Verifying measurements on Siemens Atellica® instruments using clinically acceptable analytical performance specifications.

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q4 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL Scandinavian Journal of Clinical & Laboratory Investigation Pub Date : 2023-10-01 Epub Date: 2023-09-06 DOI:10.1080/00365513.2023.2253422
Emmi Rotgers, Tea Lamberg, Tero Pihlajamaa, Christel Pussinen, Lotta Joutsi-Korhonen, Timo T Kouri
{"title":"Verifying measurements on Siemens Atellica® instruments using clinically acceptable analytical performance specifications.","authors":"Emmi Rotgers,&nbsp;Tea Lamberg,&nbsp;Tero Pihlajamaa,&nbsp;Christel Pussinen,&nbsp;Lotta Joutsi-Korhonen,&nbsp;Timo T Kouri","doi":"10.1080/00365513.2023.2253422","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Measurements on clinical chemistry analysers must be verified to demonstrate applicability to their intended clinical use. We verified the performance of measurements on the Siemens Atellica® Solution chemistry analysers against the clinically acceptable analytical performance specifications, <i>CAAPS</i>, including the component of intra-individual biological variation, <i>CV<sub>I</sub></i>. The relative standard uncertainty of measurement, i.e. analytical variation, <i>CV<sub>A</sub></i>, was estimated for six example measurands, haemoglobin A<sub>1c</sub> in whole blood (B-HbA<sub>1c</sub>), albumin in urine (U-Alb), and the following measurands in plasma: sodium (P-Na), pancreatic amylase (P-AmylP), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (P-LDL-C), and creatinine (P-Crea). Experimental <i>CV<sub>A</sub></i> was calculated from single-instrument imprecision using control samples, variation between measurements on parallel instruments, and estimation of bias with pooled patient specimens. Each obtained <i>CV<sub>A</sub></i> was compared with previously developed <i>CAAPS</i>. The calculated <i>CV<sub>A</sub></i> was 1.4% for B-HbA<sub>1c</sub> (<i>CAAPS</i> 1.9% for single diagnostic testing, <i>CAAPS</i> 2.0% for monitoring after duplicate tests; IFCC units), 10.9% for U-Alb (<i>CAAPS</i> 44.9%), 1.2% for P-Na (<i>CAAPS</i> 0.6%, after triplicate testing 1.5%), 8.2% for P-AmylP (<i>CAAPS</i> 22.9%). The <i>CV<sub>A</sub></i> was 4.9% for P-LDL-C (<i>CAAPS</i> for cardiovascular risk stratification 4.9% after four replicates), and 4.2% for P-Crea (<i>CAAPS</i> 8.0%). Three of the six measurands fulfilled the estimated clinical need. Results from P-Na measurements indicate a general need for improving the P-Na assays for emergency patients. It is necessary to consider <i>CV<sub>I</sub></i> when creating diagnostic targets for laboratory tests, as emphasised by the <i>CAAPS</i> estimates of B-HbA<sub>1c</sub> and P-LDL-C.</p>","PeriodicalId":21474,"journal":{"name":"Scandinavian Journal of Clinical & Laboratory Investigation","volume":" ","pages":"408-416"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scandinavian Journal of Clinical & Laboratory Investigation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00365513.2023.2253422","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/9/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Measurements on clinical chemistry analysers must be verified to demonstrate applicability to their intended clinical use. We verified the performance of measurements on the Siemens Atellica® Solution chemistry analysers against the clinically acceptable analytical performance specifications, CAAPS, including the component of intra-individual biological variation, CVI. The relative standard uncertainty of measurement, i.e. analytical variation, CVA, was estimated for six example measurands, haemoglobin A1c in whole blood (B-HbA1c), albumin in urine (U-Alb), and the following measurands in plasma: sodium (P-Na), pancreatic amylase (P-AmylP), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (P-LDL-C), and creatinine (P-Crea). Experimental CVA was calculated from single-instrument imprecision using control samples, variation between measurements on parallel instruments, and estimation of bias with pooled patient specimens. Each obtained CVA was compared with previously developed CAAPS. The calculated CVA was 1.4% for B-HbA1c (CAAPS 1.9% for single diagnostic testing, CAAPS 2.0% for monitoring after duplicate tests; IFCC units), 10.9% for U-Alb (CAAPS 44.9%), 1.2% for P-Na (CAAPS 0.6%, after triplicate testing 1.5%), 8.2% for P-AmylP (CAAPS 22.9%). The CVA was 4.9% for P-LDL-C (CAAPS for cardiovascular risk stratification 4.9% after four replicates), and 4.2% for P-Crea (CAAPS 8.0%). Three of the six measurands fulfilled the estimated clinical need. Results from P-Na measurements indicate a general need for improving the P-Na assays for emergency patients. It is necessary to consider CVI when creating diagnostic targets for laboratory tests, as emphasised by the CAAPS estimates of B-HbA1c and P-LDL-C.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
使用临床可接受的分析性能规范验证西门子Atellica®仪器的测量值。
必须验证临床化学分析仪的测量值,以证明其适用于预期临床用途。我们根据临床可接受的分析性能规范CAAPS,包括个体内生物变异成分CVI,验证了西门子Atellica®溶液化学分析仪的测量性能。测量的相对标准不确定度,即分析变异CVA,估计了六个示例被测物,全血中的血红蛋白A1c(B-HbA1c)、尿液中的白蛋白(U-Alb)和血浆中的以下被测物:钠(P-Na)、胰淀粉酶(P-AmylP)、低密度脂蛋白胆固醇(P-LDL-C)和肌酸酐(P-Crea)。实验CVA是通过使用对照样本的单仪器不精确性、平行仪器上测量值之间的变化以及合并患者样本的偏差估计来计算的。将每个获得的CVA与先前开发的CAAPS进行比较。计算出的B-HbA1c的CVA为1.4%(CAAPS 1.9%用于单次诊断测试,CAAPS 2.0%用于重复测试后的监测;IFCC单位),U-Alb为10.9%(CAAPS 44.9%),P-Na为1.2%(CAAPS 0.6%,重复测试后为1.5%),P-AmylP为8.2%(CAAPS22.9%),P-Crea为4.2%(CAAPS为8.0%)。六个测量值中有三个满足了估计的临床需求。来自P-Na测量的结果表明,对于急诊患者,一般需要改进P-Na测定。正如CAAPS对B-HbA1c和P-LDL-C的估计所强调的那样,在为实验室测试创建诊断目标时,有必要考虑CVI。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
4.80%
发文量
85
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Scandinavian Journal of Clinical and Laboratory Investigation is an international scientific journal covering clinically oriented biochemical and physiological research. Since the launch of the journal in 1949, it has been a forum for international laboratory medicine, closely related to, and edited by, The Scandinavian Society for Clinical Chemistry. The journal contains peer-reviewed articles, editorials, invited reviews, and short technical notes, as well as several supplements each year. Supplements consist of monographs, and symposium and congress reports covering subjects within clinical chemistry and clinical physiology.
期刊最新文献
Analytical interference on measurement of immunoglobulins in monoclonal gammopathy. FlowDiff: a simple, flow cytometry-based approach for performing a leukocyte differential count. Reference intervals for 23 common biochemical parameters during pregnancy and the first six postpartum months. Prevalence of monoclonal proteins in patients with isolated hypogammaglobulinemia on serum protein electrophoresis. Challenges of preanalytical variables in erythrocyte sedimentation rate: a CUBE 30 touch evaluation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1