Red Mist and the Irresistible Defense of "Losing It".

Kenneth J Weiss
{"title":"Red Mist and the Irresistible Defense of \"Losing It\".","authors":"Kenneth J Weiss","doi":"10.29158/JAAPL.230054-23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Let’s say I was asked to assist the defense in the criminal trial. How would I approach it? You’ve got to be kidding, I thought. But everyone is entitled to a defense, so keep an open mind. “Junior” said he didn’t intend for his father to die. He wasn’t himself. There was no mental illness before this (unless you count daddy problems and a soupçon of entitlement), no intoxication, and no mental status changes now. It was a one-off faux pas. There was the narcissistic injury of disinheritance followed by feeling indignant rage, grabbing a dagger, and stabbing the old man. He said he didn’t know what he was doing until the stabbing. Hmm. . . Was he cognitively (M’Naughten) insane, losing a sense of wrongfulness in the moment? No, calling anger a mental disease wouldn’t fly. But he said two other things: he was maddened, and he saw red. Maybe he’s saying he couldn’t help himself. Is that a thing, psychiatrically or legally? As it turns out, loss of self-control is on the books in many jurisdictions, a form of short-lived volitional insanity. It’s in the Model Penal Code (MPC) standard; two bites of the apple (cognitive or volitional). Still, was it a mental disease? Or maybe he can say he was provoked by extreme and unexpected cruelty, not insanity but mitigation. No, a dagger in the heart was not a reasonable response. Maybe there’s another option: extreme emotional distress (EED), a kind of mitigation without a standard provocation. I can’t get “mad” and “seeing red” out of my head, I ruminated as I pondered how to respond to the request for service. Can anger excuse or mitigate homicide? Or is it a square peg searching for a round (loop)hole? Three options swirled in my consciousness: insanity, the heat of passion, and EED. What, if anything, could I say that would not readily be apparent to jurors? I continued to reflect on madness, anger, mental disease, reasonableness, excuses, and mitigating factors. The reverie took me to ancient Rome, British and American law, fiction, tabloid journalism, and feminist legal analysis. Dr. Weiss is Clinical Professor of Psychiatry, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA. Address correspondence to: Kenneth J. Weiss, MD. E-mail: kenweiss@upenn.edu.","PeriodicalId":47554,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law","volume":"51 3","pages":"431-435"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29158/JAAPL.230054-23","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Let’s say I was asked to assist the defense in the criminal trial. How would I approach it? You’ve got to be kidding, I thought. But everyone is entitled to a defense, so keep an open mind. “Junior” said he didn’t intend for his father to die. He wasn’t himself. There was no mental illness before this (unless you count daddy problems and a soupçon of entitlement), no intoxication, and no mental status changes now. It was a one-off faux pas. There was the narcissistic injury of disinheritance followed by feeling indignant rage, grabbing a dagger, and stabbing the old man. He said he didn’t know what he was doing until the stabbing. Hmm. . . Was he cognitively (M’Naughten) insane, losing a sense of wrongfulness in the moment? No, calling anger a mental disease wouldn’t fly. But he said two other things: he was maddened, and he saw red. Maybe he’s saying he couldn’t help himself. Is that a thing, psychiatrically or legally? As it turns out, loss of self-control is on the books in many jurisdictions, a form of short-lived volitional insanity. It’s in the Model Penal Code (MPC) standard; two bites of the apple (cognitive or volitional). Still, was it a mental disease? Or maybe he can say he was provoked by extreme and unexpected cruelty, not insanity but mitigation. No, a dagger in the heart was not a reasonable response. Maybe there’s another option: extreme emotional distress (EED), a kind of mitigation without a standard provocation. I can’t get “mad” and “seeing red” out of my head, I ruminated as I pondered how to respond to the request for service. Can anger excuse or mitigate homicide? Or is it a square peg searching for a round (loop)hole? Three options swirled in my consciousness: insanity, the heat of passion, and EED. What, if anything, could I say that would not readily be apparent to jurors? I continued to reflect on madness, anger, mental disease, reasonableness, excuses, and mitigating factors. The reverie took me to ancient Rome, British and American law, fiction, tabloid journalism, and feminist legal analysis. Dr. Weiss is Clinical Professor of Psychiatry, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA. Address correspondence to: Kenneth J. Weiss, MD. E-mail: kenweiss@upenn.edu.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
红雾与“失去它”的不可抗拒的防御。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
29.60%
发文量
92
期刊介绍: The American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law (AAPL, pronounced "apple") is an organization of psychiatrists dedicated to excellence in practice, teaching, and research in forensic psychiatry. Founded in 1969, AAPL currently has more than 1,500 members in North America and around the world.
期刊最新文献
Legal and Ethics Concerns of Psilocybin as Medicine. A Review of the Interpretation of the Canadian Test for Fitness to Stand Trial. Clinical and Legal Considerations When Optimizing Trauma Narratives in Immigration Law Evaluations. Flexibility and Innovation in Decisional Capacity Assessment. Mental Health Service Referral and Treatment Following Screening and Assessment in Juvenile Detention.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1