Turkish journal of anaesthesiology and reanimation最新文献

Primary intratracheal masses causing luminal obstruction are relatively rare, posing a challenge for anaesthesiologists in airway management. This case report describes a distinctive airway management approach in a 71-year-old female patient with an aorta-carotid artery bypass graft that significantly obstructed the trachea. The patient presented with worsening shortness of breath, and a thoracic computed tomography scan revealed a 19.2 mm×9.9 mm×19.3 contrast-enhancing mass penetrating the right anterolateral tracheal wall, resulting in 80% occlusion of the tracheal lumen. Awake fiberoptic bronchoscopy (FOB)-guided nasotracheal intubation was performed following topical upper airway anaesthesia, with the patient positioned at a 30º head-up angle and slight right-up tilt to minimize discomfort. A 6.0 mm ID cuffed endotracheal tube was successfully placed under fiberoptic guidance distal to the intratracheal vascular graft but proximal to the carina. Intratracheal masses can lead to severe tracheal obstruction followed by progressive airway obstruction, which can be life-threatening when effective ventilation cannot be established after the induction of general anaesthesia. We recommend the use of awake FOB-guided intubation in such cases. Additionally, contingency plans should be prepared and meticulously prepared in the event of intubation or ventilation failure.

Objective: The primary aim of this study was to investigate the guidance effect of the bispectral index (BIS) on the target plasma concentration (TPC) of propofol required for deep sedation during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). Second, to identify propofol consumption, recovery time, and adverse events.

Methods: A total of 42 consecutive patients with liver cirrhosis and 43 consecutive patients with healthy livers were enrolled. Propofol was administered via a target control infusion (TCI) syringe pump (Marsh Model) at BIS 60-70. Patients were not intubated, were placed in the prone position, and underwent spontaneous breathing. Propofol TPCs (μg mL^-1) and BIS values were recorded at T0 (baseline), T1 (5 min after induction), T2 (5 min into ERCP), T3 (15 min), T4 (30 min), and T5 (recovery).

Results: TPCs and propofol consumption were lower in patients with cirrhosis than in those without cirrhosis (T4: 2.7±0.5 vs. 3.3±0.4 μg mL^-1), P=0.001, and 270.4±6.9 mg vs. 390.8±13.4 mg, P=0.001), respectively. Patients with cirrhosis required more time to recover (8.5±2 vs. 6.2±0.9 min, P=0.001), despite comparable ERCP durations (31.1±11.1 vs. 34±12.5 min, P=0.28). A significant decline in TPC values among patients with cirrhosis with time (T1: 3.3±0.3, T2: 3.1±0.3, T3: 2.9±0.4, T4: 2.7±0.5 μg mL^-1, P=0.001), indicating a cumulative effect. One patient with cirrhosis required bag-mask ventilation, while three patients without cirrhosis were converted to general anaesthesia.

Conclusion: Combining the TCI Marsh pharmacokinetic model with BIS monitoring lowered the TPC levels required for deep sedation in patients with cirrhosis compared with healthy patients and allowed for individual variations. The prone position in deeply sedated and non-intubated spontaneous breathing patients is not without the risk of hypoxia.

Objective: This study functional endoscopic sinus surgery (FESS) is a surgical procedure requiring minimal bleeding to optimize the surgical field. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of magnesium sulfate, lignocaine, and propofol in attenuating hemodynamic response. The primary objective of this study was to compare the efficacy of these agents in reducing hemodynamic response. The secondary objectives included assessing the quality of the surgical field, recovery time, and total neuromuscular dose.

Methods: We randomly allocated 105 patients scheduled for FESS into three groups: lignocaine, propofol, and magnesium sulfate. Heart rate and mean arterial pressure were recorded every 5 min for the first 30 min, followed by measurements every 10 min at the end of the procedure. Moreover, recovery time, total neuromuscular blocking dose, and surgical field score were noted upon completion of the procedure. Statistical analysis was conducted using the number cruncher statistical systems version 9.0.8 software.

Results: All three groups showed comparable hemodynamic response and surgical field scores. The recovery time was notably longer in the magnesium sulfate group [10.94 min (2.45)] than in the lignocaine [4.37 min (1.03)] [95% confidence interval (CI) -7.32, -5.83; P=0.000] and propofol groups [4.60 min (0.60)] (95% CI 5.60, 7.095; P=0.000). Moreover, the total neuromuscular blocking agent used was significantly lower in the magnesium sulfate group [5.89 mg (0.47)] than in the lignocaine [6.26 mg (0.56)] (95% CI 0.66, 0.03; P=0.035).

Conclusion: Propofol, magnesium sulfate, and lignocaine exerted equal efficacy in attenuating hemodynamic responses during surgery and ensuring a satisfactory surgical field. However, magnesium sulfate led to significantly longer recovery times compared with propofol and lignocaine. In addition, magnesium sulfate required a significantly lower total dose of neuromuscular blocking agents than lignocaine.

The enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) pathway is a perioperative care pathway intended to facilitate early recovery and minimize hospital stays among patients undergoing major surgery. Critical factors for successful ERAS implementation, which may vary depending on care processes, include a multidisciplinary team, organizational commitment to change, and a real-time system for compliance and outcome audits. As most clinicians and health organizations can attest, incorporating and implementing new evidence-based practice changes almost always involves overcoming systemic challenges and obstacles. The same holds true for ERAS programs. The main barriers to ERAS protocol implementation have been resistance to change, lack of time and resources, and inadequate communication and coordination among departments. According to evidence-based ERAS guidelines, the best way to efficiently implement all recommendations into practice is to discover. Implementation science aims to identify and address care gaps, support change in practice, and enhance healthcare quality. Implementation research should also build a robust and generalizable evidence base to inform implementation practice. Most implementation investigations focus on one of two approaches to achieving change. Implementation can progress through top-down or bottom-up processes depending on factors such as national policies, organizational properties, or the implementation culture of society, especially for health issues. Although the ERAS guidelines are based on evidence-based knowledge, only a limited number of health centers around the world have officially been able to implement them. The purpose of this review is to analyze the implementation of the ERAS pathways in theory and practice in Turkey, considering the absence of an ERAS-qualified center in Turkey.

Objective: This prospective, double-blind, randomized study aimed to compare the effects of dexmedetomidine and fentanyl on the latency and amplitude of transcranial motor evoked potentials (TcMEPs) under propofol-based total intravenous anaesthesia (TIVA) in spine surgery. Secondarily, intraoperative hemodynamics, total propofol consumption, recovery profile, and surgical field quality were compared.

Methods: TcMEP amplitude and latency recordings of bilateral abductor pollicis brevis and abductor hallucis muscles posted for elective lumbar spine surgery under TcMEP monitoring randomly divided into two study groups. Throughout the surgery, TIVA was administered using intravenous propofol (100-150 μg kg^-1 min^-1) and dexmedetomidine (0.5-0.7 μg kg^-1 h^-1) in group D and intravenous propofol (100-150 μg kg^-1 min^-1) and fentanyl (1 μg kg^-1 h^-1) in group F. TcMEPs were recorded at various time points during the surgery. Immediately after extubation recovery from anaesthesia was noted. Additionally, hemodynamic parameters, total propofol consumption, and surgical field quality were assessed.

Results: Latency and amplitude were comparable between the groups. Time to extubation was significantly longer in group D, but the mean (standard deviation) duration of stay in recovery was shorter in group D [47.55 (7.51) 95% confidence interval (CI) (44.863-50.237)] (P=0.046). Total propofol consumption was reduced in group D [220 (38) 95% CI (206.402-233.598)] (P=0.025) and surgical field condition was better in group D.

Conclusions: Dexmedetomidine and fentanyl do not have any effect on TcMEP amplitude and latency. However, dexmedetomidine provides the additional advantage of reduced total propofol consumption, shorter stay in recovery, and better surgical field quality.

Objective: The primary aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of 5 μg, 7.5 μg, and 10 μg doses of dexmedetomidine added to hyperbaric 0.75% ropivacaine on the duration of analgesia during cesarean section. Furthermore, the onset of sensory and motor block, hemodynamics, sedation, and adverse effects were investigated.

Methods: A total of 120 full-term parturients scheduled for cesarean section under spinal anaesthesia were randomized into three groups. Group RD5 received intrathecal hyperbaric 0.75% ropivacaine 15 mg (2 mL) plus dexmedetomidine 5 μg (0.5 mL), group RD7.5 received intrathecal hyperbaric 0.75% ropivacaine 15 mg (2 mL) plus dexmedetomidine 7.5 μg (0.5 mL), and group RD10 received intrathecal hyperbaric 0.75% ropivacaine 15 mg (2 mL) plus dexmedetomidine 10 μg (0.5 mL). Sensorimotor blockade characteristics, analgesia duration, hemodynamic variables, and adverse events were documented. Student's t-test and the chi-square test were used for data analysis.

Results: In groups RD5, RD7.5, and RD10, the onset of sensory block was 2.96±1.32 min, 2.26±1.50 min, and 1.96±0.93 min, respectively, while the onset of motor block was 9.63±0.11 min, 8.63±0.58 min, and 6.40±0.14 min, respectively. The duration of analgesia was significantly prolonged in group RD10 compared with groups RD7.5 and RD5 (483.43±76.21 vs. 398.74±73.59 vs. 362.58±79.87 min, respectively, P=0.001). Group RD10 also exhibited significantly higher incidences of sedation, bradycardia, and vomiting.

Conclusion: We conclude that increasing dexmedetomidine doses decreases the onset of sensory and motor blockade while prolonging analgesia duration in a dose-dependent manner.

Objective: This study aims to identify the obstacles to recycling and environmental sustainability habits in a university hospital's operating room (OR) environment in Turkey and lay the groundwork for potential solutions.

Methods: A questionnaire was used to measure current views among the 140 OR staff members aged 20-54 years. The survey assessed awareness and behaviors of recycling at home and in the OR, as well as awareness of environmentally safe anaesthesia practices.

Results: Half of the participants believed that ORs significantly affected their carbon footprint, and most agreed that these environmental effects could be reduced. The primary barriers to recycling were inadequate knowledge, negative staff attitudes and insufficient services. Notably, 76% of participants paid attention to segregating OR waste, yet many lacked formal education about the environmental impact of their practices. Approximately 89% agreed that the environmental effects of ORs could be further reduced, with education being a critical need.

Conclusion: The healthcare sector's contribution to carbon emissions and waste production is significant, especially in ORs. The lack of education regarding ecological implications is concerning. Implementing standardized training programs and enhancing recycling services can substantially reduce the environmental impact of ORs, highlighting the need for a more sustainable healthcare system.

Objective: Various electroencephalogram-based monitors have been introduced to objectively quantify anaesthesia depth. However, limited data are available on their comparative clinical efficacy in various surgical procedures. Therefore, we planned this study to compare the relative efficacy of patient state index (PSI) vs. Bi-spectral index (BIS) assessment in patients undergoing elective spine surgery under general anaesthesia.

Methods: This prospective, parallel-group, single-center study included patients undergoing major spine surgery with neuromonitoring. Patients were randomized into two groups, i.e., group B (undergoing surgery under BIS monitoring) and group P (undergoing surgery under PSI monitoring). The primary objective was to compare the time to eye opening after stopping anaesthetic drug infusions.

Results: The mean propofol dose required for induction in group B was 130.45±26.579, whereas that in group P, it was 139.28±17.86 (P value 0.085). The maintenance doses of propofol and fentanyl required for surgery were also comparable between the groups. Time to eye opening was 12.2±4.973 in group B and 12.93±4.19 in group P, with a P value of 0.2664 (U-statistic-684.50).

Conclusion: The intraoperative PSI and BIS had similar clinical efficacy in terms of the dose of propofol required for induction, time of induction, maintenance dose of propofol and fentanyl, time of eye opening, and recovery profile in patients undergoing elective spine surgery under neuromonitoring.

Heart rate variability biofeedback (HRVBF) is a non-invasive therapeutic technique that aims to regulate variability in heart rate. This intervention has promise in mitigating perioperative stress, a critical factor for surgical patient outcomes. This comprehensive review aimed to explore the current evidence on the perioperative role of HRV biofeedback in improving patient outcomes, reducing perioperative stress, enhancing recovery, and optimizing anaesthesia management. A review of the PubMed and Google Scholar databases was conducted to identify articles focused on HRVBF in relation to the perioperative period. Studies were selected using appropriate keywords in English (MeSH). Ample potential applications of HRVBF in clinical anaesthesia have been identified and proven feasible. It is a non-invasive and an easy method an anaesthesiologists has at its disposal with potential utility in reducing perioperative stress, as a tool of optimization of comorbidities, analgesia supplementation and in predicting catastrophic complications. Although HRVBF has the potential to enhance anaesthesia management and improve patient outcomes, several limitations and challenges must be addressed to maximize its clinical utility. Overcoming these obstacles through research and technological advancements will be crucial for realizing the full benefits of HRVBF in perioperative care.