Diagnostic performance of artificial intelligence using cone-beam computed tomography imaging of the oral and maxillofacial region: A scoping review and meta-analysis.

IF 1.7 Q3 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE Imaging Science in Dentistry Pub Date : 2023-06-01 DOI:10.5624/isd.20220224
Farida Abesi, Mahla Maleki, Mohammad Zamani
{"title":"Diagnostic performance of artificial intelligence using cone-beam computed tomography imaging of the oral and maxillofacial region: A scoping review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Farida Abesi,&nbsp;Mahla Maleki,&nbsp;Mohammad Zamani","doi":"10.5624/isd.20220224","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The aim of this study was to conduct a scoping review and meta-analysis to provide overall estimates of the recall and precision of artificial intelligence for detection and segmentation using oral and maxillofacial cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) scans.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A literature search was done in Embase, PubMed, and Scopus through October 31, 2022 to identify studies that reported the recall and precision values of artificial intelligence systems using oral and maxillofacial CBCT images for the automatic detection or segmentation of anatomical landmarks or pathological lesions. Recall (sensitivity) indicates the percentage of certain structures that are correctly detected. Precision (positive predictive value) indicates the percentage of accurately identified structures out of all detected structures. The performance values were extracted and pooled, and the estimates were presented with 95% confidence intervals (CIs).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 12 eligible studies were finally included. The overall pooled recall for artificial intelligence was 0.91 (95% CI: 0.87-0.94). In a subgroup analysis, the pooled recall was 0.88 (95% CI: 0.77-0.94) for detection and 0.92 (95% CI: 0.87-0.96) for segmentation. The overall pooled precision for artificial intelligence was 0.93 (95% CI: 0.88-0.95). A subgroup analysis showed that the pooled precision value was 0.90 (95% CI: 0.77-0.96) for detection and 0.94 (95% CI: 0.89-0.97) for segmentation.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Excellent performance was found for artificial intelligence using oral and maxillofacial CBCT images.</p>","PeriodicalId":51714,"journal":{"name":"Imaging Science in Dentistry","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/ed/1f/isd-53-101.PMC10315225.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Imaging Science in Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5624/isd.20220224","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Purpose: The aim of this study was to conduct a scoping review and meta-analysis to provide overall estimates of the recall and precision of artificial intelligence for detection and segmentation using oral and maxillofacial cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) scans.

Materials and methods: A literature search was done in Embase, PubMed, and Scopus through October 31, 2022 to identify studies that reported the recall and precision values of artificial intelligence systems using oral and maxillofacial CBCT images for the automatic detection or segmentation of anatomical landmarks or pathological lesions. Recall (sensitivity) indicates the percentage of certain structures that are correctly detected. Precision (positive predictive value) indicates the percentage of accurately identified structures out of all detected structures. The performance values were extracted and pooled, and the estimates were presented with 95% confidence intervals (CIs).

Results: In total, 12 eligible studies were finally included. The overall pooled recall for artificial intelligence was 0.91 (95% CI: 0.87-0.94). In a subgroup analysis, the pooled recall was 0.88 (95% CI: 0.77-0.94) for detection and 0.92 (95% CI: 0.87-0.96) for segmentation. The overall pooled precision for artificial intelligence was 0.93 (95% CI: 0.88-0.95). A subgroup analysis showed that the pooled precision value was 0.90 (95% CI: 0.77-0.96) for detection and 0.94 (95% CI: 0.89-0.97) for segmentation.

Conclusion: Excellent performance was found for artificial intelligence using oral and maxillofacial CBCT images.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
口腔颌面区域锥形束计算机断层成像的人工智能诊断性能:范围回顾和荟萃分析。
目的:本研究的目的是进行范围回顾和荟萃分析,以提供使用口腔和颌面锥形束计算机断层扫描(CBCT)进行检测和分割的人工智能的召回率和精度的总体估计。材料和方法:在Embase、PubMed和Scopus中进行文献检索,检索截止到2022年10月31日,以确定使用口腔颌面CBCT图像自动检测或分割解剖标志或病理病变的人工智能系统的召回率和精度值的研究。召回率(灵敏度)表示某些结构被正确检测到的百分比。精度(正预测值)表示准确识别的结构占所有检测到的结构的百分比。提取并汇总性能值,并以95%置信区间(ci)表示估计值。结果:最终共纳入12项符合条件的研究。人工智能的总召回率为0.91 (95% CI: 0.87-0.94)。在亚组分析中,检测的合并召回率为0.88 (95% CI: 0.77-0.94),分割的合并召回率为0.92 (95% CI: 0.87-0.96)。人工智能的总体汇总精度为0.93 (95% CI: 0.88-0.95)。亚组分析显示,检测的合并精度值为0.90 (95% CI: 0.77-0.96),分割的合并精度值为0.94 (95% CI: 0.89-0.97)。结论:口腔颌面部CBCT图像的人工智能应用效果良好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Imaging Science in Dentistry
Imaging Science in Dentistry DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
11.10%
发文量
42
期刊最新文献
Impact of the spatial orientation of the patient's head, metal artifact reduction, and tube current on cone-beam computed tomography artifact expression adjacent to a dental implant: A laboratory study using a simulated surgical guide. Optimizing cone-beam computed tomography exposure for an effective radiation dose and image quality balance. Temporomandibular joint ankylosis suspected to be associated with ankylosing spondylitis based on cervical computed tomography images: A pictorial essay. Vertical root fracture diagnosis in teeth with metallic posts: Impact of metal artifact reduction and sharpening filters. A novel method for determining dose distribution on panoramic reconstruction computed tomography images from radiotherapy computed tomography.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1