Classification of Histopathological Images from Breast Cancer Patients Using Deep Learning: A Comparative Analysis.

Louie Antony Thalakottor, Rudresh Deepak Shirwaikar, Pavan Teja Pothamsetti, Lincy Meera Mathews
{"title":"Classification of Histopathological Images from Breast Cancer Patients Using Deep Learning: A Comparative Analysis.","authors":"Louie Antony Thalakottor,&nbsp;Rudresh Deepak Shirwaikar,&nbsp;Pavan Teja Pothamsetti,&nbsp;Lincy Meera Mathews","doi":"10.1615/CritRevBiomedEng.2023047793","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Cancer, a leading cause of mortality, is distinguished by the multi-stage conversion of healthy cells into cancer cells. Discovery of the disease early can significantly enhance the possibility of survival. Histology is a procedure where the tissue of interest is first surgically removed from a patient and cut into thin slices. A pathologist will then mount these slices on glass slides, stain them with specialized dyes like hematoxylin and eosin (H&E), and then inspect the slides under a microscope. Unfortunately, a manual analysis of histopathology images during breast cancer biopsy is time consuming. Literature suggests that automated techniques based on deep learning algorithms with artificial intelligence can be used to increase the speed and accuracy of detection of abnormalities within the histopathological specimens obtained from breast cancer patients. This paper highlights some recent work on such algorithms, a comparative study on various deep learning methods is provided. For the present study the breast cancer histopathological database (BreakHis) is used. These images are processed to enhance the inherent features, classified and an evaluation is carried out regarding the accuracy of the algorithm. Three convolutional neural network (CNN) models, visual geometry group (VGG19), densely connected convolutional networks (DenseNet201), and residual neural network (ResNet50V2), were employed while analyzing the images. Of these the DenseNet201 model performed better than other models and attained an accuracy of 91.3%. The paper includes a review of different classification techniques based on machine learning methods including CNN-based models and some of which may replace manual breast cancer diagnosis and detection.</p>","PeriodicalId":53679,"journal":{"name":"Critical Reviews in Biomedical Engineering","volume":"51 4","pages":"41-62"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Critical Reviews in Biomedical Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1615/CritRevBiomedEng.2023047793","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Engineering","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Cancer, a leading cause of mortality, is distinguished by the multi-stage conversion of healthy cells into cancer cells. Discovery of the disease early can significantly enhance the possibility of survival. Histology is a procedure where the tissue of interest is first surgically removed from a patient and cut into thin slices. A pathologist will then mount these slices on glass slides, stain them with specialized dyes like hematoxylin and eosin (H&E), and then inspect the slides under a microscope. Unfortunately, a manual analysis of histopathology images during breast cancer biopsy is time consuming. Literature suggests that automated techniques based on deep learning algorithms with artificial intelligence can be used to increase the speed and accuracy of detection of abnormalities within the histopathological specimens obtained from breast cancer patients. This paper highlights some recent work on such algorithms, a comparative study on various deep learning methods is provided. For the present study the breast cancer histopathological database (BreakHis) is used. These images are processed to enhance the inherent features, classified and an evaluation is carried out regarding the accuracy of the algorithm. Three convolutional neural network (CNN) models, visual geometry group (VGG19), densely connected convolutional networks (DenseNet201), and residual neural network (ResNet50V2), were employed while analyzing the images. Of these the DenseNet201 model performed better than other models and attained an accuracy of 91.3%. The paper includes a review of different classification techniques based on machine learning methods including CNN-based models and some of which may replace manual breast cancer diagnosis and detection.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
使用深度学习对乳腺癌患者的组织病理图像进行分类:比较分析。
癌症是导致死亡的主要原因,其特点是健康细胞向癌细胞的多阶段转化。早期发现疾病可以显著提高生存的可能性。组织学是一种首先从患者身上切除感兴趣的组织并切成薄片的过程。病理学家将这些切片放在载玻片上,用苏木精和伊红(H&E)等特殊染料染色,然后在显微镜下检查载玻片。不幸的是,在乳腺癌活检过程中对组织病理学图像进行人工分析是非常耗时的。文献表明,基于人工智能的深度学习算法的自动化技术可用于提高从乳腺癌患者获得的组织病理标本中检测异常的速度和准确性。本文重点介绍了这些算法的一些最新工作,并对各种深度学习方法进行了比较研究。本研究使用了乳腺癌组织病理学数据库(BreakHis)。对这些图像进行处理,增强其固有特征,对其进行分类,并对算法的准确性进行评价。图像分析采用了视觉几何组(VGG19)、密集连接卷积网络(DenseNet201)和残差神经网络(ResNet50V2)三种卷积神经网络(CNN)模型。其中,DenseNet201模型表现优于其他模型,达到91.3%的准确率。本文回顾了基于机器学习方法的不同分类技术,包括基于cnn的模型,其中一些可能取代人工乳腺癌诊断和检测。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Critical Reviews in Biomedical Engineering
Critical Reviews in Biomedical Engineering Engineering-Biomedical Engineering
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
25
期刊介绍: Biomedical engineering has been characterized as the application of concepts drawn from engineering, computing, communications, mathematics, and the physical sciences to scientific and applied problems in the field of medicine and biology. Concepts and methodologies in biomedical engineering extend throughout the medical and biological sciences. This journal attempts to critically review a wide range of research and applied activities in the field. More often than not, topics chosen for inclusion are concerned with research and practice issues of current interest. Experts writing each review bring together current knowledge and historical information that has led to the current state-of-the-art.
期刊最新文献
A Review on Implantable Neuroelectrodes. Using Fuzzy Mathematical Model in the Differential Diagnosis of Pancreatic Lesions Using Ultrasonography and Echographic Texture Analysis. Has Machine Learning Enhanced the Diagnosis of Autism Spectrum Disorder? Smart Microfluidics: Synergy of Machine Learning and Microfluidics in the Development of Medical Diagnostics for Chronic and Emerging Infectious Diseases. Engineers in Medicine: Foster Innovation by Traversing Boundaries.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1