Non-Laboratory Project-Based Learning for Final Year Bioscience Students: Lessons From COVID-19.

IF 2.7 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY British Journal of Biomedical Science Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.3389/bjbs.2023.11561
Declan J McKenna
{"title":"Non-Laboratory Project-Based Learning for Final Year Bioscience Students: Lessons From COVID-19.","authors":"Declan J McKenna","doi":"10.3389/bjbs.2023.11561","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Provision of \"dry-lab\" final year honours projects, based outside the laboratory, have been proposed as a viable alternative to traditional \"wet-lab\" projects in bioscience subjects, but their value has not been widely evaluated to date. In 2020-21, the COVID-19 pandemic meant all students in the School of Biomedical Sciences at Ulster University (UU) undertook dry-lab projects, due to campus lockdown. Therefore, this provided an ideal opportunity to evaluate the provision of dry-lab projects in a large student cohort. <b>Methods:</b> A pilot group of final year students (<i>n</i> = 4) studying Biomedical Science at UU were interviewed to evaluate their experience of conducting a dry-lab project. This evaluation and the themes that emerged were subsequently used to inform the co-creation of a survey to appraise student experience of dry-lab research project learning across the final year student cohort in School of Biomedical Sciences (<i>n</i> = 140). Quantitative and qualitative data was collected and analysed for trends and themes. <b>Results:</b> The results of this project identified four main themes related to dry-lab projects; expectations, skills & employability, quality of experience and choice. Student expectations about dry-lab projects were not dramatically changed, although initial negative opinions of some individuals were over-turned. Most students recognised that they had developed many useful employability skills through dry-lab projects, although lack of practical laboratory experience was still perceived as a drawback. Student experience was influenced by personal circumstances but students reporting poor project experience had significantly lower levels of communication with supervisor (<i>p</i> < 0.05). Most students agreed that choice of dry- and wet-lab projects would be valuable for future cohorts. <b>Conclusion:</b> This report concludes that dry-lab project provision can be a suitable and equitable alternative for wet-lab projects. Dry-lab projects can be valuable for learning new skills and may be an attractive option for some students and supervisors who prefer to work outside the laboratory setting. A choice of both dry-lab and wet-lab projects is highly recommended as it provides more choice for students to tailor their final year experience to their individual circumstances, strengths and future career aspirations.</p>","PeriodicalId":9236,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Biomedical Science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10476339/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of Biomedical Science","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/bjbs.2023.11561","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Provision of "dry-lab" final year honours projects, based outside the laboratory, have been proposed as a viable alternative to traditional "wet-lab" projects in bioscience subjects, but their value has not been widely evaluated to date. In 2020-21, the COVID-19 pandemic meant all students in the School of Biomedical Sciences at Ulster University (UU) undertook dry-lab projects, due to campus lockdown. Therefore, this provided an ideal opportunity to evaluate the provision of dry-lab projects in a large student cohort. Methods: A pilot group of final year students (n = 4) studying Biomedical Science at UU were interviewed to evaluate their experience of conducting a dry-lab project. This evaluation and the themes that emerged were subsequently used to inform the co-creation of a survey to appraise student experience of dry-lab research project learning across the final year student cohort in School of Biomedical Sciences (n = 140). Quantitative and qualitative data was collected and analysed for trends and themes. Results: The results of this project identified four main themes related to dry-lab projects; expectations, skills & employability, quality of experience and choice. Student expectations about dry-lab projects were not dramatically changed, although initial negative opinions of some individuals were over-turned. Most students recognised that they had developed many useful employability skills through dry-lab projects, although lack of practical laboratory experience was still perceived as a drawback. Student experience was influenced by personal circumstances but students reporting poor project experience had significantly lower levels of communication with supervisor (p < 0.05). Most students agreed that choice of dry- and wet-lab projects would be valuable for future cohorts. Conclusion: This report concludes that dry-lab project provision can be a suitable and equitable alternative for wet-lab projects. Dry-lab projects can be valuable for learning new skills and may be an attractive option for some students and supervisors who prefer to work outside the laboratory setting. A choice of both dry-lab and wet-lab projects is highly recommended as it provides more choice for students to tailor their final year experience to their individual circumstances, strengths and future career aspirations.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
最后一年生物科学专业学生的非实验室项目学习:来自COVID-19的教训。
背景:提供“干实验室”的最后一年荣誉项目,基于实验室之外,已被提议作为生物科学学科传统“湿实验室”项目的可行替代方案,但其价值迄今尚未得到广泛评估。在2020-21年,由于校园封锁,新冠肺炎大流行意味着阿尔斯特大学生物医学科学学院的所有学生都承担了干实验室项目。因此,这提供了一个理想的机会来评估在一个大的学生群体中提供的干实验室项目。方法:对UU生物医学科学专业的最后一年级学生(n = 4)进行了访谈,以评估他们进行干实验室项目的经验。该评估和出现的主题随后被用于通知共同创建一项调查,以评估生物医学科学学院最后一年学生群体(n = 140)的干实验室研究项目学习体验。收集和分析了数量和质量数据的趋势和主题。结果:本项目的结果确定了与干实验室项目相关的四个主要主题;期望,技能和就业能力,经验质量和选择。学生对干实验项目的期望并没有显著改变,尽管一些人最初的负面看法被推翻了。大多数学生认识到,他们通过干实验室项目发展了许多有用的就业技能,尽管缺乏实际的实验室经验仍然被认为是一个缺点。学生体验受个人环境的影响,但报告项目体验差的学生与导师的沟通水平显著降低(p < 0.05)。大多数学生都认为,选择干湿实验项目对未来的学生很有价值。结论:本报告认为,提供干法实验室项目可作为湿法实验室项目的合适和公平的替代方案。干实验室项目对于学习新技能很有价值,对于一些喜欢在实验室之外工作的学生和主管来说可能是一个有吸引力的选择。我们强烈建议学生选择干实验室和湿实验室项目,因为它为学生提供了更多的选择,使他们能够根据个人情况、优势和未来的职业抱负来调整他们最后一年的经验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
British Journal of Biomedical Science
British Journal of Biomedical Science 医学-医学实验技术
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
15.80%
发文量
29
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The British Journal of Biomedical Science is committed to publishing high quality original research that represents a clear advance in the practice of biomedical science, and reviews that summarise recent advances in the field of biomedical science. The overall aim of the Journal is to provide a platform for the dissemination of new and innovative information on the diagnosis and management of disease that is valuable to the practicing laboratory scientist.
期刊最新文献
Improving Biomedical Science Literacy and Patient-Directed Knowledge of Tuberculosis (TB): A Cross-Sectional Infodemiology Study Examining Readability of Patient-Facing TB Information. Mesoporous Silica Microparticle-Protein Complexes: Effects of Protein Size and Solvent Properties on Diffusion and Loading Efficiency. Neuronal Vulnerability of the Entorhinal Cortex to Tau Pathology in Alzheimer's Disease. Evaluating Lung Changes in Long COVID: Ultra-Low-Dose vs. Standard-Dose CT Chest. Editorial: Advances in Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1