Patterns of career decision-making difficulties in 16 countries: A person-centered investigation.

IF 3.8 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED Journal of Counseling Psychology Pub Date : 2024-01-01 Epub Date: 2023-09-04 DOI:10.1037/cou0000704
Nimrod Levin, Yuliya Lipshits-Braziler, Itamar Gati
{"title":"Patterns of career decision-making difficulties in 16 countries: A person-centered investigation.","authors":"Nimrod Levin, Yuliya Lipshits-Braziler, Itamar Gati","doi":"10.1037/cou0000704","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Classifying clients into career indecision types can facilitate tailoring interventions to each client's specific needs. The present research examined a typology of career indecision on 50 data sets (N = 31,527) representing diverse populations from 16 countries on five continents. Latent profile analyses of participants' responses on the Career Decision-Making Difficulties Questionnaire (CDDQ) revealed seven replicable career indecision types across samples: <i>unmotivated, unrealistic, generally uninformed, occupations-uninformed, conflicted-uninformed, externally conflicted</i>, and <i>internally conflicted.</i> Age emerged as a negligible predictor of career indecision types, whereas gender predicted membership in the unmotivated type, with men twice more likely to be unmotivated than women. The seven types were similarly predictive of career decision status, decision certainty, and decision self-efficacy. These results largely support using the CDDQ to differentially diagnose career indecision types based on 10 causes of career indecision in different countries, life stages, and genders. Classifying individuals based on their patterns of career decision-making difficulties supports tailoring individual career counseling or group interventions to clients' needs. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":48424,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Counseling Psychology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Counseling Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/cou0000704","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/9/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Classifying clients into career indecision types can facilitate tailoring interventions to each client's specific needs. The present research examined a typology of career indecision on 50 data sets (N = 31,527) representing diverse populations from 16 countries on five continents. Latent profile analyses of participants' responses on the Career Decision-Making Difficulties Questionnaire (CDDQ) revealed seven replicable career indecision types across samples: unmotivated, unrealistic, generally uninformed, occupations-uninformed, conflicted-uninformed, externally conflicted, and internally conflicted. Age emerged as a negligible predictor of career indecision types, whereas gender predicted membership in the unmotivated type, with men twice more likely to be unmotivated than women. The seven types were similarly predictive of career decision status, decision certainty, and decision self-efficacy. These results largely support using the CDDQ to differentially diagnose career indecision types based on 10 causes of career indecision in different countries, life stages, and genders. Classifying individuals based on their patterns of career decision-making difficulties supports tailoring individual career counseling or group interventions to clients' needs. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
16 个国家的职业决策困难模式:以人为本的调查。
将客户划分为职业犹豫不决类型有助于根据每个客户的具体需求制定干预措施。本研究对来自五大洲 16 个国家、代表不同人群的 50 组数据(N = 31527)进行了职业犹豫类型分析。对参与者在职业决策困难问卷(CDDQ)上的回答进行的潜在特征分析显示,在不同的样本中存在七种可复制的职业犹豫不决类型:缺乏动机、不切实际、一般不了解情况、职业不了解情况、冲突不了解情况、外部冲突和内部冲突。年龄对职业犹豫不决类型的预测作用微乎其微,而性别则会预测是否属于缺乏动力类型,男性缺乏动力的可能性是女性的两倍。这七种类型对职业决策状态、决策确定性和决策自我效能的预测作用类似。这些结果在很大程度上支持使用 CDDQ,根据不同国家、不同人生阶段和不同性别的 10 种职业犹豫不决原因,对职业犹豫不决类型进行不同诊断。根据个人职业决策困难的模式对其进行分类,有助于根据客户的需求量身定制个人职业咨询或团体干预。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA,保留所有权利)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
7.70%
发文量
80
期刊介绍: The Journal of Counseling Psychology® publishes empirical research in the areas of counseling activities (including assessment, interventions, consultation, supervision, training, prevention, and psychological education) career development and vocational psychology diversity and underrepresented populations in relation to counseling activities the development of new measures to be used in counseling activities professional issues in counseling psychology In addition, the Journal of Counseling Psychology considers reviews or theoretical contributions that have the potential for stimulating further research in counseling psychology, and conceptual or empirical contributions about methodological issues in counseling psychology research.
期刊最新文献
Perceived parental career expectation and adolescent career development: The mediating role of adolescent career-planning and goal-setting self-efficacy and the moderating role of perceived parent-adolescent career congruence. Psychotherapists' outcome expectations: How are they established? Traditional healing as mental health intervention: Contemporary insights from an American Indian healer. Trauma-informed acceptance and commitment therapy with peer coaching for college students: A pilot randomized controlled trial. Navigating faith transitions: A 4-year longitudinal examination of religious deidentification among LGBTQ+ latter-day saints.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1