Lessons from the Women and Gender Constituency: Interrogating Civil Society Strategies for Organising in the UNFCCC.

Joanna Flavell
{"title":"Lessons from the Women and Gender Constituency: Interrogating Civil Society Strategies for Organising in the UNFCCC.","authors":"Joanna Flavell","doi":"10.1007/s10767-023-09448-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>While scholarship on the topic of gender and the environment is steadily growing, little is known about the challenges faced and successes seen by women and gender NGOs operating as a central part of environment-focused civil society. In this paper, I offer such an analysis, examining the political strategies-rhetorical and procedural-mobilised by the Women and Gender Constituency (WGC) in the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC). I argue that the WGC has seen lots of success in mobilising arguments that foreground women's vulnerability to the effects of climate change. But at the same time, the constituency has seen far more resistance to more intersectional feminist arguments that interrogate the role of masculinised discursive power in shaping climate politics. This is at least in part a result of a wider structure of civil society that pigeonholes different identities (e.g. gender, youth, indigenous peoples) in a way that separates their deeply interconnected struggles. Understanding this structural barrier, or dark side of civil society, is crucial to envisioning a more fruitful integration of civil society in sustainability politics.</p>","PeriodicalId":45635,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Politics Culture and Society","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10078084/pdf/","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Politics Culture and Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10767-023-09448-z","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

While scholarship on the topic of gender and the environment is steadily growing, little is known about the challenges faced and successes seen by women and gender NGOs operating as a central part of environment-focused civil society. In this paper, I offer such an analysis, examining the political strategies-rhetorical and procedural-mobilised by the Women and Gender Constituency (WGC) in the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC). I argue that the WGC has seen lots of success in mobilising arguments that foreground women's vulnerability to the effects of climate change. But at the same time, the constituency has seen far more resistance to more intersectional feminist arguments that interrogate the role of masculinised discursive power in shaping climate politics. This is at least in part a result of a wider structure of civil society that pigeonholes different identities (e.g. gender, youth, indigenous peoples) in a way that separates their deeply interconnected struggles. Understanding this structural barrier, or dark side of civil society, is crucial to envisioning a more fruitful integration of civil society in sustainability politics.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
妇女和性别群体的经验教训:询问民间社会组织《气候公约》的战略。
尽管关于性别与环境问题的学术研究正在稳步增长,但人们对妇女和性别问题非政府组织作为注重环境的民间社会的核心部分所面临的挑战和取得的成功知之甚少。在这篇论文中,我提供了这样一个分析,考察了妇女和性别群体在《联合国气候变化框架公约》(UNFCCC)中动员的政治策略——修辞和程序。我认为,工作组在动员关于女性易受气候变化影响的论点方面取得了很大成功。但与此同时,该选区对更具交叉性的女权主义论点的抵制要大得多,这些论点质疑男性化的话语权在塑造气候政治中的作用。这至少在一定程度上是民间社会更广泛结构的结果,这种结构将不同的身份(如性别、青年、土著人民)划分开来,将他们之间相互关联的斗争分开。了解这一结构性障碍,或民间社会的黑暗面,对于设想民间社会更富有成效地融入可持续性政治至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
21
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Politics, Culture, and Society welcomes original articles on issues arising at the intersection of nations, states, civil societies, and global institutions and processes. The editors are particularly interested in article manuscripts dealing with changing patterns in world economic and political institutions; analysis of ethnic groups, social classes, religions, personal networks, and special interests; changes in mass culture, propaganda, and technologies of communication and their social effects; and the impact of social transformations on the changing order of public and private life. The journal is interdisciplinary in orientation and international in scope, and is not tethered to particular theoretical or research traditions. The journal presents material of varying length, from research notes to article-length monographs.
期刊最新文献
Critical Theory and Climate Change: Collective Subjectivity, Evolution and Modernity Prisons of Poverty and Politics: How Russian Human Rights Workers Embed Themselves in Middle Class Social Movements Masculinity, Citizenship, and Demography: the Rise of Populism Culture of Meritocracy, Political Hegemony, and Singapore’s Development Authorial Power, Authoritarianism, and Exiled Intellectuals: Syria and Turkey
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1