Alyssa Edwards, Rina Hung, Jennifer B Levin, Larry Forthun, Martha Sajatovic, Molly McVoy
{"title":"Health Disparities among Rural Individuals with Mental Health Conditions: A Systematic Literature Review.","authors":"Alyssa Edwards, Rina Hung, Jennifer B Levin, Larry Forthun, Martha Sajatovic, Molly McVoy","doi":"10.1037/rmh0000228","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>There is growing concern about the availability of healthcare services for rural patients. This systematic literature review evaluates original research on health disparities among rural and urban populations with mental health conditions in North America. Using PRISMA guidelines, we used four electronic databases (Pubmed, Cochrane, PsychInfo, Web of Science) and hand searches and included original research conducted in the United States or Canada before July 2021 that compared health outcomes of patients with any mental health disorder in rural versus non-rural areas. Both qualitative and quantitative data were extracted including demographics, mental health condition, health disparity measure, rural definition, health outcome measures/main findings, and delivery method. To evaluate study quality, the modified Newcastle Ottawa Scale was used. Our initial search returned 491 studies and 17 studies met final inclusion criteria. Mental health disorders included schizophrenia (4 studies), PTSD (10), mood disorders (9), and anxiety disorders (6). Total sample size was 5,314,818 with the majority being military veterans. Six studies (35.2%) showed no significant rural-urban disparities while eleven (64.7%) identified at least one. Of those, nine reported worse outcomes for rural patients. The most common disparities were diagnostic differences, increased suicide rates and access problems. This review found mixed results regarding outcomes in rural patients with mental health disorders. Disparities were found regarding risk of suicide and access to services. Telehealth in addition to in person outreach to these rural communities may be alternatives to impact these outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":74746,"journal":{"name":"Rural mental health","volume":"47 3","pages":"163-178"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10449379/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rural mental health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/rmh0000228","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/5/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
There is growing concern about the availability of healthcare services for rural patients. This systematic literature review evaluates original research on health disparities among rural and urban populations with mental health conditions in North America. Using PRISMA guidelines, we used four electronic databases (Pubmed, Cochrane, PsychInfo, Web of Science) and hand searches and included original research conducted in the United States or Canada before July 2021 that compared health outcomes of patients with any mental health disorder in rural versus non-rural areas. Both qualitative and quantitative data were extracted including demographics, mental health condition, health disparity measure, rural definition, health outcome measures/main findings, and delivery method. To evaluate study quality, the modified Newcastle Ottawa Scale was used. Our initial search returned 491 studies and 17 studies met final inclusion criteria. Mental health disorders included schizophrenia (4 studies), PTSD (10), mood disorders (9), and anxiety disorders (6). Total sample size was 5,314,818 with the majority being military veterans. Six studies (35.2%) showed no significant rural-urban disparities while eleven (64.7%) identified at least one. Of those, nine reported worse outcomes for rural patients. The most common disparities were diagnostic differences, increased suicide rates and access problems. This review found mixed results regarding outcomes in rural patients with mental health disorders. Disparities were found regarding risk of suicide and access to services. Telehealth in addition to in person outreach to these rural communities may be alternatives to impact these outcomes.
人们越来越关注农村病人获得保健服务的情况。本系统文献综述评估了北美农村和城市人口心理健康状况差异的原始研究。使用PRISMA指南,我们使用了四个电子数据库(Pubmed, Cochrane, PsychInfo, Web of Science)和手工检索,并纳入了2021年7月之前在美国或加拿大进行的原始研究,这些研究比较了农村地区与非农村地区任何精神健康障碍患者的健康结果。提取定性和定量数据,包括人口统计学、心理健康状况、健康差距测量、农村定义、健康结果测量/主要发现和交付方法。为评价研究质量,采用改良的纽卡斯尔渥太华量表。我们的初步检索结果为491项研究,其中17项研究符合最终纳入标准。精神健康障碍包括精神分裂症(4项研究)、创伤后应激障碍(10项研究)、情绪障碍(9项研究)和焦虑症(6项研究)。总样本量为5,314,818,其中大多数是退伍军人。6项研究(35.2%)没有发现显著的城乡差异,11项研究(64.7%)至少发现了一种差异。其中,有9家报告农村患者的预后较差。最常见的差异是诊断差异、自杀率上升和获取问题。这篇综述发现农村精神健康障碍患者的结果好坏参半。在自杀风险和获得服务方面发现了差异。除了亲自到这些农村社区外,远程保健可能是影响这些结果的替代办法。