Pub Date : 2025-04-01Epub Date: 2023-09-01DOI: 10.1080/08870446.2023.2248481
Laura M Lesnewich, Justeen K Hyde, Mikhaela L McFarlin, Rendelle E Bolton, Peter J Bayley, Helena K Chandler, Drew A Helmer, L Alison Phillips, Matthew J Reinhard, Susan L Santos, Rachel S Stewart, Lisa M McAndrew
Objective: Medically unexplained symptoms (MUS), such as chronic fatigue syndrome, irritable bowel syndrome, and Gulf War Illness (GWI), are difficult to treat. Concordance-shared understanding between patient and provider about illness causes, course, and treatment-is an essential component of high-quality care for people with MUS. This qualitative paper focuses on the experiences of United States military Veterans living with GWI who have endured unique healthcare challenges. Methods & Measures: Qualitative interviews were conducted with 31 Veterans with GWI to explore factors that contribute to and detract from concordance with their Veteran Affairs (VA) healthcare providers. In addition to being seen by VA primary care, over half of participants also sought care at a War Related Illness and Injury Study Center, which specializes in post-deployment health. Deductive and inductive codes were used to organize the data, and themes were identified through iterative review of coded data. Results: Major themes associated with patient-provider concordance included validation of illness experiences, perceived provider expertise in GWI/MUS, and trust in providers. Invalidation, low provider expertise, and distrust detracted from concordance. Conclusion: These findings suggest providers can foster concordance with MUS patients by legitimizing patients' experiences, communicating knowledge about MUS, and establishing trust.
{"title":"'She thought the same way I that I thought:' a qualitative study of patient-provider concordance among Gulf War Veterans with Gulf War Illness.","authors":"Laura M Lesnewich, Justeen K Hyde, Mikhaela L McFarlin, Rendelle E Bolton, Peter J Bayley, Helena K Chandler, Drew A Helmer, L Alison Phillips, Matthew J Reinhard, Susan L Santos, Rachel S Stewart, Lisa M McAndrew","doi":"10.1080/08870446.2023.2248481","DOIUrl":"10.1080/08870446.2023.2248481","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objective:</b> Medically unexplained symptoms (MUS), such as chronic fatigue syndrome, irritable bowel syndrome, and Gulf War Illness (GWI), are difficult to treat. Concordance-shared understanding between patient and provider about illness causes, course, and treatment-is an essential component of high-quality care for people with MUS. This qualitative paper focuses on the experiences of United States military Veterans living with GWI who have endured unique healthcare challenges. <b>Methods & Measures:</b> Qualitative interviews were conducted with 31 Veterans with GWI to explore factors that contribute to and detract from concordance with their Veteran Affairs (VA) healthcare providers. In addition to being seen by VA primary care, over half of participants also sought care at a War Related Illness and Injury Study Center, which specializes in post-deployment health. Deductive and inductive codes were used to organize the data, and themes were identified through iterative review of coded data. <b>Results:</b> Major themes associated with patient-provider concordance included validation of illness experiences, perceived provider expertise in GWI/MUS, and trust in providers. Invalidation, low provider expertise, and distrust detracted from concordance. <b>Conclusion:</b> These findings suggest providers can foster concordance with MUS patients by legitimizing patients' experiences, communicating knowledge about MUS, and establishing trust.</p>","PeriodicalId":20718,"journal":{"name":"Psychology & Health","volume":" ","pages":"616-634"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10502502","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-04-01Epub Date: 2023-09-07DOI: 10.1080/08870446.2023.2252874
Iga Palacz-Poborczyk, Kerry Chamberlain, Felix Naughton, Alicja Baska, Aleksandra Luszczynska, Eleanor Quested, Martin S Hagger, Sherry Pagoto, Peter Verboon, Suzanne Robinson, Dominika Kwasnicka
Objective: The aim of this study was to explore health perceptions and self-defined facilitators to health in general population. An additional aim of the study was to assess if these perceptions were connected with the context of the Covid-19 pandemic.
Design: We applied photo-elicitation method by gathering original photographs and narratives (captions) via social media and e-mails. Participants (N = 50) were asked to answer the question: 'What does it mean to be healthy?'. Data were collected online in Poland. We generated and interpreted the main themes associated with common perceptions of health and self-defined facilitators to health using polytextual thematic analysis.
Results: The health perception themes were, health as: a 'long journey'; keeping balance; and self-acceptance. The main facilitators to health were: enjoyment of activities that are part of a healthy lifestyle; planning time for rest; contact with nature, and supportive relationships. Participants' perceptions of how Covid-19 impacted on their health differed.
Conclusions: The findings provide evidence for individual health perceptions and self-defined facilitators to health and can support the development of future health interventions.
{"title":"'A healthy lifestyle is a journey': exploring health perceptions and self-defined facilitators to health through photo-elicitation.","authors":"Iga Palacz-Poborczyk, Kerry Chamberlain, Felix Naughton, Alicja Baska, Aleksandra Luszczynska, Eleanor Quested, Martin S Hagger, Sherry Pagoto, Peter Verboon, Suzanne Robinson, Dominika Kwasnicka","doi":"10.1080/08870446.2023.2252874","DOIUrl":"10.1080/08870446.2023.2252874","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim of this study was to explore health perceptions and self-defined facilitators to health in general population. An additional aim of the study was to assess if these perceptions were connected with the context of the Covid-19 pandemic.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>We applied photo-elicitation method by gathering original photographs and narratives (captions) <i>via</i> social media and e-mails. Participants (<i>N</i> = 50) were asked to answer the question: 'What does it mean to be healthy?'. Data were collected online in Poland. We generated and interpreted the main themes associated with common perceptions of health and self-defined facilitators to health using polytextual thematic analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The health perception themes were, health as: a 'long journey'; keeping balance; and self-acceptance. The main facilitators to health were: enjoyment of activities that are part of a healthy lifestyle; planning time for rest; contact with nature, and supportive relationships. Participants' perceptions of how Covid-19 impacted on their health differed.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The findings provide evidence for individual health perceptions and self-defined facilitators to health and can support the development of future health interventions.</p>","PeriodicalId":20718,"journal":{"name":"Psychology & Health","volume":" ","pages":"652-680"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10524015","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-04-01Epub Date: 2023-08-06DOI: 10.1080/08870446.2023.2244522
Erika A Waters, Thorsten Pachur, Gabrielle Pogge, Jean Hunleth, Gregory D Webster, David A Fedele, James A Shepperd
Objective: Parents and guardians (hereafter caregivers) make decisions for their children's medical care. However, many caregivers of children with asthma struggle to understand their child's illness. We used the psychometric paradigm to investigate how caregivers conceptualize, or mentally represent, asthma triggers and symptoms and how these representations are linked to perceived asthma exacerbation risk.
Methods: We asked 377 caregivers of children with asthma across the U.S. to rate 20 triggers or 20 symptoms along 15 characteristics. Caregivers also indicated their perceived risk of their child having an asthma exacerbation (hereafter interpersonal risk perceptions). Using principal components analysis, we extracted key dimensions underlying caregivers' ratings on the characteristics. Then we related the triggers' and symptoms' scores on the dimensions to caregivers' interpersonal risk perceptions.
Results: Interpersonal risk perceptions were higher for triggers with high ratings for the dimensions severe and relevant, and negative affect-yet manageable, but not chronic-yet unpredictable. Risk perceptions were also higher for symptoms with high ratings for the dimensions severe and unpredictable, and relevant and common, but not self-blame or manageable despite unknown cause.
Conclusion: By identifying key dimensions underlying caregivers' mental representations of asthma triggers and symptoms, these findings can inform a new approach to asthma education.
{"title":"How are mental representations of asthma triggers and symptoms related to interpersonal risk perceptions? A psychometric investigation of caregivers of children with asthma.","authors":"Erika A Waters, Thorsten Pachur, Gabrielle Pogge, Jean Hunleth, Gregory D Webster, David A Fedele, James A Shepperd","doi":"10.1080/08870446.2023.2244522","DOIUrl":"10.1080/08870446.2023.2244522","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Parents and guardians (hereafter <i>caregivers</i>) make decisions for their children's medical care. However, many caregivers of children with asthma struggle to understand their child's illness. We used the psychometric paradigm to investigate how caregivers conceptualize, or <i>mentally represent</i>, asthma triggers and symptoms and how these representations are linked to perceived asthma exacerbation risk.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We asked 377 caregivers of children with asthma across the U.S. to rate 20 triggers or 20 symptoms along 15 characteristics. Caregivers also indicated their perceived risk of their child having an asthma exacerbation (hereafter <i>interpersonal risk perceptions</i>). Using principal components analysis, we extracted key dimensions underlying caregivers' ratings on the characteristics. Then we related the triggers' and symptoms' scores on the dimensions to caregivers' interpersonal risk perceptions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Interpersonal risk perceptions were higher for triggers with high ratings for the dimensions <i>severe and relevant,</i> and <i>negative affect-yet manageable</i>, but not <i>chronic-yet unpredictable</i>. Risk perceptions were also higher for symptoms with high ratings for the dimensions <i>severe and unpredictable</i>, and <i>relevant and common</i>, but not <i>self-blame</i> or <i>manageable despite unknown cause</i>.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>By identifying key dimensions underlying caregivers' mental representations of asthma triggers and symptoms, these findings can inform a new approach to asthma education.</p>","PeriodicalId":20718,"journal":{"name":"Psychology & Health","volume":" ","pages":"571-593"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11073392/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10048231","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-04-01Epub Date: 2023-09-04DOI: 10.1080/08870446.2023.2253258
Marta Llorca-Pellicer, Pedro Gil-LaOrden, Vicente J Prado-Gascó, Pedro R Gil-Monte
This study aims to assess the effect of psychosocial risks and resources on burnout, psychosomatic disorders, and job satisfaction using Hierarchical Regression Modelling (HRM) and Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA).
Method: The sample consisted of 9020 non-university public education teachers (Mage = 45.33 years, SD = 9.15; 72.5% women).
Results: Demands variables (Workload, Emotional labour, Imbalance, and Interpersonal conflict) were better predictors than resources variables (Job autonomy, Social support, and Resources at work). Resources also significantly improved the model's predictive capacity, except in the case of Indolence. In the QCA results, none of the conditions seems to be necessary. Regarding sufficiency, the combination of the different conditions explains between 44-49% of high levels of Burnout and between 40-47% of low levels of Burnout; between 44-47% of high levels of Psychosomatic disorders and 40-47% of low levels of Psychosomatic disorders; 49% of high Job satisfaction levels and 45-56% of low Job satisfaction levels.
Conclusions: The results show that QCA models have better explanatory capacity than HRM. Some variables were not significant in HRM, but they were present in combination with other QCA model variables. The findings contribute to understanding how psychosocial risks affect workers' health and job satisfaction.
{"title":"The role of psychosocial risks in burnout, psychosomatic disorders, and job satisfaction: lineal models vs a QCA approach in non-university teachers.","authors":"Marta Llorca-Pellicer, Pedro Gil-LaOrden, Vicente J Prado-Gascó, Pedro R Gil-Monte","doi":"10.1080/08870446.2023.2253258","DOIUrl":"10.1080/08870446.2023.2253258","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study aims to assess the effect of psychosocial risks and resources on burnout, psychosomatic disorders, and job satisfaction using Hierarchical Regression Modelling (HRM) and Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA).</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>The sample consisted of 9020 non-university public education teachers (<i>M</i><sub>age</sub> = 45.33 years, <i>SD</i> = 9.15; 72.5% women).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Demands variables (Workload, Emotional labour, Imbalance, and Interpersonal conflict) were better predictors than resources variables (Job autonomy, Social support, and Resources at work). Resources also significantly improved the model's predictive capacity, except in the case of Indolence. In the QCA results, none of the conditions seems to be necessary. Regarding sufficiency, the combination of the different conditions explains between 44-49% of high levels of Burnout and between 40-47% of low levels of Burnout; between 44-47% of high levels of Psychosomatic disorders and 40-47% of low levels of Psychosomatic disorders; 49% of high Job satisfaction levels and 45-56% of low Job satisfaction levels.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The results show that QCA models have better explanatory capacity than HRM. Some variables were not significant in HRM, but they were present in combination with other QCA model variables. The findings contribute to understanding how psychosocial risks affect workers' health and job satisfaction.</p>","PeriodicalId":20718,"journal":{"name":"Psychology & Health","volume":" ","pages":"681-695"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10155298","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-04-01Epub Date: 2023-08-29DOI: 10.1080/08870446.2023.2250382
Ana Blasco-Belled, Claudia Tejada-Gallardo, Carles Alsinet
Objective: This study examines the efficacy of positive psychology interventions (PPIs) for patients with chronic pain through a systematic review and meta-analysis. PPIs are defined as strategies that involve focusing on positive emotions, thoughts, and behaviors that improve mental health by increasing mental well-being and reducing psychological distress.
Design: The search was conducted using the PubMed, Scopus, PsycINFO, and Cochrane Library databases.
Main outcome measures: Subjective, psychological, and social well-being were used as indicators of mental well-being, and depression, anxiety, and stress symptoms were used as indicators of psychological distress. Results: Nine studies were included. Eight studies evaluated subjective well-being, seven evaluated depression, and three evaluated anxiety symptoms. No studies examined psychological well-being, social well-being, or stress. PPIs were found to be effective in promoting subjective well-being post-treatment (Hedges' g = 0.40; 95% CI [0.06, 0.73]) and reducing anxiety (Hedges' g = -0.32, 95% CI [-0.59, -0.06]), but no significant results were found for depression (Hedges' g = -0.23, 95% CI [-0.50, 0.04]).
Conclusion: The included investigations, while limited, suggest the utility of PPIs in mitigating the psychological consequences of chronic pain. Researchers and practitioners are encouraged to implement PPI practices.
目的:通过系统回顾和荟萃分析,探讨积极心理干预(PPIs)对慢性疼痛患者的疗效。PPIs被定义为关注积极情绪、思想和行为的策略,通过增加心理幸福感和减少心理困扰来改善心理健康。设计:使用PubMed、Scopus、PsycINFO和Cochrane图书馆数据库进行搜索。主要结果测量:主观、心理和社会幸福感被用作心理健康的指标,抑郁、焦虑和压力症状被用作心理困扰的指标。结果:纳入9项研究。8项研究评估主观幸福感,7项评估抑郁,3项评估焦虑症状。没有研究考察心理健康、社会健康或压力。PPIs在促进治疗后主观幸福感方面是有效的(Hedges’g = 0.40;95% CI[0.06, 0.73])和减少焦虑(Hedges' g = -0.32, 95% CI[-0.59, -0.06]),但在抑郁方面没有发现显著结果(Hedges' g = -0.23, 95% CI[-0.50, 0.04])。结论:纳入的调查虽然有限,但表明PPIs在减轻慢性疼痛的心理后果方面的效用。鼓励研究人员和从业人员实施PPI实践。
{"title":"Positive psychology interventions can improve mental health for chronic pain patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Ana Blasco-Belled, Claudia Tejada-Gallardo, Carles Alsinet","doi":"10.1080/08870446.2023.2250382","DOIUrl":"10.1080/08870446.2023.2250382","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study examines the efficacy of positive psychology interventions (PPIs) for patients with chronic pain through a systematic review and meta-analysis. PPIs are defined as strategies that involve focusing on positive emotions, thoughts, and behaviors that improve mental health by increasing mental well-being and reducing psychological distress.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>The search was conducted using the PubMed, Scopus, PsycINFO, and Cochrane Library databases.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>Subjective, psychological, and social well-being were used as indicators of mental well-being, and depression, anxiety, and stress symptoms were used as indicators of psychological distress. Results: Nine studies were included. Eight studies evaluated subjective well-being, seven evaluated depression, and three evaluated anxiety symptoms. No studies examined psychological well-being, social well-being, or stress. PPIs were found to be effective in promoting subjective well-being post-treatment (Hedges' <i>g</i> = 0.40; 95% CI [0.06, 0.73]) and reducing anxiety (Hedges' g = -0.32, 95% CI [-0.59, -0.06]), but no significant results were found for depression (Hedges' g = -0.23, 95% CI [-0.50, 0.04]).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The included investigations, while limited, suggest the utility of PPIs in mitigating the psychological consequences of chronic pain. Researchers and practitioners are encouraged to implement PPI practices.</p>","PeriodicalId":20718,"journal":{"name":"Psychology & Health","volume":" ","pages":"635-651"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10115263","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-04-01Epub Date: 2023-08-06DOI: 10.1080/08870446.2023.2241777
Amanda L Rebar, Rebecca Williams, Camile E Short, Ronald Plotnikoff, Mitch J Duncan, Kerry Mummery, Stephanie Alley, Stephanie Schoeppe, Quyen To, Corneel Vandelanotte
Objective: Action planning is a common approach used in physical activity interventions. The aim of this study was to assess the association of frequency, consistency and content of action planning with physical activity behaviour, intention strength and habit strength.
Methods and measures: Within a 3-month web-based, computer-tailored physical activity intervention, participants (N = 115; 68.7% female, M age =43.9; range = 22-73 years) could create 6 rounds of action plans for 4 activities each (24 total).
Results: Consistency of action planning during the intervention was associated with change in physical activity at 9-months, and intention and habit strength at 3-months and 9-months. Frequency of action planning was negatively associated with intention at 3-months and 9-months. The effect of action planning consistency on physical activity behaviour was no longer significant when accounting for change in intention and habit strength.
Conclusion: Consistency of how, where, when and with whom people plan their physical activity may translate into stronger physical activity habits. Interventions should avoid encouraging making many distinct action plans, but rather encourage stable contexts through consistent action planning.
{"title":"The impact of action plans on habit and intention strength for physical activity in a web-based intervention: is it the thought that counts?","authors":"Amanda L Rebar, Rebecca Williams, Camile E Short, Ronald Plotnikoff, Mitch J Duncan, Kerry Mummery, Stephanie Alley, Stephanie Schoeppe, Quyen To, Corneel Vandelanotte","doi":"10.1080/08870446.2023.2241777","DOIUrl":"10.1080/08870446.2023.2241777","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Action planning is a common approach used in physical activity interventions. The aim of this study was to assess the association of frequency, consistency and content of action planning with physical activity behaviour, intention strength and habit strength.</p><p><strong>Methods and measures: </strong>Within a 3-month web-based, computer-tailored physical activity intervention, participants (<i>N</i> = 115; 68.7% female, <i>M</i> age =43.9; range = 22-73 years) could create 6 rounds of action plans for 4 activities each (24 total).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Consistency of action planning during the intervention was associated with change in physical activity at 9-months, and intention and habit strength at 3-months and 9-months. Frequency of action planning was negatively associated with intention at 3-months and 9-months. The effect of action planning consistency on physical activity behaviour was no longer significant when accounting for change in intention and habit strength.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Consistency of how, where, when and with whom people plan their physical activity may translate into stronger physical activity habits. Interventions should avoid encouraging making many distinct action plans, but rather encourage stable contexts through consistent action planning.</p>","PeriodicalId":20718,"journal":{"name":"Psychology & Health","volume":" ","pages":"550-570"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10302830","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-04-01Epub Date: 2023-08-17DOI: 10.1080/08870446.2023.2247426
Eva Pila, C M Sabiston, R A G Christensen, K L Huellemann, L Hallward, V H Taylor, K P Arbour-Nicitopoulos, S Wharton
Self-monitoring weight is commonly recommended for higher-weight women with a history of breast cancer, despite evidence demonstrating potentially negative psychological consequences of frequent self-weighing. The extent to which higher-weight women with breast cancer experience emotional and behavioral consequences in response to daily self-weighing is unknown. In this pilot study, women (n = 51) with a history of breast cancer in a behavioral weight management program completed a weeklong daily diary protocol. Participants were asked to self-weigh every morning and report on subsequent weight-related shame and guilt, and end-of-day engagement in compensatory exercise, diet, and purging behaviors. Women reported higher levels of guilt on days when their body weight was higher than usual, and when there was more discrepancy between their current vs. goal weight. Additionally, women engaged in higher levels of compensatory diet behavior on days when they experienced more weight-related guilt than usual. Based on these preliminary findings, daily self-weighing may be associated with harmful emotional and behavioral consequences among higher-weight women with a history of breast cancer.
{"title":"Consequences of daily self-weighing: a pilot study in higher-weight women with a history of breast cancer.","authors":"Eva Pila, C M Sabiston, R A G Christensen, K L Huellemann, L Hallward, V H Taylor, K P Arbour-Nicitopoulos, S Wharton","doi":"10.1080/08870446.2023.2247426","DOIUrl":"10.1080/08870446.2023.2247426","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Self-monitoring weight is commonly recommended for higher-weight women with a history of breast cancer, despite evidence demonstrating potentially negative psychological consequences of frequent self-weighing. The extent to which higher-weight women with breast cancer experience emotional and behavioral consequences in response to daily self-weighing is unknown. In this pilot study, women (<i>n</i> = 51) with a history of breast cancer in a behavioral weight management program completed a weeklong daily diary protocol. Participants were asked to self-weigh every morning and report on subsequent weight-related shame and guilt, and end-of-day engagement in compensatory exercise, diet, and purging behaviors. Women reported higher levels of guilt on days when their body weight was higher than usual, and when there was more discrepancy between their current <i>vs.</i> goal weight. Additionally, women engaged in higher levels of compensatory diet behavior on days when they experienced more weight-related guilt than usual. Based on these preliminary findings, daily self-weighing may be associated with harmful emotional and behavioral consequences among higher-weight women with a history of breast cancer.</p>","PeriodicalId":20718,"journal":{"name":"Psychology & Health","volume":" ","pages":"594-615"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10012250","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-04-01Epub Date: 2023-07-25DOI: 10.1080/08870446.2023.2239279
Jiehu Yuan, Wendy Wing Tak Lam, Jingyi Xiao, Benjamin J Cowling, Michael Y Ni, Meihong Dong, Qiuyan Liao
Background: High COVID-19 vaccination uptake rates across all age groups are important for achieving herd immunity. However, age disparity in vaccination acceptance was consistently identified.
Objective: Taking cues from tenets of socioemotional selectivity theory, this study examined how the contextual and psychosocial factors contributed to age-specific COVID-19 vaccination acceptance.
Method: Four rounds of population-based cross-sectional surveys were conducted before and after the COVID-19 vaccination programme started in Hong Kong (n = 3527). Participants' vaccination acceptance, trust in government, social norms, vaccine confidence and risk perception of COVID-19 were obtained. Vaccine-related news headlines were collected in the same timeframe.
Result: Sentiment analysis found that the impact of negative news sentiment on vaccine hesitancy was greater among older people. The path analyses found that older people had greater trust in government, perceived greater influence of social norms, and had greater vaccine confidence which all in turn were associated with greater vaccination acceptance. However, older people were found to have less worry about contracting COVID-19, which somewhat lowered their vaccination acceptance.
Conclusion: Communication to promote older people's vaccination uptake should focus on promoting the government's timely response to the negative news reports about vaccines and increasing the positive influences of social norms on their vaccination acceptance.
{"title":"Unravelling disparity in age-specific acceptance of COVID-19 vaccination: the contextual and psychosocial influences.","authors":"Jiehu Yuan, Wendy Wing Tak Lam, Jingyi Xiao, Benjamin J Cowling, Michael Y Ni, Meihong Dong, Qiuyan Liao","doi":"10.1080/08870446.2023.2239279","DOIUrl":"10.1080/08870446.2023.2239279","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>High COVID-19 vaccination uptake rates across all age groups are important for achieving herd immunity. However, age disparity in vaccination acceptance was consistently identified.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>Taking cues from tenets of socioemotional selectivity theory, this study examined how the contextual and psychosocial factors contributed to age-specific COVID-19 vaccination acceptance.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Four rounds of population-based cross-sectional surveys were conducted before and after the COVID-19 vaccination programme started in Hong Kong (<i>n</i> = 3527). Participants' vaccination acceptance, trust in government, social norms, vaccine confidence and risk perception of COVID-19 were obtained. Vaccine-related news headlines were collected in the same timeframe.</p><p><strong>Result: </strong>Sentiment analysis found that the impact of negative news sentiment on vaccine hesitancy was greater among older people. The path analyses found that older people had greater trust in government, perceived greater influence of social norms, and had greater vaccine confidence which all in turn were associated with greater vaccination acceptance. However, older people were found to have less worry about contracting COVID-19, which somewhat lowered their vaccination acceptance.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Communication to promote older people's vaccination uptake should focus on promoting the government's timely response to the negative news reports about vaccines and increasing the positive influences of social norms on their vaccination acceptance.</p>","PeriodicalId":20718,"journal":{"name":"Psychology & Health","volume":" ","pages":"530-549"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9871339","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-04-01Epub Date: 2023-08-22DOI: 10.1080/08870446.2023.2249538
Giulia Ferraris, Mikołaj Zarzycki, Pierre Gérain, Saif Elayan, Val Morrison, Robbert Sanderman, Mariët Hagedoorn
Objective: Informal caregivers are expected to be willing to care for relatives with care needs. Little is known about whether and how willingness to care changes over time. Using a weekly diary study, we examined changes in the willingness of 955 caregivers from nine countries. Caregivers provided information on their caregiving context, relationship type, and relationship satisfaction with the care recipient.
Methods and measures: For 24 consecutive weeks, caregivers evaluated willingness to care as it was 'right now'.
Results: Willingness differs from one caregiver to another (68% between-level variability) but also fluctuates in the same caregiver from week to week (32% within-level variability), with a decrease over 6 months (intercept = 8.55; slope = -0.93; p < .001). Regardless of individual differences in average willingness to care based on caregiving context and relationship satisfaction, caregivers reported decreases in willingness. Caregivers who presented one or more health conditions themselves reported higher weekly fluctuations in willingness than caregivers with no health conditions.
Conclusion: Willingness is not a stable attitude because it decreases and caregivers experience fluctuations from week to week. A clearer understanding of weekly processes is optimal for monitoring the caregivers' well-being and tailoring interventions in line with weekly individual variations.
{"title":"Does willingness to care fluctuate over time? A weekly diary study among informal caregivers.","authors":"Giulia Ferraris, Mikołaj Zarzycki, Pierre Gérain, Saif Elayan, Val Morrison, Robbert Sanderman, Mariët Hagedoorn","doi":"10.1080/08870446.2023.2249538","DOIUrl":"10.1080/08870446.2023.2249538","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Informal caregivers are expected to be willing to care for relatives with care needs. Little is known about whether and how willingness to care changes over time. Using a weekly diary study, we examined changes in the willingness of 955 caregivers from nine countries. Caregivers provided information on their caregiving context, relationship type, and relationship satisfaction with the care recipient.</p><p><strong>Methods and measures: </strong>For 24 consecutive weeks, caregivers evaluated willingness to care as it was 'right now'.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Willingness differs from one caregiver to another (68% between-level variability) but also fluctuates in the same caregiver from week to week (32% within-level variability), with a decrease over 6 months (intercept = 8.55; slope = -0.93; <i>p</i> < .001). Regardless of individual differences in average willingness to care based on caregiving context and relationship satisfaction, caregivers reported decreases in willingness. Caregivers who presented one or more health conditions themselves reported higher weekly fluctuations in willingness than caregivers with no health conditions.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Willingness is not a stable attitude because it decreases and caregivers experience fluctuations from week to week. A clearer understanding of weekly processes is optimal for monitoring the caregivers' well-being and tailoring interventions in line with weekly individual variations.</p>","PeriodicalId":20718,"journal":{"name":"Psychology & Health","volume":" ","pages":"511-529"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10054219","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}