Universal cash transfers and prescription utilization: Evidence from the Alaska permanent fund dividend

IF 3.4 2区 经济学 Q1 ECONOMICS Journal of Health Economics Pub Date : 2023-07-01 DOI:10.1016/j.jhealeco.2023.102758
Mouhcine Guettabi, Allison Witman
{"title":"Universal cash transfers and prescription utilization: Evidence from the Alaska permanent fund dividend","authors":"Mouhcine Guettabi,&nbsp;Allison Witman","doi":"10.1016/j.jhealeco.2023.102758","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>We investigate the impact of a large cash transfer on prescription utilization. Our identification strategy leverages the Alaksa Permanent Fund Dividend (PFD), which is distributed annually in October and comprises 6% of the average household's annual income. We study the impact of the PFD on the use of prescription medications<span> using a within-Alaska comparison group and difference-in-differences design. Using the IBM MarketScan Commercial Claims and Encounters Prescription Drug Database, we observe prescriptions for 50,866 commercially-insured individuals who filled prescriptions between 2013 and 2019. We find no changes in prescription use overall and are able to rule out changes larger than 0.5% in the week of the PFD and 1.4% the week after. Subgroup analyses find no changes by patient characteristics<span>, degree of cost sharing, or prescription type. We also conduct a synthetic control analysis using a non-Alaska comparison group and find no effects of the PFD on prescriptions. These findings are useful for understanding liquidity sensitivity for prescription medication and the effects of cash distributions among individuals with employer-based health insurance.</span></span></p></div>","PeriodicalId":50186,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Health Economics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Health Economics","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167629623000358","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We investigate the impact of a large cash transfer on prescription utilization. Our identification strategy leverages the Alaksa Permanent Fund Dividend (PFD), which is distributed annually in October and comprises 6% of the average household's annual income. We study the impact of the PFD on the use of prescription medications using a within-Alaska comparison group and difference-in-differences design. Using the IBM MarketScan Commercial Claims and Encounters Prescription Drug Database, we observe prescriptions for 50,866 commercially-insured individuals who filled prescriptions between 2013 and 2019. We find no changes in prescription use overall and are able to rule out changes larger than 0.5% in the week of the PFD and 1.4% the week after. Subgroup analyses find no changes by patient characteristics, degree of cost sharing, or prescription type. We also conduct a synthetic control analysis using a non-Alaska comparison group and find no effects of the PFD on prescriptions. These findings are useful for understanding liquidity sensitivity for prescription medication and the effects of cash distributions among individuals with employer-based health insurance.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
普遍现金转移和处方使用:来自阿拉斯加永久基金红利的证据
我们调查了大额现金转移对处方使用率的影响。我们的识别策略利用了Alaksa永久基金股息(PFD),该股息每年10月分配,占普通家庭年收入的6%。我们使用阿拉斯加内部比较组和差异设计研究PFD对处方药使用的影响。使用IBM MarketScan商业索赔和遭遇处方药数据库,我们观察了2013年至2019年间50866名商业保险个人的处方。我们发现处方使用总体上没有变化,并且能够排除PFD一周和之后一周大于0.5%和1.4%的变化。亚组分析发现,患者特征、费用分担程度或处方类型没有变化。我们还使用非阿拉斯加对照组进行了综合对照分析,发现PFD对处方没有影响。这些发现有助于了解处方药的流动性敏感性以及在拥有雇主健康保险的个人中现金分配的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Health Economics
Journal of Health Economics 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
2.90%
发文量
96
审稿时长
49 days
期刊介绍: This journal seeks articles related to the economics of health and medical care. Its scope will include the following topics: Production and supply of health services; Demand and utilization of health services; Financing of health services; Determinants of health, including investments in health and risky health behaviors; Economic consequences of ill-health; Behavioral models of demanders, suppliers and other health care agencies; Evaluation of policy interventions that yield economic insights; Efficiency and distributional aspects of health policy; and such other topics as the Editors may deem appropriate.
期刊最新文献
Pharmaceutical innovation collaboration, evaluation, and matching Paying for advance care planning in medicare: Impacts on care and spending near end of life Editorial Board Hospital competition when patients learn through experience Do e-cigarette retail licensure laws reduce youth tobacco use?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1