Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities最新文献

Evidence in the literature suggests an association between Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM) and dementia, but this relationship has not been studied in the most recently available nationally representative datasets. This retrospective, observational, cross-sectional study of adults (60+ years of age) seeks to investigate this association across racial and ethnic groups in the most recently available National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey (NAMCS) datasets. A multivariable logistic regression model is employed to investigate the association between T2DM and the diagnosis of dementia and assess disparities in racial and ethnic groups, while controlling for available covariates of interest. The analysis found no evidence of a relationship between T2DM and dementia even after adjusting for available covariates of interest (OR 1.13, 95% CI = 0.81-1.57). However, evidence of differences in the proportion with dementia was observed between ethnicities and race groups. Hispanic/Latinos were found to have more than double the odds of dementia compared to Non-Hispanic/Latinos (OR 2.08, 95% CI = 1.05-4.14), while the Other race group had 74% lower odds of dementia compared to the White race group (OR 0.26, 95% CI = 0.10-0.64). This study suggests that disparities in the risk of dementia remain for ethnic/racial groups. As minority populations continue to grow, educational and preventative measures for both diabetes and dementia are vital public health priorities. Perceptions of cognitive impairment, its association with T2DM, and the interventions needed to address the deficits may vary by culture and ethnic background; therefore, specific characteristics relevant to these populations should be further evaluated.

Background: The emergency department (ED) is an important gateway into the health system for people from culturally and linguistically diverse (CALD) backgrounds; their experience in the ED is likely to impact the way they access care in the future. Our review aimed to describe interventions used to improve ED health care delivery for adults from a CALD background.

Methods: An electronic search of four databases was conducted to identify empirical studies that reported interventions with a primary focus of improving ED care for CALD adults (aged ≥ 18 years), with measures relating to ED system performance, patient outcomes, patient experience, or staff experience. Studies published from inception to November 2022 were included. We excluded non-empirical studies, studies where an intervention was not provided in ED, papers where the full text was unavailable, or papers published in a language other than English. The intervention strategies were categorised thematically, and measures were tabulated.

Results: Following the screening of 3654 abstracts, 89 articles underwent full text review; 16 articles met the inclusion criteria. Four clear strategies for targeting action tailored to the CALD population of interest were identified: improving self-management of health issues, improving communication between patients and providers, adhering to good clinical practice, and building health workforce capacity.

Conclusions: The four strategies identified provide a useful framework for targeted action tailored to the population and outcome of interest. These detailed examples show how intervention design must consider intersecting socio-economic barriers, so as not to perpetuate existing disparity.

Registration: PROSPERO registration number: CRD42022379584.

The gap in fatal opioid overdose rates has been closing between non-Hispanic Black and non-Hispanic White individuals. The rising opioid-involved mortality rates among non-Hispanic Black adults has been identified by SAMHSA as a critical public health issue. However, further research is needed that utilizes comprehensive surveillance data on both fatal and non-fatal opioid-involved overdoses to better assess the changing trends and evaluate factors contributing to changing disparities. We conducted an analysis of medical examiner and hospital data for years 2016-2021 from the largest county in Illinois (Cook) to (1) evaluate disparities in non-fatal and fatal opioid-involved overdoses between middle-aged non-Hispanic Black adults and Black adults of other age groups stratified by sex, (2) to assess if disparities exist across middle-aged adults of different race-ethnicities specifically non-Hispanic White and Hispanic-Latino adults, and (3) evaluate factors contributing to the disparities. Fatal opioid overdose rates among middle-aged Black men 45-64 years old were on average 5.3 times higher than Black men of other age groups, and 6.2 times higher than middle-aged non-Black men. Similarly, fatal opioid overdose rates among middle-aged Black women were on average 5.0 times higher than Black women of other age groups, and 4.9 times higher than middle-aged non-Black women. Hospital utilization rates for opioid-involved overdoses showed similar disparities between age groups and race-ethnicities. Findings indicate that stark disparities in rates of opioid-involved overdoses among middle-aged Black men and women are likely attributed to exposure to more lethal opioids, drug variability in local markets, differences in concurrent drug exposures, and lower access to harm reduction, emergent and preventative health services.

Background: Studies showed disparities in management and outcomes of African American when compared to Caucasian population. The presence of chorioamnionitis may affect the decision to have a cesarean delivery (CD); however, it is not known if such a decision is affected by the mothers' race/ethnicity.

Objective: To assess the interaction between African American race/ethnicity and CD in women with chorioamnionitis.

Methods: Utilizing the National Inpatient Sample dataset, we examined the association of CD with chorioamnionitis in the overall population and within Caucasian and African American. Logistic regression models were used to control for confounders.

Results: The study included 6,648,883 women who delivered 6,925,920 infants. The prevalence of chorioamnionitis was 0.78 and 1.1 in Caucasian and African American, respectively. CD with and without chorioamnionitis was 41.2% and 32.4%, respectively (aOR 1.46 (1.43-1.49), p < 0.001), in Caucasian population and 45.0% and 36.6% in African American population aOR 1.42 (1.37-1.47), p < 0.001. African American population had significantly higher CD after controlling for chorioamnionitis and other confounding variables (aOR of 1.18 (1.17-1.18), p < 0.001).

Conclusion: Chorioamnionitis is associated with increased rate of CD. Ethnic disparities exist in CD rates regardless of the chorioamnionitis status. Such findings warrant further investigation to explore factors associated with this discrepancy.

Purpose: The demographic proportions of plastic surgery trials approximating real-world disease have not well been studied. Judicious trial representation is essential in evaluation of treatments across diverse patient populations. Herein, we investigate sex, racial, and ethnic disparities in patient enrollment across burn trials.

Methods: Cross-sectional analysis of participants enrolled in high-quality, with reduced risk of bias, randomized controlled trials (RCT) on burns registered on clinicaltrials.gov under the query "burn." Completed RCTs reporting at least two demographic groups, employing double masking or greater, and with results accessible through the registry or publications were included. Trial characteristics (sponsor country, site location, initiation year, study phase, masking) and demographic data (sex, race, ethnicity per US reporting guidelines) were collected. The Global Burden of Disease database provided sex-based burn disease burdens. The primary outcome was the population-to-prevalence ratio of enrolled female participants. Secondary outcomes included representation of racial and ethnic populations as related to study blinding, phase, and study/sponsor locations.

Results: Of 546 records, 39 trials met the inclusion criteria (2919 participants). All trials reported sex demographics, with females comprising 37.02% of all participants (PPR = 0.71, 95% CI [0.59, 0.82], likely indicating underrepresentation against their empiric disease burden). Only 7 and 9 trials reported ethnicity and race, respectively, although not comprehensively. Among trials reporting race or ethnicity, Caucasians and Black persons comprised 57.52% and 21.80% of participants, respectively, while only 9.80% had Hispanic/Latino ethnicity. Severe underreporting of race and ethnicity precluded much of secondary significance testing across study variables.

Conclusions: Females are likely underrepresented in high-quality, US-registered burn trials, unreflective of their real-world disease burden. Further, severe underreporting of race and ethnicity was noted. Future trials should enroll diverse demographics and equitable populations for promotion of study generalizability.

The University of Mississippi Medical Center Graduate Training and Education Center houses the Robert E. Smith, MD, Scholars Program, a two-year certificate program that equips predoctoral trainees from five Mississippi universities with advanced research skills in cardiovascular epidemiology. Funded by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI), the program focuses on addressing health disparities, minority health, and health inequities in underserved communities. Trainees receive mentorship, career coaching, and a $7,500 annual stipend, building a foundation for postdoctoral opportunities and expanding professional networks. The Smith Scholars Program emphasizes population health and provides interdisciplinary training in areas such as biostatistics, scientific communication, and cardiovascular health. It is uniquely positioned to address systemic challenges, particularly in Mississippi, a state with high cardiovascular disease prevalence and limited research funding. The program's regional advantage and its partnership with the Jackson Heart Study offer scholars exposure to health disparities in Black/African American communities, preparing them to contribute to innovative, community-based research. Additionally, it fosters collaborative science, enabling participants to overcome academic barriers and engage with large-scale health equity research efforts. The Smith Scholars Program has been instrumental in shaping the career trajectories of its participants, facilitating their transition to postdoctoral positions and independent research roles.

Background: The strong Black woman (SBW) stereotype can be seen as a positive view of Black women and even a standard to uphold. SBW internalization is a coping mechanism for dealing with racism and sexism. However, multiple recent studies have indicated that Black women in the modern era experience the paradox of SBW internalization having negative generational health effects. We interviewed Black women with a personal or relation diagnosis of breast or ovarian cancer to understand their views and experiences, including how the perception of the SBW stereotype influenced their care.

Methods: Qualitative semi-structured interviews were conducted via telephone or video conference and transcribed verbatim. Transcripts were qualitatively analyzed for iterative themes related to cancer care and psychosocial support.

Results: Sixty-one Black women completed an interview. Responses in multiple transcripts expressed experiences and sentiments consistent with the SBW stereotype, including the importance of maintaining the appearance of strength during their cancer journey. This resulted in some patients declining assistance during their cancer journeys. Participants shared a hope that there would be more willingness to show vulnerability so that future generations of cancer patients receive adequate support. Key aspects of the SBW stereotype were also cited as potential contributors to ongoing racial disparities in breast and ovarian cancer outcomes.

Conclusion(s): Participants described a paradox of the SBW stereotype that is ultimately detrimental to health and wellbeing. Healthcare professionals and cancer researchers should be aware of this phenomenon to address cancer care more appropriately in Black women.

Black men experience high rates of adverse health that can be prevented or mitigated by the regular use of preventive health services. Efforts are urgently needed to promote this type of health service use among Black men. The U.S. Preventive Services Task Force and the Institute of Medicine indicate that such efforts must align with Black men's values, perspectives, and preferences. However, little guidance exists on how to align these efforts for Black men. The present qualitative study was developed to understand factors associated with preventive health service use among Black men and community-informed strategies to promote preventive health service use among these men. An approach rooted in community-based participatory research and ecological theory was used. A core leadership team consisting of five Black men from the area guided the project's development, implementation, and evaluation. The core leadership team conducted 22 interviews with Black men from their communities. Four themes emerged from these interviews: (1) holistic well-being challenges faced by Black men: interaction of mental, physical, and societal forces; (2) the interplay of financial, informational, and gendered barriers/facilitators to using preventative health services among Black men; (3) the importance of shared identity in peer health education about preventive health service use; and (4) the need for community-centered initiatives to improve preventive health service use among Black men that prioritize accessibility and information. Findings of the present study can be used to tailor preventive health service use efforts for Black men. Such efforts have the potential to promote health and mitigate health disparities.

Bridging the healthcare access gap and addressing COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy among rural-dwelling Black American adults residing in the Deep South require involvement of faith-based leaders in the community. This study explored perceived barriers and resources to meeting community needs, including vaccination, during the COVID-19 pandemic as reported by 17 Black American church leaders in the rural West Alabama Black Belt geographic region in May 2022. The main themes that emerged included (1) attending to community impact of COVID-19 illness and death; (2) maximizing health literacy and diminishing vaccine hesitancy through engaging in preventive health practices and sharing public health information; (3) addressing challenges created or exacerbated by COVID-19, including reduction in in-person attendance (particularly among adolescents and young adults), limited access to and literacy with technology, and political perceptions influencing engagement in preventive health behaviors; (4) maximizing technological solutions to increase attendance in the church; and (5) engaging in solution-focused and innovative initiatives to meet the identified needs in the congregation and community. Church leaders in West Alabama rural areas facing economic, health, and technological disparities identified "silver linings" as well as challenges created or exacerbated during the pandemic. As the need for COVID-19 vaccination and booster vaccination continues, Black American church leaders play pivotal roles in meeting rural community needs.

Introduction: Coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) may have increased morbidity and mortality in patients having Cesarean delivery (CD) in the USA.

Methods: We performed a retrospective cohort study of patients who had CD in 2020 using the national inpatient sample. After stratification by COVID-19 status, demographics, comorbidities, complications, mortality, and costs were compared.

Results: There were 31,444,222 hospitalizations in the USA in 2020 with a mortality rate of 2.8%. Among these, 1,453,945 patients had COVID-19 and mortality was 13.2%. There were 1,108,755 patients who had CD and 15,550 had COVID-19. Patients with COVID-19 more frequently had Medicaid and were Hispanic. Patients with COVID-19 had more comorbidities including chronic hypertension, diabetes mellitus, pre-eclampsia, and eclampsia. Mortality in CD patients with COVID-19 was 30 in 10,000 patients, while for non-COVID-19 patients, it was 1 in 10,000 patients, P < 0.001. The crude odds ratio for mortality in COVID-19 patients was 32.1 (95% confidence interval = 22.9 to 44.7), P < 0.001 and the adjusted odds ratio was 29.3 (95% confidence interval = 20.7 to 41.4), P < 0.001.

Conclusions: CD patients with COVID-19 had 30-fold higher mortality before widespread vaccination was available with Hispanic and Medicaid patients disproportionately impacted. Potential explanations for this disparity include reduced access to personal protective equipment (e.g., masks) and testing, as well as socio-economic factors. Further research is needed to understand the factors that contributed to disparities in infection and clinical outcomes among obstetric patients during the COVID-19 pandemic. In future pandemics, enhanced efforts will be needed to protect economically disadvantaged women who are pregnant.