Noninvasive Brain Stimulation: Multiple Effects on Cognition.

IF 3.5 3区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Neuroscientist Pub Date : 2023-10-01 Epub Date: 2022-07-29 DOI:10.1177/10738584221113806
Gesa Hartwigsen, Juha Silvanto
{"title":"Noninvasive Brain Stimulation: Multiple Effects on Cognition.","authors":"Gesa Hartwigsen,&nbsp;Juha Silvanto","doi":"10.1177/10738584221113806","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Noninvasive brain stimulation (NIBS) techniques are widely used tools for the study and rehabilitation of cognitive functions. Different NIBS approaches aim to enhance or impair different cognitive processes. The methodological focus for achieving this has been on stimulation protocols that are considered either inhibitory or facilitatory. However, despite more than three decades of use, their application is based on incomplete and overly simplistic conceptualizations of mechanisms of action. Such misconception limits the usefulness of these approaches in the basic science and clinical domains. In this review, we challenge this view by arguing that stimulation protocols themselves are neither inhibitory nor facilitatory. Instead, we suggest that all induced effects reflect complex interactions of internal and external factors. Given these considerations, we present a novel model in which we conceptualize NIBS effects as an interaction between brain activity and the characteristics of the external stimulus. This interactive model can explain various phenomena in the brain stimulation literature that have been considered unexpected or paradoxical. We argue that these effects no longer seem paradoxical when considered from the viewpoint of state dependency.</p>","PeriodicalId":49753,"journal":{"name":"Neuroscientist","volume":"29 5","pages":"639-653"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"10","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neuroscientist","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10738584221113806","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/7/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

Abstract

Noninvasive brain stimulation (NIBS) techniques are widely used tools for the study and rehabilitation of cognitive functions. Different NIBS approaches aim to enhance or impair different cognitive processes. The methodological focus for achieving this has been on stimulation protocols that are considered either inhibitory or facilitatory. However, despite more than three decades of use, their application is based on incomplete and overly simplistic conceptualizations of mechanisms of action. Such misconception limits the usefulness of these approaches in the basic science and clinical domains. In this review, we challenge this view by arguing that stimulation protocols themselves are neither inhibitory nor facilitatory. Instead, we suggest that all induced effects reflect complex interactions of internal and external factors. Given these considerations, we present a novel model in which we conceptualize NIBS effects as an interaction between brain activity and the characteristics of the external stimulus. This interactive model can explain various phenomena in the brain stimulation literature that have been considered unexpected or paradoxical. We argue that these effects no longer seem paradoxical when considered from the viewpoint of state dependency.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
非侵入性脑刺激:对认知的多重影响。
非侵入性脑刺激(NIBS)技术是广泛用于认知功能研究和康复的工具。不同的NIBS方法旨在增强或削弱不同的认知过程。实现这一目标的方法重点是被认为是抑制性或促进性的刺激方案。然而,尽管使用了30多年,但它们的应用是基于对行动机制的不完整和过于简单的概念化。这种误解限制了这些方法在基础科学和临床领域的实用性。在这篇综述中,我们对这一观点提出了质疑,认为刺激方案本身既不是抑制性的,也不是促进性的。相反,我们认为所有诱导效应都反映了内部和外部因素的复杂相互作用。考虑到这些因素,我们提出了一个新的模型,在该模型中,我们将NIBS效应概念化为大脑活动和外部刺激特征之间的相互作用。这种互动模型可以解释大脑刺激文献中被认为出乎意料或自相矛盾的各种现象。我们认为,从国家依赖的角度来看,这些影响似乎不再矛盾。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Neuroscientist
Neuroscientist 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
11.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
68
期刊介绍: Edited by Stephen G. Waxman, The Neuroscientist (NRO) reviews and evaluates the noteworthy advances and key trends in molecular, cellular, developmental, behavioral systems, and cognitive neuroscience in a unique disease-relevant format. Aimed at basic neuroscientists, neurologists, neurosurgeons, and psychiatrists in research, academic, and clinical settings, The Neuroscientist reviews and updates the most important new and emerging basic and clinical neuroscience research.
期刊最新文献
A new frontier in the treatment of schizophrenia. Forthcoming Articles. Single-Nuclei Multiomics of the Prefrontal Cortex: 388 Brains Tell a Powerful Story. The Day After. Activity-Dependent Synapse Refinement: From Mechanisms to Molecules.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1