Liniker Garcia, Ricardo Yukio Asano, Rodrigo Silveira, Anthony C Hackney, Monica Y Takito, Marcus W Kilpatrick, Raul Cosme Ramos Prado
{"title":"Psychophysiological Responses to Self-Selected Exercise Intensity Over the Menstrual Cycle: A Randomized Crossover Phase Trial.","authors":"Liniker Garcia, Ricardo Yukio Asano, Rodrigo Silveira, Anthony C Hackney, Monica Y Takito, Marcus W Kilpatrick, Raul Cosme Ramos Prado","doi":"10.1080/02701367.2022.2036316","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Purpose:</b> This study investigated the psychophysiological responses during self-selected exercise intensity over the course of the menstrual cycle (MC). <b>Methods:</b> Seventeen healthy women with regular MCs completed three randomized treadmill bouts of 30 min of self-selected exercise intensity during menstruation, mid-follicular, and late luteal phases. Anxiety, menstrual distress (i.e., pain, behavior change, autonomic reaction, fluid retention, and negative affect) and profile of mood (i.e., tension, depression, and anger) were measured before exercise. Arousal, heart rate (HR), motivation, rating of perceived exertion and affective valence were measured before, during and after each exercise session. <b>Results:</b> Anger, anxiety, behavior change, pain, and negative affect were significantly greater (<i>p</i> < .05) during menstruation compared to the mid-follicular phase, whereas fluid retention, anger, behavior change, and autonomic reaction were greater (<i>p</i> < .05) during the late luteal phase compared with the mid-follicular phase. Participants felt more negative affective valence and less motivation to start exercise during menstruation compared with other MC phases. Average treadmill speed (5.8 ± 1.1 vs 6.0 ± 0.7 vs 5.9 ± 0.7 km/h<sup>-1</sup>, <i>p</i> = .36) and %HR<sub>max</sub> (74.9 ± 3.2 vs 77.8 ± 5.4 vs 77.4 ± 7.1%, <i>p</i> = .40) did not differ between menstruation, mid-follicular, and late luteal phases. Also, noteworthy is that participants self-selected an intensity that exceeded the minimum levels recommended for health and cardiorespiratory fitness promotion (64-70% HR<sub>max</sub>). <b>Conclusions:</b> Results of this study indicate that psychophysiological responses are negatively impacted mainly during menstruation and the late luteal phase of the MC. These findings may be helpful for professionals who work to promote the initiation and maintenance of exercise in women.</p>","PeriodicalId":54491,"journal":{"name":"Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport","volume":"94 3","pages":"646-654"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02701367.2022.2036316","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HOSPITALITY, LEISURE, SPORT & TOURISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
Abstract
Purpose: This study investigated the psychophysiological responses during self-selected exercise intensity over the course of the menstrual cycle (MC). Methods: Seventeen healthy women with regular MCs completed three randomized treadmill bouts of 30 min of self-selected exercise intensity during menstruation, mid-follicular, and late luteal phases. Anxiety, menstrual distress (i.e., pain, behavior change, autonomic reaction, fluid retention, and negative affect) and profile of mood (i.e., tension, depression, and anger) were measured before exercise. Arousal, heart rate (HR), motivation, rating of perceived exertion and affective valence were measured before, during and after each exercise session. Results: Anger, anxiety, behavior change, pain, and negative affect were significantly greater (p < .05) during menstruation compared to the mid-follicular phase, whereas fluid retention, anger, behavior change, and autonomic reaction were greater (p < .05) during the late luteal phase compared with the mid-follicular phase. Participants felt more negative affective valence and less motivation to start exercise during menstruation compared with other MC phases. Average treadmill speed (5.8 ± 1.1 vs 6.0 ± 0.7 vs 5.9 ± 0.7 km/h-1, p = .36) and %HRmax (74.9 ± 3.2 vs 77.8 ± 5.4 vs 77.4 ± 7.1%, p = .40) did not differ between menstruation, mid-follicular, and late luteal phases. Also, noteworthy is that participants self-selected an intensity that exceeded the minimum levels recommended for health and cardiorespiratory fitness promotion (64-70% HRmax). Conclusions: Results of this study indicate that psychophysiological responses are negatively impacted mainly during menstruation and the late luteal phase of the MC. These findings may be helpful for professionals who work to promote the initiation and maintenance of exercise in women.
目的:研究月经周期中自我选择运动强度的生理心理反应。方法:17名正常MCs的健康女性在月经期、卵泡中期和黄体晚期完成了三组随机的30分钟运动强度的跑步机运动。在运动前测量焦虑、月经困扰(即疼痛、行为改变、自主反应、体液潴留和负面影响)和情绪状况(即紧张、抑郁和愤怒)。在每次运动之前、期间和之后测量唤醒、心率(HR)、动机、感知运动等级和情感效价。结果:愤怒、焦虑、行为改变、疼痛和负面情绪显著增加(p p -1, p = 0.36), %HRmax(74.9±3.2 vs 77.8±5.4 vs 77.4±7.1%,p = 0.40)在月经期、卵泡中期和黄体晚期之间无差异。此外,值得注意的是,参与者自我选择的强度超过了促进健康和心肺健康的最低推荐水平(64-70% HRmax)。结论:本研究结果表明,心理生理反应主要在月经期和黄体晚期受到负面影响。这些发现可能对促进女性开始和维持运动的专业人员有所帮助。
期刊介绍:
Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport publishes research in the art and science of human movement that contributes significantly to the knowledge base of the field as new information, reviews, substantiation or contradiction of previous findings, development of theory, or as application of new or improved techniques. The goals of RQES are to provide a scholarly outlet for knowledge that: (a) contributes to the study of human movement, particularly its cross-disciplinary and interdisciplinary nature; (b) impacts theory and practice regarding human movement; (c) stimulates research about human movement; and (d) provides theoretical reviews and tutorials related to the study of human movement. The editorial board, associate editors, and external reviewers assist the editor-in-chief. Qualified reviewers in the appropriate subdisciplines review manuscripts deemed suitable. Authors are usually advised of the decision on their papers within 75–90 days.