The Effects of the COVID-19-induced Lockdown on the Social Capital and Cultural Capital in Italy.

IF 2.8 2区 社会学 Q1 SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY Social Indicators Research Pub Date : 2023-06-01 DOI:10.1007/s11205-023-03140-7
Elisa Menardo, Marta Viola, Alice Bacherini, Luana Angelini, Roberto Cubelli, Giulia Balboni
{"title":"The Effects of the COVID-19-induced Lockdown on the Social Capital and Cultural Capital in Italy.","authors":"Elisa Menardo,&nbsp;Marta Viola,&nbsp;Alice Bacherini,&nbsp;Luana Angelini,&nbsp;Roberto Cubelli,&nbsp;Giulia Balboni","doi":"10.1007/s11205-023-03140-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The present study investigated the effects of the first COVID-19 lockdown on the Cultural and Social Capitals in Italy in a large group of adults (<i>n</i> = 1125). The relationships between the COVID-19 spread and participants' Cultural Capital, Social Capital, educational level, occupational prestige, and age were studied using structural equation models. For women but not for men, pandemic spread was positively affected by occupational prestige and it had a positive relationship with their Social Capital (women: CFI = 0.949; RMSEA = 0.059 [CI = 0.045-0.075]; men: CFI = 0.959; RMSEA = 0.064 [CI = 0.039-0.087]). Moreover, the participants were divided into three validated clusters based on their Cultural and Social Capitals levels to investigate changes in the Capitals compared with the pre-lockdown period. It was found that the lockdown contributed to improving the gap among individuals increasing high levels and decreasing low levels of both the Capitals. People with high Cultural and Social Capitals seemed to have seized the opportunity given by COVID-19 restrictions to cultivate their cultural interests and become more involved within their networks. In contrast, individuals with low Cultural and Social Capitals paid the highest price for the social isolation. Given that the Capitals encourage healthy behavior and influence well-being and mental health, institutions should develop or improve their policies and practices to foster individual resources, and make fairer opportunities available during the pandemic.</p><p><strong>Supplementary information: </strong>The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11205-023-03140-7.</p>","PeriodicalId":21943,"journal":{"name":"Social Indicators Research","volume":" ","pages":"1-22"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10234587/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Social Indicators Research","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-023-03140-7","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The present study investigated the effects of the first COVID-19 lockdown on the Cultural and Social Capitals in Italy in a large group of adults (n = 1125). The relationships between the COVID-19 spread and participants' Cultural Capital, Social Capital, educational level, occupational prestige, and age were studied using structural equation models. For women but not for men, pandemic spread was positively affected by occupational prestige and it had a positive relationship with their Social Capital (women: CFI = 0.949; RMSEA = 0.059 [CI = 0.045-0.075]; men: CFI = 0.959; RMSEA = 0.064 [CI = 0.039-0.087]). Moreover, the participants were divided into three validated clusters based on their Cultural and Social Capitals levels to investigate changes in the Capitals compared with the pre-lockdown period. It was found that the lockdown contributed to improving the gap among individuals increasing high levels and decreasing low levels of both the Capitals. People with high Cultural and Social Capitals seemed to have seized the opportunity given by COVID-19 restrictions to cultivate their cultural interests and become more involved within their networks. In contrast, individuals with low Cultural and Social Capitals paid the highest price for the social isolation. Given that the Capitals encourage healthy behavior and influence well-being and mental health, institutions should develop or improve their policies and practices to foster individual resources, and make fairer opportunities available during the pandemic.

Supplementary information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11205-023-03140-7.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
新冠疫情引发的封锁对意大利社会资本和文化资本的影响。
本研究调查了第一次新冠肺炎封锁对意大利一大群成年人的文化和社会资本的影响(n = 1125)。使用结构方程模型研究了新冠肺炎传播与参与者的文化资本、社会资本、教育水平、职业声望和年龄之间的关系。对于女性而非男性,疫情传播受到职业声望的积极影响,并与她们的社会资本呈正相关(女性:CFI = 0.949;RMSEA = 0.059[CI = 0.045-0.075];男性:CFI = 0.959;RMSEA = 0.064[CI = 0.039-0.087])。此外,参与者根据其文化和社会资本水平被分为三个经过验证的集群,以调查与封锁前相比资本的变化。研究发现,封锁有助于改善两个首都的高水平和低水平之间的差距。具有较高文化和社会资本的人似乎抓住了新冠肺炎限制措施带来的机会,培养了他们的文化兴趣,并更多地参与了他们的网络。相比之下,文化和社会资本较低的个人为社会孤立付出了最高的代价。鉴于首都鼓励健康行为,影响福祉和心理健康,各机构应制定或改进其政策和做法,以培养个人资源,并在疫情期间提供更公平的机会。补充信息:在线版本包含补充材料,可访问10.1007/11205-023-03140-7。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
6.50%
发文量
174
期刊介绍: Since its foundation in 1974, Social Indicators Research has become the leading journal on problems related to the measurement of all aspects of the quality of life. The journal continues to publish results of research on all aspects of the quality of life and includes studies that reflect developments in the field. It devotes special attention to studies on such topics as sustainability of quality of life, sustainable development, and the relationship between quality of life and sustainability. The topics represented in the journal cover and involve a variety of segmentations, such as social groups, spatial and temporal coordinates, population composition, and life domains. The journal presents empirical, philosophical and methodological studies that cover the entire spectrum of society and are devoted to giving evidences through indicators. It considers indicators in their different typologies, and gives special attention to indicators that are able to meet the need of understanding social realities and phenomena that are increasingly more complex, interrelated, interacted and dynamical. In addition, it presents studies aimed at defining new approaches in constructing indicators.
期刊最新文献
Economic Growth and Human Well-being in India: Evidence through adjusted GDP measure Challenges for Inclusive Organizational Behavior (IOB) in Terms of Supporting the Employment of People with Disabilities by Enhancing Remote Working A European Unemployment Benefit to Protect Atypical Workers? Evaluation for the Development of Urban Agglomeration Integration: A Case Study of Pearl River Delta From the Referential Pattern of Universal Values (RPUV) to a new Index of Human Development (HDI)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1