The effect of ultrasonic vibration protocols for cast post removal on the incidence of root dentin defects.

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q2 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE Journal of oral science Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.2334/josnusd.23-0048
Giulliano C Serpa, Orlando A Guedes, Neurinelma S S Freitas, Julio A Silva, Carlos Estrela, Daniel A Decurcio
{"title":"The effect of ultrasonic vibration protocols for cast post removal on the incidence of root dentin defects.","authors":"Giulliano C Serpa,&nbsp;Orlando A Guedes,&nbsp;Neurinelma S S Freitas,&nbsp;Julio A Silva,&nbsp;Carlos Estrela,&nbsp;Daniel A Decurcio","doi":"10.2334/josnusd.23-0048","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To investigate the effects of two ultrasonic vibration protocols for cast post removal (single or double ultrasound units) on the development of defects in root dentin.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Sixty bovine incisors were selected. Fifteen roots were left unprepared (control). Forty-five roots were instrumented and filled. A 10-mm post space was prepared using #1-4 Largo drills. Fifteen teeth were prepared for post space and received no further procedure. Thirty roots had cast posts cemented and were submitted to ultrasonic vibration protocols for removal. The time necessary to remove each post was recorded. Roots were sectioned 3, 6, 9, and 12 mm from the coronal portion and viewed through a 25× magnification in a stereomicroscope. The presence of root fractures, partial cracks, and craze lines was registered. Chi-square and Fisher's exact tests were performed to compare the incidence of dentin defects. The Kruskal-Wallis test was performed to explore the difference between the time needed for post removal. The significance level was set at P = 0.05.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Root defects were observed in all experimental groups. There were no statistical differences comparing previous root canal treatment and post removal steps, either with 1 or 2 ultrasonic units, in the formation of defects (P = 0.544) or fractures (P = 0.679).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Ultrasonic vibration protocols for removing cast posts did not increase the number of dentin defects compared to root canal preparation and obturation and post space preparation steps.</p>","PeriodicalId":16646,"journal":{"name":"Journal of oral science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of oral science","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2334/josnusd.23-0048","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To investigate the effects of two ultrasonic vibration protocols for cast post removal (single or double ultrasound units) on the development of defects in root dentin.

Methods: Sixty bovine incisors were selected. Fifteen roots were left unprepared (control). Forty-five roots were instrumented and filled. A 10-mm post space was prepared using #1-4 Largo drills. Fifteen teeth were prepared for post space and received no further procedure. Thirty roots had cast posts cemented and were submitted to ultrasonic vibration protocols for removal. The time necessary to remove each post was recorded. Roots were sectioned 3, 6, 9, and 12 mm from the coronal portion and viewed through a 25× magnification in a stereomicroscope. The presence of root fractures, partial cracks, and craze lines was registered. Chi-square and Fisher's exact tests were performed to compare the incidence of dentin defects. The Kruskal-Wallis test was performed to explore the difference between the time needed for post removal. The significance level was set at P = 0.05.

Results: Root defects were observed in all experimental groups. There were no statistical differences comparing previous root canal treatment and post removal steps, either with 1 or 2 ultrasonic units, in the formation of defects (P = 0.544) or fractures (P = 0.679).

Conclusion: Ultrasonic vibration protocols for removing cast posts did not increase the number of dentin defects compared to root canal preparation and obturation and post space preparation steps.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
超声振动法去除铸桩对牙根缺陷发生率的影响。
目的:探讨两种超声振动方案(单、双超声单元)对铸造桩拔除后牙根质缺损发展的影响。方法:选择60只牛切牙。15根根没有做好准备(对照组)。45根根进行了器械和填充。使用1-4号Largo钻头准备10毫米柱空间。15颗牙准备后置空间,未接受进一步手术。30根已浇筑桩胶结,并提交超声振动方案去除。记录了移除每个帖子所需的时间。根距冠状部分3、6、9和12 mm,在体视显微镜下25倍放大观察。存在的根断裂,部分裂纹,和开裂线被登记。采用卡方检验和Fisher精确检验比较牙本质缺损的发生率。采用Kruskal-Wallis试验探讨两组间术后拔除所需时间的差异。显著性水平设为P = 0.05。结果:各实验组均有牙根缺损。术前根管治疗与拔除后1个或2个超声单元根管治疗在缺损形成(P = 0.544)和骨折形成(P = 0.679)方面比较,差异无统计学意义。结论:与根管预备、充填和桩位预备步骤相比,超声振动移除铸桩的方案没有增加牙本质缺陷的数量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of oral science
Journal of oral science DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
58
期刊介绍: Information not localized
期刊最新文献
A micro-computed tomographic evaluation of maxillary first molar accessory root canal morphology in a Black South African subpopulation. Attitudes of general and specialist French practitioners toward stage III-IV grade C periodontitis with familial aggregation. Clinical behavior and survival of endodontically treated teeth with or without post placement: a systematic review and meta-analysis. CAD-CAM for removable partial denture fabrication after marginal mandibulectomy based on a well-adjusted pre-existing denture. Assessment of cytotoxicity, odontoblast-like differentiation, shear bond strength, and microhardness of four orthodontic adhesive composites.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1