Machine learning models in predicting health care costs in patients with a recent acute coronary syndrome: A prospective pilot study

IF 2.6 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Cardiovascular digital health journal Pub Date : 2023-08-01 DOI:10.1016/j.cvdhj.2023.05.001
Arto J. Hautala PhD , Babooshka Shavazipour PhD , Bekir Afsar PhD , Mikko P. Tulppo PhD , Kaisa Miettinen PhD
{"title":"Machine learning models in predicting health care costs in patients with a recent acute coronary syndrome: A prospective pilot study","authors":"Arto J. Hautala PhD ,&nbsp;Babooshka Shavazipour PhD ,&nbsp;Bekir Afsar PhD ,&nbsp;Mikko P. Tulppo PhD ,&nbsp;Kaisa Miettinen PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.cvdhj.2023.05.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Health care budgets are limited, requiring the optimal use of resources. Machine learning (ML) methods may have an enormous potential for effective use of health care resources.</p></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><p>We assessed the applicability of selected ML tools to evaluate the contribution of known risk markers for prognosis of coronary artery disease to predict health care costs for all reasons in patients with a recent acute coronary syndrome (n = 65, aged 65 ± 9 years) for 1-year follow-up.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Risk markers were assessed at baseline, and health care costs were collected from electronic health registries. The Cross-decomposition algorithms were used to rank the considered risk markers based on their impacts on variances. Then regression analysis was performed to predict costs by entering the first top-ranking risk marker and adding the next-best markers, one by one, to build up altogether 13 predictive models.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The average annual health care costs were €2601 ± €5378 per patient. The Depression Scale showed the highest predictive value (r = 0.395), accounting for 16% of the costs (<em>P</em> = .001). When the next 2 ranked markers (LDL cholesterol, r = 0.230; and left ventricular ejection fraction, r = -0.227, respectively) were added to the model, the predictive value was 24% for the costs (<em>P</em> = .001).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Higher depression score is the primary variable forecasting health care costs in 1-year follow-up among acute coronary syndrome patients. The ML tools may help decision-making when planning optimal utilization of treatment strategies.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":72527,"journal":{"name":"Cardiovascular digital health journal","volume":"4 4","pages":"Pages 137-142"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10435951/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cardiovascular digital health journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666693623000300","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Health care budgets are limited, requiring the optimal use of resources. Machine learning (ML) methods may have an enormous potential for effective use of health care resources.

Objective

We assessed the applicability of selected ML tools to evaluate the contribution of known risk markers for prognosis of coronary artery disease to predict health care costs for all reasons in patients with a recent acute coronary syndrome (n = 65, aged 65 ± 9 years) for 1-year follow-up.

Methods

Risk markers were assessed at baseline, and health care costs were collected from electronic health registries. The Cross-decomposition algorithms were used to rank the considered risk markers based on their impacts on variances. Then regression analysis was performed to predict costs by entering the first top-ranking risk marker and adding the next-best markers, one by one, to build up altogether 13 predictive models.

Results

The average annual health care costs were €2601 ± €5378 per patient. The Depression Scale showed the highest predictive value (r = 0.395), accounting for 16% of the costs (P = .001). When the next 2 ranked markers (LDL cholesterol, r = 0.230; and left ventricular ejection fraction, r = -0.227, respectively) were added to the model, the predictive value was 24% for the costs (P = .001).

Conclusion

Higher depression score is the primary variable forecasting health care costs in 1-year follow-up among acute coronary syndrome patients. The ML tools may help decision-making when planning optimal utilization of treatment strategies.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
机器学习模型预测近期急性冠脉综合征患者的医疗费用:一项前瞻性试点研究
背景医疗保健预算有限,需要最佳利用资源。机器学习(ML)方法在有效利用医疗资源方面可能具有巨大潜力。目的我们评估了所选ML工具的适用性,以评估已知风险标志物对冠状动脉疾病预后的贡献,从而预测近期急性冠状动脉综合征(n=65,年龄65±9岁)患者1年随访的各种原因的医疗费用,医疗保健费用是从电子健康登记处收集的。交叉分解算法用于根据所考虑的风险标记对方差的影响对其进行排序。然后进行回归分析,通过输入第一个排名靠前的风险标记并逐个添加下一个最佳标记来预测成本,从而建立总共13个预测模型。结果每位患者的年平均医疗费用为2601欧元±5378欧元。抑郁量表显示出最高的预测值(r=0.395),占成本的16%(P=.001)。当将接下来的两个排名标志物(LDL胆固醇,r=0.230;左心室射血分数,分别为r=-0.227)添加到模型中时,费用的预测值为24%(P=0.001)。结论在急性冠状动脉综合征患者的1年随访中,较高的抑郁评分是预测医疗费用的主要变量。ML工具可以在规划治疗策略的最佳利用时帮助决策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Cardiovascular digital health journal
Cardiovascular digital health journal Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
58 days
期刊最新文献
Determinants of global cardiac implantable electrical device remote monitoring utilization – Results from an international survey Cellular-Enabled Remote Patient Monitoring for Pregnancies Complicated by Hypertension Point-of-care testing preferences 2020–2022: Trends over the years Feasibility of remote monitoring for fatal coronary heart disease using Apple Watch ECGs Artificial intelligence–based screening for cardiomyopathy in an obstetric population: A pilot study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1