Performance of two commercial serological assays for bovine tuberculosis using plasma samples

IF 1.4 3区 农林科学 Q4 IMMUNOLOGY Veterinary immunology and immunopathology Pub Date : 2023-09-01 DOI:10.1016/j.vetimm.2023.110644
Charlotte Moens , Claude Saegerman , David Fretin , Sylvie Marché
{"title":"Performance of two commercial serological assays for bovine tuberculosis using plasma samples","authors":"Charlotte Moens ,&nbsp;Claude Saegerman ,&nbsp;David Fretin ,&nbsp;Sylvie Marché","doi":"10.1016/j.vetimm.2023.110644","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>In the bovine tuberculosis diagnosis, the use of plasma samples (already available for IFNɣ assays) in serological tests might facilitate the work in the field. Here, the performance of two commercial serological tests (ELISA IDEXX <em>M. bovis</em> Ab test and Enferplex Bovine TB antibody test) were evaluated using plasma samples from cattle in Belgium. Specificity values estimated from 567 plasma samples collected from bTB-free cattle were 98.4% when using the ELISA IDEXX <em>M. bovis</em> Ab test, and were 96.5% and 93.3% when using the high specificity and high sensitivity settings of the Enferplex Bovine TB antibody test, respectively. Sensitivity values were calculated relative to SICCT-positive (N = 117) and IFNɣ-positive (N = 132) animals originating from <em>M. bovis</em>-infected herds. Overall, the multiplexed Enferplex Bovine TB antibody test had better sensitivity (mean: 32.5% and 43.4% for the high specificity and sensitivity settings, respectively) compared to the ELISA IDEXX <em>M. bovis</em> Ab test (mean: 12%). Data obtained from plasma samples in the current study were compared to a previous study using both serological tests with sera. In conclusion, both serological tests showed comparable performance with both matrix; although overall specificity values with the Enferplex Bovine TB antibody test were lower when using plasma samples than sera.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":23511,"journal":{"name":"Veterinary immunology and immunopathology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Veterinary immunology and immunopathology","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0165242723000983","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In the bovine tuberculosis diagnosis, the use of plasma samples (already available for IFNɣ assays) in serological tests might facilitate the work in the field. Here, the performance of two commercial serological tests (ELISA IDEXX M. bovis Ab test and Enferplex Bovine TB antibody test) were evaluated using plasma samples from cattle in Belgium. Specificity values estimated from 567 plasma samples collected from bTB-free cattle were 98.4% when using the ELISA IDEXX M. bovis Ab test, and were 96.5% and 93.3% when using the high specificity and high sensitivity settings of the Enferplex Bovine TB antibody test, respectively. Sensitivity values were calculated relative to SICCT-positive (N = 117) and IFNɣ-positive (N = 132) animals originating from M. bovis-infected herds. Overall, the multiplexed Enferplex Bovine TB antibody test had better sensitivity (mean: 32.5% and 43.4% for the high specificity and sensitivity settings, respectively) compared to the ELISA IDEXX M. bovis Ab test (mean: 12%). Data obtained from plasma samples in the current study were compared to a previous study using both serological tests with sera. In conclusion, both serological tests showed comparable performance with both matrix; although overall specificity values with the Enferplex Bovine TB antibody test were lower when using plasma samples than sera.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
两种商用牛结核病血浆血清学分析方法的性能
在牛结核病诊断中,在血清学测试中使用血浆样本(已可用于IFN测定)可能有助于该领域的工作。在此,使用比利时牛的血浆样本评估了两种商业血清学测试(ELISA IDEXX牛分枝杆菌抗体测试和Enferplex牛结核病抗体测试)的性能。当使用ELISA IDEXX牛分枝杆菌抗体测试时,从从无bTB牛采集的567份血浆样本中估计的特异性值为98.4%,当使用Enferplex牛结核病抗体测试的高特异性和高灵敏度设置时,特异性值分别为96.5%和93.3%。计算源于牛分枝杆菌感染群的SICCT阳性(N=117)和IFN-阳性(N=132)动物的敏感性值。总体而言,与ELISA IDEXX牛分枝杆菌抗体测试(平均值:12%)相比,多重Enferplex牛结核病抗体测试具有更好的灵敏度(在高特异性和高灵敏度设置下,平均值分别为32.5%和43.4%)。将当前研究中从血浆样本中获得的数据与之前的一项研究进行了比较,该研究使用了两种血清血清学测试。总之,两种血清学测试都显示出与两种基质相当的性能;尽管Enferplex牛结核病抗体测试的总体特异性值在使用血浆样本时低于血清。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
5.60%
发文量
79
审稿时长
70 days
期刊介绍: The journal reports basic, comparative and clinical immunology as they pertain to the animal species designated here: livestock, poultry, and fish species that are major food animals and companion animals such as cats, dogs, horses and camels, and wildlife species that act as reservoirs for food, companion or human infectious diseases, or as models for human disease. Rodent models of infectious diseases that are of importance in the animal species indicated above,when the disease requires a level of containment that is not readily available for larger animal experimentation (ABSL3), will be considered. Papers on rabbits, lizards, guinea pigs, badgers, armadillos, elephants, antelope, and buffalo will be reviewed if the research advances our fundamental understanding of immunology, or if they act as a reservoir of infectious disease for the primary animal species designated above, or for humans. Manuscripts employing other species will be reviewed if justified as fitting into the categories above. The following topics are appropriate: biology of cells and mechanisms of the immune system, immunochemistry, immunodeficiencies, immunodiagnosis, immunogenetics, immunopathology, immunology of infectious disease and tumors, immunoprophylaxis including vaccine development and delivery, immunological aspects of pregnancy including passive immunity, autoimmuity, neuroimmunology, and transplanatation immunology. Manuscripts that describe new genes and development of tools such as monoclonal antibodies are also of interest when part of a larger biological study. Studies employing extracts or constituents (plant extracts, feed additives or microbiome) must be sufficiently defined to be reproduced in other laboratories and also provide evidence for possible mechanisms and not simply show an effect on the immune system.
期刊最新文献
Efficacy of the H7N9 vaccine as a candidate for the Korean avian influenza antigen bank Development of bovine IgG3-specific assays using a novel recombinant single-domain binding reagent Editorial Board Solving technical issues in flow cytometry to characterize porcine CD8α/β expressing lymphocytes Expression of key immune genes in polarized porcine monocyte-derived macrophage subsets
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1