Biologically-oriented Alveolar Ridge Preservation.

IF 1.1 Q3 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE Minerva dental and oral science Pub Date : 2023-08-01 DOI:10.23736/S2724-6329.23.04776-9
Mattia Pramstraller, Anna Simonelli, Roberto Farina, Leonardo Trombelli
{"title":"Biologically-oriented Alveolar Ridge Preservation.","authors":"Mattia Pramstraller,&nbsp;Anna Simonelli,&nbsp;Roberto Farina,&nbsp;Leonardo Trombelli","doi":"10.23736/S2724-6329.23.04776-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>A recent systematic review failed to identify one approach for alveolar ridge preservation with superior outcomes. The present case series aimed to evaluate the dimensional changes of sites undergoing Biologically-oriented Alveolar Ridge Preservation (BARP).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The sockets were filled with a collagen sponge up to 4-5 mm from the most coronal extensions of the crest. Xenograft particles were placed to fill the coronal part. In cases with a compromised buccal/lingual bone, an additional collagen sponge was interposed between the residual cortical bone plate and the mucoperiosteal flap. A collagen sponge was placed to cover the graft.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study population consisted in 10 extraction sites. Mean change in bone width and vertical ridge position as observed from BARP to re-entry for implant placement were 1.3 mm (14.4%) and 0.6 mm, respectively. The mean distance between buccal and lingual flap healing by secondary intention shifted from 4.9 mm immediately after BARP to 1.8 mm at 2 weeks. No marked differences in the dimensional changes of alveolar ridge were observed between sites with intact or deficient buccal bone plate. All implants were successfully loaded at 2-3 months after placement. In one case, bone augmentation was required.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The stratification of materials proposed in BARP-technique and the additional use of a resorbable device to stabilize graft particles at the buccal aspect provided the conditions for maintaining the ridge dimensions following tooth extraction comparable to the other technique of ARP, restricting the use of graft material to the most coronal portion of the socket.</p>","PeriodicalId":18709,"journal":{"name":"Minerva dental and oral science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Minerva dental and oral science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23736/S2724-6329.23.04776-9","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background: A recent systematic review failed to identify one approach for alveolar ridge preservation with superior outcomes. The present case series aimed to evaluate the dimensional changes of sites undergoing Biologically-oriented Alveolar Ridge Preservation (BARP).

Methods: The sockets were filled with a collagen sponge up to 4-5 mm from the most coronal extensions of the crest. Xenograft particles were placed to fill the coronal part. In cases with a compromised buccal/lingual bone, an additional collagen sponge was interposed between the residual cortical bone plate and the mucoperiosteal flap. A collagen sponge was placed to cover the graft.

Results: The study population consisted in 10 extraction sites. Mean change in bone width and vertical ridge position as observed from BARP to re-entry for implant placement were 1.3 mm (14.4%) and 0.6 mm, respectively. The mean distance between buccal and lingual flap healing by secondary intention shifted from 4.9 mm immediately after BARP to 1.8 mm at 2 weeks. No marked differences in the dimensional changes of alveolar ridge were observed between sites with intact or deficient buccal bone plate. All implants were successfully loaded at 2-3 months after placement. In one case, bone augmentation was required.

Conclusions: The stratification of materials proposed in BARP-technique and the additional use of a resorbable device to stabilize graft particles at the buccal aspect provided the conditions for maintaining the ridge dimensions following tooth extraction comparable to the other technique of ARP, restricting the use of graft material to the most coronal portion of the socket.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
生物导向的牙槽嵴保存。
背景:最近的一项系统综述未能确定一种具有良好结果的牙槽嵴保存方法。本病例系列旨在评估进行生物定向牙槽嵴保存(BARP)的部位的尺寸变化。方法:在牙冠最冠状延伸处用胶原蛋白海绵填充牙窝4-5 mm。放置异种移植物颗粒填充冠状部分。对于颊/舌骨受损的病例,在残余皮质骨板和粘骨膜瓣之间插入一个额外的胶原海绵。用胶原蛋白海绵覆盖移植物。结果:研究人群包括10个提取点。从BARP到重新进入种植体时观察到的骨宽度和垂直脊位置的平均变化分别为1.3 mm(14.4%)和0.6 mm。口腔和舌瓣经二次意向愈合的平均距离从BARP后立即的4.9 mm转移到2周时的1.8 mm。牙槽嵴的尺寸变化在颊骨板完整或缺失部位无明显差异。所有种植体在放置后2-3个月成功加载。在一个病例中,需要骨增强。结论:barp技术中提出的材料分层和额外使用可吸收装置在颊侧稳定移植物颗粒提供了与其他ARP技术相当的拔牙后维持嵴尺寸的条件,将移植物材料的使用限制在牙槽的最冠状部分。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Minerva dental and oral science
Minerva dental and oral science DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
5.00%
发文量
61
期刊最新文献
In-silico immunoinformatic vaccine design for Treponema denticola ergothionase. Virtual reality in specialized dentistry: employing virtual reality for the alleviation of pain and anxiety in hereditary angioedema patients. Medico-legal considerations in immediate loading implantology: risks, responsibilities, and best practices. Restorative and endodontic clinical strategies during COVID-19 (SARS-CoV-2) pandemic: a revision of the literature. A simple method to identify implant sites in totally edentulous arches: a pilot study with thermo-printed templates used with cone beam computed tomography.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1