Comparison of unilateral and bilateral embryo transfer in mice.

IF 1.3 4区 农林科学 Q2 VETERINARY SCIENCES Laboratory Animals Pub Date : 2023-08-01 DOI:10.1177/00236772221149844
Kerstin E Auer, Thomas Kolbe, Claudia Laschalt, Thomas Rülicke
{"title":"Comparison of unilateral and bilateral embryo transfer in mice.","authors":"Kerstin E Auer,&nbsp;Thomas Kolbe,&nbsp;Claudia Laschalt,&nbsp;Thomas Rülicke","doi":"10.1177/00236772221149844","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Surgical embryo transfer in mice is a key technique in assisted reproduction and applied for different purposes in biomedical research. Due to its frequent application in rodent facilities across the world, further improvement of the procedure can substantially contribute to fulfil the principles of the 3Rs. Here, we investigated the effect of bilateral and unilateral left- or right-sided oviduct transfers on the success of embryo transfers. In total, we performed 223 embryo transfers (56 unilateral left, 56 unilateral right, 111 bilateral), in which we transferred 10-14 two-cell embryos each. We found that the type of transfer significantly influenced both the pregnancy rate of recipients and the survival rate of transferred embryos. Bilateral transfers yielded higher pregnancy and survival rates than left-sided unilateral transfers. Right-sided unilateral transfers yielded higher pregnancy rates than left-sided unilateral transfers and did not differ in embryo survival rates from bilateral transfers. We found no evidence that the number of transferred embryos affected the pregnancy rate. However, the number of born pups increased with the number of transferred embryos. In conclusion, unilateral embryo transfers into the right reproductive tract yield equally high pregnancy and embryo survival rates as bilateral transfers. Given that a second abdominal incision can be prevented and the time of surgery can be reduced, we recommend applying unilateral right-sided transfers, as this would reduce postoperative pain and lower the impact on recipients.</p>","PeriodicalId":18013,"journal":{"name":"Laboratory Animals","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Laboratory Animals","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00236772221149844","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"VETERINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Surgical embryo transfer in mice is a key technique in assisted reproduction and applied for different purposes in biomedical research. Due to its frequent application in rodent facilities across the world, further improvement of the procedure can substantially contribute to fulfil the principles of the 3Rs. Here, we investigated the effect of bilateral and unilateral left- or right-sided oviduct transfers on the success of embryo transfers. In total, we performed 223 embryo transfers (56 unilateral left, 56 unilateral right, 111 bilateral), in which we transferred 10-14 two-cell embryos each. We found that the type of transfer significantly influenced both the pregnancy rate of recipients and the survival rate of transferred embryos. Bilateral transfers yielded higher pregnancy and survival rates than left-sided unilateral transfers. Right-sided unilateral transfers yielded higher pregnancy rates than left-sided unilateral transfers and did not differ in embryo survival rates from bilateral transfers. We found no evidence that the number of transferred embryos affected the pregnancy rate. However, the number of born pups increased with the number of transferred embryos. In conclusion, unilateral embryo transfers into the right reproductive tract yield equally high pregnancy and embryo survival rates as bilateral transfers. Given that a second abdominal incision can be prevented and the time of surgery can be reduced, we recommend applying unilateral right-sided transfers, as this would reduce postoperative pain and lower the impact on recipients.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
小鼠单侧和双侧胚胎移植的比较。
小鼠胚胎移植是辅助生殖的一项关键技术,在生物医学研究中有着广泛的应用。由于它在世界各地的啮齿动物设施中经常应用,进一步改进程序可以大大有助于实现3Rs原则。在这里,我们研究了双侧和单侧左侧或右侧输卵管移植对胚胎移植成功的影响。我们总共进行了223例胚胎移植(56例单侧左侧,56例单侧右侧,111例双侧),每例移植10-14个双细胞胚胎。我们发现移植类型对受者的妊娠率和移植胚胎的存活率都有显著影响。与左侧单侧移植相比,双侧移植的妊娠率和存活率更高。右侧单侧移植比左侧单侧移植获得更高的妊娠率,胚胎存活率与双侧移植没有差异。我们没有发现移植胚胎数量影响妊娠率的证据。然而,幼崽的数量随着移植胚胎的数量而增加。总之,单侧胚胎移植到右侧生殖道的妊娠率和胚胎存活率与双侧胚胎移植一样高。考虑到可以防止第二次腹部切口和减少手术时间,我们建议采用单侧右侧转移,因为这将减少术后疼痛并降低对受术者的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Laboratory Animals
Laboratory Animals 生物-动物学
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
8.30%
发文量
64
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The international journal of laboratory animal science and welfare, Laboratory Animals publishes peer-reviewed original papers and reviews on all aspects of the use of animals in biomedical research. The journal promotes improvements in the welfare or well-being of the animals used, it particularly focuses on research that reduces the number of animals used or which replaces animal models with in vitro alternatives.
期刊最新文献
Half the price, twice the gain: How to simultaneously decrease animal numbers and increase precision with good experimental design. Heterogeneity of animal experiments and how to deal with it. How cage effects can hurt statistical analyses of completely randomized designs. Simulation methodologies to determine statistical power in laboratory animal research studies. Understanding p-values and significance.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1