Evaluation of between-assay consistency among laboratory testing methods for neurosyphilis: a systematic review.

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 INFECTIOUS DISEASES Sexual health Pub Date : 2023-10-01 DOI:10.1071/SH22203
Xu Zhang, Fang-Zhi Du, Qian-Qiu Wang, Rui-Li Zhang
{"title":"Evaluation of between-assay consistency among laboratory testing methods for neurosyphilis: a systematic review.","authors":"Xu Zhang,&nbsp;Fang-Zhi Du,&nbsp;Qian-Qiu Wang,&nbsp;Rui-Li Zhang","doi":"10.1071/SH22203","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>We conducted a systematic review to analyse the consistency of nontreponemal-specific tests of Treponema pallidum in cerebrospinal fluid. We searched the PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, CNKI, Wanfang and Chongqing VIP databases. The inclusion criteria were studies conducted on nontreponemal-specific tests in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) within the same population. Exclusion criteria were studies with incomplete data or where we were unable to obtain the full text, duplicate reports, case reports and studies without sensitivity or specificity results. We used kappa value analysis and McNemar's test to analyse study consistency. We initially collected a total of 198 articles and ultimately included six articles that involved 429 patients with neurosyphilis. The performance between venereal disease research laboratory tests (VDRL) and the reactive plasma regain or toluidine red serum unheated test was similar. The kappa value for consistency between VDRL and reactive plasma regain was >0.8 in three articles, and was 0.892 for consistency between VDRL and toluidine red serum unheated test in one article. Our results suggested that CSF-reactive plasma regain or CSF-toluidine red serum unheated test may serve as alternative tests in the diagnosis of neurosyphilis with CSF-VDRL.</p>","PeriodicalId":22165,"journal":{"name":"Sexual health","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sexual health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1071/SH22203","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We conducted a systematic review to analyse the consistency of nontreponemal-specific tests of Treponema pallidum in cerebrospinal fluid. We searched the PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, CNKI, Wanfang and Chongqing VIP databases. The inclusion criteria were studies conducted on nontreponemal-specific tests in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) within the same population. Exclusion criteria were studies with incomplete data or where we were unable to obtain the full text, duplicate reports, case reports and studies without sensitivity or specificity results. We used kappa value analysis and McNemar's test to analyse study consistency. We initially collected a total of 198 articles and ultimately included six articles that involved 429 patients with neurosyphilis. The performance between venereal disease research laboratory tests (VDRL) and the reactive plasma regain or toluidine red serum unheated test was similar. The kappa value for consistency between VDRL and reactive plasma regain was >0.8 in three articles, and was 0.892 for consistency between VDRL and toluidine red serum unheated test in one article. Our results suggested that CSF-reactive plasma regain or CSF-toluidine red serum unheated test may serve as alternative tests in the diagnosis of neurosyphilis with CSF-VDRL.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
神经梅毒实验室检测方法测定间一致性的评估:一项系统综述。
我们进行了一项系统综述,以分析脑脊液中苍白螺旋体的非特异性测试的一致性。我们搜索了PubMed、EMBASE、Web of Science、CNKI、万方和重庆VIP数据库。纳入标准是在同一人群中对脑脊液(CSF)中的非特异性测试进行的研究。排除标准是数据不完整的研究,或者我们无法获得全文、重复报告、病例报告和没有敏感性或特异性结果的研究。我们使用kappa值分析和McNemar检验来分析研究的一致性。我们最初总共收集了198篇文章,最终包括6篇涉及429名神经梅毒患者的文章。性病研究实验室测试(VDRL)和反应性血浆回潮或甲苯胺红血清未加热测试之间的表现相似。在三篇文章中,VDRL和反应性血浆回潮之间一致性的kappa值>0.8,在一篇文章中VDRL和甲苯胺红血清未加热试验之间一致性为0.892。我们的结果表明,CSF反应性血浆恢复或CSF甲苯胺红血清未加热试验可作为诊断CSF-VDRL神经梅毒的替代试验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Sexual health
Sexual health 医学-传染病学
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
12.50%
发文量
121
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Sexual Health publishes original and significant contributions to the fields of sexual health including HIV/AIDS, Sexually transmissible infections, issues of sexuality and relevant areas of reproductive health. This journal is directed towards those working in sexual health as clinicians, public health practitioners, researchers in behavioural, clinical, laboratory, public health or social, sciences. The journal publishes peer reviewed original research, editorials, review articles, topical debates, case reports and critical correspondence. Officially sponsored by: The Australasian Chapter of Sexual Health Medicine of RACP Sexual Health Society of Queensland Sexual Health is the official journal of the International Union against Sexually Transmitted Infections (IUSTI), Asia-Pacific, and the Asia-Oceania Federation of Sexology.
期刊最新文献
Sex work, syndemic conditions and condomless anal intercourse among men who have sex with men who engage in sex work in Latin America Exploring midwives’ training needs and preferences for providing sexual health education for pregnant women: a mixed-methods study Women living with HIV: identifying and managing their menopause, age-related, and psychosocial health needs in a metropolitan sexual health service in Sydney, Australia Digital technology and self-care in sexual health Fear really comes from the unknowns: exploring the impact of HIV stigma and discrimination on quality of life for people living with HIV in Singapore through the minority stress model
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1