Understanding predictors of mental health and substance use treatment utilization among US adults: A repeated cross-sectional study

Jaskiran Dhinsa , Andres Roman-Urrestarazu , Robin van Kessel , Keith Humphreys
{"title":"Understanding predictors of mental health and substance use treatment utilization among US adults: A repeated cross-sectional study","authors":"Jaskiran Dhinsa ,&nbsp;Andres Roman-Urrestarazu ,&nbsp;Robin van Kessel ,&nbsp;Keith Humphreys","doi":"10.1016/j.gloepi.2023.100109","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Understanding discrepancies in mental health and substance use treatment utilization can help identify inequities in access to health services. We investigate mental health and substance use treatment utilization as function of demographic and social determinants, as well as pre-existing mental health and substance use disorders.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>In this repeated cross-sectional study, we used the 2017–2019 National Survey on Drug Use and Health data on US adults above age 18. Two logistic regression models were conducted, using predictors of age, gender, race/Hispanicity, sexual identity, education, insurance, family income, and past year mental health and substance use disorders, with outcomes of mental health or substance use treatment utilization. Weighted estimates of substance use disorders and insurance types and Pearson's correlation tests of vulnerability among age, gender, and treatment type were reported.</p></div><div><h3>Findings</h3><p>Racial minorities, uninsured populations, sexual minorities, and females had lower odds of receiving mental health treatment, while older populations, lower income groups, and dual eligible enrollees had higher odds. Individuals with substance use disorders but no mental illness had higher odds of receiving mental health treatment. Those utilizing mental health treatment were mostly of high income, privately insured, and using cannabis, cocaine, and opioids. Older populations, men, and Medicaid only enrollees had higher odds of receiving substance use disorder treatment, whereas racial minorities had lower odds. Distribution of income, insurance type, and substance use were more widespread than mental health treatment.</p></div><div><h3>Interpretation</h3><p>Mental health treatment can be used as an avenue for substance use treatment, particularly opioid use disorders. It is important to target vulnerable populations, like racial minorities and uninsured populations to improve access to mental health and substance use treatment.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":36311,"journal":{"name":"Global Epidemiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/c0/91/main.PMC10445987.pdf","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Epidemiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590113323000123","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Background

Understanding discrepancies in mental health and substance use treatment utilization can help identify inequities in access to health services. We investigate mental health and substance use treatment utilization as function of demographic and social determinants, as well as pre-existing mental health and substance use disorders.

Methods

In this repeated cross-sectional study, we used the 2017–2019 National Survey on Drug Use and Health data on US adults above age 18. Two logistic regression models were conducted, using predictors of age, gender, race/Hispanicity, sexual identity, education, insurance, family income, and past year mental health and substance use disorders, with outcomes of mental health or substance use treatment utilization. Weighted estimates of substance use disorders and insurance types and Pearson's correlation tests of vulnerability among age, gender, and treatment type were reported.

Findings

Racial minorities, uninsured populations, sexual minorities, and females had lower odds of receiving mental health treatment, while older populations, lower income groups, and dual eligible enrollees had higher odds. Individuals with substance use disorders but no mental illness had higher odds of receiving mental health treatment. Those utilizing mental health treatment were mostly of high income, privately insured, and using cannabis, cocaine, and opioids. Older populations, men, and Medicaid only enrollees had higher odds of receiving substance use disorder treatment, whereas racial minorities had lower odds. Distribution of income, insurance type, and substance use were more widespread than mental health treatment.

Interpretation

Mental health treatment can be used as an avenue for substance use treatment, particularly opioid use disorders. It is important to target vulnerable populations, like racial minorities and uninsured populations to improve access to mental health and substance use treatment.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
了解美国成年人心理健康和药物使用治疗利用率的预测因素:一项重复的横断面研究
背景了解心理健康和药物使用治疗利用方面的差异有助于发现获得医疗服务方面的不公平现象。我们调查了心理健康和药物使用治疗的利用率,作为人口和社会决定因素的函数,以及先前存在的心理健康和物质使用障碍。方法在这项重复的横断面研究中,我们使用了2017-2019年美国18岁以上成年人的药物使用和健康调查数据。使用年龄、性别、种族/西班牙裔、性认同、教育、保险、家庭收入和过去一年的心理健康和物质使用障碍的预测因素,以及心理健康或物质使用治疗利用的结果,进行了两个逻辑回归模型。报告了药物使用障碍和保险类型的加权估计,以及年龄、性别和治疗类型之间脆弱性的Pearson相关性检验。发现少数种族、无保险人群、性少数群体和女性接受心理健康治疗的几率较低,而老年人群、低收入群体和符合双重条件的参与者接受心理健康的几率较高。有物质使用障碍但没有精神疾病的人接受心理健康治疗的几率更高。那些使用心理健康治疗的人大多收入高,有私人保险,并使用大麻、可卡因和阿片类药物。老年人、男性和仅参加医疗补助的人接受药物使用障碍治疗的几率更高,而少数种族接受药物使用紊乱治疗的几率更低。收入分配、保险类型和药物使用比心理健康治疗更为广泛。心理健康治疗可以作为药物使用治疗的途径,尤其是阿片类药物使用障碍。重要的是要针对弱势群体,如少数种族和没有保险的人群,以改善获得心理健康和药物使用治疗的机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Global Epidemiology
Global Epidemiology Medicine-Infectious Diseases
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
22
审稿时长
39 days
期刊最新文献
A note on handling conditional missing values Tailored guidance to apply the Estimand framework to Trials within Cohorts (TwiCs) studies Improving the timeliness of birth registration in Fiji through a financial incentive Predicting adolescent psychopathology from early life factors: A machine learning tutorial Challenging unverified assumptions in causal claims: Do gas stoves increase risk of pediatric asthma?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1