Resection cavity dynamics and optimal timing of adjuvant stereotactic radiosurgery for resected brain metastases.

IF 0.7 Q4 SURGERY Journal of radiosurgery and SBRT Pub Date : 2022-01-01
Sujay Rajkumar, Yun Liang, Matthew J Shepard, Richard Williamson, Alexander Yu, Stephen M Karlovits, E Wegner Rodney
{"title":"Resection cavity dynamics and optimal timing of adjuvant stereotactic radiosurgery for resected brain metastases.","authors":"Sujay Rajkumar,&nbsp;Yun Liang,&nbsp;Matthew J Shepard,&nbsp;Richard Williamson,&nbsp;Alexander Yu,&nbsp;Stephen M Karlovits,&nbsp;E Wegner Rodney","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Optimal timing of SRS after surgical resection of brain metastases (BMs) remains debated but is generally advocated to occur within 4 weeks of surgery to account for cavity remodeling. Our study assesses this recommendation by examining cavity dynamics and any downstream effects on outcome.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Post-operative MRIs were used to compare target lesion volumes to target volume at time of SRS. Spearman's analysis identified a relationship between the time to SRS (ttSRS) and target remodeling. The Mann-Whitney-U test compared median remodeling between groups receiving standard (≤4 weeks) and late (>4 weeks) adjuvant SRS. Kaplan Meier functions estimated probabilities of local recurrence (LR) and survival (OS). A Cox proportional hazards model (CPH) identified predictors of OS, LR, and leptomeningeal disease (LMD).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Median ttSRS was 32 days (3-72). A positive correlation exists when comparing ttSRS to reduction in cavity volume (0-10 weeks; p = 0.01) with no difference in median cavity remodeling between standard and late SRS groups. OS and LR rates were respectively 53.3% and 70.2% at 12 months with no difference in OS (p = 0.16) or LR (p = 0.54) between standard and late SRS groups. Subtotal resection predicted LMD (HR: 6.37; p = 0.03). No grade 3 or higher toxicity was seen in follow-up.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Resection cavities may continue to shrink well after resection. There is no significant difference in OS or LR based on ttSRS, however, treatment factors such as the extent of resection may account for outcomes such as LMD.</p>","PeriodicalId":16917,"journal":{"name":"Journal of radiosurgery and SBRT","volume":"8 4","pages":"247-255"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10322174/pdf/rsbrt-8-247.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of radiosurgery and SBRT","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Optimal timing of SRS after surgical resection of brain metastases (BMs) remains debated but is generally advocated to occur within 4 weeks of surgery to account for cavity remodeling. Our study assesses this recommendation by examining cavity dynamics and any downstream effects on outcome.

Methods: Post-operative MRIs were used to compare target lesion volumes to target volume at time of SRS. Spearman's analysis identified a relationship between the time to SRS (ttSRS) and target remodeling. The Mann-Whitney-U test compared median remodeling between groups receiving standard (≤4 weeks) and late (>4 weeks) adjuvant SRS. Kaplan Meier functions estimated probabilities of local recurrence (LR) and survival (OS). A Cox proportional hazards model (CPH) identified predictors of OS, LR, and leptomeningeal disease (LMD).

Results: Median ttSRS was 32 days (3-72). A positive correlation exists when comparing ttSRS to reduction in cavity volume (0-10 weeks; p = 0.01) with no difference in median cavity remodeling between standard and late SRS groups. OS and LR rates were respectively 53.3% and 70.2% at 12 months with no difference in OS (p = 0.16) or LR (p = 0.54) between standard and late SRS groups. Subtotal resection predicted LMD (HR: 6.37; p = 0.03). No grade 3 or higher toxicity was seen in follow-up.

Conclusion: Resection cavities may continue to shrink well after resection. There is no significant difference in OS or LR based on ttSRS, however, treatment factors such as the extent of resection may account for outcomes such as LMD.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
切除脑转移瘤的切除腔动力学和辅助立体定向放射手术的最佳时机。
目的:脑转移瘤(BMs)手术切除后SRS的最佳时机仍存在争议,但通常主张在手术4周内进行,以考虑腔重塑。我们的研究通过检查空腔动力学和对结果的任何下游影响来评估这一建议。方法:采用术后mri比较靶病变体积与SRS时靶体积。Spearman的分析确定了到达SRS的时间(ttSRS)和靶重构之间的关系。Mann-Whitney-U检验比较标准(≤4周)和晚期(>4周)辅助SRS治疗组的中位重构。Kaplan Meier函数估计局部复发(LR)和生存(OS)的概率。Cox比例风险模型(CPH)确定了OS、LR和轻脑膜病(LMD)的预测因子。结果:中位ttSRS为32天(3-72)。ttSRS与空腔体积缩小呈正相关(0-10周;p = 0.01),标准组和晚期SRS组中位腔重构无差异。12个月时OS和LR率分别为53.3%和70.2%,标准组和晚期SRS组之间OS (p = 0.16)和LR (p = 0.54)无差异。次全切除预测LMD (HR: 6.37;P = 0.03)。随访中未见3级或以上毒性。结论:切除后腔体可继续良好缩小。基于ttSRS的OS和LR没有显著差异,然而,诸如切除程度等治疗因素可能会导致LMD等结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
8.30%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A single center, inter-observer evaluation of vestibular schwannoma stereotactic radiosurgery and its dosimetric impact. Bilateral anterior cingulotomy with Gamma Knife radiosurgery: Another alternative for the treatment of non-oncologic intractable chronic pain. Cytoreductive single-fraction stereotactic radiation therapy prior to living donor transplantation for inoperable liver-confined metastatic rectal cancer. Emergency SBRT to trachea and carina for adenoid cystic carcinoma of the trachea with partial airway obstruction. Experience of Gamma Knife radiosurgery for treatment of brain metastases in pregnancy with literature review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1