Establishing the measurement properties of the Residential Environment Impact Scale (Version 4.0).

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q2 REHABILITATION Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy Pub Date : 2023-08-01 DOI:10.1080/11038128.2022.2143891
Michele Harrison, Kirsty Forsyth, Aja Louise Murray, Rocco Angarola, Shona Henderson, Linda Irvine Fitzpatrick, Gail Fisher
{"title":"Establishing the measurement properties of the Residential Environment Impact Scale (Version 4.0).","authors":"Michele Harrison,&nbsp;Kirsty Forsyth,&nbsp;Aja Louise Murray,&nbsp;Rocco Angarola,&nbsp;Shona Henderson,&nbsp;Linda Irvine Fitzpatrick,&nbsp;Gail Fisher","doi":"10.1080/11038128.2022.2143891","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Developed as an environment assessment informed by the Model of Human Occupation, the Residential Environment Impact Survey considered the physical, social and activity features of the environment, evaluating the impact of the environment on resident's quality of life. Clinicians reported that the Residential Environment Impact Survey was a useful tool; however, it had not been structured to be a measurement tool and did not have established psychometric properties.</p><p><strong>Aims/objectives: </strong>This study examines the psychometric properties of the restructured Residential Environment Impact Scale Version 4.0 (REIS), which measures the level of environment support provided to residents.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>The REIS was completed across residential sites for people with complex mental health needs. A many facets Rasch analysis was conducted to establish the reliability and validity of the REIS.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The REIS demonstrated reasonable psychometric properties, with items demonstrating internal scale validity and scale items following an expected pattern of increasingly challenging environment support.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and significance: </strong>Initial evidence suggests that the REIS provides a valid and reliable measure of environment support, providing a detailed assessment of how physical, social and activity elements of the environment support or inhibit participation and can be applied across a range of living environments.</p>","PeriodicalId":49570,"journal":{"name":"Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/11038128.2022.2143891","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Developed as an environment assessment informed by the Model of Human Occupation, the Residential Environment Impact Survey considered the physical, social and activity features of the environment, evaluating the impact of the environment on resident's quality of life. Clinicians reported that the Residential Environment Impact Survey was a useful tool; however, it had not been structured to be a measurement tool and did not have established psychometric properties.

Aims/objectives: This study examines the psychometric properties of the restructured Residential Environment Impact Scale Version 4.0 (REIS), which measures the level of environment support provided to residents.

Material and methods: The REIS was completed across residential sites for people with complex mental health needs. A many facets Rasch analysis was conducted to establish the reliability and validity of the REIS.

Results: The REIS demonstrated reasonable psychometric properties, with items demonstrating internal scale validity and scale items following an expected pattern of increasingly challenging environment support.

Conclusions and significance: Initial evidence suggests that the REIS provides a valid and reliable measure of environment support, providing a detailed assessment of how physical, social and activity elements of the environment support or inhibit participation and can be applied across a range of living environments.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
建立居住环境影响量表(4.0版)的测量性质。
背景:住宅环境影响调查是根据人类职业模型进行的环境评估,考虑了环境的物理、社会和活动特征,评估了环境对居民生活质量的影响。临床医生报告说,住宅环境影响调查是一个有用的工具;然而,它并没有被设计成一种测量工具,也没有建立起心理测量学的特性。目的/目的:本研究检视重整后的住宅环境影响量表4.0 (REIS)的心理测量特性,该量表衡量居民所获得的环境支持程度。材料和方法:REIS是在有复杂心理健康需求的人的居住地点完成的。通过多方面的Rasch分析,建立了REIS的信度和效度。结果:REIS量表显示出合理的心理测量特性,量表项目显示出内部效度,量表项目遵循越来越具有挑战性的环境支持的预期模式。结论和意义:初步证据表明,REIS提供了一种有效和可靠的环境支持措施,提供了对环境的物理、社会和活动要素如何支持或抑制参与的详细评估,并可应用于一系列生活环境。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
15.80%
发文量
45
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy is an internationally well-recognized journal that aims to provide a forum for occupational therapy research worldwide and especially the Nordic countries. Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy welcomes: theoretical frameworks, original research reports emanating from quantitative, qualitative and mixed methods studies, literature reviews, case studies, presentation and evaluation of instruments, evaluation of interventions, learning and teaching in OT, letters to the editor.
期刊最新文献
Occupational therapy's oversight: How science veiled our humanity. Cognitive interviews on the Swedish occupational balance questionnaire. Occupational therapy in the space of artificial intelligence: Ethical considerations and human-centered efforts. Evaluation of a driving clinical decision pathway for generalist occupational therapists: Pilot test of practice change. Developmental coordination disorder questionnaire - translation and adaptation into Danish.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1