Comparison of arterial storage conditions for delayed arterial ring testing

Q3 Medicine JVS-vascular science Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.1016/j.jvssci.2023.100122
Dylan K. McLaughlin MD , Carson Hoffmann MD , Maiko Sasaki MS, MPH , Feifei Li MD , Jing Ma BS , Xiangqin Cui PhD , Roy L. Sutliff PhD , Luke P. Brewster MD, PhD
{"title":"Comparison of arterial storage conditions for delayed arterial ring testing","authors":"Dylan K. McLaughlin MD ,&nbsp;Carson Hoffmann MD ,&nbsp;Maiko Sasaki MS, MPH ,&nbsp;Feifei Li MD ,&nbsp;Jing Ma BS ,&nbsp;Xiangqin Cui PhD ,&nbsp;Roy L. Sutliff PhD ,&nbsp;Luke P. Brewster MD, PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.jvssci.2023.100122","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>Arterial ring testing is the gold standard for measuring arterial function. Increased arterial tone through arterial contraction and impaired endothelial relaxation (endothelial dysfunction) are key metrics of impaired arterial health in peripheral arterial disease (PAD). To allow for comparative testing of arteries during standard laboratory hours, storage buffers and conditions have been used to extend the functional life of arteries. Various storage conditions have been compared, but there has not been a robust comparison or validation in human arteries. The objective of this work is to optimize storage of arterial segments for endothelial cell (EC) testing in a murine model and to test EC function in human PAD arteries. We hypothesized that certain storage conditions would be superior to others.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Healthy murine aortas were harvested from 10- to 14-week-old C57/Bl6J male and female mice and compared under different storage protocols (24 hours) to immediate arterial testing. The storage conditions tested were: Opti-MEM (37°C or 4°C), Krebs-HEPES with 1.8 mmol/L or 2.5 mmol/L calcium (4°C), or Wisconsin (WI) solution at 4°C. Vascular function was evaluated by isometric force testing. Endothelium-dependent and -independent relaxation were measured after precontraction with addition of methacholine or sodium nitroprusside, respectively. Arterial contraction was stimulated with potassium chloride or phenylephrine. Analysis of variance was used to determine significance compared with immediate testing with <em>P</em> &lt; .05. Under institutional review board approval, 28 PAD arteries were collected at amputation and underwent vascular function testing as described. Disturbed flow conditions were determined by indirect (upstream occlusion) flow to the harvested tibial arteries. Stable flow arteries had in-line flow. Arterial calcification was quantified manually as present or not present.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>We found that 4°C WI and 37°C Opti-MEM best preserved endothelium-dependent relaxation and performed similarly to immediately testing aortas (termed fresh for freshly tested) (<em>P</em> &gt; .95). Other storage conditions were inferior to freshly tested aortas (<em>P</em> &lt; .05). Vascular smooth muscle function was tested by endothelial-independent relaxation and contractility. All storage conditions preserved endothelial-independent relaxation and contractility similar to freshly tested arteries. However, 4°C WI and 37°C Opti-MEM storage conditions most closely approximated the maximum force of contraction of freshly tested arteries in response to potassium chloride (<em>P</em> &gt; .39). For human arterial testing, 28 tibial arteries were tested for relaxation and contraction with 16 arteries with peripheral artery occlusive disease (PAD with disturbed flow) and 12 without peripheral artery occlusive disease (PAD with stable flow), of which 14 were calcified and 14 were noncalcified. Endothelial-dependent relaxation data was measurable in 9 arteries and arterial contraction data was measurable in 14 arteries. When comparing flow conditions, arteries exposed to disturbed flow (n = 4) had significantly less relaxation (2% vs 59%; <em>P</em> = .03) compared with stable flow conditions (n = 5). In contrast, presence the (n = 6) or absence of calcification (n = 3) did not impact arterial relaxation. Arterial contraction was not different between groups in either comparison by flow (n = 9 disturbed; n = 5 stable) or calcification (n = 6 present; n = 8 absent).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>In healthy murine aortas, arterial storage for 24 hours in 4°C WI or 37°C Opti-MEM both preserved endothelium-dependent relaxation and maximum force of contraction. In human PAD arteries stored in 4° WI, flow conditions before arterial harvest, but not arterial calcification, led to differences in arterial relaxation in human PAD arteries. Arterial contractility was more robust (11/28 arteries) compared with arterial relaxation (7/28 arteries), but was not significantly different under flow or calcification parameters. This work defines ideal storage conditions for arterial ring testing and identifies that EC dysfunction from disturbed flow may persist in delayed ex vivo arterial testing.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":74035,"journal":{"name":"JVS-vascular science","volume":"4 ","pages":"Article 100122"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/6d/1e/main.PMC10463248.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JVS-vascular science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666350323000263","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

Arterial ring testing is the gold standard for measuring arterial function. Increased arterial tone through arterial contraction and impaired endothelial relaxation (endothelial dysfunction) are key metrics of impaired arterial health in peripheral arterial disease (PAD). To allow for comparative testing of arteries during standard laboratory hours, storage buffers and conditions have been used to extend the functional life of arteries. Various storage conditions have been compared, but there has not been a robust comparison or validation in human arteries. The objective of this work is to optimize storage of arterial segments for endothelial cell (EC) testing in a murine model and to test EC function in human PAD arteries. We hypothesized that certain storage conditions would be superior to others.

Methods

Healthy murine aortas were harvested from 10- to 14-week-old C57/Bl6J male and female mice and compared under different storage protocols (24 hours) to immediate arterial testing. The storage conditions tested were: Opti-MEM (37°C or 4°C), Krebs-HEPES with 1.8 mmol/L or 2.5 mmol/L calcium (4°C), or Wisconsin (WI) solution at 4°C. Vascular function was evaluated by isometric force testing. Endothelium-dependent and -independent relaxation were measured after precontraction with addition of methacholine or sodium nitroprusside, respectively. Arterial contraction was stimulated with potassium chloride or phenylephrine. Analysis of variance was used to determine significance compared with immediate testing with P < .05. Under institutional review board approval, 28 PAD arteries were collected at amputation and underwent vascular function testing as described. Disturbed flow conditions were determined by indirect (upstream occlusion) flow to the harvested tibial arteries. Stable flow arteries had in-line flow. Arterial calcification was quantified manually as present or not present.

Results

We found that 4°C WI and 37°C Opti-MEM best preserved endothelium-dependent relaxation and performed similarly to immediately testing aortas (termed fresh for freshly tested) (P > .95). Other storage conditions were inferior to freshly tested aortas (P < .05). Vascular smooth muscle function was tested by endothelial-independent relaxation and contractility. All storage conditions preserved endothelial-independent relaxation and contractility similar to freshly tested arteries. However, 4°C WI and 37°C Opti-MEM storage conditions most closely approximated the maximum force of contraction of freshly tested arteries in response to potassium chloride (P > .39). For human arterial testing, 28 tibial arteries were tested for relaxation and contraction with 16 arteries with peripheral artery occlusive disease (PAD with disturbed flow) and 12 without peripheral artery occlusive disease (PAD with stable flow), of which 14 were calcified and 14 were noncalcified. Endothelial-dependent relaxation data was measurable in 9 arteries and arterial contraction data was measurable in 14 arteries. When comparing flow conditions, arteries exposed to disturbed flow (n = 4) had significantly less relaxation (2% vs 59%; P = .03) compared with stable flow conditions (n = 5). In contrast, presence the (n = 6) or absence of calcification (n = 3) did not impact arterial relaxation. Arterial contraction was not different between groups in either comparison by flow (n = 9 disturbed; n = 5 stable) or calcification (n = 6 present; n = 8 absent).

Conclusions

In healthy murine aortas, arterial storage for 24 hours in 4°C WI or 37°C Opti-MEM both preserved endothelium-dependent relaxation and maximum force of contraction. In human PAD arteries stored in 4° WI, flow conditions before arterial harvest, but not arterial calcification, led to differences in arterial relaxation in human PAD arteries. Arterial contractility was more robust (11/28 arteries) compared with arterial relaxation (7/28 arteries), but was not significantly different under flow or calcification parameters. This work defines ideal storage conditions for arterial ring testing and identifies that EC dysfunction from disturbed flow may persist in delayed ex vivo arterial testing.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
延迟动脉环试验中动脉储存条件的比较
目的动脉环试验是测定动脉功能的金标准。动脉收缩引起的动脉张力增加和内皮舒张受损(内皮功能障碍)是外周动脉疾病(PAD)中动脉健康受损的关键指标。为了在标准实验室时间内对动脉进行比较测试,使用了储存缓冲液和条件来延长动脉的功能寿命。已经比较了各种储存条件,但在人体动脉中还没有强有力的比较或验证。这项工作的目的是优化小鼠模型中内皮细胞(EC)测试的动脉段储存,并测试EC在人类PAD动脉中的功能。我们假设某些储存条件会优于其他条件。方法采集10 ~ 14周龄C57/Bl6J雄性和雌性小鼠的健康主动脉,比较不同保存方式(24小时)和即时动脉检测。测试的储存条件为:Opti-MEM(37°C或4°C), Krebs-HEPES (1.8 mmol/L或2.5 mmol/L钙)(4°C),或Wisconsin (WI)溶液(4°C)。血管功能通过等距力试验评估。分别加入甲胆碱或硝普钠预收缩后测定内皮依赖性松弛和非依赖性松弛。用氯化钾或苯肾上腺素刺激动脉收缩。采用方差分析来确定与P <即时检验相比的显著性;. 05。经机构审查委员会批准,在截肢时收集28条PAD动脉,并进行如上所述的血管功能测试。通过间接(上游闭塞)流向采集的胫骨动脉来确定受干扰的血流情况。稳定流动动脉呈直线流动。动脉钙化被人工量化为存在或不存在。结果我们发现,4°C WI和37°C Opti-MEM能最好地保存内皮依赖性松弛,其效果与立即检测主动脉(新鲜检测称为新鲜)相似(P >.95)。其他储存条件不如新鲜测试的主动脉(P <. 05)。血管平滑肌功能采用内皮非依赖性舒张和收缩性检测。所有的储存条件都保持了内皮独立的舒张和收缩性,类似于新鲜测试的动脉。然而,4°C WI和37°C Opti-MEM储存条件最接近新测试动脉对氯化钾(P >点)。在人体动脉测试中,对28条胫骨动脉进行舒张和收缩测试,其中16条动脉有外周动脉闭塞症(PAD伴血流紊乱),12条动脉无外周动脉闭塞症(PAD伴血流稳定),其中14条动脉钙化,14条动脉无钙化。9条动脉可测内皮依赖性舒张数据,14条动脉可测动脉收缩数据。当比较流动条件时,暴露于扰动流动(n = 4)的动脉松弛程度显著降低(2% vs 59%;与稳定血流条件(n = 5)相比,P = .03)。相反,存在(n = 6)或不存在钙化(n = 3)不影响动脉舒张。两组间动脉收缩无明显差异(n = 9;N = 5稳定)或钙化(N = 6存在;N = 8缺席)。结论健康小鼠主动脉在4°C WI或37°C Opti-MEM条件下保存24 h均能保持内皮依赖性舒张和最大收缩力。在4°WI储存的人PAD动脉中,动脉采集前的血流状况,而不是动脉钙化,导致了人PAD动脉动脉舒张的差异。动脉收缩性(11/28条动脉)比动脉舒张性(7/28条动脉)更强,但在血流或钙化参数下差异不显著。这项工作定义了动脉环测试的理想储存条件,并确定了血液流动紊乱导致的EC功能障碍可能在延迟的离体动脉测试中持续存在。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
28 weeks
期刊最新文献
Toll-Like Receptor 4, a potential therapeutic target of lower limb ischemic myopathy that raises further questions Role of Toll-like Receptor 4 in Skeletal Muscle Damage in Chronic Limb Threatening Ischaemia Predicting Future Occlusion or Stenosis of Lower Extremity Bypass Grafts Using Artificial Intelligence to Simultaneously Analyze All Flow Velocities Collected in Current and Previous Ultrasound Exams A central arteriovenous fistula reduces systemic hypertension in a mouse model Systematic review and meta-analysis of the genetics of peripheral arterial disease
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1