Perspectives from a Predominantly African American Community about Biobank Research and a Biobank Consent Form

Q2 Social Sciences Ethics & human research Pub Date : 2022-07-08 DOI:10.1002/eahr.500134
Laura K. Sedig, E. Hill De Loney, Sarah B. Bailey, Kayte Spector-Bagdady, Bianca Ghita, Lydia Koh Krienke, Raymond Hutchinson
{"title":"Perspectives from a Predominantly African American Community about Biobank Research and a Biobank Consent Form","authors":"Laura K. Sedig,&nbsp;E. Hill De Loney,&nbsp;Sarah B. Bailey,&nbsp;Kayte Spector-Bagdady,&nbsp;Bianca Ghita,&nbsp;Lydia Koh Krienke,&nbsp;Raymond Hutchinson","doi":"10.1002/eahr.500134","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>Minority populations have been underrepresented in clinical trials, as well as in research biobanks that are created to conduct research with participants' biospecimens and related medical and research data. Biobank research raises issues about informed consent and privacy and the confidentiality of participants' personal data. Our study involved three focus groups of 10 adults each that were conducted in a medically underserved, predominantly African American community to elucidate questions and concerns regarding an institutional biobank. Transcripts from the discussion were qualitatively analyzed. Three main themes that arose from the focus groups included the importance of trust, the importance of the community in research, and suggestions to improve trust. The concerns identified in this study provide a starting point for future research to help research institutions become more trustworthy to the communities they serve.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":36829,"journal":{"name":"Ethics & human research","volume":"44 4","pages":"26-33"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ethics & human research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/eahr.500134","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Minority populations have been underrepresented in clinical trials, as well as in research biobanks that are created to conduct research with participants' biospecimens and related medical and research data. Biobank research raises issues about informed consent and privacy and the confidentiality of participants' personal data. Our study involved three focus groups of 10 adults each that were conducted in a medically underserved, predominantly African American community to elucidate questions and concerns regarding an institutional biobank. Transcripts from the discussion were qualitatively analyzed. Three main themes that arose from the focus groups included the importance of trust, the importance of the community in research, and suggestions to improve trust. The concerns identified in this study provide a starting point for future research to help research institutions become more trustworthy to the communities they serve.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
以非洲裔美国人为主的社区对生物库研究和生物库同意书的看法
在临床试验以及为利用参与者的生物标本和相关医学和研究数据进行研究而建立的研究生物库中,少数民族人口的代表性不足。生物银行的研究提出了关于知情同意、隐私和参与者个人数据保密性的问题。我们的研究涉及三个焦点小组,每个小组10名成年人,在一个医疗服务不足的主要是非裔美国人社区进行,以阐明有关机构生物库的问题和关注。对讨论的文字记录进行了定性分析。从焦点小组中产生的三个主要主题包括信任的重要性,社区在研究中的重要性,以及改善信任的建议。本研究中确定的问题为未来的研究提供了一个起点,以帮助研究机构变得更值得他们所服务的社区信任。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Ethics & human research
Ethics & human research Social Sciences-Health (social science)
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
35
期刊最新文献
Issue Information The Prospect of Artificial Intelligence-Supported Ethics Review Ethical Issues Faced by Data Monitoring Committees: Results from an Exploratory Qualitative Study The Ethical Case for Decentralized Clinical Trials The European Health Data Space as a Case Study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1