Rethinking Prophylactic Laser Peripheral Iridotomy in Primary Angle-Closure Suspects

Abstract

Purpose

To examine the generalizability, discuss limitations, and critically appraise recommendations on the management of primary angle-closure suspects (PACSs) that emerged as a result of recent randomized clinical trials challenging the widely accepted clinical practice of offering laser peripheral iridotomy (LPI) to PACS patients. To synthetize findings from these and other studies.

Design

Narrative review.

Subjects

Patients classified as PACS.

Methods

The Zhongshan Angle-Closure Prevention (ZAP)–Trial and the Singapore Asymptomatic Narrow Angle Laser Iridotomy Study (ANA-LIS) along with accompanying publications were reviewed. Epidemiologic studies reporting on the prevalence of primary angle-closure glaucoma and other precursor forms of the disease were also analyzed along with publications reporting on the natural course of the disease or studies reporting on outcomes after prophylactic LPI.

Main Outcome Measures

Incidence of progression to more severe forms of angle closure.

Results

Patients recruited in recent randomized clinical trials are asymptomatic, do not have cataracts, may be younger, and have, on average, deeper anterior chambers depth compared with patients treated with LPI in clinics.

Conclusions

The ZAP-Trial and ANA-LIS clearly represent the best available data on PACS management, additional parameters however may need to be considered when physicians face patients in clinic. PACS patients encountered at tertiary referral centers may represent more advanced cases with respect to ocular biometric parameters and may be at higher risk for disease progression compared with those recruited through population-based screening.

Financial Disclosure(s)

Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.