Let's Talk About Firearms: Perspectives of Older Veterans and VA Clinicians on Universal and Dementia-Specific Firearm Safety Discussions.

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q3 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY Clinical Gerontologist Pub Date : 2024-07-01 Epub Date: 2023-09-04 DOI:10.1080/07317115.2023.2254292
Megan Lafferty, AnnaMarie O'Neill, Nicole Cerra, Lauren Maxim, Abigail Mulcahy, Jessica J Wyse, Kathleen F Carlson
{"title":"Let's Talk About Firearms: Perspectives of Older Veterans and VA Clinicians on Universal and Dementia-Specific Firearm Safety Discussions.","authors":"Megan Lafferty, AnnaMarie O'Neill, Nicole Cerra, Lauren Maxim, Abigail Mulcahy, Jessica J Wyse, Kathleen F Carlson","doi":"10.1080/07317115.2023.2254292","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Veterans experience high rates of fatal and non-fatal firearm injuries. This risk may be compounded among Veterans who are rural-residing, aging, and/or experiencing cognitive decline or dementia. Firearm safety discussions are not broadly implemented across Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) healthcare settings due, in part, to concerns of causing Veterans to disengage from care. This study examines perceptions about firearm safety discussions to inform healthcare-based harm-reduction efforts.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted interviews with 34 Veterans (median age 70) and 22 clinicians from four VA facilities that treat high rates of rural patients with firearm-related injuries.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Most Veterans accepted the idea of universal firearm safety discussions at the VA. Some reported they might not be forthright in such discussions, but raising the topic would not stop them from engaging with VA care. Veterans and clinicians unanimously endorsed firearm safety discussions for older patients experiencing cognitive decline or dementia.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>VA patients and clinicians are amenable to firearm safety discussions during healthcare visits and especially endorse the need for such discussions among high-risk populations.</p><p><strong>Clinical implications: </strong>Universal firearm safety discussions could be incorporated into standard VA practice, particularly for Veterans experiencing cognitive decline or dementia, without risking Veteran disengagement from care.</p>","PeriodicalId":10376,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Gerontologist","volume":" ","pages":"544-554"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Gerontologist","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/07317115.2023.2254292","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/9/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Veterans experience high rates of fatal and non-fatal firearm injuries. This risk may be compounded among Veterans who are rural-residing, aging, and/or experiencing cognitive decline or dementia. Firearm safety discussions are not broadly implemented across Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) healthcare settings due, in part, to concerns of causing Veterans to disengage from care. This study examines perceptions about firearm safety discussions to inform healthcare-based harm-reduction efforts.

Methods: We conducted interviews with 34 Veterans (median age 70) and 22 clinicians from four VA facilities that treat high rates of rural patients with firearm-related injuries.

Results: Most Veterans accepted the idea of universal firearm safety discussions at the VA. Some reported they might not be forthright in such discussions, but raising the topic would not stop them from engaging with VA care. Veterans and clinicians unanimously endorsed firearm safety discussions for older patients experiencing cognitive decline or dementia.

Conclusions: VA patients and clinicians are amenable to firearm safety discussions during healthcare visits and especially endorse the need for such discussions among high-risk populations.

Clinical implications: Universal firearm safety discussions could be incorporated into standard VA practice, particularly for Veterans experiencing cognitive decline or dementia, without risking Veteran disengagement from care.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
让我们谈谈枪支:老年退伍军人和退伍军人事务部临床医生对通用和痴呆症专用枪支安全讨论的看法。
目标:退伍军人遭受致命和非致命枪支伤害的比例很高。居住在农村、年事已高和/或认知能力下降或患有痴呆症的退伍军人面临的风险可能更大。退伍军人事务部(VA)的医疗机构并未广泛开展枪支安全讨论,部分原因是担心会导致退伍军人脱离医疗服务。本研究调查了退伍军人对枪支安全讨论的看法,以便为医疗保健机构减少伤害的工作提供参考:我们对 34 名退伍军人(中位年龄为 70 岁)和 22 名临床医生进行了访谈,他们来自退伍军人事务部的四家机构,这些机构收治了大量与枪支相关伤害的农村患者:结果:大多数退伍军人接受在退伍军人事务部开展全民枪支安全讨论的想法。一些退伍军人表示,他们在此类讨论中可能不会直言不讳,但提出这个话题并不会阻止他们参与退伍军人事务部的护理工作。退伍军人和临床医生一致赞同对认知能力下降或痴呆的老年患者进行枪械安全讨论:退伍军人事务部的患者和临床医生都愿意在就医过程中讨论枪支安全问题,尤其赞同在高风险人群中开展此类讨论:临床意义:退伍军人事务部的标准做法中可以纳入枪支安全问题的普遍讨论,尤其是针对认知能力下降或患有痴呆症的退伍军人,而不会使退伍军人面临脱离护理的风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical Gerontologist
Clinical Gerontologist GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY-PSYCHIATRY
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
25.00%
发文量
90
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinical Gerontologist presents original research, reviews, and clinical comments relevant to the needs of behavioral health professionals and all practitioners who work with older adults. Published in cooperation with Psychologists in Long Term Care, the journal is designed for psychologists, physicians, nurses, social workers, counselors (family, pastoral, and vocational), and other health professionals who address behavioral health concerns found in later life, including: -adjustments to changing roles- issues related to diversity and aging- family caregiving- spirituality- cognitive and psychosocial assessment- depression, anxiety, and PTSD- Alzheimer’s disease and other neurocognitive disorders- long term care- behavioral medicine in aging- rehabilitation and education for older adults. Each issue provides insightful articles on current topics. Submissions are peer reviewed by content experts and selected for both scholarship and relevance to the practitioner to ensure that the articles are among the best in the field. Authors report original research and conceptual reviews. A unique column in Clinical Gerontologist is “Clinical Comments." This section features brief observations and specific suggestions from practitioners which avoid elaborate research designs or long reference lists. This section is a unique opportunity for you to learn about the valuable clinical work of your peers in a short, concise format.
期刊最新文献
Harmonizing Cognitive and Psychosocial Needs in Cognitive Training: Lessons Learned from Piano Training in Persons Living with Mild Cognitive Impairment. Treating Symptoms of Posttraumatic Stress in People with Dementia: Expert Consensus Using the Delphi Method. Modified Prolonged Exposure Therapy for Posttraumatic Stress Disorder with an 85-Year-Old Native American Cajun Man With Late-Onset Deafness: A Case Report. Child Maltreatment Among Older Adults: A Narrative Review of Psychotherapeutic Interventions and Clinical Considerations. Association Between Personality Traits and Functional Limitations in Older Adults with Affective Disorders: A Cross Sectional Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1