Bite force evaluation at maximal intercuspal position: An in vivo comparative study between stainless steel and zirconia crowns on primary molar teeth.

K Maheshkumar, Nagalakshmi Chowdhary, Ramesh Chowdharry, Rajashekar Reddy Vundela, Nithin Kumar Sonnahalli, A Thirumagal Anuraaga
{"title":"Bite force evaluation at maximal intercuspal position: An <i>in vivo</i> comparative study between stainless steel and zirconia crowns on primary molar teeth.","authors":"K Maheshkumar,&nbsp;Nagalakshmi Chowdhary,&nbsp;Ramesh Chowdharry,&nbsp;Rajashekar Reddy Vundela,&nbsp;Nithin Kumar Sonnahalli,&nbsp;A Thirumagal Anuraaga","doi":"10.4103/jisppd.jisppd_156_23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The objective of this study was to clinically evaluate and compare the mean bite force changes at maximum intercuspal position, along with parental satisfaction following full crown restoration using stainless steel crown/zirconia crown on primary molar teeth using digital occlusal analysis system T-Scan III (Tekscan Corp, Boston, Mass., USA).</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Thirty-six primary molars of children aged 6-9 years with pulpal involvement were selected for the study. The selected teeth were allocated to either of the two groups using simple random sampling technique: Group A = stainless steel crowned teeth and Group B = zirconia crowned teeth. The mean bite force was recorded before the placement of the crown, after the placement of the crown, and after 1 month-follow-up. The inter-group and intra-group comparison was done among the groups. After the placement of the crown, parents were asked to fill out a questionnaire for assessing parental satisfaction.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A significant result in the bite force on crowned tooth, vertical dimension was seen from baseline to 1-month follow-up between the SSC and zirconia groups. In the zirconia crown group, the mean bite force was more compared to the stainless steel crown group. Parents' satisfaction was higher with zirconia crown in terms of color and esthetics.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>SSC is more acceptable than zirconia crown since occlusal re-equilibration was attained better in SSC as compared to zirconia crown.</p>","PeriodicalId":35797,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Indian Society of Pedodontics and Preventive Dentistry","volume":"41 2","pages":"89-97"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Indian Society of Pedodontics and Preventive Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jisppd.jisppd_156_23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Dentistry","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The objective of this study was to clinically evaluate and compare the mean bite force changes at maximum intercuspal position, along with parental satisfaction following full crown restoration using stainless steel crown/zirconia crown on primary molar teeth using digital occlusal analysis system T-Scan III (Tekscan Corp, Boston, Mass., USA).

Materials and methods: Thirty-six primary molars of children aged 6-9 years with pulpal involvement were selected for the study. The selected teeth were allocated to either of the two groups using simple random sampling technique: Group A = stainless steel crowned teeth and Group B = zirconia crowned teeth. The mean bite force was recorded before the placement of the crown, after the placement of the crown, and after 1 month-follow-up. The inter-group and intra-group comparison was done among the groups. After the placement of the crown, parents were asked to fill out a questionnaire for assessing parental satisfaction.

Results: A significant result in the bite force on crowned tooth, vertical dimension was seen from baseline to 1-month follow-up between the SSC and zirconia groups. In the zirconia crown group, the mean bite force was more compared to the stainless steel crown group. Parents' satisfaction was higher with zirconia crown in terms of color and esthetics.

Conclusion: SSC is more acceptable than zirconia crown since occlusal re-equilibration was attained better in SSC as compared to zirconia crown.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
最大尖牙间位置的咬合力评估:不锈钢和氧化锆牙冠在乳牙上的体内比较研究。
目的:本研究的目的是临床评估和比较最大尖间位置的平均咬合力变化,以及使用数字咬合分析系统T-Scan III(Tekscan Corp,Boston,Mass.,USA)在乳牙上使用不锈钢冠/氧化锆冠进行全冠修复后父母的满意度。采用简单随机抽样技术将所选牙齿分为两组:A组=不锈钢冠牙,B组=氧化锆冠牙。在放置牙冠之前、放置牙冠之后和1个月随访之后记录平均咬合力。在各组之间进行组间和组内比较。戴上王冠后,父母被要求填写一份问卷,以评估父母的满意度。结果:从基线到随访1个月,SSC组和氧化锆组对冠牙的咬合力、垂直尺寸有显著影响。氧化锆牙冠组的平均咬合力高于不锈钢牙冠组。家长对氧化锆冠在颜色和美观方面的满意度较高。结论:SSC比氧化锆冠更容易接受,因为与氧化锆冠相比,SSC能更好地实现咬合重新平衡。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
54
审稿时长
39 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Indian Society of Pedodontics and Preventive Dentistry (ISSN - 0970-4388) is the official organ of Indian Society of Pedodontics and Preventive Dentistry. The journal publishes original articles and case reports pertaining to pediatric and preventive dentistry.
期刊最新文献
Bite force evaluation at maximal intercuspal position: An in vivo comparative study between stainless steel and zirconia crowns on primary molar teeth. Traumatic dental injuries - The psychological perspective! Determination and correlation of matrix metalloproteases profile and total antioxidant capacity in severe early childhood caries children - A randomized clinical trial. Assessment of changes in Streptococcus pyogenes levels using N-acetylgalactosamine-6-sulfatase marker and pharyngeal airway space with appliance therapy in mouth breathers - An ELISA-based study. Reliability of three pain assessment tools in children requiring dental treatment: A comparative clinical study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1