The Social, Demographic, and Clinical Predictors of COVID-19 Severity: a Model-based Analysis of United States Veterans.

IF 3.2 3区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2023-09-01 DOI:10.1007/s40615-023-01773-5
Alyssa R Greenhouse, Danielle Richard, Anjali Khakharia, Michael Goodman, Lawrence S Phillips, Julie A Gazmararian
{"title":"The Social, Demographic, and Clinical Predictors of COVID-19 Severity: a Model-based Analysis of United States Veterans.","authors":"Alyssa R Greenhouse, Danielle Richard, Anjali Khakharia, Michael Goodman, Lawrence S Phillips, Julie A Gazmararian","doi":"10.1007/s40615-023-01773-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study aims to identify the contributions of individual and community social determinants of health (SDOH), demographic, and clinical factors in COVID-19 disease severity through a model-based analysis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This national cross-sectional study focused on hospitalization among those tested for COVID-19 and use of intensive care, analyzing data on 220,848 Veterans tested between February 20, 2020 and October 20, 2021. Multiple logistic regression models were constructed using backwards elimination. The predictive value of each model was assessed with a c-statistic.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Those hospitalized were older, more likely to be male, of Black or Asian race, have an income less than $39,999, live in an urban residence, and have medical comorbidities. The strongest predictors for hospitalization included Gini inequality index, race, income, heart failure, chronic kidney disease (CKD), and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). For intensive care, Asian race, rural residence, COPD, and CKD were the strongest predictors. C-statistics were c = 0.749 for hospitalization and c = 0.582 for ICU admission.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A combination of clinical, demographic, individual and community SDOH factors predict COVID-19 hospitalization with good predictive ability and can inform risk stratification, discharge planning, and public health interventions. Racial disparities were not explained by social or clinical factors. Intensive care models had low discriminative power and may be better explained by other characteristics.</p>","PeriodicalId":16921,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40615-023-01773-5","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/9/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: This study aims to identify the contributions of individual and community social determinants of health (SDOH), demographic, and clinical factors in COVID-19 disease severity through a model-based analysis.

Methods: This national cross-sectional study focused on hospitalization among those tested for COVID-19 and use of intensive care, analyzing data on 220,848 Veterans tested between February 20, 2020 and October 20, 2021. Multiple logistic regression models were constructed using backwards elimination. The predictive value of each model was assessed with a c-statistic.

Results: Those hospitalized were older, more likely to be male, of Black or Asian race, have an income less than $39,999, live in an urban residence, and have medical comorbidities. The strongest predictors for hospitalization included Gini inequality index, race, income, heart failure, chronic kidney disease (CKD), and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). For intensive care, Asian race, rural residence, COPD, and CKD were the strongest predictors. C-statistics were c = 0.749 for hospitalization and c = 0.582 for ICU admission.

Conclusions: A combination of clinical, demographic, individual and community SDOH factors predict COVID-19 hospitalization with good predictive ability and can inform risk stratification, discharge planning, and public health interventions. Racial disparities were not explained by social or clinical factors. Intensive care models had low discriminative power and may be better explained by other characteristics.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
COVID-19 严重程度的社会、人口和临床预测因素:基于模型的美国退伍军人分析》(The Social, Demographic, and Clinical Predictors of COVID-19 Severity: a Model-based Analysis of United States Veterans)。
目的:本研究旨在通过基于模型的分析,确定个人和社区健康社会决定因素(SDOH)、人口统计学和临床因素对 COVID-19 疾病严重程度的影响:这项全国性横断面研究重点关注 COVID-19 检测者的住院情况和重症监护的使用情况,分析了 2020 年 2 月 20 日至 2021 年 10 月 20 日期间检测的 220,848 名退伍军人的数据。采用反向排除法构建了多元逻辑回归模型。用c统计量评估了每个模型的预测价值:住院患者年龄较大,更有可能是男性、黑人或亚裔、收入低于 39,999 美元、居住在城市、患有合并症。吉尼不平等指数、种族、收入、心力衰竭、慢性肾病(CKD)和慢性阻塞性肺病(COPD)是住院的最强预测因素。在重症监护方面,亚裔、农村居民、慢性阻塞性肺病和慢性阻塞性肺病是最强的预测因素。住院治疗的 C 统计量为 c = 0.749,入住重症监护室的 C 统计量为 c = 0.582:结论:综合临床、人口、个人和社区 SDOH 因素可预测 COVID-19 的住院情况,具有良好的预测能力,可为风险分层、出院规划和公共卫生干预提供依据。社会或临床因素无法解释种族差异。重症监护模型的判别能力较低,其他特征可能可以更好地解释这一现象。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities
Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
7.30
自引率
5.10%
发文量
263
期刊介绍: Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities reports on the scholarly progress of work to understand, address, and ultimately eliminate health disparities based on race and ethnicity. Efforts to explore underlying causes of health disparities and to describe interventions that have been undertaken to address racial and ethnic health disparities are featured. Promising studies that are ongoing or studies that have longer term data are welcome, as are studies that serve as lessons for best practices in eliminating health disparities. Original research, systematic reviews, and commentaries presenting the state-of-the-art thinking on problems centered on health disparities will be considered for publication. We particularly encourage review articles that generate innovative and testable ideas, and constructive discussions and/or critiques of health disparities.Because the Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities receives a large number of submissions, about 30% of submissions to the Journal are sent out for full peer review.
期刊最新文献
Disparities in Patient Portal Activation and Usage at a Large Pediatric Academic Institution. Intersecting Epidemics: Examining the Impact of Internalized Homophobia and Depression Symptoms on HIV Testing Through a Suicide Syndemic Among Young Black Men Who Have Sex with Men. Socioeconomic Status, Social Support, and Quality of Life Among Black Adults. Bridging the Gap: Culturally Responsive Strategies for NIH Trial Recruitment. A Review of the Public Health Literature Examining the Roles of Socioeconomic Status and Race/Ethnicity on Health Outcomes in the United States.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1