Does active coaching reduce actual treatment duration for frameless Gamma Knife stereotactic radiosurgery?

IF 0.7 Q4 SURGERY Journal of radiosurgery and SBRT Pub Date : 2022-01-01
Taoran Cui, Elizabeth E Ginalis, Ke Nie, Anupama Chundury, Nisha Ohri, Danish Shabbar, Ning Yue, Joseph Weiner
{"title":"Does active coaching reduce actual treatment duration for frameless Gamma Knife stereotactic radiosurgery?","authors":"Taoran Cui,&nbsp;Elizabeth E Ginalis,&nbsp;Ke Nie,&nbsp;Anupama Chundury,&nbsp;Nisha Ohri,&nbsp;Danish Shabbar,&nbsp;Ning Yue,&nbsp;Joseph Weiner","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose/objectives: </strong>Frameless Gamma Knife stereotactic radiosurgery (GKSRS) has become an effective supplement to frame-based, which is however sensitive to patient's involuntary motions and prone to prolonged treatment duration. Such delays during treatment inevitably result in patient discomfort and the inability to complete intended treatment. The purpose of this study is to investigate whether active coaching during frameless GKSRS can reduce actual treatment duration.</p><p><strong>Materials/methods: </strong>Patients treated at a single institution with frameless GKSRS from 2017 to 2020 were retrospectively identified. Beginning in 2019, all patients treated with frameless GKSRS were actively coached to prevent treatment interruptions. Patient characteristics and treatment plans were compared between the cohorts of patients treated with and without active coaching. Linear regressions between the planned and actual treatment duration of treatment sessions were performed on either cohort. ANOVA and Wilcoxon tests were used for statistical analyses with a p-value less than 0.05 considered as significant.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the total 43 patients and 105 treatment sessions identified, 27 patients underwent 51 treatment sessions of frameless GKSRS with active coaching. There was no significant difference in patient characteristics and treatment plans between the two cohorts. Patients treated with active coaching underwent significantly fewer CBCTs during treatment. The median planned and actual treatment durations were 31.4 and 51.7 min for the non-coached cohort, and 38.6 and 49.8 min for the coached cohort. The results of linear regressions showed that the actual treatment duration was 1.29 and 1.56 times longer with and without active coaching, respectively, which indicated a significant reduction in the actual treatment duration with active coaching.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our results suggest that active coaching was associated with significant reductions of actual treatment duration. This simple intervention can be clinically implemented to prevent unnecessary treatment interruptions, improve patient comfort and ensure completion of treatment as prescribed during frameless GKSRS.</p>","PeriodicalId":16917,"journal":{"name":"Journal of radiosurgery and SBRT","volume":"8 4","pages":"291-296"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10322178/pdf/rsbrt-8-291.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of radiosurgery and SBRT","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose/objectives: Frameless Gamma Knife stereotactic radiosurgery (GKSRS) has become an effective supplement to frame-based, which is however sensitive to patient's involuntary motions and prone to prolonged treatment duration. Such delays during treatment inevitably result in patient discomfort and the inability to complete intended treatment. The purpose of this study is to investigate whether active coaching during frameless GKSRS can reduce actual treatment duration.

Materials/methods: Patients treated at a single institution with frameless GKSRS from 2017 to 2020 were retrospectively identified. Beginning in 2019, all patients treated with frameless GKSRS were actively coached to prevent treatment interruptions. Patient characteristics and treatment plans were compared between the cohorts of patients treated with and without active coaching. Linear regressions between the planned and actual treatment duration of treatment sessions were performed on either cohort. ANOVA and Wilcoxon tests were used for statistical analyses with a p-value less than 0.05 considered as significant.

Results: Of the total 43 patients and 105 treatment sessions identified, 27 patients underwent 51 treatment sessions of frameless GKSRS with active coaching. There was no significant difference in patient characteristics and treatment plans between the two cohorts. Patients treated with active coaching underwent significantly fewer CBCTs during treatment. The median planned and actual treatment durations were 31.4 and 51.7 min for the non-coached cohort, and 38.6 and 49.8 min for the coached cohort. The results of linear regressions showed that the actual treatment duration was 1.29 and 1.56 times longer with and without active coaching, respectively, which indicated a significant reduction in the actual treatment duration with active coaching.

Conclusion: Our results suggest that active coaching was associated with significant reductions of actual treatment duration. This simple intervention can be clinically implemented to prevent unnecessary treatment interruptions, improve patient comfort and ensure completion of treatment as prescribed during frameless GKSRS.

Abstract Image

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
主动指导是否缩短无框架伽玛刀立体定向放射手术的实际治疗时间?
目的/目的:无框伽玛刀立体定向放射外科(GKSRS)已成为基于框架的有效补充,但对患者的不自主运动敏感,容易延长治疗时间。这种治疗延误不可避免地导致患者不适和无法完成预期的治疗。本研究的目的是探讨在无框架GKSRS期间积极指导是否可以缩短实际治疗时间。材料/方法:回顾性分析2017年至2020年在单一机构接受无框架GKSRS治疗的患者。从2019年开始,所有接受无框架GKSRS治疗的患者都得到了积极的指导,以防止治疗中断。患者特征和治疗计划在接受和不接受积极指导的患者队列之间进行比较。在两个队列中对计划治疗时间和实际治疗时间进行线性回归。统计学分析采用方差分析和Wilcoxon检验,p值小于0.05为显著性。结果:在43名患者和105个疗程中,27名患者接受了51个疗程的无框架GKSRS治疗。两组患者的特征和治疗方案没有显著差异。接受积极指导的患者在治疗期间的cbct显著减少。非指导组计划和实际治疗时间的中位数分别为31.4分钟和51.7分钟,指导组为38.6分钟和49.8分钟。线性回归结果显示,有主动指导和没有主动指导的实际治疗时间分别延长了1.29倍和1.56倍,这表明有主动指导的实际治疗时间明显缩短。结论:我们的研究结果表明,积极指导与实际治疗时间的显著缩短有关。这种简单的干预可以在临床上实施,以防止不必要的治疗中断,提高患者的舒适度,并确保在无框架GKSRS期间按照规定完成治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
8.30%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A single center, inter-observer evaluation of vestibular schwannoma stereotactic radiosurgery and its dosimetric impact. Bilateral anterior cingulotomy with Gamma Knife radiosurgery: Another alternative for the treatment of non-oncologic intractable chronic pain. Cytoreductive single-fraction stereotactic radiation therapy prior to living donor transplantation for inoperable liver-confined metastatic rectal cancer. Emergency SBRT to trachea and carina for adenoid cystic carcinoma of the trachea with partial airway obstruction. Experience of Gamma Knife radiosurgery for treatment of brain metastases in pregnancy with literature review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1