Effects of cortical distance on the Ebbinghaus and Delboeuf illusions.

IF 1.6 4区 心理学 Q3 OPHTHALMOLOGY Perception Pub Date : 2023-07-01 DOI:10.1177/03010066231175014
Poutasi W B Urale, Dietrich Samuel Schwarzkopf
{"title":"Effects of cortical distance on the Ebbinghaus and Delboeuf illusions.","authors":"Poutasi W B Urale,&nbsp;Dietrich Samuel Schwarzkopf","doi":"10.1177/03010066231175014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The Ebbinghaus and Delboeuf illusions affect the perceived size of a target circle depending on the size and proximity of circular inducers or a ring. Converging evidence suggests that these illusions are driven by interactions between contours mediated by their cortical distance in primary visual cortex. We tested the effect of cortical distance on these illusions using two methods: First, we manipulated retinal distance between target and inducers in a two-interval forced choice design, finding that targets appeared larger with a closer surround. Next, we predicted that targets presented peripherally should appear larger due to cortical magnification. Hence, we tested the illusion strength when positioning the stimuli at various eccentricities, with results supporting this hypothesis. We calculated estimated cortical distances between illusion elements in each experiment and used these estimates to compare the relationship between cortical distance and illusion strength across our experiments. In a final experiment, we modified the Delboeuf illusion to test whether the influence of the inducers/annuli in this illusion is influenced by an inhibitory surround. We found evidence that an additional outer ring makes targets appear smaller compared to a single-ring condition, suggesting that near and distal contours have antagonistic effects on perceived target size.</p>","PeriodicalId":49708,"journal":{"name":"Perception","volume":"52 7","pages":"459-483"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10291393/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Perception","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/03010066231175014","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The Ebbinghaus and Delboeuf illusions affect the perceived size of a target circle depending on the size and proximity of circular inducers or a ring. Converging evidence suggests that these illusions are driven by interactions between contours mediated by their cortical distance in primary visual cortex. We tested the effect of cortical distance on these illusions using two methods: First, we manipulated retinal distance between target and inducers in a two-interval forced choice design, finding that targets appeared larger with a closer surround. Next, we predicted that targets presented peripherally should appear larger due to cortical magnification. Hence, we tested the illusion strength when positioning the stimuli at various eccentricities, with results supporting this hypothesis. We calculated estimated cortical distances between illusion elements in each experiment and used these estimates to compare the relationship between cortical distance and illusion strength across our experiments. In a final experiment, we modified the Delboeuf illusion to test whether the influence of the inducers/annuli in this illusion is influenced by an inhibitory surround. We found evidence that an additional outer ring makes targets appear smaller compared to a single-ring condition, suggesting that near and distal contours have antagonistic effects on perceived target size.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
皮层距离对艾宾浩斯错觉和德尔博夫错觉的影响。
艾宾浩斯和德尔伯夫错觉会影响目标圆的感知大小,这取决于圆形诱导器或环的大小和邻近程度。越来越多的证据表明,这些错觉是由初级视觉皮层皮层距离介导的轮廓之间的相互作用驱动的。我们用两种方法测试了皮质距离对这些错觉的影响:首先,我们在两个间隔的强迫选择设计中操纵目标和诱导物之间的视网膜距离,发现目标在更近的环境中显得更大。接下来,我们预测由于皮质放大,外周呈现的靶标应该显得更大。因此,我们测试了在不同的偏心位置放置刺激时的错觉强度,结果支持了这一假设。我们计算了每个实验中错觉元素之间的估计皮质距离,并使用这些估计来比较我们实验中皮质距离和错觉强度之间的关系。在最后的实验中,我们修改了Delboeuf错觉,以测试在这种错觉中诱导剂/环空的影响是否受到抑制环绕的影响。我们发现有证据表明,与单环条件相比,额外的外环使目标看起来更小,这表明近端和远端轮廓对感知目标尺寸具有拮抗作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Perception
Perception 医学-心理学
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
5.90%
发文量
74
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Perception is a traditional print journal covering all areas of the perceptual sciences, but with a strong historical emphasis on perceptual illusions. Perception is a subscription journal, free for authors to publish their research as a Standard Article, Short Report or Short & Sweet. The journal also publishes Editorials and Book Reviews.
期刊最新文献
Re-examining our evolutionary propensities toward snakes: Insights from children's inattentional blindness. Face to face: Comparing ChatGPT with human performance on face matching. The overestimation of gaze for horizontal, vertical, and diagonal fixation points. Crossmodal to unimodal transfer of temporal perceptual learning. The Ames room and the misunderstood versions and depictions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1