首页 > 最新文献

Journal of radiosurgery and SBRT最新文献

英文 中文
Bilateral anterior cingulotomy with Gamma Knife radiosurgery: Another alternative for the treatment of non-oncologic intractable chronic pain. 伽玛刀放射外科手术下的双侧前脑干切开术:治疗非肿瘤性难治性慢性疼痛的另一种选择。
IF 0.7 Q4 SURGERY Pub Date : 2024-01-01
Oscar I Molina-Romero, Juan Carlos Diez Palma, Andrés Fonnegra Caballero, Andrés Segura-Hernandez, Juan P Leal-Isaza, Julio R Fonnegra Pardo
{"title":"Bilateral anterior cingulotomy with Gamma Knife radiosurgery: Another alternative for the treatment of non-oncologic intractable chronic pain.","authors":"Oscar I Molina-Romero, Juan Carlos Diez Palma, Andrés Fonnegra Caballero, Andrés Segura-Hernandez, Juan P Leal-Isaza, Julio R Fonnegra Pardo","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":16917,"journal":{"name":"Journal of radiosurgery and SBRT","volume":"9 2","pages":"165-169"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11288646/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141860088","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Impact of TP53 mutations on brain metastasis control in non-small cell lung cancer patients undergoing stereotactic radiosurgery. TP53突变对接受立体定向放射手术的非小细胞肺癌患者脑转移控制的影响
IF 0.7 Q4 SURGERY Pub Date : 2024-01-01
Jim X Leng, Chang Su, David J Carpenter, Warren Floyd, Eugene Vaios, Rachel Shenker, Peter G Hendrickson, Will Giles, Trey Mullikin, Scott R Floyd, John P Kirkpatrick, Michelle Green, Zachary J Reitman

Purpose: To investigate whether TP53 variants may be correlated with overall survival and local control following stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) for brain metastases (BMs) from non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

Methods: Patients undergoing an initial course of SRS for NSCLC brain metastases between 1/2015 and 12/2020 were retrospectively identified. Overall survival and freedom from local intracranial progression (FFLIP) were estimated via Kaplan-Meier method. Cox models assessed TP53 variant status (pathogenic variant, PV; variant not detected, ND).

Results: 255 patients underwent molecular profiling for TP53, among whom 144 (56%) had a TP53 PV. Median follow-up was 11.6 months. OS was not significantly different across TP53 status. A trend toward superior FFLIP was observed for PV (95% CI 62.9 months-NR) versus ND patients (95% CI 29.4 months-NR; p=0.06). Superior FFLIP was observed for patients with one TP53 variant versus those with TP53 ND.

Conclusion: Among NSCLC patients with BMs, the potential association between TP53 status and post-SRS FFLIP warrants further investigation in a larger prospective cohort.

目的:研究TP53变异是否与非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)脑转移瘤(BMs)立体定向放射外科手术(SRS)后的总生存率和局部控制率相关:方法:对2015年1月1日至2020年12月12日期间因NSCLC脑转移接受SRS初始疗程的患者进行回顾性鉴定。通过卡普兰-梅耶法估算总生存期和颅内局部进展自由度(FFLIP)。Cox模型评估了TP53变异状态(致病变异,PV;未检测到变异,ND)。结果:255名患者接受了TP53分子分析,其中144人(56%)有TP53变异。中位随访时间为 11.6 个月。不同 TP53 状态的 OS 无明显差异。观察到PV(95% CI 62.9个月-NR)与ND患者(95% CI 29.4个月-NR;P=0.06)相比,FFLIP呈上升趋势。TP53变异患者的FFLIP优于TP53 ND患者:在患有BMs的NSCLC患者中,TP53状态与SRS后FFLIP之间的潜在关联值得在更大的前瞻性队列中进一步研究。
{"title":"Impact of <i>TP53</i> mutations on brain metastasis control in non-small cell lung cancer patients undergoing stereotactic radiosurgery.","authors":"Jim X Leng, Chang Su, David J Carpenter, Warren Floyd, Eugene Vaios, Rachel Shenker, Peter G Hendrickson, Will Giles, Trey Mullikin, Scott R Floyd, John P Kirkpatrick, Michelle Green, Zachary J Reitman","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To investigate whether TP53 variants may be correlated with overall survival and local control following stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) for brain metastases (BMs) from non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients undergoing an initial course of SRS for NSCLC brain metastases between 1/2015 and 12/2020 were retrospectively identified. Overall survival and freedom from local intracranial progression (FFLIP) were estimated via Kaplan-Meier method. Cox models assessed TP53 variant status (pathogenic variant, PV; variant not detected, ND).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>255 patients underwent molecular profiling for TP53, among whom 144 (56%) had a TP53 PV. Median follow-up was 11.6 months. OS was not significantly different across TP53 status. A trend toward superior FFLIP was observed for PV (95% CI 62.9 months-NR) versus ND patients (95% CI 29.4 months-NR; p=0.06). Superior FFLIP was observed for patients with one TP53 variant versus those with TP53 ND.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Among NSCLC patients with BMs, the potential association between TP53 status and post-SRS FFLIP warrants further investigation in a larger prospective cohort.</p>","PeriodicalId":16917,"journal":{"name":"Journal of radiosurgery and SBRT","volume":"9 2","pages":"91-99"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11288656/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141860092","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Cytoreductive single-fraction stereotactic radiation therapy prior to living donor transplantation for inoperable liver-confined metastatic rectal cancer. 对无法手术的肝脏局限性转移性直肠癌进行活体移植前的单次分次立体定向放射治疗。
IF 0.7 Q4 SURGERY Pub Date : 2024-01-01
Panos A Papanikolaou, Russell N Wesson, Nilofer S Azad, Jeffrey J Meyer
{"title":"Cytoreductive single-fraction stereotactic radiation therapy prior to living donor transplantation for inoperable liver-confined metastatic rectal cancer.","authors":"Panos A Papanikolaou, Russell N Wesson, Nilofer S Azad, Jeffrey J Meyer","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":16917,"journal":{"name":"Journal of radiosurgery and SBRT","volume":"9 2","pages":"181-183"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11288647/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141860089","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Patient and physician attitudes towards salvage stereotactic radiosurgery or radiotherapy for brain metastases. 患者和医生对脑转移瘤抢救性立体定向放射手术或放疗的态度。
IF 0.7 Q4 SURGERY Pub Date : 2024-01-01
Benjamin J Rich, Timoteo Almeida, Jared A Maas, Shahil Mehta, Raj Singh, Haley K Perlow, Benjamin Silver, Eric J Lehrer, Yash Soni, William H Jin, Crystal S Seldon, Gregory Azzam, Raphael Yechieli, Gregory Kubicek, Ricardo J Komotar, Carolina G Benjamin, Tejan Diwanji, Eric A Mellon

Background: The experience of patients with brain metastases treated with stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) may shape attitudes towards salvage therapy. Furthermore, physician attitudes towards salvage therapy may differ based on specialty and experience. Our objective is to compare physician attitudes and patient experiences with SRS.

Methods: Eligible patients with brain metastases treated with one course of SRS or fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (FSRT) without whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT) in the definitive or postoperative setting at a single institution were surveyed from 11/2021 to 11/2022 regarding their perspectives on salvage therapy. A separate 11-question multi-disciplinary physician survey was distributed to residents, fellows and attendings at seven additional academic institutions in the US. Chi-square test and Mann-Whitney U test were used to assess differences.

Results: A total of 30 patients and 88 physicians were surveyed. Most patients reported being satisfied or very satisfied with initial SRS/FSRT (90%). When given an option between WBRT or SRS for salvage treatment, all patients favored SRS. The physicians consisted of radiation oncologists (69.3%), neurosurgeons (19.3%), medical oncologists (8.0%), and neuro-oncologists (3.4%). Most physicians were confident or very confident in their ability to discuss the risks and benefits of SRS for brain metastases (78.9%), but this was significantly lower if the patient had received prior SRS (56.6%, P<.001). In these cases, there were significant differences in response by medical specialty and confidence level (P<0.05).

Conclusions: Patients and physicians view tumor control followed by long-term toxicity as the most important factors for salvage therapy after initial SRS for brain metastases.

背景:接受立体定向放射手术(SRS)治疗的脑转移患者的经历可能会影响对挽救治疗的态度。此外,医生对挽救治疗的态度可能因专业和经验而异。我们的目的是比较医生对 SRS 的态度和患者的经历:在 2021 年 11 月至 2022 年 11 月期间,我们对在一家医疗机构接受过一个疗程的 SRS 或分次立体定向放射治疗 (FSRT) 而未接受全脑放射治疗 (WBRT) 的符合条件的脑转移患者进行了调查,了解他们对挽救疗法的看法。另外还向美国另外七所学术机构的住院医师、研究员和主治医师发放了一份包含 11 个问题的多学科医师调查问卷。采用卡方检验(Chi-square test)和曼-惠特尼U检验(Mann-Whitney U test)评估差异:共有 30 名患者和 88 名医生接受了调查。大多数患者对最初的 SRS/FSRT 表示满意或非常满意(90%)。当患者可以选择WBRT或SRS进行挽救治疗时,所有患者都倾向于SRS。医生包括放射肿瘤科医生(69.3%)、神经外科医生(19.3%)、肿瘤内科医生(8.0%)和神经肿瘤科医生(3.4%)。大多数医生对自己讨论脑转移瘤 SRS 风险和益处的能力有信心或非常有信心(78.9%),但如果患者之前接受过 SRS,则信心明显不足(56.6%,PConclusions:患者和医生认为,肿瘤控制和长期毒性是脑转移瘤初次SRS治疗后进行挽救治疗的最重要因素。
{"title":"Patient and physician attitudes towards salvage stereotactic radiosurgery or radiotherapy for brain metastases.","authors":"Benjamin J Rich, Timoteo Almeida, Jared A Maas, Shahil Mehta, Raj Singh, Haley K Perlow, Benjamin Silver, Eric J Lehrer, Yash Soni, William H Jin, Crystal S Seldon, Gregory Azzam, Raphael Yechieli, Gregory Kubicek, Ricardo J Komotar, Carolina G Benjamin, Tejan Diwanji, Eric A Mellon","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The experience of patients with brain metastases treated with stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) may shape attitudes towards salvage therapy. Furthermore, physician attitudes towards salvage therapy may differ based on specialty and experience. Our objective is to compare physician attitudes and patient experiences with SRS.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Eligible patients with brain metastases treated with one course of SRS or fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (FSRT) without whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT) in the definitive or postoperative setting at a single institution were surveyed from 11/2021 to 11/2022 regarding their perspectives on salvage therapy. A separate 11-question multi-disciplinary physician survey was distributed to residents, fellows and attendings at seven additional academic institutions in the US. Chi-square test and Mann-Whitney U test were used to assess differences.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 30 patients and 88 physicians were surveyed. Most patients reported being satisfied or very satisfied with initial SRS/FSRT (90%). When given an option between WBRT or SRS for salvage treatment, all patients favored SRS. The physicians consisted of radiation oncologists (69.3%), neurosurgeons (19.3%), medical oncologists (8.0%), and neuro-oncologists (3.4%). Most physicians were confident or very confident in their ability to discuss the risks and benefits of SRS for brain metastases (78.9%), but this was significantly lower if the patient had received prior SRS (56.6%, P<.001). In these cases, there were significant differences in response by medical specialty and confidence level (P<0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Patients and physicians view tumor control followed by long-term toxicity as the most important factors for salvage therapy after initial SRS for brain metastases.</p>","PeriodicalId":16917,"journal":{"name":"Journal of radiosurgery and SBRT","volume":"9 2","pages":"101-111"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11288657/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141860095","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Emergency SBRT to trachea and carina for adenoid cystic carcinoma of the trachea with partial airway obstruction. 气管腺样囊性癌伴部分气道阻塞时的气管和心尖紧急SBRT治疗。
IF 0.7 Q4 SURGERY Pub Date : 2024-01-01
Santosh K Prusty, Amrit Neupane, Rambha Pandey, Seema Sharma, Karan Madan, Madhavi Tripathy, Ipsita Pati, Subhash Gupta, K P Haresh
{"title":"Emergency SBRT to trachea and carina for adenoid cystic carcinoma of the trachea with partial airway obstruction.","authors":"Santosh K Prusty, Amrit Neupane, Rambha Pandey, Seema Sharma, Karan Madan, Madhavi Tripathy, Ipsita Pati, Subhash Gupta, K P Haresh","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":16917,"journal":{"name":"Journal of radiosurgery and SBRT","volume":"9 2","pages":"185-188"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11288648/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141860090","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Upper rectal fixation with an endorectal balloon in prostate cancer radiotherapy. 在前列腺癌放射治疗中使用肛门直肠内球囊固定直肠上部。
IF 0.7 Q4 SURGERY Pub Date : 2024-01-01
Yukihiro Hama, Etsuko Tate

Purpose: Despite the efficacy of endorectal balloon (ERB) in reducing rectal radiation dose, the effectiveness of upper rectal fixation remains to be evaluated. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the impact of ERB on upper rectal fixation in patients diagnosed with localized prostate cancer.

Materials: Cine MRI was performed in 46 patients with localized prostate cancer to assess the stability of the anterior rectal wall with and without ERB by calculating the standard deviation of the normalized signal intensity at the level of the midgland or the seminal vesicle.

Results: The standard deviation of the normalized signal intensity for the anterior rectal wall decreased significantly with the use of ERB both at the level of the midgland (p < 0.05) and the seminal vesicle (p < 0.05). The standard deviation of the anterior rectal wall at the level of the seminal vesicle was significantly higher than at the level of the midgland without ERB (p < 0.05). But with ERB, the standard deviation of the normalized signal intensity at the level of the seminal vesicle became comparable to that at the level of the midgland (p = 0.392).

Conclusion: The anterior rectal wall is stabilized by ERBs not only at the level of the midgland but also at the level of the seminal vesicle. ERBs can transform the rectum from a moving and deformable organ into a static and rigid organ.

目的:尽管肛门直肠内球囊(ERB)在减少直肠放射剂量方面效果显著,但直肠上部固定的效果仍有待评估。本研究旨在评估 ERB 对确诊为局部前列腺癌患者的直肠上部固定的影响:对 46 例局部前列腺癌患者进行了 Cine MRI 检查,通过计算中段或精囊水平的归一化信号强度标准偏差,评估有无 ERB 的直肠前壁稳定性:使用 ERB 后,直肠前壁在中庭(p < 0.05)和精囊(p < 0.05)水平的归一化信号强度标准偏差均显著下降。在没有使用 ERB 的情况下,精囊水平的直肠前壁标准偏差明显高于中庭水平(p < 0.05)。但使用 ERB 后,精囊水平的归一化信号强度标准偏差与中段水平相当(p = 0.392):结论:ERB 不仅能稳定直肠中段水平的直肠前壁,还能稳定精囊水平的直肠前壁。ERB可将直肠从一个可移动、可变形的器官转变为一个静态、刚性的器官。
{"title":"Upper rectal fixation with an endorectal balloon in prostate cancer radiotherapy.","authors":"Yukihiro Hama, Etsuko Tate","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Despite the efficacy of endorectal balloon (ERB) in reducing rectal radiation dose, the effectiveness of upper rectal fixation remains to be evaluated. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the impact of ERB on upper rectal fixation in patients diagnosed with localized prostate cancer.</p><p><strong>Materials: </strong>Cine MRI was performed in 46 patients with localized prostate cancer to assess the stability of the anterior rectal wall with and without ERB by calculating the standard deviation of the normalized signal intensity at the level of the midgland or the seminal vesicle.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The standard deviation of the normalized signal intensity for the anterior rectal wall decreased significantly with the use of ERB both at the level of the midgland (p < 0.05) and the seminal vesicle (p < 0.05). The standard deviation of the anterior rectal wall at the level of the seminal vesicle was significantly higher than at the level of the midgland without ERB (p < 0.05). But with ERB, the standard deviation of the normalized signal intensity at the level of the seminal vesicle became comparable to that at the level of the midgland (p = 0.392).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The anterior rectal wall is stabilized by ERBs not only at the level of the midgland but also at the level of the seminal vesicle. ERBs can transform the rectum from a moving and deformable organ into a static and rigid organ.</p>","PeriodicalId":16917,"journal":{"name":"Journal of radiosurgery and SBRT","volume":"9 2","pages":"129-133"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11288649/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141860097","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Experience of Gamma Knife radiosurgery for treatment of brain metastases in pregnancy with literature review. 伽玛刀放射外科治疗妊娠期脑转移瘤的经验及文献综述。
IF 0.7 Q4 SURGERY Pub Date : 2024-01-01
Beehong Soon, Fuad Ismail, Marfu'ah Nik Ezzamudden, Shahizon Azura Mohamed Mukari, Aida-Widure Mustapha Mohd Mustapha, Aida Hani Mohd Kalok, Norlia Abdullah, Ian Paddick, Ramesh Kumar

Brain metastases during pregnancy poses complex conundrum in management. Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) offers valuable option to clinicians in this scenario. We reviewed and described the safety and effectiveness of Gamma Knife (GK) SRS in treating a solitary cerebellar metastasis in a patient with recurrent breast cancer at 28 weeks of gestation. Following multidisciplinary discussion, she consented for urgent single session GK SRS to the brain metastasis with 2 cycles of 3-weekly paclitaxel chemotherapy prior to planned delivery at term. Prior to the frame-based treatment, a trial run with dosimeters placed on the superior and inferior parts of foam knee support showed radiation exposure of 3.12 mSv and 1.06 mSv respectively. A prescription dose of 16 Gy at the 50% isodose was delivered using 24 isocentres over 39.7' of beam on time. The treatment plan had 98% coverage, 89% selectivity and a gradient index of 2.98. Dosimeters placed near the uterine fundus and suprapubic region (consistent with location of fetal head) during the actual treatment recorded 2.83 mSv and 0.27 mSv, which is lower than the trial dosimeter readings. The patient successfully completed SRS treatment and gave birth to a healthy baby two months later. Follow-up MRI at three months interval showed total resolution of the lesion. GK SRS is known for the lowest extracranial dose compared to other SRS modalities. This report and literature review confirmed that GK is a sharp and effective, yet gentle and safe treatment for pregnant patients with brain metastases.

妊娠期脑转移给治疗带来了复杂的难题。在这种情况下,立体定向放射外科(SRS)为临床医生提供了宝贵的选择。我们回顾并描述了伽玛刀(GK)SRS治疗一名妊娠28周的复发性乳腺癌患者单发小脑转移瘤的安全性和有效性。经过多学科讨论,她同意在计划足月分娩前对脑转移灶进行紧急单次伽玛刀SRS治疗,同时接受2个周期、每周3次的紫杉醇化疗。在进行基于框架的治疗之前,在泡沫膝关节支撑的上部和下部分别放置了剂量计进行试运行,结果显示辐射量分别为 3.12 mSv 和 1.06 mSv。使用 24 个等中心,在 39.7 英尺的光束照射时间内,以 50% 等剂量照射了 16 Gy 的处方剂量。治疗计划的覆盖率为 98%,选择性为 89%,梯度指数为 2.98。在实际治疗过程中,放置在子宫底和耻骨上区域(与胎头位置一致)附近的剂量计分别记录到 2.83 mSv 和 0.27 mSv,低于试验剂量计读数。患者顺利完成了 SRS 治疗,两个月后产下一名健康婴儿。间隔三个月的随访核磁共振成像显示病灶完全消退。众所周知,与其他 SRS 方式相比,GK SRS 的颅外剂量最低。该报告和文献综述证实,GK 对妊娠期脑转移瘤患者是一种锐利、有效、温和且安全的治疗方法。
{"title":"Experience of Gamma Knife radiosurgery for treatment of brain metastases in pregnancy with literature review.","authors":"Beehong Soon, Fuad Ismail, Marfu'ah Nik Ezzamudden, Shahizon Azura Mohamed Mukari, Aida-Widure Mustapha Mohd Mustapha, Aida Hani Mohd Kalok, Norlia Abdullah, Ian Paddick, Ramesh Kumar","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Brain metastases during pregnancy poses complex conundrum in management. Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) offers valuable option to clinicians in this scenario. We reviewed and described the safety and effectiveness of Gamma Knife (GK) SRS in treating a solitary cerebellar metastasis in a patient with recurrent breast cancer at 28 weeks of gestation. Following multidisciplinary discussion, she consented for urgent single session GK SRS to the brain metastasis with 2 cycles of 3-weekly paclitaxel chemotherapy prior to planned delivery at term. Prior to the frame-based treatment, a trial run with dosimeters placed on the superior and inferior parts of foam knee support showed radiation exposure of 3.12 mSv and 1.06 mSv respectively. A prescription dose of 16 Gy at the 50% isodose was delivered using 24 isocentres over 39.7' of beam on time. The treatment plan had 98% coverage, 89% selectivity and a gradient index of 2.98. Dosimeters placed near the uterine fundus and suprapubic region (consistent with location of fetal head) during the actual treatment recorded 2.83 mSv and 0.27 mSv, which is lower than the trial dosimeter readings. The patient successfully completed SRS treatment and gave birth to a healthy baby two months later. Follow-up MRI at three months interval showed total resolution of the lesion. GK SRS is known for the lowest extracranial dose compared to other SRS modalities. This report and literature review confirmed that GK is a sharp and effective, yet gentle and safe treatment for pregnant patients with brain metastases.</p>","PeriodicalId":16917,"journal":{"name":"Journal of radiosurgery and SBRT","volume":"9 2","pages":"171-175"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11288652/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141860091","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Initial experience and patient tolerance of proton stereotactic body radiotherapy. 质子立体定向体放射治疗的初步经验和患者耐受性。
IF 0.7 Q4 SURGERY Pub Date : 2024-01-01
Naba Ali, Jun Zhou, Bree R Eaton, Jeffrey M Switchenko, Yichun Cao, William A Stokes, Pretesh R Patel, Katja M Langen, Roelf Slopsema, Jeffrey D Bradley, Mark W McDonald

Purpose: To review our initial experience with proton-based SBRT to evaluate the planning outcomes and initial patient tolerance of treatment.

Patients and methods: From Sep. 2019 to Dec. 2020, 52 patients were treated with proton SBRT to 62 lesions. Fractionation varied by indication and site with a median of 5 fractions and median fractional dose of 8 Gy. Planning outcomes, including plan heterogeneity, conformity, and PTV volume receiving 100% of the prescription dose (PTV V100%) were evaluated. Acute toxicities were prospectively recorded, and patient reported outcomes were assessed prior to and at completion of treatment using the MD Anderson Symptom Inventory (MDASI) and EQ-5D5L visual analogue score (VAS).

Results: All treated patients completed their course of proton-based SBRT. The mean conformity index was 1.05 (range 0.51-1.48). R50% values were comparable to ideal photon parameters. PTV V100% was 89.9% on average (40.44% - 99.76%). 5 patients (10%) required plan modification due to setup or tumor changes. No patients developed a new grade 3 or greater toxicity during treatment. Comparing pretreatment to end of treatment timepoints, there was a significant improvement in the mean VAS (65 to 75, p = 0.014), with no significant change in the mean MDASI symptom (1.7, 1.8; p = 0.79) or interference (2.3, 2.4; p = 0.452) scores.

Conclusion: Proton-based SBRT can achieve dosimetric goals required by major clinical photon trials. It was well-tolerated with no decrement in patient reported outcomes and a mean 10-point improvement in VAS at the conclusion of SBRT. Further follow-up is necessary for tumor control and late effects analysis.

目的:回顾我们使用质子SBRT的初步经验,评估计划结果和患者对治疗的初步耐受性:从2019年9月至2020年12月,52名患者接受了质子SBRT治疗,共治疗62个病灶。分次因适应症和部位而异,中位分次为 5 次,中位分次剂量为 8 Gy。对计划结果进行了评估,包括计划异质性、一致性和接受100%处方剂量的PTV体积(PTV V100%)。对急性毒性进行了前瞻性记录,并使用MD安德森症状量表(MDASI)和EQ-5D5L视觉模拟评分(VAS)对治疗前和治疗结束时的患者报告结果进行了评估:所有接受治疗的患者都完成了质子SBRT疗程。平均符合性指数为1.05(范围为0.51-1.48)。R50%值与理想的光子参数相当。PTV V100% 平均为 89.9%(40.44% - 99.76%)。5名患者(10%)因设置或肿瘤变化而需要修改计划。没有患者在治疗期间出现新的 3 级或以上毒性。比较治疗前和治疗结束时点,VAS平均值有显著改善(从65分到75分,p = 0.014),MDASI症状(1.7,1.8;p = 0.79)或干扰(2.3,2.4;p = 0.452)平均值无显著变化:结论:基于质子的SBRT可以达到主要临床光子试验所要求的剂量学目标。结论:基于质子的 SBRT 可以达到主要临床光子试验所要求的剂量目标,其耐受性良好,患者报告的结果无下降,SBRT 结束时 VAS 平均改善 10 分。肿瘤控制和后期效应分析需要进一步的随访。
{"title":"Initial experience and patient tolerance of proton stereotactic body radiotherapy.","authors":"Naba Ali, Jun Zhou, Bree R Eaton, Jeffrey M Switchenko, Yichun Cao, William A Stokes, Pretesh R Patel, Katja M Langen, Roelf Slopsema, Jeffrey D Bradley, Mark W McDonald","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To review our initial experience with proton-based SBRT to evaluate the planning outcomes and initial patient tolerance of treatment.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>From Sep. 2019 to Dec. 2020, 52 patients were treated with proton SBRT to 62 lesions. Fractionation varied by indication and site with a median of 5 fractions and median fractional dose of 8 Gy. Planning outcomes, including plan heterogeneity, conformity, and PTV volume receiving 100% of the prescription dose (PTV V100%) were evaluated. Acute toxicities were prospectively recorded, and patient reported outcomes were assessed prior to and at completion of treatment using the MD Anderson Symptom Inventory (MDASI) and EQ-5D5L visual analogue score (VAS).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All treated patients completed their course of proton-based SBRT. The mean conformity index was 1.05 (range 0.51-1.48). R50% values were comparable to ideal photon parameters. PTV V100% was 89.9% on average (40.44% - 99.76%). 5 patients (10%) required plan modification due to setup or tumor changes. No patients developed a new grade 3 or greater toxicity during treatment. Comparing pretreatment to end of treatment timepoints, there was a significant improvement in the mean VAS (65 to 75, p = 0.014), with no significant change in the mean MDASI symptom (1.7, 1.8; p = 0.79) or interference (2.3, 2.4; p = 0.452) scores.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Proton-based SBRT can achieve dosimetric goals required by major clinical photon trials. It was well-tolerated with no decrement in patient reported outcomes and a mean 10-point improvement in VAS at the conclusion of SBRT. Further follow-up is necessary for tumor control and late effects analysis.</p>","PeriodicalId":16917,"journal":{"name":"Journal of radiosurgery and SBRT","volume":"9 2","pages":"121-128"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11288653/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141860093","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Comprehensive assessment of proton plans with three different beam delivery systems for multiple brain metastases. 采用三种不同的射束传输系统对治疗多发性脑转移瘤的质子计划进行综合评估。
IF 0.7 Q4 SURGERY Pub Date : 2024-01-01
Tara Gray, Anna Maria Kolano, Chieh-Wen Liu, Young-Bin Cho, Jeremy Donaghue, Samuel Chao, John Suh, Ping Xia, Jonathan Farr

Purpose: To compare plan quality among photon volumetric arc therapy (VMAT), Gamma Knife, and three different proton beam modalities.

Methods: Fifty-five brain lesions from 20 patients were planned with three different proton spot size ranges of cyclotron-generated proton beams, CPBs (spot size σ: 2.7-7.0 mm), linear accelerator proton beams, LPBs (σ: 2.9-5.5 mm), and linear accelerator proton minibeams, LPMBs (σ: 0.9-3.9 mm), with and without apertures and compared against photon VMAT and Gamma Knife plans. Dose coverage to each lesion for each proton and photon plan was set to 99% of the GTV receiving the prescription (Rx) dose. All proton plans used ±2 mm setup uncertainty and ±2% range uncertainty in robust evaluation to achieve V100%Rx > 95% of the GTV. Apertures were applied to proton beams irradiating tumors <1 cm3 volume and located <2.5 cm depth. Conformity index (CI), gradient index (GI), V12 Gy, V4.5 Gy, and mean brain dose were compared across all plan types. The Wilcoxon signed rank test was utilized to determine statistical significance of dosimetric results compared between photon and proton plans.

Results: When compared to CPB generated plans, average CI and GI were significantly better for the LPB and LPMB plans. Aperture-based IMPT plans showed improvement from Gamma Knife for all dosimetric metrics. Aperture-based IMPT plans also showed improvement in all dosimetric metrics for shallow tumors (d < 2.5 cm) when compared with non-aperture-based plans.

Conclusion: The LPB and LPMB stand as excellent alternatives to CPB or photon therapy and significantly increase the preservation of normal tissue.

目的:比较光子容积弧治疗(VMAT)、伽玛刀和三种不同质子束模式的计划质量:用回旋加速器产生的质子束CPBs(光斑尺寸σ:2.7-7.0毫米)、直线加速器质子束LPBs(σ:2.9-5.5毫米)和直线加速器质子小光束LPMBs(σ:0.9-3.9毫米)三种不同的质子光斑尺寸范围对20名患者的55个脑部病灶进行计划,并与光子VMAT和伽玛刀计划进行比较。每种质子和光子计划对每个病灶的剂量覆盖率都设定为接受处方(Rx)剂量的 GTV 的 99%。所有质子计划都在稳健评估中使用了±2毫米设置不确定性和±2%范围不确定性,以实现V100%Rx > 95%的GTV。所有计划类型的质子束照射肿瘤3个体积和12 Gy、V4.5 Gy的孔径以及平均脑剂量进行了比较。利用Wilcoxon符号秩检验来确定光子和质子计划之间剂量测定结果的统计学意义:结果:与 CPB 生成的计划相比,LPB 和 LPMB 计划的平均 CI 和 GI 明显更好。基于光圈的 IMPT 计划在所有剂量学指标上都优于伽玛刀。与非基于孔径的计划相比,基于孔径的 IMPT 计划在浅表肿瘤(d < 2.5 厘米)的所有剂量学指标上都有所改进:结论:LPB 和 LPMB 是 CPB 或光子疗法的绝佳替代方案,可显著提高正常组织的保存率。
{"title":"Comprehensive assessment of proton plans with three different beam delivery systems for multiple brain metastases.","authors":"Tara Gray, Anna Maria Kolano, Chieh-Wen Liu, Young-Bin Cho, Jeremy Donaghue, Samuel Chao, John Suh, Ping Xia, Jonathan Farr","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To compare plan quality among photon volumetric arc therapy (VMAT), Gamma Knife, and three different proton beam modalities.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Fifty-five brain lesions from 20 patients were planned with three different proton spot size ranges of cyclotron-generated proton beams, CPBs (spot size σ: 2.7-7.0 mm), linear accelerator proton beams, LPBs (σ: 2.9-5.5 mm), and linear accelerator proton minibeams, LPMBs (σ: 0.9-3.9 mm), with and without apertures and compared against photon VMAT and Gamma Knife plans. Dose coverage to each lesion for each proton and photon plan was set to 99% of the GTV receiving the prescription (Rx) dose. All proton plans used ±2 mm setup uncertainty and ±2% range uncertainty in robust evaluation to achieve V<sub>100%Rx</sub> > 95% of the GTV. Apertures were applied to proton beams irradiating tumors <1 cm<sup>3</sup> volume and located <2.5 cm depth. Conformity index (CI), gradient index (GI), V<sub>12 Gy</sub>, V<sub>4.5 Gy</sub>, and mean brain dose were compared across all plan types. The Wilcoxon signed rank test was utilized to determine statistical significance of dosimetric results compared between photon and proton plans.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>When compared to CPB generated plans, average CI and GI were significantly better for the LPB and LPMB plans. Aperture-based IMPT plans showed improvement from Gamma Knife for all dosimetric metrics. Aperture-based IMPT plans also showed improvement in all dosimetric metrics for shallow tumors (d < 2.5 cm) when compared with non-aperture-based plans.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The LPB and LPMB stand as excellent alternatives to CPB or photon therapy and significantly increase the preservation of normal tissue.</p>","PeriodicalId":16917,"journal":{"name":"Journal of radiosurgery and SBRT","volume":"9 2","pages":"145-156"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11288651/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141862057","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
A single center, inter-observer evaluation of vestibular schwannoma stereotactic radiosurgery and its dosimetric impact. 对前庭分裂瘤立体定向放射手术及其剂量影响的单中心观察者间评估。
IF 0.7 Q4 SURGERY Pub Date : 2024-01-01
Maria Jose Perez-Calatayud, Antonio Menéndez, Françoise Lliso, Vicente Carmona, Antonio Conde, Francisco Celada, Mariola Bernisz, Carlos Botella, Jose Perez-Calatayud

The aim of this work was to evaluate the inter- and intra-observer variation in contouring vestibular schwannoma (VS) and the organs-at-risk (OAR), and its dosimetric impact in Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy (VMAT). Three VS typical cases were contoured by four clinicians. The Agreement Volume Index (AVI) appeared to be notably higher in VS than in OARs, such that the dose coverage of VS is fairly robust. In OARs, the largest variation was +1.02Gy in dmax for the brainstem, +0.78Gy in dmean for the cochlea and +1.05Gy in dmax of the trigeminal nerve. Accordingly, it was decided that all VS delineations for stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS), and all frame-based SRS contouring in general, should always be reviewed by a second physician. In addition, the retrospective presentation of VS cases at daily peer review meetings has also been adopted to ensure that the consensus is constantly updated, as well as for training purposes.

这项工作的目的是评估前庭分裂瘤(VS)和危险器官(OAR)轮廓的观察者之间和观察者内部的差异,及其对体积调制弧治疗(VMAT)的剂量影响。四位临床医生对三个典型的 VS 病例进行了轮廓分析。VS 的协议容积指数 (AVI) 明显高于 OAR,因此 VS 的剂量覆盖范围相当稳固。在 OARs 中,最大的差异是脑干 dmax +1.02Gy,耳蜗 dmean +0.78Gy,三叉神经 dmax +1.05Gy。因此,决定所有立体定向放射手术(SRS)的 VS 划线以及所有基于框架的 SRS 轮廓都应始终由第二名医生审查。此外,在每天的同行评审会议上也会回顾性地介绍 VS 病例,以确保不断更新共识,并用于培训目的。
{"title":"A single center, inter-observer evaluation of vestibular schwannoma stereotactic radiosurgery and its dosimetric impact.","authors":"Maria Jose Perez-Calatayud, Antonio Menéndez, Françoise Lliso, Vicente Carmona, Antonio Conde, Francisco Celada, Mariola Bernisz, Carlos Botella, Jose Perez-Calatayud","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The aim of this work was to evaluate the inter- and intra-observer variation in contouring vestibular schwannoma (VS) and the organs-at-risk (OAR), and its dosimetric impact in Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy (VMAT). Three VS typical cases were contoured by four clinicians. The Agreement Volume Index (AVI) appeared to be notably higher in VS than in OARs, such that the dose coverage of VS is fairly robust. In OARs, the largest variation was +1.02Gy in dmax for the brainstem, +0.78Gy in dmean for the cochlea and +1.05Gy in dmax of the trigeminal nerve. Accordingly, it was decided that all VS delineations for stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS), and all frame-based SRS contouring in general, should always be reviewed by a second physician. In addition, the retrospective presentation of VS cases at daily peer review meetings has also been adopted to ensure that the consensus is constantly updated, as well as for training purposes.</p>","PeriodicalId":16917,"journal":{"name":"Journal of radiosurgery and SBRT","volume":"9 2","pages":"113-120"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11288650/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141860087","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Journal of radiosurgery and SBRT
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1