Technical comparison of MinIon and Illumina technologies for genotyping Chikungunya virus in clinical samples.

IF 3.6 Q2 BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY Journal, genetic engineering & biotechnology Pub Date : 2023-08-29 DOI:10.1186/s43141-023-00536-3
Leandro Menezes de Souza, Isabelle Dias de Oliveira, Flávia Cristina Silva Sales, Antonio Charlys da Costa, Karoline Rodrigues Campos, Adriano Abbud, Juliana Mariotti Guerra, Cinthya Dos Santos Cirqueira Borges, Carlos Pires Fernandes Júnior Takahashi, Leonardo José Tadeu de Araújo
{"title":"Technical comparison of MinIon and Illumina technologies for genotyping Chikungunya virus in clinical samples.","authors":"Leandro Menezes de Souza, Isabelle Dias de Oliveira, Flávia Cristina Silva Sales, Antonio Charlys da Costa, Karoline Rodrigues Campos, Adriano Abbud, Juliana Mariotti Guerra, Cinthya Dos Santos Cirqueira Borges, Carlos Pires Fernandes Júnior Takahashi, Leonardo José Tadeu de Araújo","doi":"10.1186/s43141-023-00536-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>New-generation sequencing (NGS) techniques have brought the opportunity for genomic monitoring of several microorganisms potentially relevant to public health. The establishment of different methods with different mechanisms provides a wide choice, taking into account several aspects. With that in mind, the present aim of the study was to compare basic genomic sequencing metrics that could potentially impact genotyping by nanopores from Oxford Nanopore Technologies and by synthesis from Illumina in clinical samples positive for Chikungunya (CHIKV). Among the metrics studied, running time, read production, and Q score were better represented in Illumina sequencing, while the MinIOn platform showed better response time and greater diversity of generated files. That said, it was possible to establish differences between the studied metrics in addition to verifying that the distinctions in the methods did not impact the identification of the CHIKV virus genotype.</p>","PeriodicalId":74026,"journal":{"name":"Journal, genetic engineering & biotechnology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10465416/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal, genetic engineering & biotechnology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s43141-023-00536-3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

New-generation sequencing (NGS) techniques have brought the opportunity for genomic monitoring of several microorganisms potentially relevant to public health. The establishment of different methods with different mechanisms provides a wide choice, taking into account several aspects. With that in mind, the present aim of the study was to compare basic genomic sequencing metrics that could potentially impact genotyping by nanopores from Oxford Nanopore Technologies and by synthesis from Illumina in clinical samples positive for Chikungunya (CHIKV). Among the metrics studied, running time, read production, and Q score were better represented in Illumina sequencing, while the MinIOn platform showed better response time and greater diversity of generated files. That said, it was possible to establish differences between the studied metrics in addition to verifying that the distinctions in the methods did not impact the identification of the CHIKV virus genotype.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
MinIon和Illumina技术用于基孔肯雅病毒临床分型的技术比较。
新一代测序(NGS)技术为几种可能与公共卫生相关的微生物的基因组监测带来了机会。用不同的机制建立不同的方法提供了广泛的选择,考虑到几个方面。考虑到这一点,该研究目前的目的是比较在基孔肯雅热(CHIKV)阳性的临床样本中,牛津纳米孔技术公司的纳米孔和Illumina公司的合成可能影响基因分型的基本基因组测序指标。在研究的指标中,运行时间、读取量和Q评分在Illumina测序中表现得更好,而MinIOn平台表现出更好的响应时间和更大的生成文件多样性。这就是说,除了验证方法上的差异不影响对CHIKV病毒基因型的鉴定之外,还可能确定所研究的指标之间的差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Physiochemical analyses and molecular characterization of heavy metal-resistant bacteria from Ilesha gold mining sites in Nigeria. Whole genome sequence and comparative genomics analysis of multidrug-resistant Staphylococcus xylosus NM36 isolated from a cow with mastitis in Basrah city. Immunoinformatics-aided rational design of multiepitope-based peptide vaccine (MEBV) targeting human parainfluenza virus 3 (HPIV-3) stable proteins. Isolation of plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria from the agricultural fields of Tattiannaram, Telangana. Short tandem repeat (STR) variation from 6 cities in Iraq based on 15 loci.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1