BPD 患者(27%)和其他 PD 患者(13.8%)在入院后诊断出创伤后应激障碍的比例较低。本研究提供了初步证据,表明创伤后应激障碍在临床实践中可能被诊断不足,从而导致创伤后应激障碍患者得不到管理,这表明创伤后应激障碍在创伤后应激障碍患者中的识别率有待提高。
{"title":"Underdiagnosis of Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Among Outpatients With Personality Disorders in Clinical Practice Despite the Use of a Diagnostic Instrument.","authors":"Simon Hofman, Christina W Slotema","doi":"10.1521/pedi.2024.38.5.477","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1521/pedi.2024.38.5.477","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>While existing literature suggests that posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) is frequently undetected in routine clinical practice, the detection rate of PTSD in patients with a personality disorder (PD) has not been investigated. This study examined the point prevalence of PTSD and frequency of trauma-focused treatment in 204 outpatients with a PD. Data were derived from electronic patient files. Compared to the mean weighted prevalence of PTSD in the literature, the Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview Plus (MINI-Plus) found lower rates of PTSD for the entire sample (29.2%), but not separately for patients with borderline PD (BPD; 33.3%) and patients with other PDs (26.9%). In addition, PTSD diagnoses following intake were less prevalent for PD patients overall (18.6%), BPD patients (27%), and patients with other PDs (13.8%). The present study provides preliminary evidence that PTSD might be underdiagnosed and consequently unmanaged in PD patients in clinical practice, suggesting that the recognition of PTSD among patients with PD needs improvement.</p>","PeriodicalId":48175,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Personality Disorders","volume":"38 5","pages":"477-492"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142477921","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The Role of Diagnostic Models in Prejudice Toward People With Borderline Personality Disorder: An Experimental Investigation. 诊断模型在对边缘型人格障碍患者的偏见中的作用:一项实验研究
IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q3 PSYCHIATRY Pub Date : 2024-10-01 DOI: 10.1521/pedi.2024.38.5.415
Nicholas Wai, Boris Bizumic, Conal Monaghan, Hannah Sheppard, Lisa-Marie Greenwood

We tested whether dimensional personality disorder models such as the Alternative Model for Personality Disorders (AMPD) cause less prejudice toward people with borderline personality disorder (BPD) than categorical models, and we sought to identify the mechanisms underpinning this reduction in prejudice. Undergraduate psychology students (n = 183) were randomly assigned to one of three conditions (AMPD, categorical, control) and given descriptive information about BPD. Participants in the AMPD and categorical conditions also received a presentation about their respective BPD diagnostic criteria. Students in all conditions then completed a survey assessing their prejudice toward people with BPD. There was no difference between conditions on overall prejudice toward people with BPD. However, the AMPD increased continuum beliefs and decreased categorical beliefs, and these, in turn, affected perceptions of people with BPD as ingroup members, which indirectly reduced prejudice. We have identified pathways through which the AMPD indirectly reduces prejudice toward people with BPD.

我们测试了人格障碍替代模型(AMPD)等维度人格障碍模型对边缘型人格障碍(BPD)患者造成的偏见是否少于分类模型,并试图找出偏见减少的机制。心理学本科生(n = 183)被随机分配到三种条件(AMPD、分类、对照)中的一种,并获得有关 BPD 的描述性信息。AMPD和分类条件下的参与者还接受了关于各自BPD诊断标准的介绍。然后,所有条件下的学生都完成了一项调查,评估他们对 BPD 患者的偏见。在对 BPD 患者的总体偏见方面,不同条件下的学生没有差异。然而,AMPD增加了连续性信念,减少了分类信念,这些信念反过来又影响了对BPD患者作为内群体成员的看法,从而间接地减少了偏见。我们确定了AMPD间接减少对BPD患者偏见的途径。
{"title":"The Role of Diagnostic Models in Prejudice Toward People With Borderline Personality Disorder: An Experimental Investigation.","authors":"Nicholas Wai, Boris Bizumic, Conal Monaghan, Hannah Sheppard, Lisa-Marie Greenwood","doi":"10.1521/pedi.2024.38.5.415","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1521/pedi.2024.38.5.415","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>We tested whether dimensional personality disorder models such as the Alternative Model for Personality Disorders (AMPD) cause less prejudice toward people with borderline personality disorder (BPD) than categorical models, and we sought to identify the mechanisms underpinning this reduction in prejudice. Undergraduate psychology students (<i>n</i> = 183) were randomly assigned to one of three conditions (AMPD, categorical, control) and given descriptive information about BPD. Participants in the AMPD and categorical conditions also received a presentation about their respective BPD diagnostic criteria. Students in all conditions then completed a survey assessing their prejudice toward people with BPD. There was no difference between conditions on overall prejudice toward people with BPD. However, the AMPD increased continuum beliefs and decreased categorical beliefs, and these, in turn, affected perceptions of people with BPD as ingroup members, which indirectly reduced prejudice. We have identified pathways through which the AMPD indirectly reduces prejudice toward people with BPD.</p>","PeriodicalId":48175,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Personality Disorders","volume":"38 5","pages":"415-434"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142477920","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Erratum. 勘误。
IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q3 PSYCHIATRY Pub Date : 2024-10-01 DOI: 10.1521/pedi.2024.38.5.503
{"title":"Erratum.","authors":"","doi":"10.1521/pedi.2024.38.5.503","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1521/pedi.2024.38.5.503","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":48175,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Personality Disorders","volume":"38 5","pages":"503"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142477918","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Comparing the DSM-5 Dimensional Trait and Triarchic Model Conceptions of Psychopathy: An External Validity Analysis. 比较 DSM-5 心理变态的维度特质和三元模型概念:外部有效性分析
IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q3 PSYCHIATRY Pub Date : 2024-08-01 DOI: 10.1521/pedi.2024.38.4.368
Claudio Sica, Corrado Caudek, Ilaria Colpizzi, Gioia Bottesi, Sara Iannattone, Christopher J Patrick

In the DSM-5 Alternative Model of Personality Disorders (AMPD), psychopathy is marked by the presence of attention seeking, low anxiousness, and lack of social withdrawal, along with traits from the domains of Antagonism and Disinhibition. The triarchic model of psychopathy (TriPM) posits three biobehaviorally based traits underlying it: disinhibition, meanness, and boldness. The current study directly compared relations for measures of the two models with the broad dimensions of externalizing, internalizing, and positive adjustment. Participants (1,678 adults) were surveyed regarding maladaptive personality traits, clinical symptoms, and positive adjustment features. The TriPM model explained more variance than the AMPD in substance use, positive adjustment, and empathy, whereas the AMPD model explained more variance in internalizing symptoms. In addition, AMPD Antagonism and the Psychopathy Specifier diverged from TriPM Meanness and Boldness in their associations with some specific outcomes. Overall, our study provides evidence for complementarity of the two models in characterizing the multifaceted nature of psychopathy.

在《DSM-5 人格障碍替代模式》(AMPD)中,精神变态的特征是寻求关注、焦虑程度低、缺乏社会退缩,以及对抗和抑制领域的特征。心理变态的三元模型(TriPM)认为,心理变态有三个基于生物行为的特质:抑制、卑鄙和大胆。本研究直接比较了两种模式的测量结果与外化、内化和积极适应等广泛维度之间的关系。对参与者(1,678 名成年人)进行了有关适应不良人格特质、临床症状和积极适应特征的调查。在药物使用、积极适应和移情方面,TriPM 模型比 AMPD 模型能解释更多的方差,而 AMPD 模型则能解释更多的内化症状方差。此外,AMPD 的对抗性和精神病态特异性与 TriPM 的卑劣性和大胆性在与某些特定结果的关联上存在差异。总之,我们的研究为这两种模型在描述精神变态的多面性方面的互补性提供了证据。
{"title":"Comparing the <i>DSM-5</i> Dimensional Trait and Triarchic Model Conceptions of Psychopathy: An External Validity Analysis.","authors":"Claudio Sica, Corrado Caudek, Ilaria Colpizzi, Gioia Bottesi, Sara Iannattone, Christopher J Patrick","doi":"10.1521/pedi.2024.38.4.368","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1521/pedi.2024.38.4.368","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In the <i>DSM-5</i> Alternative Model of Personality Disorders (AMPD), psychopathy is marked by the presence of attention seeking, low anxiousness, and lack of social withdrawal, along with traits from the domains of Antagonism and Disinhibition. The triarchic model of psychopathy (TriPM) posits three biobehaviorally based traits underlying it: disinhibition, meanness, and boldness. The current study directly compared relations for measures of the two models with the broad dimensions of externalizing, internalizing, and positive adjustment. Participants (1,678 adults) were surveyed regarding maladaptive personality traits, clinical symptoms, and positive adjustment features. The TriPM model explained more variance than the AMPD in substance use, positive adjustment, and empathy, whereas the AMPD model explained more variance in internalizing symptoms. In addition, AMPD Antagonism and the Psychopathy Specifier diverged from TriPM Meanness and Boldness in their associations with some specific outcomes. Overall, our study provides evidence for complementarity of the two models in characterizing the multifaceted nature of psychopathy.</p>","PeriodicalId":48175,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Personality Disorders","volume":"38 4","pages":"368-400"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141879542","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Self-Reported ICD-11 Personality Disorder Severity in Peruvian Adolescents: Structure, Validity, and Tentative Cutoffs. 秘鲁青少年自述的 ICD-11 人格障碍严重程度:结构、有效性和暂定临界值。
IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q3 PSYCHIATRY Pub Date : 2024-08-01 DOI: 10.1521/pedi.2024.38.4.401
Luis Hualparuca-Olivera, Margarita Calle-Arancibia, Tomás Caycho-Rodríguez, Bo Bach

Personality disorder (PD) is particularly common in adolescents, which underscores the significance of early screening, diagnosis, and intervention. To date, the definition of PD in the new ICD-11 has not yet been investigated in adolescents. This study therefore aimed to investigate the unidimensionality and criterion validity of self-reported ICD-11 PD features in Peruvian adolescents using the Personality Disorder Severity ICD-11 (PDS-ICD-11) scale. A total of 1,073 students (63% female; age range 12-16 years) were administered the PDS-ICD-11 scale along with criterion measures of personality pathology and symptom distress. The PDS-ICD-11 score showed adequate unidimensionality and conceptually meaningful associations with external criterion variables. The findings indicate that ICD-11 PD features, as measured with the PDS-ICD-11 scale, are structurally and conceptually sound when employed with adolescents. Norm-based cutoffs derived from the present study may be used for clinical interpretation. The PDS-ICD-11 may be employed as an efficient screening tool for personality dysfunction in adolescents.

人格障碍(PD)在青少年中尤为常见,这凸显了早期筛查、诊断和干预的重要性。迄今为止,新版 ICD-11 中的人格障碍定义尚未在青少年中进行调查。因此,本研究旨在使用人格障碍严重程度 ICD-11 量表(PDS-ICD-11)调查秘鲁青少年自我报告的 ICD-11 PD 特征的单维性和标准有效性。共有 1073 名学生(63% 为女性,年龄在 12-16 岁之间)接受了 PDS-ICD-11 量表以及人格病理学和症状困扰的标准测量。PDS-ICD-11量表的得分显示出足够的单维性以及与外部标准变量之间有概念意义的关联。研究结果表明,用PDS-ICD-11量表测量的ICD-11 PD特征在结构上和概念上对青少年都是合理的。本研究得出的基于常模的临界值可用于临床解释。PDS-ICD-11可作为青少年人格功能障碍的有效筛查工具。
{"title":"Self-Reported <i>ICD-11</i> Personality Disorder Severity in Peruvian Adolescents: Structure, Validity, and Tentative Cutoffs.","authors":"Luis Hualparuca-Olivera, Margarita Calle-Arancibia, Tomás Caycho-Rodríguez, Bo Bach","doi":"10.1521/pedi.2024.38.4.401","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1521/pedi.2024.38.4.401","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Personality disorder (PD) is particularly common in adolescents, which underscores the significance of early screening, diagnosis, and intervention. To date, the definition of PD in the new <i>ICD-11</i> has not yet been investigated in adolescents. This study therefore aimed to investigate the unidimensionality and criterion validity of self-reported <i>ICD-11</i> PD features in Peruvian adolescents using the Personality Disorder Severity ICD-11 (PDS-ICD-11) scale. A total of 1,073 students (63% female; age range 12-16 years) were administered the PDS-ICD-11 scale along with criterion measures of personality pathology and symptom distress. The PDS-ICD-11 score showed adequate unidimensionality and conceptually meaningful associations with external criterion variables. The findings indicate that <i>ICD-11</i> PD features, as measured with the PDS-ICD-11 scale, are structurally and conceptually sound when employed with adolescents. Norm-based cutoffs derived from the present study may be used for clinical interpretation. The PDS-ICD-11 may be employed as an efficient screening tool for personality dysfunction in adolescents.</p>","PeriodicalId":48175,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Personality Disorders","volume":"38 4","pages":"401-413"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141879546","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Exploring the Nexus: Personality Disorders and Their Impact on Violent Extremism, Radicalism, and Activism. 探索联系:人格障碍及其对暴力极端主义、激进主义和激进主义的影响。
IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q3 PSYCHIATRY Pub Date : 2024-08-01 DOI: 10.1521/pedi.2024.38.4.350
Nicholas D Thomson, Sophie L Kjaervik

The escalating global concerns surrounding radicalization and violent extremism necessitate a comprehensive understanding and explanation. Identifying the risk factors associated with radicalism and violent extremism is critical to the development of risk assessment, prevention, and intervention strategies. It is imperative to distinguish these risks from civic responsibilities (i.e., activism) to safeguard individual rights. This study aims to examine the association between well-established risk factors for violence-personality disorder symptoms-and violent extremist attitudes, radicalism, and activism. Findings indicate that antisocial personality disorder symptoms were linked to violent extremist attitudes and radicalism, whereas obsessive-compulsive disorder symptoms were related to activism. This suggests that obsessive-compulsive personality disorder may signify a readiness for legal and nonviolent political action; in contrast, antisocial personality disorder symptoms signify a readiness for extremist violence and illegal political action.

围绕激进主义和暴力极端主义的全球关注不断升级,有必要对此进行全面的了解和解释。确定与激进主义和暴力极端主义相关的风险因素对于制定风险评估、预防和干预战略至关重要。当务之急是将这些风险与维护个人权利的公民责任(即激进主义)区分开来。本研究旨在探讨暴力风险因素(人格障碍症状)与暴力极端主义态度、激进主义和激进主义之间的关联。研究结果表明,反社会人格障碍症状与暴力极端主义态度和激进主义有关,而强迫症症状与激进主义有关。这表明,强迫型人格障碍可能代表着一种合法和非暴力政治行动的准备状态;相反,反社会型人格障碍症状则代表着一种极端暴力和非法政治行动的准备状态。
{"title":"Exploring the Nexus: Personality Disorders and Their Impact on Violent Extremism, Radicalism, and Activism.","authors":"Nicholas D Thomson, Sophie L Kjaervik","doi":"10.1521/pedi.2024.38.4.350","DOIUrl":"10.1521/pedi.2024.38.4.350","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The escalating global concerns surrounding radicalization and violent extremism necessitate a comprehensive understanding and explanation. Identifying the risk factors associated with radicalism and violent extremism is critical to the development of risk assessment, prevention, and intervention strategies. It is imperative to distinguish these risks from civic responsibilities (i.e., activism) to safeguard individual rights. This study aims to examine the association between well-established risk factors for violence-personality disorder symptoms-and violent extremist attitudes, radicalism, and activism. Findings indicate that antisocial personality disorder symptoms were linked to violent extremist attitudes and radicalism, whereas obsessive-compulsive disorder symptoms were related to activism. This suggests that obsessive-compulsive personality disorder may signify a readiness for legal and nonviolent political action; in contrast, antisocial personality disorder symptoms signify a readiness for extremist violence and illegal political action.</p>","PeriodicalId":48175,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Personality Disorders","volume":"38 4","pages":"350-367"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141879544","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Examining the Validity of the Levels of Personality Functioning Questionnaire for Adolescents Aged 12-18 (LOPF-Q 12-18): A Replication and Extension With a Sample of Lithuanian Adolescents. 检验 12-18 岁青少年人格功能水平问卷(LOPF-Q 12-18)的有效性:立陶宛青少年样本的复制和扩展。
IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q3 PSYCHIATRY Pub Date : 2024-08-01 DOI: 10.1521/pedi.2024.38.4.330
Rasa Barkauskienė, Carla Sharp, Sophie Kerr, Elena Gaudiešiūtė, Kirstin Goth, Gabrielė Skabeikytė-Norkienė

With the shift to the dimensional model of personality pathology, the need for measures assessing personality functioning in adolescence has emerged. The Levels of Personality Functioning Questionnaire 12-18 (LoPF-Q 12-18) was developed specifically for adolescents, tailoring the Alternative Model of Personality Disorders in the DSM-5. Using the Lithuanian LoPF-Q 1218, we further investigate its validity by reexamining its factorial structure and extending convergent, discriminant, and incremental validity analyses. A total of 1,048 community-based and clinically referred 12-18-year-old adolescents completed the LoPF-Q 12-18 along with other self-report measures of personality pathology, psychopathological symptoms, and psychosocial functioning. In line with previous findings, the results supported the bifactor model consisting of a strong general factor and little multidimensionality caused by the group factors, overall suggesting an essentially unidimensional structure. Further analyses provided additional information on the construct validity of the LoPF-Q 12-18.

随着人格病理学向维度模型的转变,评估青少年人格功能的测量方法也应运而生。人格功能水平问卷 12-18(LoPF-Q 12-18)是专为青少年开发的,它是根据 DSM-5 中的人格障碍替代模型量身定制的。通过使用立陶宛 LoPF-Q 1218,我们重新审查了其因子结构,并扩展了收敛性、判别性和增量有效性分析,从而进一步研究了其有效性。共有 1048 名社区和临床转诊的 12-18 岁青少年完成了 LoPF-Q 12-18,同时还完成了有关人格病理学、心理病理症状和社会心理功能的其他自我报告测量。与之前的研究结果一致,研究结果支持双因素模型,其中包括一个强有力的一般因素,而由群体因素引起的多维性很小,总体上表明该模型基本上是一个单维结构。进一步的分析为 LoPF-Q 12-18 的构建有效性提供了更多信息。
{"title":"Examining the Validity of the Levels of Personality Functioning Questionnaire for Adolescents Aged 12-18 (LOPF-Q 12-18): A Replication and Extension With a Sample of Lithuanian Adolescents.","authors":"Rasa Barkauskienė, Carla Sharp, Sophie Kerr, Elena Gaudiešiūtė, Kirstin Goth, Gabrielė Skabeikytė-Norkienė","doi":"10.1521/pedi.2024.38.4.330","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1521/pedi.2024.38.4.330","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>With the shift to the dimensional model of personality pathology, the need for measures assessing personality functioning in adolescence has emerged. The Levels of Personality Functioning Questionnaire 12-18 (LoPF-Q 12-18) was developed specifically for adolescents, tailoring the Alternative Model of Personality Disorders in the <i>DSM-5.</i> Using the Lithuanian LoPF-Q 1218, we further investigate its validity by reexamining its factorial structure and extending convergent, discriminant, and incremental validity analyses. A total of 1,048 community-based and clinically referred 12-18-year-old adolescents completed the LoPF-Q 12-18 along with other self-report measures of personality pathology, psychopathological symptoms, and psychosocial functioning. In line with previous findings, the results supported the bifactor model consisting of a strong general factor and little multidimensionality caused by the group factors, overall suggesting an essentially unidimensional structure. Further analyses provided additional information on the construct validity of the LoPF-Q 12-18.</p>","PeriodicalId":48175,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Personality Disorders","volume":"38 4","pages":"330-349"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141879543","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Journal of Personality Disorders
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1