Pub Date : 2024-12-01DOI: 10.1521/pedi.2024.38.6.535
Christina O Carlisi, Jennifer C Fielder, Annchen R Knodt, Adrienne L Romer, Ahmad R Hariri, Essi Viding
Psychopathy is a personality disorder characterized by affective-interpersonal features and an impulsive-antisocial lifestyle. Psychopathy commonly co-occurs with other forms of psychopathology, but current understanding of how behavioral features of psychopathy co-occur with, or are distinct from, other mental health problems is limited. In this study, we analysed data from a large sample of young adults to study the relationship between different facets of psychopathic traits and general psychopathology ("p"). Data were collected between 2010 and 2016 and included 1,324 U.S. undergraduate students (Mage = 19.7 years; 57% female). Linear regression models revealed that the antisocial facet of psychopathy was distinct from p, while the lifestyle facet was correlated with p and externalizing behavior. Interpersonal and affective facets were correlated with internalizing behaviors. Collectively, these findings suggest that psychopathic traits of severe, premeditated antisocial behavior are distinct from general psychopathology, whereas impulsive and uninhibited lifestyle traits are a shared feature of psychopathology.
{"title":"Differential Mapping of Psychopathic Traits and General Psychopathology in a Large Young Adult Sample.","authors":"Christina O Carlisi, Jennifer C Fielder, Annchen R Knodt, Adrienne L Romer, Ahmad R Hariri, Essi Viding","doi":"10.1521/pedi.2024.38.6.535","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1521/pedi.2024.38.6.535","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Psychopathy is a personality disorder characterized by affective-interpersonal features and an impulsive-antisocial lifestyle. Psychopathy commonly co-occurs with other forms of psychopathology, but current understanding of how behavioral features of psychopathy co-occur with, or are distinct from, other mental health problems is limited. In this study, we analysed data from a large sample of young adults to study the relationship between different facets of psychopathic traits and general psychopathology (\"p\"). Data were collected between 2010 and 2016 and included 1,324 U.S. undergraduate students (<i>M</i><sub>age</sub> = 19.7 years; 57% female). Linear regression models revealed that the antisocial facet of psychopathy was distinct from p, while the lifestyle facet was correlated with <i>p</i> and externalizing behavior. Interpersonal and affective facets were correlated with internalizing behaviors. Collectively, these findings suggest that psychopathic traits of severe, premeditated antisocial behavior are distinct from general psychopathology, whereas impulsive and uninhibited lifestyle traits are a shared feature of psychopathology.</p>","PeriodicalId":48175,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Personality Disorders","volume":"38 6","pages":"535-558"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142869751","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-12-01DOI: 10.1521/pedi.2024.38.6.520
Feyza Urer, Robert F Bornstein
The degree to which schizoid and avoidant personality styles represent unique variants of interpersonal detachment remains controversial. This study contrasted core traits associated with schizoid versus avoidant personalities in a mixed-sex sample of 221 community adults, using the five traits that comprise the Alternative Model for Personality Disorders (AMPD). The International Personality Disorders Examination Screening Questionnaire was used to assess schizoid and avoidant personality traits; the Personality Inventory for DSM-5 was used to assess negative affectivity, detachment, antagonism, disinhibition, and psychoticism. As expected, schizoid and avoidant scores were both positively associated with AMPD detachment scores (rs were .68 and .57, respectively). Regression analyses confirmed that, in addition to detachment, high levels of negative affectivity and low levels of disinhibition were uniquely predictive of avoidant personality traits, whereas low levels of antagonism were uniquely predictive of schizoid personality traits. The present findings support the distinctiveness of these two contrasting expressions of detachment.
{"title":"Deconstructing Detachment: Contrasting Trait Profiles in Community Adults With Schizoid Versus Avoidant Personality Styles.","authors":"Feyza Urer, Robert F Bornstein","doi":"10.1521/pedi.2024.38.6.520","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1521/pedi.2024.38.6.520","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The degree to which schizoid and avoidant personality styles represent unique variants of interpersonal detachment remains controversial. This study contrasted core traits associated with schizoid versus avoidant personalities in a mixed-sex sample of 221 community adults, using the five traits that comprise the Alternative Model for Personality Disorders (AMPD). The International Personality Disorders Examination Screening Questionnaire was used to assess schizoid and avoidant personality traits; the Personality Inventory for DSM-5 was used to assess negative affectivity, detachment, antagonism, disinhibition, and psychoticism. As expected, schizoid and avoidant scores were both positively associated with AMPD detachment scores <i>(rs</i> were .68 and .57, respectively). Regression analyses confirmed that, in addition to detachment, high levels of negative affectivity and low levels of disinhibition were uniquely predictive of avoidant personality traits, whereas low levels of antagonism were uniquely predictive of schizoid personality traits. The present findings support the distinctiveness of these two contrasting expressions of detachment.</p>","PeriodicalId":48175,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Personality Disorders","volume":"38 6","pages":"520-534"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142869738","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-12-01DOI: 10.1521/pedi.2024.38.6.599
{"title":"Author Index to Volume 38 Journal of Personality Disorders.","authors":"","doi":"10.1521/pedi.2024.38.6.599","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1521/pedi.2024.38.6.599","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":48175,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Personality Disorders","volume":"38 6","pages":"599-605"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142869737","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-12-01DOI: 10.1521/pedi.2024.38.6.503
Isabel V Glass, Frances R Frankenburg, Garrett M Fitzmaurice, Mary C Zanarini
This study describes the 8-year course of physical and psychosocial impairment in middle-aged patients with borderline personality disorder (BPD) and other personality disorders (OPD). This study also compares BPD subgroups (recovered vs. nonrecovered) and explores predictors of physical impairment. Patients (N = 282) were assessed as part of the McLean Study of Adult Development. Physical and psychosocial impairments were assessed using the 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey. Patients with BPD reported significantly more impairment than OPD patients across all domains. Nonrecovered BPD patients reported significantly more impairment than their recovered counterparts. Three medical conditions (osteoarthritis, chronic fatigue syndrome, and obesity) and two symptomatic disorders (mood disorder and posttraumatic stress disorder) were significant multivariate predictors of physical impairment in BPD patients. These results suggest that BPD patients experience serious functioning impairment that persists over time and that physical functioning impairments reported by these patients are strongly related to certain physical and psychiatric health conditions.
{"title":"Longitudinal Course of Physical and Psychosocial Impairment in Patients With Borderline Personality Disorder and Personality-Disordered Comparison Subjects: Description and Prediction.","authors":"Isabel V Glass, Frances R Frankenburg, Garrett M Fitzmaurice, Mary C Zanarini","doi":"10.1521/pedi.2024.38.6.503","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1521/pedi.2024.38.6.503","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study describes the 8-year course of physical and psychosocial impairment in middle-aged patients with borderline personality disorder (BPD) and other personality disorders (OPD). This study also compares BPD subgroups (recovered vs. nonrecovered) and explores predictors of physical impairment. Patients (<i>N</i> = 282) were assessed as part of the McLean Study of Adult Development. Physical and psychosocial impairments were assessed using the 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey. Patients with BPD reported significantly more impairment than OPD patients across all domains. Nonrecovered BPD patients reported significantly more impairment than their recovered counterparts. Three medical conditions (osteoarthritis, chronic fatigue syndrome, and obesity) and two symptomatic disorders (mood disorder and posttraumatic stress disorder) were significant multivariate predictors of physical impairment in BPD patients. These results suggest that BPD patients experience serious functioning impairment that persists over time and that physical functioning impairments reported by these patients are strongly related to certain physical and psychiatric health conditions.</p>","PeriodicalId":48175,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Personality Disorders","volume":"38 6","pages":"503-519"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142869752","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-12-01DOI: 10.1521/pedi.2024.38.6.559
Jonathan Phillips, Thomas Whitehead, Alvaro Barrera
The phenomenological differences in auditory hallucinations between schizophrenia and borderline personality disorder (BPD) are unclear in the existing literature, in part due to underpowered studies and heterogeneous research populations that do not represent those in the acute clinical setting. This study addresses this by using patient records to compare auditory hallucinations at the point of clinical psychiatric assessment for 341 unique patients, 165 with BPD and 176 with schizophrenia. Patients with BPD were found to have more subjectively distressing and objectively negative hallucinations, as well as more command hallucinations. Furthermore, they possessed more insight and were less likely to incorporate hallucinations into delusions. These results support the hypothesis that, while descriptively similar, auditory hallucinations are interpreted differently between the two groups. This study also supports that electronic records of patient assessments are a feasible way to assess large numbers of reports of auditory hallucinations.
{"title":"Auditory Hallucinations in Borderline Personality Disorder and Schizophrenia: A Quantitative Comparison Using Patient Records.","authors":"Jonathan Phillips, Thomas Whitehead, Alvaro Barrera","doi":"10.1521/pedi.2024.38.6.559","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1521/pedi.2024.38.6.559","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The phenomenological differences in auditory hallucinations between schizophrenia and borderline personality disorder (BPD) are unclear in the existing literature, in part due to underpowered studies and heterogeneous research populations that do not represent those in the acute clinical setting. This study addresses this by using patient records to compare auditory hallucinations at the point of clinical psychiatric assessment for 341 unique patients, 165 with BPD and 176 with schizophrenia. Patients with BPD were found to have more subjectively distressing and objectively negative hallucinations, as well as more command hallucinations. Furthermore, they possessed more insight and were less likely to incorporate hallucinations into delusions. These results support the hypothesis that, while descriptively similar, auditory hallucinations are interpreted differently between the two groups. This study also supports that electronic records of patient assessments are a feasible way to assess large numbers of reports of auditory hallucinations.</p>","PeriodicalId":48175,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Personality Disorders","volume":"38 6","pages":"559-572"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142869736","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-12-01DOI: 10.1521/pedi.2024.38.6.573
Erika Fanti, Marco Di Sarno, Rossella Di Pierro
The discriminant validity of paranoid personality disorder has been recently questioned, and paranoid presentations are now conceived of as transdiagnostic features of personality disorders (PDs). However, empirical results are inconsistent. This study investigated the link between subclinical personality disorders (except paranoid PD) and paranoid presentations, exploring how the severity of personality functioning affects this relationship. Nonclinical participants (N = 270, females: n = 194; 71.9%) completed self-report measures of the constructs of interest. In multiple regression analyses, subclinical borderline PD was primarily related to a wide range of paranoid presentations. Moreover, the severity of personality functioning increased the strength of the association between subclinical BPD and severe paranoid presentations. Results suggest that, when exploring unique contributions, paranoid presentations are especially associated with subclinical forms of BPD and highlight the importance of considering personality dysfunction severity. Additionally, the findings demonstrate that paranoid presentations are a relatively transdiagnostic dimension.
{"title":"When the Others Are Dangerous: Paranoid Presentations in Subclinical Forms of Personality Disorders.","authors":"Erika Fanti, Marco Di Sarno, Rossella Di Pierro","doi":"10.1521/pedi.2024.38.6.573","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1521/pedi.2024.38.6.573","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The discriminant validity of paranoid personality disorder has been recently questioned, and paranoid presentations are now conceived of as transdiagnostic features of personality disorders (PDs). However, empirical results are inconsistent. This study investigated the link between subclinical personality disorders (except paranoid PD) and paranoid presentations, exploring how the severity of personality functioning affects this relationship. Nonclinical participants (<i>N</i> = 270, females: <i>n</i> = 194; 71.9%) completed self-report measures of the constructs of interest. In multiple regression analyses, subclinical borderline PD was primarily related to a wide range of paranoid presentations. Moreover, the severity of personality functioning increased the strength of the association between subclinical BPD and severe paranoid presentations. Results suggest that, when exploring unique contributions, paranoid presentations are especially associated with subclinical forms of BPD and highlight the importance of considering personality dysfunction severity. Additionally, the findings demonstrate that paranoid presentations are a relatively transdiagnostic dimension.</p>","PeriodicalId":48175,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Personality Disorders","volume":"38 6","pages":"573-598"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142869754","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-10-01DOI: 10.1521/pedi.2024.38.5.435
Sabrina Winterstein, Trevor G Mazzucchelli, James J Gross, Robert F Krueger, David A Preece
Alexithymia is an important transdiagnostic risk factor for many psychopathologies. To explore its relevance for personality disorders, we examined the association between alexithymia and maladaptive personality traits, as conceptualized within the DSM-5-TR Alternative Model for Personality Disorders (i.e., negative affect, detachment, antagonism, disinhibition, psychoticism). Participants (N = 651) completed a battery of psychometric questionnaires. Regressions revealed that alexithymia facets accounted for a significant 15% of the variance in negative affect, 22% in detachment, 11% in antagonism, 18% in disinhibition, and 25% in psychoticism. Latent profile analysis showed that profiles with more severe personality pathology were generally characterized by more severe levels of alexithymia. Overall, our data highlight that alexithymia is important in understanding personality dysfunction. All facets of alexithymia, across both positive and negative emotions, are linked to each maladaptive personality trait. The assessment and targeting of alexithymia may therefore be of high relevance for the treatment of personality pathology.
{"title":"Alexithymia and Personality Pathology.","authors":"Sabrina Winterstein, Trevor G Mazzucchelli, James J Gross, Robert F Krueger, David A Preece","doi":"10.1521/pedi.2024.38.5.435","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1521/pedi.2024.38.5.435","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Alexithymia is an important transdiagnostic risk factor for many psychopathologies. To explore its relevance for personality disorders, we examined the association between alexithymia and maladaptive personality traits, as conceptualized within the <i>DSM-5-TR</i> Alternative Model for Personality Disorders (i.e., negative affect, detachment, antagonism, disinhibition, psychoticism). Participants (<i>N</i> = 651) completed a battery of psychometric questionnaires. Regressions revealed that alexithymia facets accounted for a significant 15% of the variance in negative affect, 22% in detachment, 11% in antagonism, 18% in disinhibition, and 25% in psychoticism. Latent profile analysis showed that profiles with more severe personality pathology were generally characterized by more severe levels of alexithymia. Overall, our data highlight that alexithymia is important in understanding personality dysfunction. All facets of alexithymia, across both positive and negative emotions, are linked to each maladaptive personality trait. The assessment and targeting of alexithymia may therefore be of high relevance for the treatment of personality pathology.</p>","PeriodicalId":48175,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Personality Disorders","volume":"38 5","pages":"435-454"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142477917","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-10-01DOI: 10.1521/pedi.2024.38.5.455
Chloe Dean, Helen Mildred, Anna Klas, Sathya Rao, Jillian H Broadbear
Borderline personality disorder (BPD) is frequently understood as a diagnosis applicable mainly to women, despite population studies suggesting similar prevalence between men and women. The scarce available information suggests that compared to women, men may face additional gender-related barriers to diagnosis and treatment when attempting to engage with support and treatment for BPD-related difficulties. The current study presents a qualitative in-depth exploration of the help-seeking and diagnosis experiences of four men with BPD. Using Interpretive Phenomenological Analysis, three themes were generated: (1) "There's just no help out there": barriers to treatment; (2) self-understanding and insight; and (3) the importance of emotional and psychological connection with health care professionals and close family and friends. Having a greater understanding of male-specific experiences of BPD could improve the helpseeking journeys of men with BPD through early identification, accurate and timely diagnosis, to relevant and effective treatment and support.
{"title":"A Qualitative Exploration of Help-Seeking and Experiences of Diagnosis Among Men With Borderline Personality Disorder.","authors":"Chloe Dean, Helen Mildred, Anna Klas, Sathya Rao, Jillian H Broadbear","doi":"10.1521/pedi.2024.38.5.455","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1521/pedi.2024.38.5.455","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Borderline personality disorder (BPD) is frequently understood as a diagnosis applicable mainly to women, despite population studies suggesting similar prevalence between men and women. The scarce available information suggests that compared to women, men may face additional gender-related barriers to diagnosis and treatment when attempting to engage with support and treatment for BPD-related difficulties. The current study presents a qualitative in-depth exploration of the help-seeking and diagnosis experiences of four men with BPD. Using Interpretive Phenomenological Analysis, three themes were generated: (1) \"There's just no help out there\": barriers to treatment; (2) self-understanding and insight; and (3) the importance of emotional and psychological connection with health care professionals and close family and friends. Having a greater understanding of male-specific experiences of BPD could improve the helpseeking journeys of men with BPD through early identification, accurate and timely diagnosis, to relevant and effective treatment and support.</p>","PeriodicalId":48175,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Personality Disorders","volume":"38 5","pages":"455-476"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142477916","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-10-01DOI: 10.1521/pedi.2024.38.5.493
Kelly V Huynh, Isabel V Glass, Mary C Zanarini
While research has shown that the prevalence of ADHD in the general population has increased over time, there have been no studies focused on ADHD prevalence in patients with borderline personality disorder (BPD). This study compares two cohorts of adults with rigorously diagnosed BPD recruited nearly three decades apart (1992 vs. 2020). Participants from the 1992 McLean Study of Adult Development (MSAD) (N = 290) and the 2020 Flourishing study (N = 147) were assessed for ADHD using DSM-III-R and DSM-5 criteria respectively. Compared to MSAD subjects, the prevalence of ADHD among Flourishing subjects was significantly higher overall, and in female (but not male) subjects. This increased prevalence, which is likely due to the broadening of the DSM criteria over time, highlights what many observers believe to be a problematic expansion of the diagnostic criteria for ADHD that may have decoupled this criteria set from capturing a neurodevelopmental disorder that typically begins in childhood.
研究表明,随着时间的推移,多动症在普通人群中的患病率在不断上升,但目前还没有针对边缘型人格障碍(BPD)患者多动症患病率的研究。本研究比较了相隔近三十年(1992 年与 2020 年)招募的两组严格诊断为 BPD 的成年人。1992年麦克林成人发展研究(McLean Study of Adult Development,MSAD)的参与者(N = 290)和2020年Flourishing研究的参与者(N = 147)分别采用DSM-III-R和DSM-5标准进行了多动症评估。与 MSAD 受试者相比,Flourishing 受试者的多动症患病率总体上明显较高,女性(而非男性)的患病率也明显较高。这种患病率的增加很可能是由于随着时间的推移,DSM标准的范围不断扩大,这凸显了许多观察家认为ADHD诊断标准的扩大是有问题的,它可能使这套标准与通常始于儿童期的神经发育障碍脱钩。
{"title":"Increasing Prevalence of Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder in Patients With Borderline Personality Disorder.","authors":"Kelly V Huynh, Isabel V Glass, Mary C Zanarini","doi":"10.1521/pedi.2024.38.5.493","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1521/pedi.2024.38.5.493","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>While research has shown that the prevalence of ADHD in the general population has increased over time, there have been no studies focused on ADHD prevalence in patients with borderline personality disorder (BPD). This study compares two cohorts of adults with rigorously diagnosed BPD recruited nearly three decades apart (1992 vs. 2020). Participants from the 1992 McLean Study of Adult Development (MSAD) (<i>N</i> = 290) and the 2020 Flourishing study (<i>N</i> = 147) were assessed for ADHD using <i>DSM-III-R</i> and <i>DSM-5</i> criteria respectively. Compared to MSAD subjects, the prevalence of ADHD among Flourishing subjects was significantly higher overall, and in female (but not male) subjects. This increased prevalence, which is likely due to the broadening of the <i>DSM</i> criteria over time, highlights what many observers believe to be a problematic expansion of the diagnostic criteria for ADHD that may have decoupled this criteria set from capturing a neurodevelopmental disorder that typically begins in childhood.</p>","PeriodicalId":48175,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Personality Disorders","volume":"38 5","pages":"493-502"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142477919","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-10-01DOI: 10.1521/pedi.2024.38.5.477
Simon Hofman, Christina W Slotema
While existing literature suggests that posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) is frequently undetected in routine clinical practice, the detection rate of PTSD in patients with a personality disorder (PD) has not been investigated. This study examined the point prevalence of PTSD and frequency of trauma-focused treatment in 204 outpatients with a PD. Data were derived from electronic patient files. Compared to the mean weighted prevalence of PTSD in the literature, the Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview Plus (MINI-Plus) found lower rates of PTSD for the entire sample (29.2%), but not separately for patients with borderline PD (BPD; 33.3%) and patients with other PDs (26.9%). In addition, PTSD diagnoses following intake were less prevalent for PD patients overall (18.6%), BPD patients (27%), and patients with other PDs (13.8%). The present study provides preliminary evidence that PTSD might be underdiagnosed and consequently unmanaged in PD patients in clinical practice, suggesting that the recognition of PTSD among patients with PD needs improvement.
{"title":"Underdiagnosis of Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Among Outpatients With Personality Disorders in Clinical Practice Despite the Use of a Diagnostic Instrument.","authors":"Simon Hofman, Christina W Slotema","doi":"10.1521/pedi.2024.38.5.477","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1521/pedi.2024.38.5.477","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>While existing literature suggests that posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) is frequently undetected in routine clinical practice, the detection rate of PTSD in patients with a personality disorder (PD) has not been investigated. This study examined the point prevalence of PTSD and frequency of trauma-focused treatment in 204 outpatients with a PD. Data were derived from electronic patient files. Compared to the mean weighted prevalence of PTSD in the literature, the Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview Plus (MINI-Plus) found lower rates of PTSD for the entire sample (29.2%), but not separately for patients with borderline PD (BPD; 33.3%) and patients with other PDs (26.9%). In addition, PTSD diagnoses following intake were less prevalent for PD patients overall (18.6%), BPD patients (27%), and patients with other PDs (13.8%). The present study provides preliminary evidence that PTSD might be underdiagnosed and consequently unmanaged in PD patients in clinical practice, suggesting that the recognition of PTSD among patients with PD needs improvement.</p>","PeriodicalId":48175,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Personality Disorders","volume":"38 5","pages":"477-492"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142477921","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}