Preoperative Anemia and Female Gender are Risk Factors for Transfusion in Patients Undergoing Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting with a Restrictive Transfusion Strategy.

Özgen Ilgaz Koçyiğit, Muharrem Koçyiğit, Ahmet Ümit Güllü, Şahin Şenay, Fevzi Toraman, Cem Alhan
{"title":"Preoperative Anemia and Female Gender are Risk Factors for Transfusion in Patients Undergoing Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting with a Restrictive Transfusion Strategy.","authors":"Özgen Ilgaz Koçyiğit,&nbsp;Muharrem Koçyiğit,&nbsp;Ahmet Ümit Güllü,&nbsp;Şahin Şenay,&nbsp;Fevzi Toraman,&nbsp;Cem Alhan","doi":"10.4274/TJAR.2023.22856","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Red blood cell (RBC) transfusion in cardiac surgery is associated with increased morbidity and mortality. Even when using patient blood management methods, blood transfusions may still be needed in cardiac surgery. This study examined the risk factors for blood transfusion in isolated coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery with a restrictive transfusion strategy, along with individualized patient blood management.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We enrolled 198 patients (age, 61.8 ± 9.9 years; 28 females and 170 males) who underwent isolated CABG surgery in a single private hospital using a restrictive transfusion strategy between April 2015 and October 2020. Pre-, intra-, and postoperative parameters were compared between patients with and without RBC transfusions. The risk factors for transfusion and transfusion probability were analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Patients who received RBC transfusions had higher European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation values (13.60 ± 18.27%). Preoperative hematocrit (Hct) [odds ratio (OR)=0.752; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.639-0.884; <i>P</i>=0.001] and female gender (OR=7.874; 95% CI 1.678-36.950; <i>P</i>=0.009) were significant independent risk factors for RBC transfusion in logistic regression analysis. When the preoperative Hct was 30%, the RBC transfusion probability was 61.08% in females and 16.6% in males. Patients who received RBC transfusions had longer intensive care unit (31.40 ± 25.42 hours) and hospital (11.18 ± 6.75 days) stays.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Risk factors for RBC transfusion in isolated CABG surgery with a restrictive blood transfusion strategy were preoperative anemia and female gender.</p>","PeriodicalId":23353,"journal":{"name":"Turkish journal of anaesthesiology and reanimation","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Turkish journal of anaesthesiology and reanimation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4274/TJAR.2023.22856","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Red blood cell (RBC) transfusion in cardiac surgery is associated with increased morbidity and mortality. Even when using patient blood management methods, blood transfusions may still be needed in cardiac surgery. This study examined the risk factors for blood transfusion in isolated coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery with a restrictive transfusion strategy, along with individualized patient blood management.

Methods: We enrolled 198 patients (age, 61.8 ± 9.9 years; 28 females and 170 males) who underwent isolated CABG surgery in a single private hospital using a restrictive transfusion strategy between April 2015 and October 2020. Pre-, intra-, and postoperative parameters were compared between patients with and without RBC transfusions. The risk factors for transfusion and transfusion probability were analyzed.

Results: Patients who received RBC transfusions had higher European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation values (13.60 ± 18.27%). Preoperative hematocrit (Hct) [odds ratio (OR)=0.752; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.639-0.884; P=0.001] and female gender (OR=7.874; 95% CI 1.678-36.950; P=0.009) were significant independent risk factors for RBC transfusion in logistic regression analysis. When the preoperative Hct was 30%, the RBC transfusion probability was 61.08% in females and 16.6% in males. Patients who received RBC transfusions had longer intensive care unit (31.40 ± 25.42 hours) and hospital (11.18 ± 6.75 days) stays.

Conclusion: Risk factors for RBC transfusion in isolated CABG surgery with a restrictive blood transfusion strategy were preoperative anemia and female gender.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
术前贫血和女性性别是冠状动脉旁路移植术患者输血的危险因素。
目的:心脏手术中红细胞(RBC)输注与发病率和死亡率增加有关。即使采用患者血液管理方法,心脏手术仍可能需要输血。本研究考察了孤立冠状动脉旁路移植(CABG)手术中限制输血策略以及个体化患者血液管理的输血危险因素。方法:纳入198例患者(年龄:61.8±9.9岁;2015年4月至2020年10月期间,28名女性和170名男性在一家私立医院采用限制性输血策略接受了孤立的CABG手术。比较输注和未输注红细胞的患者的术前、术中和术后参数。分析输血危险因素及输血概率。结果:接受红细胞输注的患者具有较高的欧洲心脏手术风险评价系统(13.60±18.27%)。术前红细胞压积(Hct)[优势比(OR)=0.752;95%置信区间(CI) 0.639 ~ 0.884;P=0.001]和女性(OR=7.874;95% ci 1.678-36.950;P=0.009)为输血的独立危险因素。术前Hct为30%时,女性输血概率为61.08%,男性为16.6%。接受红细胞输注的患者在重症监护病房(31.40±25.42小时)和医院(11.18±6.75天)的住院时间更长。结论:术前贫血和女性是孤立性冠状动脉搭桥手术限制性输血的危险因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Cesarean Sections Under Spinal Anaesthesia: Comparison of Varying Doses of Dexmedetomidine Combined with 0.75% Hyperbaric Ropivacaine: A Double-Blind Randomized Trial. Comparative Efficacy of Intraoperative Patient State Index vs. Bi-Spectral Index in Patients Undergoing Elective Spine Surgery with Neuromonitoring Under General Anaesthesia: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Comparison of Tracheal Intubation Using the Air-Q ILA and LMA Blockbuster Among Adults Undergoing Elective Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Evaluation of Operating Room Staff Awareness of Environmental Sustainability and Medical Waste Management. Exploring Heart Rate Variability Biofeedback as a Nonpharmacological Intervention for Enhancing Perioperative Care: A Narrative Review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1