Positive psychology interventions can improve mental health for chronic pain patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

IF 1.9 3区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Psychology & Health Pub Date : 2025-04-01 Epub Date: 2023-08-29 DOI:10.1080/08870446.2023.2250382
Ana Blasco-Belled, Claudia Tejada-Gallardo, Carles Alsinet
{"title":"Positive psychology interventions can improve mental health for chronic pain patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Ana Blasco-Belled, Claudia Tejada-Gallardo, Carles Alsinet","doi":"10.1080/08870446.2023.2250382","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study examines the efficacy of positive psychology interventions (PPIs) for patients with chronic pain through a systematic review and meta-analysis. PPIs are defined as strategies that involve focusing on positive emotions, thoughts, and behaviors that improve mental health by increasing mental well-being and reducing psychological distress.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>The search was conducted using the PubMed, Scopus, PsycINFO, and Cochrane Library databases.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>Subjective, psychological, and social well-being were used as indicators of mental well-being, and depression, anxiety, and stress symptoms were used as indicators of psychological distress. Results: Nine studies were included. Eight studies evaluated subjective well-being, seven evaluated depression, and three evaluated anxiety symptoms. No studies examined psychological well-being, social well-being, or stress. PPIs were found to be effective in promoting subjective well-being post-treatment (Hedges' <i>g</i> = 0.40; 95% CI [0.06, 0.73]) and reducing anxiety (Hedges' g = -0.32, 95% CI [-0.59, -0.06]), but no significant results were found for depression (Hedges' g = -0.23, 95% CI [-0.50, 0.04]).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The included investigations, while limited, suggest the utility of PPIs in mitigating the psychological consequences of chronic pain. Researchers and practitioners are encouraged to implement PPI practices.</p>","PeriodicalId":20718,"journal":{"name":"Psychology & Health","volume":" ","pages":"635-651"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychology & Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/08870446.2023.2250382","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/8/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: This study examines the efficacy of positive psychology interventions (PPIs) for patients with chronic pain through a systematic review and meta-analysis. PPIs are defined as strategies that involve focusing on positive emotions, thoughts, and behaviors that improve mental health by increasing mental well-being and reducing psychological distress.

Design: The search was conducted using the PubMed, Scopus, PsycINFO, and Cochrane Library databases.

Main outcome measures: Subjective, psychological, and social well-being were used as indicators of mental well-being, and depression, anxiety, and stress symptoms were used as indicators of psychological distress. Results: Nine studies were included. Eight studies evaluated subjective well-being, seven evaluated depression, and three evaluated anxiety symptoms. No studies examined psychological well-being, social well-being, or stress. PPIs were found to be effective in promoting subjective well-being post-treatment (Hedges' g = 0.40; 95% CI [0.06, 0.73]) and reducing anxiety (Hedges' g = -0.32, 95% CI [-0.59, -0.06]), but no significant results were found for depression (Hedges' g = -0.23, 95% CI [-0.50, 0.04]).

Conclusion: The included investigations, while limited, suggest the utility of PPIs in mitigating the psychological consequences of chronic pain. Researchers and practitioners are encouraged to implement PPI practices.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
积极心理学干预可以改善慢性疼痛患者的心理健康:一项系统综述和荟萃分析。
目的:通过系统回顾和荟萃分析,探讨积极心理干预(PPIs)对慢性疼痛患者的疗效。PPIs被定义为关注积极情绪、思想和行为的策略,通过增加心理幸福感和减少心理困扰来改善心理健康。设计:使用PubMed、Scopus、PsycINFO和Cochrane图书馆数据库进行搜索。主要结果测量:主观、心理和社会幸福感被用作心理健康的指标,抑郁、焦虑和压力症状被用作心理困扰的指标。结果:纳入9项研究。8项研究评估主观幸福感,7项评估抑郁,3项评估焦虑症状。没有研究考察心理健康、社会健康或压力。PPIs在促进治疗后主观幸福感方面是有效的(Hedges’g = 0.40;95% CI[0.06, 0.73])和减少焦虑(Hedges' g = -0.32, 95% CI[-0.59, -0.06]),但在抑郁方面没有发现显著结果(Hedges' g = -0.23, 95% CI[-0.50, 0.04])。结论:纳入的调查虽然有限,但表明PPIs在减轻慢性疼痛的心理后果方面的效用。鼓励研究人员和从业人员实施PPI实践。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.30
自引率
3.00%
发文量
95
期刊介绍: Psychology & Health promotes the study and application of psychological approaches to health and illness. The contents include work on psychological aspects of physical illness, treatment processes and recovery; psychosocial factors in the aetiology of physical illnesses; health attitudes and behaviour, including prevention; the individual-health care system interface particularly communication and psychologically-based interventions. The journal publishes original research, and accepts not only papers describing rigorous empirical work, including meta-analyses, but also those outlining new psychological approaches and interventions in health-related fields.
期刊最新文献
Understanding the disconnect between lifestyle advice and patient engagement: a discourse analysis of how expert knowledge is constructed by patients with CHD. Illness experience and (unmet) needs of women with Mayer-Rokitansky-Küster-Hauser Syndrome (MRKH): a qualitative analysis of an online forum. Sleep, movement, and dietary behaviours: the mediating role of affect. 'I didn't want to go home' patient-identified modifiable risk factors associated with hospital readmission: a qualitative study. Effects of open and hidden administration of treatment-related information; a multi-experiment study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1