Combined measles-mumps-rubella-varicella vaccine and febrile convulsions: the risk considered in the broad context.

IF 5.5 3区 医学 Q1 IMMUNOLOGY Expert Review of Vaccines Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.1080/14760584.2023.2252065
Giacomo Casabona, Olivia Berton, Tina Singh, Markus Knuf, Paolo Bonanni
{"title":"Combined measles-mumps-rubella-varicella vaccine and febrile convulsions: the risk considered in the broad context.","authors":"Giacomo Casabona,&nbsp;Olivia Berton,&nbsp;Tina Singh,&nbsp;Markus Knuf,&nbsp;Paolo Bonanni","doi":"10.1080/14760584.2023.2252065","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Studies on quadrivalent measles, mumps, rubella, and varicella (MMRV) vaccines have indicated a twofold increased relative risk of febrile convulsion (FC) after the first dose compared to MMR and V administered at the same medical visit (MMR+V).</p><p><strong>Areas covered: </strong>This narrative review contextualizes FC occurrence after the first MMRV vaccine dose from a clinical perspective and outlines approaches to attenuate FC occurrence post-vaccination.</p><p><strong>Expert opinion: </strong>While the relative FC risk increases after the first dose of MMRV compared to MMR+V vaccine in measles-naïve infants, the attributable risk is low <i>versus</i> the overall FC risk in the pediatric population triggered by other causes, like natural exposure to pathogens or routine vaccination. No increased risk of FC has been reported after MMRV co-administration with other routine vaccines compared to MMRV alone. Based on our findings and considering the MMRV vaccination benefits (fewer injections, higher coverage, better vaccination compliance), the overall benefit-risk profile of MMRV vaccine is considered to remain positive. Potential occurrence of FC in predisposed children (e.g. with personal/family history of FC) may be attenuated if they receive MMR+V instead of MMRV as the first dose. It is also important to monitor vaccinees for fever during the first 2 weeks post-vaccination.</p>","PeriodicalId":12326,"journal":{"name":"Expert Review of Vaccines","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Expert Review of Vaccines","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14760584.2023.2252065","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Studies on quadrivalent measles, mumps, rubella, and varicella (MMRV) vaccines have indicated a twofold increased relative risk of febrile convulsion (FC) after the first dose compared to MMR and V administered at the same medical visit (MMR+V).

Areas covered: This narrative review contextualizes FC occurrence after the first MMRV vaccine dose from a clinical perspective and outlines approaches to attenuate FC occurrence post-vaccination.

Expert opinion: While the relative FC risk increases after the first dose of MMRV compared to MMR+V vaccine in measles-naïve infants, the attributable risk is low versus the overall FC risk in the pediatric population triggered by other causes, like natural exposure to pathogens or routine vaccination. No increased risk of FC has been reported after MMRV co-administration with other routine vaccines compared to MMRV alone. Based on our findings and considering the MMRV vaccination benefits (fewer injections, higher coverage, better vaccination compliance), the overall benefit-risk profile of MMRV vaccine is considered to remain positive. Potential occurrence of FC in predisposed children (e.g. with personal/family history of FC) may be attenuated if they receive MMR+V instead of MMRV as the first dose. It is also important to monitor vaccinees for fever during the first 2 weeks post-vaccination.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
麻疹-腮腺炎-风疹-水痘联合疫苗和热性惊厥:在广泛背景下考虑的风险。
引言:对四价麻疹、腮腺炎、风疹的研究,和水痘(MMRV)疫苗表明,与同一次就诊时接种的MMR和V(MMR+V)相比,接种第一剂疫苗后发生热性惊厥(FC)的相对风险增加了两倍。涵盖的领域:本叙述性综述从临床角度阐述了第一剂MMRV疫苗后FC的发生情况,并概述了减少接种后FC发生的方法。专家意见:虽然与MMR+V疫苗相比,首次接种MMRV后,幼稚麻疹婴儿的相对FC风险增加,但与其他原因(如自然暴露于病原体或常规疫苗接种)引发的儿科人群的总体FC风险相比,可归因风险较低。与单独使用MMRV相比,MMRV与其他常规疫苗联合使用后FC的风险没有增加。根据我们的研究结果,并考虑到MMRV疫苗接种的益处(更少的注射、更高的覆盖率、更好的疫苗接种依从性),MMRV疫苗的总体益处-风险状况被认为仍然是积极的。如果他们接受MMR+V而不是MMRV作为第一剂,那么易感儿童(例如有FC的个人/家族史)FC的潜在发生可能会减弱。监测接种者在前2天的发烧情况也很重要 接种疫苗后数周。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Expert Review of Vaccines
Expert Review of Vaccines 医学-免疫学
CiteScore
9.10
自引率
3.20%
发文量
136
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Expert Review of Vaccines (ISSN 1476-0584) provides expert commentary on the development, application, and clinical effectiveness of new vaccines. Coverage includes vaccine technology, vaccine adjuvants, prophylactic vaccines, therapeutic vaccines, AIDS vaccines and vaccines for defence against bioterrorism. All articles are subject to rigorous peer-review. The vaccine field has been transformed by recent technological advances, but there remain many challenges in the delivery of cost-effective, safe vaccines. Expert Review of Vaccines facilitates decision making to drive forward this exciting field.
期刊最新文献
Hookworm vaccines: current and future directions. A descriptive review on the real-world impact of Moderna, inc. COVID-19 vaccines. Estimating the time required to reach HPV vaccination targets across Europe. Vaccination strategies for patients under monoclonal antibody and other biological treatments: an updated comprehensive review based on EMA authorizations to January 2024. Comparison of preclinical efficacy of immunotherapies against HPV-induced cancers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1