Social Deprivation and Ethnicity Are Associated with More Problematic Sleep in Middle-Aged and Older Adults.

IF 2.1 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Clocks & Sleep Pub Date : 2023-08-07 DOI:10.3390/clockssleep5030030
John A Groeger, Piril Hepsomali
{"title":"Social Deprivation and Ethnicity Are Associated with More Problematic Sleep in Middle-Aged and Older Adults.","authors":"John A Groeger,&nbsp;Piril Hepsomali","doi":"10.3390/clockssleep5030030","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objectives:</b> We test the hypothesis that the incidence of sleep problems is influenced by socio-demographic variables, particularly social deprivation and ethnicity. <b>Methods:</b> Self-reports of sleep duration and sleep difficulties (waking in the night, sleeping in the day, difficulty waking and snoring), personal wealth (household income, property-owning, etc.), ethnic group, employment, education, as well as post-code-based Townsend Social Deprivation, were extracted from UK Biobank's cohort of c500,000 British-domiciled adults (40-70 years). Analyses contrasted the incidence of different sleep problems and a composite measure of these (the Problematic Sleep Index) across groups. <b>Results:</b> Almost one-third of participants reported sleeping shorter (24.7%), or longer (7.7%) than age-corrected recommended sleep durations. The incidence of shorter or longer sleep increased with social deprivation and varied with ethnicity. Snoring, waking during the night, finding it difficult to get up in the morning and sleeping in the daytime were subject to similar effects. The Problematic Sleep Index showed being younger, male, employed, home-owning, having a higher household income, having a higher level of educational achievement, and time in education were all associated with better sleep, as was living in a more affluent area and being White. <b>Conclusions:</b> Sleep problems in Britain show a social gradient, independently of a range of other demographic and social influences, suggesting that sleep quality differs with and between ethnic groups. These sleep inequalities suggest that the protective and recuperative effects of sleep are disproportionately distributed across society and should encourage us to consider the potential benefits of community-specific sleep interventions.</p>","PeriodicalId":33568,"journal":{"name":"Clocks & Sleep","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10443366/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clocks & Sleep","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/clockssleep5030030","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: We test the hypothesis that the incidence of sleep problems is influenced by socio-demographic variables, particularly social deprivation and ethnicity. Methods: Self-reports of sleep duration and sleep difficulties (waking in the night, sleeping in the day, difficulty waking and snoring), personal wealth (household income, property-owning, etc.), ethnic group, employment, education, as well as post-code-based Townsend Social Deprivation, were extracted from UK Biobank's cohort of c500,000 British-domiciled adults (40-70 years). Analyses contrasted the incidence of different sleep problems and a composite measure of these (the Problematic Sleep Index) across groups. Results: Almost one-third of participants reported sleeping shorter (24.7%), or longer (7.7%) than age-corrected recommended sleep durations. The incidence of shorter or longer sleep increased with social deprivation and varied with ethnicity. Snoring, waking during the night, finding it difficult to get up in the morning and sleeping in the daytime were subject to similar effects. The Problematic Sleep Index showed being younger, male, employed, home-owning, having a higher household income, having a higher level of educational achievement, and time in education were all associated with better sleep, as was living in a more affluent area and being White. Conclusions: Sleep problems in Britain show a social gradient, independently of a range of other demographic and social influences, suggesting that sleep quality differs with and between ethnic groups. These sleep inequalities suggest that the protective and recuperative effects of sleep are disproportionately distributed across society and should encourage us to consider the potential benefits of community-specific sleep interventions.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
社会剥夺和种族与中老年睡眠问题有关
目的:我们检验了睡眠问题的发生率受社会人口变量影响的假设,特别是社会剥夺和种族。方法:从英国生物银行(UK Biobank)的50万名英国成年(40-70岁)人群中提取自我报告的睡眠时间和睡眠困难(夜间醒来、白天睡眠、醒来困难和打鼾)、个人财富(家庭收入、拥有财产等)、种族、就业、教育以及基于后编码的Townsend社会剥夺。分析对比了不同睡眠问题的发生率,并对这些问题进行了综合衡量(睡眠问题指数)。结果:几乎三分之一的参与者报告睡眠时间比年龄校正后的推荐睡眠时间短(24.7%)或长(7.7%)。睡眠时间较短或较长的发生率随着社交剥夺而增加,并因种族而异。打鼾、夜间醒来、早上起不来以及白天睡觉都会受到类似的影响。睡眠问题指数显示,年轻、男性、有工作、有房、家庭收入高、受教育程度高、受教育时间长都与更好的睡眠有关,生活在更富裕的地区和白人也是如此。结论:英国的睡眠问题显示出一种社会梯度,独立于一系列其他人口统计学和社会影响,这表明不同种族之间的睡眠质量是不同的。这些睡眠不平等表明,睡眠的保护和恢复作用在整个社会中不成比例地分布,应该鼓励我们考虑社区特定睡眠干预的潜在好处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Clocks & Sleep
Clocks & Sleep Multiple-
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
7 weeks
期刊最新文献
Disrupted Circadian Rhythms and Substance Use Disorders: A Narrative Review. Violet Light Effects on the Circadian Rest-Activity Rhythm and the Visual System. Effectiveness of Enriched Milk with Ashwagandha Extract and Tryptophan for Improving Subjective Sleep Quality in Adults with Sleep Problems: A Randomized Double-Blind Controlled Trial. The Impact of Lunch Timing on Nap Quality. Generative Models for Periodicity Detection in Noisy Signals.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1