Modeling the development of cognitive reserve in children: A residual index approach.

IF 2.6 4区 心理学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society Pub Date : 2024-03-01 Epub Date: 2023-09-05 DOI:10.1017/S135561772300053X
Zubin A Irani, Andrew M C Sheridan, Timothy J Silk, Vicki Anderson, Michael Weinborn, Brandon E Gavett
{"title":"Modeling the development of cognitive reserve in children: A residual index approach.","authors":"Zubin A Irani, Andrew M C Sheridan, Timothy J Silk, Vicki Anderson, Michael Weinborn, Brandon E Gavett","doi":"10.1017/S135561772300053X","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To model cognitive reserve (CR) longitudinally in a neurodiverse pediatric sample using a residual index approach, and to test the criterion and construct validity of this index.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Participants were <i>N</i> = 115 children aged 9.5-13 years at baseline (<i>M</i><sub>Age</sub> = 10.48 years, <i>SD</i><sub>Age</sub> = 0.61), and <i>n</i> = 43 (37.4%) met criteria for ADHD. The CR index represented variance in Matrix Reasoning scores from the WASI that was unexplained by MRI-based brain variables (bilateral hippocampal volumes, total gray matter volumes, and total white matter hypointensity volumes) or demographics (age and sex).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>At baseline, the CR index predicted math computation ability (estimate = 0.50, <i>SE</i> = 0.07, <i>p</i> < .001), and word reading ability (estimate = 0.26, <i>SE</i> = 0.10, <i>p</i> = .012). Longitudinally, change in CR over time was not associated with change in math computation ability (estimate = -0.02, <i>SE</i> = 0.03, <i>p</i> < .513), but did predict change in word reading ability (estimate = 0.10, <i>SE</i> = 0.03, <i>p</i> < .001). Change in CR was also found to moderate the relationship between change in word reading ability and white matter hypointensity volume (estimate = 0.10, <i>SE</i> = 0.05, <i>p = .</i>045).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Evidence for the criterion validity of this CR index is encouraging, but somewhat mixed, while construct validity was evidenced through interaction between CR, brain, and word reading ability. Future research would benefit from optimization of the CR index through careful selection of brain variables for a pediatric sample.</p>","PeriodicalId":49995,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S135561772300053X","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/9/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To model cognitive reserve (CR) longitudinally in a neurodiverse pediatric sample using a residual index approach, and to test the criterion and construct validity of this index.

Method: Participants were N = 115 children aged 9.5-13 years at baseline (MAge = 10.48 years, SDAge = 0.61), and n = 43 (37.4%) met criteria for ADHD. The CR index represented variance in Matrix Reasoning scores from the WASI that was unexplained by MRI-based brain variables (bilateral hippocampal volumes, total gray matter volumes, and total white matter hypointensity volumes) or demographics (age and sex).

Results: At baseline, the CR index predicted math computation ability (estimate = 0.50, SE = 0.07, p < .001), and word reading ability (estimate = 0.26, SE = 0.10, p = .012). Longitudinally, change in CR over time was not associated with change in math computation ability (estimate = -0.02, SE = 0.03, p < .513), but did predict change in word reading ability (estimate = 0.10, SE = 0.03, p < .001). Change in CR was also found to moderate the relationship between change in word reading ability and white matter hypointensity volume (estimate = 0.10, SE = 0.05, p = .045).

Conclusions: Evidence for the criterion validity of this CR index is encouraging, but somewhat mixed, while construct validity was evidenced through interaction between CR, brain, and word reading ability. Future research would benefit from optimization of the CR index through careful selection of brain variables for a pediatric sample.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
儿童认知储备发展模型:残差指数法
目的采用残差指数法对神经多样性儿科样本中的认知储备(CR)进行纵向建模,并检验该指数的标准效度和建构效度:基线年龄为9.5-13岁的儿童有115人(平均年龄为10.48岁,平均年龄为0.61岁),符合多动症标准的有43人(37.4%)。CR指数代表了WASI矩阵推理得分的差异,这些差异无法用基于核磁共振成像的大脑变量(双侧海马体积、灰质总体积和白质低密度总体积)或人口统计学变量(年龄和性别)来解释:基线时,CR指数可预测数学计算能力(估计值 = 0.50,SE = 0.07,p < .001)和文字阅读能力(估计值 = 0.26,SE = 0.10,p = .012)。纵向来看,随着时间的推移,CR 的变化与数学计算能力的变化无关(估计值 = -0.02,SE = 0.03,p < .513),但可以预测单词阅读能力的变化(估计值 = 0.10,SE = 0.03,p < .001)。研究还发现,CR的变化可缓和单词阅读能力变化与白质低密度体积之间的关系(估计值=0.10,SE=0.05,P=0.045):结论:这一 CR 指数的标准效度证据令人鼓舞,但有点好坏参半,而构造效度则通过 CR、大脑和单词阅读能力之间的相互作用得到了证明。未来的研究将受益于通过为儿童样本仔细选择大脑变量来优化 CR 指数。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
3.80%
发文量
185
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society is the official journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, an organization of over 4,500 international members from a variety of disciplines. The Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society welcomes original, creative, high quality research papers covering all areas of neuropsychology. The focus of articles may be primarily experimental, applied, or clinical. Contributions will broadly reflect the interest of all areas of neuropsychology, including but not limited to: development of cognitive processes, brain-behavior relationships, adult and pediatric neuropsychology, neurobehavioral syndromes (such as aphasia or apraxia), and the interfaces of neuropsychology with related areas such as behavioral neurology, neuropsychiatry, genetics, and cognitive neuroscience. Papers that utilize behavioral, neuroimaging, and electrophysiological measures are appropriate. To assure maximum flexibility and to promote diverse mechanisms of scholarly communication, the following formats are available in addition to a Regular Research Article: Brief Communication is a shorter research article; Rapid Communication is intended for "fast breaking" new work that does not yet justify a full length article and is placed on a fast review track; Case Report is a theoretically important and unique case study; Critical Review and Short Review are thoughtful considerations of topics of importance to neuropsychology and include meta-analyses; Dialogue provides a forum for publishing two distinct positions on controversial issues in a point-counterpoint format; Special Issue and Special Section consist of several articles linked thematically; Letter to the Editor responds to recent articles published in the Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society; and Book Review, which is considered but is no longer solicited.
期刊最新文献
Adherence to high-frequency ecological momentary assessment in persons with moderate-to-severe traumatic brain injury. The Grenada Learning and Memory Scale: Psychometric features and normative data in Caribbean preschool children. Beyond brain injury: Examining the neuropsychological and psychosocial sequelae of post-traumatic epilepsy. Psychometric and adherence considerations for high-frequency, smartphone-based cognitive screening protocols in older adults. Comparing and linking the Mini-Mental State Examination and Montreal Cognitive Assessment in the Amsterdam Dementia Cohort
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1