Opioid prescribing by oral and maxillofacial surgeons in the United States, 2016–2019

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q2 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE Journal of public health dentistry Pub Date : 2022-10-09 DOI:10.1111/jphd.12544
Tumader Khouja BDS, MPH, PhD, Deborah E. Polk PhD, Katie J. Suda PharmD, MS, FCCP
{"title":"Opioid prescribing by oral and maxillofacial surgeons in the United States, 2016–2019","authors":"Tumader Khouja BDS, MPH, PhD,&nbsp;Deborah E. Polk PhD,&nbsp;Katie J. Suda PharmD, MS, FCCP","doi":"10.1111/jphd.12544","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objective</h3>\n \n <p>To describe opioid prescribing trends among oral and maxillofacial surgeons (OMFS).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Prescriptions by OMFS were identified from IQVIA Longitudinal Prescription Dataset, 2016–2019. OMFS-based, patient-based and population-based prescribing rates and changes in high-risk opioid prescribing were calculated annually. We used linear regression to describe trends.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>There were 13.9 million opioid prescriptions among 12.5 million patients (627 prescriptions/OMFS/year). Hydrocodone and oxycodone decreased by 20.9% and 39.2% (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.05), while tramadol and codeine increased by 24.3% and 6.1% (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.05), respectively. Opioid prescribing rates significantly decreased by 27 prescriptions/OMFS/year, 18.6 patients/OMFS/year and by 0.9 prescriptions/100,000 population/year (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.05 for all). From 2016 to 2019, the proportion of opioids &gt;3 days decreased by 54.2% (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.05) and prescriptions ≥50 MME/day decreased by 66.3% (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.05). Although the number of opioid prescriptions by OMFS decreased in most states, 12% of states experienced increases.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>Opioid prescribing, especially high-risk prescribing, by OMFS has decreased. However, targeted interventions are warranted in some areas.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":16913,"journal":{"name":"Journal of public health dentistry","volume":"82 4","pages":"491-494"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of public health dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jphd.12544","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Objective

To describe opioid prescribing trends among oral and maxillofacial surgeons (OMFS).

Methods

Prescriptions by OMFS were identified from IQVIA Longitudinal Prescription Dataset, 2016–2019. OMFS-based, patient-based and population-based prescribing rates and changes in high-risk opioid prescribing were calculated annually. We used linear regression to describe trends.

Results

There were 13.9 million opioid prescriptions among 12.5 million patients (627 prescriptions/OMFS/year). Hydrocodone and oxycodone decreased by 20.9% and 39.2% (p < 0.05), while tramadol and codeine increased by 24.3% and 6.1% (p < 0.05), respectively. Opioid prescribing rates significantly decreased by 27 prescriptions/OMFS/year, 18.6 patients/OMFS/year and by 0.9 prescriptions/100,000 population/year (p < 0.05 for all). From 2016 to 2019, the proportion of opioids >3 days decreased by 54.2% (p < 0.05) and prescriptions ≥50 MME/day decreased by 66.3% (p < 0.05). Although the number of opioid prescriptions by OMFS decreased in most states, 12% of states experienced increases.

Conclusion

Opioid prescribing, especially high-risk prescribing, by OMFS has decreased. However, targeted interventions are warranted in some areas.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
2016-2019年美国口腔颌面外科医生开具的阿片类药物处方
目的了解口腔颌面外科医生(OMFS)的阿片类药物处方趋势。方法选取2016-2019年IQVIA纵向处方数据集中经OMFS鉴定的处方。每年计算基于omfs、基于患者和基于人群的处方率和高危阿片类药物处方的变化。我们用线性回归来描述趋势。结果1250万例患者中有1390万张阿片类药物处方(627张/OMFS/年)。氢可酮和羟考酮分别下降20.9%和39.2% (p < 0.05),曲马多和可待因分别上升24.3%和6.1% (p < 0.05)。阿片类药物处方率显著下降,分别为27张/OMFS/年、18.6名患者/OMFS/年和0.9张/10万人/年(均p < 0.05)。2016 - 2019年阿片类药物使用3天的比例下降54.2% (p < 0.05),处方≥50 MME/天的比例下降66.3% (p < 0.05)。虽然OMFS开出的阿片类药物处方数量在大多数州有所减少,但12%的州出现了增加。结论OMFS开具阿片类药物处方,特别是高危处方有所减少。然而,在某些领域有针对性的干预是必要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of public health dentistry
Journal of public health dentistry 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
4.30%
发文量
69
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Public Health Dentistry is devoted to the advancement of public health dentistry through the exploration of related research, practice, and policy developments. Three main types of articles are published: original research articles that provide a significant contribution to knowledge in the breadth of dental public health, including oral epidemiology, dental health services, the behavioral sciences, and the public health practice areas of assessment, policy development, and assurance; methods articles that report the development and testing of new approaches to research design, data collection and analysis, or the delivery of public health services; and review articles that synthesize previous research in the discipline and provide guidance to others conducting research as well as to policy makers, managers, and other dental public health practitioners.
期刊最新文献
Issue Information Associations between disability type and untreated dental decay among community dwelling US adults Evaluating the harmonization potential of oral health-related questionnaires in national longitudinal birth and child cohort surveys Educating long-term care staff on older adult oral health: Maine's oral team-based initiative vital access to education (MOTIVATE) program Integration of dental therapists in safety net practice increases access to oral health care in Minnesota
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1