Efficiency of interlaminar uniportal endoscopic lumbar discectomy.

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Bratislava Medical Journal-Bratislavske Lekarske Listy Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.4149/BLL_2023_095
Roman Kostysyn, Tomas Hosszu, Pavel Travnicek, Jiri Jandura, Pavel Poczos, Tomas Cesak
{"title":"Efficiency of interlaminar uniportal endoscopic lumbar discectomy.","authors":"Roman Kostysyn,&nbsp;Tomas Hosszu,&nbsp;Pavel Travnicek,&nbsp;Jiri Jandura,&nbsp;Pavel Poczos,&nbsp;Tomas Cesak","doi":"10.4149/BLL_2023_095","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>Prospective evaluation of the results of endoscopic lumbar discectomy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>95 patients were consecutively enrolled in the study between 2017 and 2021. We monitored low back pain and sciatica according to the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), the limitations in daily activities (Oswestry Disability Index, ODI), overall satisfaction according to a 0-100 % scale, and the rate of surgical complications and reoperations.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Postoperatively, the VAS values of low back pain and sciatica decreased significantly from 5 to 1 point and from 6 to 1 point, respectively, and the pain remained in the tolerable range (VAS 1-2) throughout the follow-up period. The ODI score improved significantly from severe disability (46 %), preoperatively, to moderate disability at discharge and one month after surgery (29 % and 22 %, respectively), down to minimal disability at 3 and 12 months after surgery (12 % and 14 %, respectively). Overall patient satisfaction improved significantly at all follow-up time points (46 %, 70 %, 77 %, 80 %, and 78 %, respectively). Reoperation rate was 6.3 %. Cerebrospinal fluid leakage was observed in one case only (1.1 %). Transient postoperative perianogenital sensory impairment occurred in two patients (2.1 %). There was no evidence of surgical site infection or haematoma.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Endoscopic discectomy provides significant pain relief and improves the patient's ability to perform activities of daily living, contributing to greater satisfaction. It is a safe method with a low risk of surgical and neurological complications (Tab. 3, Fig. 3, Ref. 27).</p>","PeriodicalId":55328,"journal":{"name":"Bratislava Medical Journal-Bratislavske Lekarske Listy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bratislava Medical Journal-Bratislavske Lekarske Listy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4149/BLL_2023_095","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: Prospective evaluation of the results of endoscopic lumbar discectomy.

Methods: 95 patients were consecutively enrolled in the study between 2017 and 2021. We monitored low back pain and sciatica according to the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), the limitations in daily activities (Oswestry Disability Index, ODI), overall satisfaction according to a 0-100 % scale, and the rate of surgical complications and reoperations.

Results: Postoperatively, the VAS values of low back pain and sciatica decreased significantly from 5 to 1 point and from 6 to 1 point, respectively, and the pain remained in the tolerable range (VAS 1-2) throughout the follow-up period. The ODI score improved significantly from severe disability (46 %), preoperatively, to moderate disability at discharge and one month after surgery (29 % and 22 %, respectively), down to minimal disability at 3 and 12 months after surgery (12 % and 14 %, respectively). Overall patient satisfaction improved significantly at all follow-up time points (46 %, 70 %, 77 %, 80 %, and 78 %, respectively). Reoperation rate was 6.3 %. Cerebrospinal fluid leakage was observed in one case only (1.1 %). Transient postoperative perianogenital sensory impairment occurred in two patients (2.1 %). There was no evidence of surgical site infection or haematoma.

Conclusion: Endoscopic discectomy provides significant pain relief and improves the patient's ability to perform activities of daily living, contributing to greater satisfaction. It is a safe method with a low risk of surgical and neurological complications (Tab. 3, Fig. 3, Ref. 27).

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
椎板间单门静脉内窥镜腰椎间盘切除术的疗效。
目的:对内镜下腰椎间盘切除术的疗效进行前瞻性评价。方法:95例患者于2017 - 2021年连续入组。我们根据视觉模拟评分(VAS)、日常活动受限(Oswestry残疾指数,ODI)、总体满意度(0- 100%)、手术并发症和再手术率监测腰痛和坐骨神经痛。结果:术后腰痛和坐骨神经痛的VAS评分分别从5分降至1分和从6分降至1分,疼痛在随访期间均保持在可承受范围内(VAS 1-2)。术前严重残疾(46%)、出院时和术后1个月中度残疾(分别为29%和22%)、术后3个月和12个月轻度残疾(分别为12%和14%)的ODI评分显著改善。在所有随访时间点,患者总体满意度显著提高(分别为46%、70%、77%、80%和78%)。再手术率为6.3%。脑脊液漏1例(1.1%)。术后一过性肛周感觉障碍2例(2.1%)。没有手术部位感染或血肿的证据。结论:内镜下椎间盘切除术能显著缓解疼痛,提高患者日常生活活动能力,提高患者满意度。这是一种安全的方法,手术和神经系统并发症的风险低(表3,图3,文献27)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
185
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The international biomedical journal - Bratislava Medical Journal – Bratislavske lekarske listy (Bratisl Lek Listy/Bratisl Med J) publishes peer-reviewed articles on all aspects of biomedical sciences, including experimental investigations with clear clinical relevance, original clinical studies and review articles.
期刊最新文献
Importance of CHB's grey zone: analysis of patients with HBeAg negative chronic hepatitis B virus infection. Prevalence of diastasis m. rectus abdominis and pelvic floor muscle dysfunction in postpartum women. The founding of the UPJS Faculty of Medicine from the memories of the first dean Prof. MUDr. Jan Knazovicky. 75th anniversary of the UPJS Faculty of Medicine in Kosice. The presence of glutathione peroxidase 8 (GPx8) in rat male genital organs. Use of hepatocyte transplantation after extensive liver resections in experiment.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1