Usefulness of one-arm motorized gait device for chronic hemiplegic stroke survivors.

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q4 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL Technology and Health Care Pub Date : 2024-01-01 DOI:10.3233/THC-230197
Ki-Hun Cho, Dong-Geon Lee, Won-Kyung Song, Gyuchang Lee
{"title":"Usefulness of one-arm motorized gait device for chronic hemiplegic stroke survivors.","authors":"Ki-Hun Cho, Dong-Geon Lee, Won-Kyung Song, Gyuchang Lee","doi":"10.3233/THC-230197","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>After stroke, gait training is a key component of rehabilitation, and most individuals use a variety of walking aids depending on their physical condition and environment.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to investigate the potential effect of a one-arm motorized gait device for gait assist of chronic hemiplegic stroke survivors through comparison with traditional gait devices (parallel bar and hemi-walker).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study was conducted on 14 chronic hemiplegic stroke survivors. The participants were asked to walk under three conditions using different gait devices, and their gait parameters during walking were collected and analyzed. The first condition involved walking on parallel bars; second condition, walking using hemi-walkers; and third condition, walking using one-arm motorized gait devices. With the use of a gait analysis system, the spatio-temporal gait parameters in each condition were collected, such as gait velocity, cadence, step length, stride length, single support time, and double support time.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the results by repeated-measures ANOVA or the Friedman test, a significant difference was found in the gait parameters among all three conditions (p< 0.05). The post-hoc test showed a significant change in the spatio-temporal gait parameters (especially, velocity, cadence and affected side single and double support time) when one-arm motorized gait device were used compared with parallel bars and hemi-walkers (p< 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The results of this study suggest that one-arm motorized gait devices developed for hemiplegic stroke survivors may be more effective potentially than parallel bars and hemi-walkers in gait assistance of chronic hemiplegic stroke survivors.</p>","PeriodicalId":48978,"journal":{"name":"Technology and Health Care","volume":" ","pages":"335-342"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Technology and Health Care","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3233/THC-230197","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: After stroke, gait training is a key component of rehabilitation, and most individuals use a variety of walking aids depending on their physical condition and environment.

Objective: This study aimed to investigate the potential effect of a one-arm motorized gait device for gait assist of chronic hemiplegic stroke survivors through comparison with traditional gait devices (parallel bar and hemi-walker).

Methods: This study was conducted on 14 chronic hemiplegic stroke survivors. The participants were asked to walk under three conditions using different gait devices, and their gait parameters during walking were collected and analyzed. The first condition involved walking on parallel bars; second condition, walking using hemi-walkers; and third condition, walking using one-arm motorized gait devices. With the use of a gait analysis system, the spatio-temporal gait parameters in each condition were collected, such as gait velocity, cadence, step length, stride length, single support time, and double support time.

Results: In the results by repeated-measures ANOVA or the Friedman test, a significant difference was found in the gait parameters among all three conditions (p< 0.05). The post-hoc test showed a significant change in the spatio-temporal gait parameters (especially, velocity, cadence and affected side single and double support time) when one-arm motorized gait device were used compared with parallel bars and hemi-walkers (p< 0.05).

Conclusion: The results of this study suggest that one-arm motorized gait devices developed for hemiplegic stroke survivors may be more effective potentially than parallel bars and hemi-walkers in gait assistance of chronic hemiplegic stroke survivors.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
单臂电动步态装置对慢性中风偏瘫幸存者的实用性。
背景:中风后,步态训练是康复的关键组成部分:中风后,步态训练是康复的关键组成部分,大多数人根据自己的身体状况和环境使用各种步行辅助工具:本研究旨在通过与传统步态器(平行杠和半步行器)的比较,探讨单臂电动步态器对慢性中风偏瘫幸存者步态辅助的潜在效果:本研究以 14 名慢性中风偏瘫幸存者为对象。方法:本研究以 14 名慢性中风偏瘫幸存者为对象,要求他们在三种条件下使用不同的步态装置行走,并收集和分析他们行走时的步态参数。第一种情况是在平行杆上行走;第二种情况是使用半步行器行走;第三种情况是使用单臂电动步态装置行走。通过步态分析系统,收集了每个条件下的时空步态参数,如步速、步幅、步长、步幅、单支撑时间和双支撑时间:重复测量方差分析或弗里德曼检验结果显示,三种条件下的步态参数均有显著差异(P< 0.05)。事后检验显示,使用单臂电动步态器与平行杆和半步行器相比,步态的时空参数(尤其是速度、步幅和患侧单双支撑时间)发生了显著变化(P< 0.05):本研究结果表明,为中风偏瘫幸存者开发的单臂电动步态器在辅助慢性中风偏瘫幸存者步态方面可能比平行杆和半步行器更有效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Technology and Health Care
Technology and Health Care HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
6.20%
发文量
282
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Technology and Health Care is intended to serve as a forum for the presentation of original articles and technical notes, observing rigorous scientific standards. Furthermore, upon invitation, reviews, tutorials, discussion papers and minisymposia are featured. The main focus of THC is related to the overlapping areas of engineering and medicine. The following types of contributions are considered: 1.Original articles: New concepts, procedures and devices associated with the use of technology in medical research and clinical practice are presented to a readership with a widespread background in engineering and/or medicine. In particular, the clinical benefit deriving from the application of engineering methods and devices in clinical medicine should be demonstrated. Typically, full length original contributions have a length of 4000 words, thereby taking duly into account figures and tables. 2.Technical Notes and Short Communications: Technical Notes relate to novel technical developments with relevance for clinical medicine. In Short Communications, clinical applications are shortly described. 3.Both Technical Notes and Short Communications typically have a length of 1500 words. Reviews and Tutorials (upon invitation only): Tutorial and educational articles for persons with a primarily medical background on principles of engineering with particular significance for biomedical applications and vice versa are presented. The Editorial Board is responsible for the selection of topics. 4.Minisymposia (upon invitation only): Under the leadership of a Special Editor, controversial or important issues relating to health care are highlighted and discussed by various authors. 5.Letters to the Editors: Discussions or short statements (not indexed).
期刊最新文献
Three-dimensional printed apical barrier model technology for pre-clinical dental education. Arterial variations and hemodynamic impact in the upper limb: Insights from an observational study. Validation of endoplasmic reticulum stress-related gene signature to predict prognosis and immune landscape of patients with non-small cell lung cancer. Lung ultrasound score for prediction of bronchopulmonary dysplasia in newborns: A meta-analysis. Predicting survival in sepsis: The prognostic value of NLR and BAR ratios.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1