Comprehension of indirect answers: Developmental trajectory for preschool- and early elementary school-aged children with typical development.

IF 1.7 2区 文学 Q1 LINGUISTICS Journal of Child Language Pub Date : 2024-05-01 Epub Date: 2023-08-30 DOI:10.1017/S0305000923000442
Timothy Huang, Lizbeth H Finestack
{"title":"Comprehension of indirect answers: Developmental trajectory for preschool- and early elementary school-aged children with typical development.","authors":"Timothy Huang, Lizbeth H Finestack","doi":"10.1017/S0305000923000442","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Indirect answers are a common type of non-literal language that do not provide an explicit \"yes\" or \"no\" to a question (e.g., \"I have to work late\" indirectly answered \"Are you going to the party?\" with a negative response). In the current study, we examined the developmental trajectory of comprehension of indirect answers among 5- to 10-year-old children with typical development. Forty-eight children, 23 boys and 25 girls, between the ages of 5 years; 0 months and 10 years; 11 months (<i>M</i> = 8;2, <i>SD</i> = 19.77 months) completed an experimental task to judge whether a verbally presented indirect answer meant yes or no (Comprehension Task) and then explain their choice (Explanation Task). Responses were scored for accuracy and coded for error analysis. On the Comprehension Task, the 5- to 8-year-olds performed with approximately 85% accuracy, while the 9- and 10-year-olds achieved 95% accuracy. On the Explanation Task, the cross-sectional trajectory revealed three stages: the 5- and 6-year-olds adequately explained indirect answers 32% of the time, the 7- and 8-year-olds performed significantly higher at 55%, and the 9- and 10-year-olds made significant gains than the younger children at 66%. Error analysis revealed that when children fail to interpret speaker intentions appropriately, they repeat the speaker's utterance or provide an insufficient explanation 80% of the time. Other responses, such as those irrelevant to the context, indicating \"I don't know\" or no response, or that were made-up interpretations each accounted for 2%-10% of total inadequate explanations. Study findings indicate discrepancies between task performances and offer two separate sets of baseline data for future comparisons that investigate comprehension or explanation of indirect answers by children with different cultural and linguistic backgrounds and by those with varying cognitive and language profiles.</p>","PeriodicalId":48132,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Child Language","volume":" ","pages":"526-549"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Child Language","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305000923000442","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/8/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Indirect answers are a common type of non-literal language that do not provide an explicit "yes" or "no" to a question (e.g., "I have to work late" indirectly answered "Are you going to the party?" with a negative response). In the current study, we examined the developmental trajectory of comprehension of indirect answers among 5- to 10-year-old children with typical development. Forty-eight children, 23 boys and 25 girls, between the ages of 5 years; 0 months and 10 years; 11 months (M = 8;2, SD = 19.77 months) completed an experimental task to judge whether a verbally presented indirect answer meant yes or no (Comprehension Task) and then explain their choice (Explanation Task). Responses were scored for accuracy and coded for error analysis. On the Comprehension Task, the 5- to 8-year-olds performed with approximately 85% accuracy, while the 9- and 10-year-olds achieved 95% accuracy. On the Explanation Task, the cross-sectional trajectory revealed three stages: the 5- and 6-year-olds adequately explained indirect answers 32% of the time, the 7- and 8-year-olds performed significantly higher at 55%, and the 9- and 10-year-olds made significant gains than the younger children at 66%. Error analysis revealed that when children fail to interpret speaker intentions appropriately, they repeat the speaker's utterance or provide an insufficient explanation 80% of the time. Other responses, such as those irrelevant to the context, indicating "I don't know" or no response, or that were made-up interpretations each accounted for 2%-10% of total inadequate explanations. Study findings indicate discrepancies between task performances and offer two separate sets of baseline data for future comparisons that investigate comprehension or explanation of indirect answers by children with different cultural and linguistic backgrounds and by those with varying cognitive and language profiles.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
理解间接答案:学龄前和小学低年级典型发育儿童的发展轨迹。
间接回答是一种常见的非字面语言,它不对问题作出明确的 "是 "或 "否 "的回答(例如,"我要加班 "间接回答了 "你会去参加聚会吗?",并作出了否定的回答)。在本研究中,我们考察了 5-10 岁典型发育儿童理解间接回答的发展轨迹。48 名年龄在 5 岁 0 个月至 10 岁 11 个月之间的儿童(23 名男孩和 25 名女孩,中位数 = 8;2,标准差 = 19.77 个月)完成了一项实验任务,即判断口头给出的间接答案是 "是 "还是 "否"(理解任务),然后解释他们的选择(解释任务)。对回答的准确性进行评分,并对错误进行编码分析。在理解任务中,5-8 岁儿童的准确率约为 85%,而 9-10 岁儿童的准确率则达到了 95%。在解释任务中,横向轨迹显示出三个阶段:5 至 6 岁儿童在 32% 的时间里充分解释了间接答案,7 至 8 岁儿童的解释正确率显著提高,达到 55%,而 9 至 10 岁儿童的解释正确率显著提高,达到 66%。错误分析表明,当儿童不能正确理解说话者的意图时,他们会在 80% 的情况下重复说话者的话语或提供不充分的解释。其他回答,如与上下文无关的回答、表示 "我不知道 "或没有回答的回答,或者胡编乱造的解释,各占不充分解释总数的 2%-10%。研究结果表明了任务表现之间的差异,并提供了两组独立的基线数据,以便今后进行比较,研究具有不同文化和语言背景的儿童以及具有不同认知和语言特征的儿童对间接答案的理解或解释。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
4.50%
发文量
142
期刊介绍: A key publication in the field, Journal of Child Language publishes articles on all aspects of the scientific study of language behaviour in children, the principles which underlie it, and the theories which may account for it. The international range of authors and breadth of coverage allow the journal to forge links between many different areas of research including psychology, linguistics, cognitive science and anthropology. This interdisciplinary approach spans a wide range of interests: phonology, phonetics, morphology, syntax, vocabulary, semantics, pragmatics, sociolinguistics, or any other recognised facet of language study.
期刊最新文献
Syntactic Structural Development in Chinese deaf Children Aged 4-7 Years with Cochlear Implants. The relation between family factors and children's vocabulary knowledge: a comparative study of rural and urban preschoolers in China. Different paths to multilingualism in Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD): Naturalistic and non-interactive Bilingual children reach early language milestones at the same age as monolingual peers An Evaluation of LENA Start™ Using Measures Derived from Parent–Child Interactions
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1